Message ID | 20170103175331.8089-1-cmaiolino@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Headers | show |
On 1/3/17 11:53 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > max_retries _show and _store functions should test against cfg->max_retries, > not cfg->retry_timeout > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Whoever made those mistakes should be very ashamed. ;) I guess it was a cut and paste error. :( This should probably cc: stable, too. Thanks, Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > index 276d302..de6195e 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ max_retries_show( > int retries; > struct xfs_error_cfg *cfg = to_error_cfg(kobject); > > - if (cfg->retry_timeout == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) > + if (cfg->max_retries == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) > retries = -1; > else > retries = cfg->max_retries; > @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ max_retries_store( > return -EINVAL; > > if (val == -1) > - cfg->retry_timeout = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; > + cfg->max_retries = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; > else > cfg->max_retries = val; > return count; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > max_retries _show and _store functions should test against cfg->max_retries, > not cfg->retry_timeout > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > index 276d302..de6195e 100644 > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ max_retries_show( > int retries; > struct xfs_error_cfg *cfg = to_error_cfg(kobject); > > - if (cfg->retry_timeout == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) > + if (cfg->max_retries == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) > retries = -1; > else > retries = cfg->max_retries; > @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ max_retries_store( > return -EINVAL; > > if (val == -1) > - cfg->retry_timeout = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; > + cfg->max_retries = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; Applied, thanks. --D > else > cfg->max_retries = val; > return count; > -- > 2.9.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 12:19:53PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 1/3/17 11:53 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > > max_retries _show and _store functions should test against cfg->max_retries, > > not cfg->retry_timeout > > > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> > > Whoever made those mistakes should be very ashamed. ;) > I guess it was a cut and paste error. :( > > This should probably cc: stable, too. Yeah, I believe so, maybe if I just forward the patch to stable might work? > > Thanks, > > Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> > > > --- > > fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > > index 276d302..de6195e 100644 > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c > > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ max_retries_show( > > int retries; > > struct xfs_error_cfg *cfg = to_error_cfg(kobject); > > > > - if (cfg->retry_timeout == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) > > + if (cfg->max_retries == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) > > retries = -1; > > else > > retries = cfg->max_retries; > > @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ max_retries_store( > > return -EINVAL; > > > > if (val == -1) > > - cfg->retry_timeout = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; > > + cfg->max_retries = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; > > else > > cfg->max_retries = val; > > return count; > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 1/4/17 4:58 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 12:19:53PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 1/3/17 11:53 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote: >>> max_retries _show and _store functions should test against cfg->max_retries, >>> not cfg->retry_timeout >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> >> >> Whoever made those mistakes should be very ashamed. ;) >> I guess it was a cut and paste error. :( >> >> This should probably cc: stable, too. > > Yeah, I believe so, > > maybe if I just forward the patch to stable might work? if cc: stable gets added when it's committed, that'll suffice. -Eric >> >> Thanks, >> >> Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> >> >>> --- >>> fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c | 4 ++-- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c >>> index 276d302..de6195e 100644 >>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c >>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c >>> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ max_retries_show( >>> int retries; >>> struct xfs_error_cfg *cfg = to_error_cfg(kobject); >>> >>> - if (cfg->retry_timeout == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) >>> + if (cfg->max_retries == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) >>> retries = -1; >>> else >>> retries = cfg->max_retries; >>> @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ max_retries_store( >>> return -EINVAL; >>> >>> if (val == -1) >>> - cfg->retry_timeout = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; >>> + cfg->max_retries = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; >>> else >>> cfg->max_retries = val; >>> return count; >>> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c index 276d302..de6195e 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ max_retries_show( int retries; struct xfs_error_cfg *cfg = to_error_cfg(kobject); - if (cfg->retry_timeout == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) + if (cfg->max_retries == XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER) retries = -1; else retries = cfg->max_retries; @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ max_retries_store( return -EINVAL; if (val == -1) - cfg->retry_timeout = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; + cfg->max_retries = XFS_ERR_RETRY_FOREVER; else cfg->max_retries = val; return count;
max_retries _show and _store functions should test against cfg->max_retries, not cfg->retry_timeout Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> --- fs/xfs/xfs_sysfs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)