diff mbox

ARM: dts: dra72-evm-tps65917: Add voltage supplies to usb_phy, mmc, dss

Message ID 20161214085703.506-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Lokesh Vutla Dec. 14, 2016, 8:57 a.m. UTC
Commit 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
added a separate dtsi for dra72-evm-tps65917 moving all the voltage supplies
to this file. But it missed adding voltage supplies to usb_phy, mmc,
dss and deleted from dra72-evm-common.dtsi. Adding the voltage supply
phandles to these nodes in dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi

Fixes: 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
Reported-by: Carlos Hernandez <ceh@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
---
Logs:
- DRA72-evm revC: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627665/ 
- DRA72-evm revB: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627658/
 arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

Comments

Roger Quadros Dec. 14, 2016, 11 a.m. UTC | #1
Lokesh,

On 14/12/16 10:57, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Commit 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
> added a separate dtsi for dra72-evm-tps65917 moving all the voltage supplies
> to this file. But it missed adding voltage supplies to usb_phy, mmc,
> dss and deleted from dra72-evm-common.dtsi. Adding the voltage supply
> phandles to these nodes in dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
> 
> Fixes: 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
> Reported-by: Carlos Hernandez <ceh@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
> ---
> Logs:
> - DRA72-evm revC: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627665/ 
> - DRA72-evm revB: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627658/
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
> index ee6dac44edf1..e6df676886c0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
> @@ -132,3 +132,19 @@
>  		ti,palmas-long-press-seconds = <6>;
>  	};
>  };
> +
> +&usb2_phy1 {
> +	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
> +};
> +
> +&usb2_phy2 {
> +	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
> +};
> +
> +&dss {
> +	vdda_video-supply = <&ldo5_reg>;
> +};
> +
> +&mmc1 {
> +	vmmc_aux-supply = <&ldo1_reg>;
> +};
> 

Are you sure that all future users of dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi will use this same configuration?
If not I'd rather put this in the board dts files.

cheers,
-roger
Lokesh Vutla Dec. 14, 2016, 12:35 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wednesday 14 December 2016 04:30 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Lokesh,
> 
> On 14/12/16 10:57, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>> Commit 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
>> added a separate dtsi for dra72-evm-tps65917 moving all the voltage supplies
>> to this file. But it missed adding voltage supplies to usb_phy, mmc,
>> dss and deleted from dra72-evm-common.dtsi. Adding the voltage supply
>> phandles to these nodes in dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>>
>> Fixes: 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
>> Reported-by: Carlos Hernandez <ceh@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Logs:
>> - DRA72-evm revC: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627665/ 
>> - DRA72-evm revB: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627658/
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>> index ee6dac44edf1..e6df676886c0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>> @@ -132,3 +132,19 @@
>>  		ti,palmas-long-press-seconds = <6>;
>>  	};
>>  };
>> +
>> +&usb2_phy1 {
>> +	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&usb2_phy2 {
>> +	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&dss {
>> +	vdda_video-supply = <&ldo5_reg>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mmc1 {
>> +	vmmc_aux-supply = <&ldo1_reg>;
>> +};
>>
> 
> Are you sure that all future users of dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi will use this same configuration?
> If not I'd rather put this in the board dts files.

hmm..This debate already happened when creating dra72-evm-tps65917 file
and concluded that all the common regulator stuff on dra72 evm revA,B,C
should go in this file. Any new board which is not similar to dra72-evm
will not be using this file.

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh

> 
> cheers,
> -roger
>
Roger Quadros Dec. 14, 2016, 12:46 p.m. UTC | #3
On 14/12/16 14:35, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wednesday 14 December 2016 04:30 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Lokesh,
>>
>> On 14/12/16 10:57, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>> Commit 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
>>> added a separate dtsi for dra72-evm-tps65917 moving all the voltage supplies
>>> to this file. But it missed adding voltage supplies to usb_phy, mmc,
>>> dss and deleted from dra72-evm-common.dtsi. Adding the voltage supply
>>> phandles to these nodes in dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>>>
>>> Fixes: 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
>>> Reported-by: Carlos Hernandez <ceh@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> Logs:
>>> - DRA72-evm revC: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627665/ 
>>> - DRA72-evm revB: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627658/
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>>> index ee6dac44edf1..e6df676886c0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
>>> @@ -132,3 +132,19 @@
>>>  		ti,palmas-long-press-seconds = <6>;
>>>  	};
>>>  };
>>> +
>>> +&usb2_phy1 {
>>> +	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&usb2_phy2 {
>>> +	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&dss {
>>> +	vdda_video-supply = <&ldo5_reg>;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +&mmc1 {
>>> +	vmmc_aux-supply = <&ldo1_reg>;
>>> +};
>>>
>>
>> Are you sure that all future users of dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi will use this same configuration?
>> If not I'd rather put this in the board dts files.
> 
> hmm..This debate already happened when creating dra72-evm-tps65917 file
> and concluded that all the common regulator stuff on dra72 evm revA,B,C
> should go in this file. Any new board which is not similar to dra72-evm
> will not be using this file.

OK, then it is fine. Thanks for clarifying.

cheers,
-roger
Tony Lindgren Dec. 27, 2016, 5:56 p.m. UTC | #4
* Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> [161214 04:46]:
> On 14/12/16 14:35, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Wednesday 14 December 2016 04:30 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> Lokesh,
> >>
> >> On 14/12/16 10:57, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> >>> Commit 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
> >>> added a separate dtsi for dra72-evm-tps65917 moving all the voltage supplies
> >>> to this file. But it missed adding voltage supplies to usb_phy, mmc,
> >>> dss and deleted from dra72-evm-common.dtsi. Adding the voltage supply
> >>> phandles to these nodes in dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 5d080aa30681 ("ARM: dts: dra72: Add separate dtsi for tps65917")
> >>> Reported-by: Carlos Hernandez <ceh@ti.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> Logs:
> >>> - DRA72-evm revC: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627665/ 
> >>> - DRA72-evm revB: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23627658/
> >>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
> >>> index ee6dac44edf1..e6df676886c0 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
> >>> @@ -132,3 +132,19 @@
> >>>  		ti,palmas-long-press-seconds = <6>;
> >>>  	};
> >>>  };
> >>> +
> >>> +&usb2_phy1 {
> >>> +	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +&usb2_phy2 {
> >>> +	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +&dss {
> >>> +	vdda_video-supply = <&ldo5_reg>;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +&mmc1 {
> >>> +	vmmc_aux-supply = <&ldo1_reg>;
> >>> +};
> >>>
> >>
> >> Are you sure that all future users of dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi will use this same configuration?
> >> If not I'd rather put this in the board dts files.
> > 
> > hmm..This debate already happened when creating dra72-evm-tps65917 file
> > and concluded that all the common regulator stuff on dra72 evm revA,B,C
> > should go in this file. Any new board which is not similar to dra72-evm
> > will not be using this file.
> 
> OK, then it is fine. Thanks for clarifying.

Applying into omap-for-v4.10/fixes thanks.

Tony
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
index ee6dac44edf1..e6df676886c0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-tps65917.dtsi
@@ -132,3 +132,19 @@ 
 		ti,palmas-long-press-seconds = <6>;
 	};
 };
+
+&usb2_phy1 {
+	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
+};
+
+&usb2_phy2 {
+	phy-supply = <&ldo4_reg>;
+};
+
+&dss {
+	vdda_video-supply = <&ldo5_reg>;
+};
+
+&mmc1 {
+	vmmc_aux-supply = <&ldo1_reg>;
+};