| Message ID | 20170106134350.32428-6-andi.shyti@samsung.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:43:50PM +0900, Andi Shyti wrote: > From: Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@samsung.com> > > Add DT node support for TM2 touchkey device. > > Signed-off-by: Beomho Seo <beomho.seo@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> > Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > Looks good, but I will wait with this one till the bindings and driver got accepted. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi, 2017-01-06 22:43 GMT+09:00 Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>: > From: Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@samsung.com> > > Add DT node support for TM2 touchkey device. > > Signed-off-by: Beomho Seo <beomho.seo@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> > Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts > index 2449266b268f..92fcc4ec8319 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts > @@ -18,6 +18,19 @@ > compatible = "samsung,tm2", "samsung,exynos5433"; > }; > > +&hsi2c_9 { > + status = "okay"; > + > + touchkey@20 { > + compatible = "samsung,tm2-touchkey"; > + reg = <0x20>; > + interrupt-parent = <&gpa3>; > + interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; > + vcc-supply = <&ldo32_reg>; > + vdd-supply = <&ldo33_reg>; > + }; > +}; > + > &ldo31_reg { > regulator-name = "TSP_VDD_1.85V_AP"; > regulator-min-microvolt = <1850000>; Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Hi, 2017-01-07 6:31 GMT+09:00 Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > 2017-01-06 22:43 GMT+09:00 Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>: >> From: Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@samsung.com> >> >> Add DT node support for TM2 touchkey device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Beomho Seo <beomho.seo@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> >> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts | 13 +++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts >> index 2449266b268f..92fcc4ec8319 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts >> @@ -18,6 +18,19 @@ >> compatible = "samsung,tm2", "samsung,exynos5433"; >> }; >> >> +&hsi2c_9 { >> + status = "okay"; >> + >> + touchkey@20 { >> + compatible = "samsung,tm2-touchkey"; >> + reg = <0x20>; >> + interrupt-parent = <&gpa3>; >> + interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; >> + vcc-supply = <&ldo32_reg>; >> + vdd-supply = <&ldo33_reg>; >> + }; >> +}; >> + >> &ldo31_reg { >> regulator-name = "TSP_VDD_1.85V_AP"; >> regulator-min-microvolt = <1850000>; > > Looks good to me. > Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> > > -- > Best Regards, > Chanwoo Choi
Hi, 2017-01-07 7:09 GMT+09:00 Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > 2017-01-07 6:31 GMT+09:00 Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> 2017-01-06 22:43 GMT+09:00 Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>: >>> From: Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@samsung.com> >>> >>> Add DT node support for TM2 touchkey device. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Beomho Seo <beomho.seo@samsung.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaechul Lee <jcsing.lee@samsung.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts | 13 +++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts >>> index 2449266b268f..92fcc4ec8319 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts >>> @@ -18,6 +18,19 @@ >>> compatible = "samsung,tm2", "samsung,exynos5433"; >>> }; >>> >>> +&hsi2c_9 { >>> + status = "okay"; >>> + >>> + touchkey@20 { >>> + compatible = "samsung,tm2-touchkey"; >>> + reg = <0x20>; >>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpa3>; >>> + interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; >>> + vcc-supply = <&ldo32_reg>; >>> + vdd-supply = <&ldo33_reg>; >>> + }; >>> +}; >>> + >>> &ldo31_reg { >>> regulator-name = "TSP_VDD_1.85V_AP"; >>> regulator-min-microvolt = <1850000>; >> >> Looks good to me. >> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> I'm sorry to send the empty mail without any content. I repiled the touchkey driver against compatible name. Usually, when developing the device driver, we use the specific h/w name but in this patch, the touckey dt node uses the h/w board name instead of original touckhey name. If this touckey device is used on other h/w board, I think the current compatible name is not proper. So. please drop the my reviewed-by tag until completing the discussion. I'm sorry to make the confusion.
Hi Chanwoo, > >>> + touchkey@20 { > >>> + compatible = "samsung,tm2-touchkey"; > >>> + reg = <0x20>; > >>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpa3>; > >>> + interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; > >>> + vcc-supply = <&ldo32_reg>; > >>> + vdd-supply = <&ldo33_reg>; > >>> + }; > >>> +}; > >>> + > >>> &ldo31_reg { > >>> regulator-name = "TSP_VDD_1.85V_AP"; > >>> regulator-min-microvolt = <1850000>; > > I repiled the touchkey driver against compatible name. > Usually, when developing the device driver, we use the specific h/w name > but in this patch, the touckey dt node uses the h/w board name instead of > original touckhey name. this should be a device specifically done for the tm2 and we are not sure who is the manufacturer of the device. In order to not assign the device to the wrong manufacturer, we preferred calling it Samsung as it is in a Samsung device. Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Andi, 2017-01-07 21:40 GMT+09:00 Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>: > Hi Chanwoo, > >> >>> + touchkey@20 { >> >>> + compatible = "samsung,tm2-touchkey"; >> >>> + reg = <0x20>; >> >>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpa3>; >> >>> + interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; >> >>> + vcc-supply = <&ldo32_reg>; >> >>> + vdd-supply = <&ldo33_reg>; >> >>> + }; >> >>> +}; >> >>> + >> >>> &ldo31_reg { >> >>> regulator-name = "TSP_VDD_1.85V_AP"; >> >>> regulator-min-microvolt = <1850000>; >> >> I repiled the touchkey driver against compatible name. >> Usually, when developing the device driver, we use the specific h/w name >> but in this patch, the touckey dt node uses the h/w board name instead of >> original touckhey name. > > this should be a device specifically done for the tm2 and we are > not sure who is the manufacturer of the device. In order to not As I knew, this touchkey was made by Cypress semiconductor. But, for more correct information, you may try to find it. > assign the device to the wrong manufacturer, we preferred calling > it Samsung as it is in a Samsung device. As you mentioned, Samsung made not this touchkey device. It is certainly wrong manufacturer. I have not seen to use the h/w board name as the peripheral device name. I don't prefer to use the inaccurate manufacturer and device name.
Hi Chanwoo, > >> >>> + touchkey@20 { > >> >>> + compatible = "samsung,tm2-touchkey"; > >> >>> + reg = <0x20>; > >> >>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpa3>; > >> >>> + interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; > >> >>> + vcc-supply = <&ldo32_reg>; > >> >>> + vdd-supply = <&ldo33_reg>; > >> >>> + }; > >> >>> +}; > >> >>> + > >> >>> &ldo31_reg { > >> >>> regulator-name = "TSP_VDD_1.85V_AP"; > >> >>> regulator-min-microvolt = <1850000>; > >> > >> I repiled the touchkey driver against compatible name. > >> Usually, when developing the device driver, we use the specific h/w name > >> but in this patch, the touckey dt node uses the h/w board name instead of > >> original touckhey name. > > > > this should be a device specifically done for the tm2 and we are > > not sure who is the manufacturer of the device. In order to not > > As I knew, this touchkey was made by Cypress semiconductor. > But, for more correct information, you may try to find it. The Android Kernel says that this is the cy8cmbr3xxx. I downloaded the datasheets, but it doesn't have any similarity with the device. Which means that on tm2 we don't the cy8cmbr3xxx bot something else that I even doubt comes from cypress, but I strongly believe it's a dedicated hardware. Now we have two choices: 1. drop support because we are not 100% sure on the device and supplier. 2. call it Samsung and provide support anyway as, at the end, it is a samsung hardware. With Jaechul we chose option 2. > > assign the device to the wrong manufacturer, we preferred calling > > it Samsung as it is in a Samsung device. > > As you mentioned, Samsung made not this touchkey device. It is > certainly wrong manufacturer. I have not seen to use the h/w board > name as the peripheral device name. > > I don't prefer to use the inaccurate manufacturer and device name. Eventually, Jaechul can assign the device to cypress, but the name has to remain tm2-touchkey. Something like this: compatible = "cypress,tm2-touchkey"; What do you think? Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Andi, 2017-01-08 14:45 GMT+09:00 Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>: > Hi Chanwoo, > >> >> >>> + touchkey@20 { >> >> >>> + compatible = "samsung,tm2-touchkey"; >> >> >>> + reg = <0x20>; >> >> >>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpa3>; >> >> >>> + interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; >> >> >>> + vcc-supply = <&ldo32_reg>; >> >> >>> + vdd-supply = <&ldo33_reg>; >> >> >>> + }; >> >> >>> +}; >> >> >>> + >> >> >>> &ldo31_reg { >> >> >>> regulator-name = "TSP_VDD_1.85V_AP"; >> >> >>> regulator-min-microvolt = <1850000>; >> >> >> >> I repiled the touchkey driver against compatible name. >> >> Usually, when developing the device driver, we use the specific h/w name >> >> but in this patch, the touckey dt node uses the h/w board name instead of >> >> original touckhey name. >> > >> > this should be a device specifically done for the tm2 and we are >> > not sure who is the manufacturer of the device. In order to not >> >> As I knew, this touchkey was made by Cypress semiconductor. >> But, for more correct information, you may try to find it. > > The Android Kernel says that this is the cy8cmbr3xxx. I > downloaded the datasheets, but it doesn't have any similarity > with the device. Which means that on tm2 we don't the > cy8cmbr3xxx bot something else that I even doubt comes from > cypress, but I strongly believe it's a dedicated hardware. Although this device is a dedicated h/w, you should keep the principal. Did you check the schematic document of TM2? The schematic document might include the specific device name. Sometimes, the downloaded datasheet does not include the all of information of device because of confidential information. But, I’m not sure. Just it is guess as my experience. I want to check the manufacturer and name of device with you on next Monday. > > Now we have two choices: > > 1. drop support because we are not 100% sure on the device and > supplier. > > 2. call it Samsung and provide support anyway as, at the end, it > is a samsung hardware. > > With Jaechul we chose option 2. > >> > assign the device to the wrong manufacturer, we preferred calling >> > it Samsung as it is in a Samsung device. >> >> As you mentioned, Samsung made not this touchkey device. It is >> certainly wrong manufacturer. I have not seen to use the h/w board >> name as the peripheral device name. >> >> I don't prefer to use the inaccurate manufacturer and device name. > > Eventually, Jaechul can assign the device to cypress, but the > name has to remain tm2-touchkey. Something like this: > > compatible = "cypress,tm2-touchkey"; > > What do you think? If we never to find the correct device name, we might use your suggestion. As I already said, I’d like to check it again with you.
Hi Chanwoo, > >> >> >>> + touchkey@20 { > >> >> >>> + compatible = "samsung,tm2-touchkey"; > >> >> >>> + reg = <0x20>; > >> >> >>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpa3>; > >> >> >>> + interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; > >> >> >>> + vcc-supply = <&ldo32_reg>; > >> >> >>> + vdd-supply = <&ldo33_reg>; > >> >> >>> + }; > >> >> >>> +}; > >> >> >>> + > >> >> >>> &ldo31_reg { > >> >> >>> regulator-name = "TSP_VDD_1.85V_AP"; > >> >> >>> regulator-min-microvolt = <1850000>; > >> >> > >> >> I repiled the touchkey driver against compatible name. > >> >> Usually, when developing the device driver, we use the specific h/w name > >> >> but in this patch, the touckey dt node uses the h/w board name instead of > >> >> original touckhey name. > >> > > >> > this should be a device specifically done for the tm2 and we are > >> > not sure who is the manufacturer of the device. In order to not > >> > >> As I knew, this touchkey was made by Cypress semiconductor. > >> But, for more correct information, you may try to find it. > > > > The Android Kernel says that this is the cy8cmbr3xxx. I > > downloaded the datasheets, but it doesn't have any similarity > > with the device. Which means that on tm2 we don't the > > cy8cmbr3xxx bot something else that I even doubt comes from > > cypress, but I strongly believe it's a dedicated hardware. > > Although this device is a dedicated h/w, you should keep the principal. > Did you check the schematic document of TM2? The schematic document > might include the specific device name. > > Sometimes, the downloaded datasheet does not include the > all of information of device because of confidential information. > But, I’m not sure. Just it is guess as my experience. > > I want to check the manufacturer and name of device with you > on next Monday. Yes, I checked everything, but didn't find the exact device name. Anyway, let's take this discussion offline and find the correct way. Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts index 2449266b268f..92fcc4ec8319 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts @@ -18,6 +18,19 @@ compatible = "samsung,tm2", "samsung,exynos5433"; }; +&hsi2c_9 { + status = "okay"; + + touchkey@20 { + compatible = "samsung,tm2-touchkey"; + reg = <0x20>; + interrupt-parent = <&gpa3>; + interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; + vcc-supply = <&ldo32_reg>; + vdd-supply = <&ldo33_reg>; + }; +}; + &ldo31_reg { regulator-name = "TSP_VDD_1.85V_AP"; regulator-min-microvolt = <1850000>;