| Message ID | 1483886830-23878-1-git-send-email-chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 08:17:10PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > The code currently uses sdio->blkbits to compute the number of blocks to > be cleaned. However sdio->blkbits is derived from the logical block size > of the underlying block device (Refer to the definition of > do_blockdev_direct_IO()). Due to this, generic/299 test would rarely > fail when executed on an ext4 filesystem with 64k as the block size and > when using a virtio based disk (having 512 byte as the logical block > size) inside a kvm guest. > > This commit fixes the bug by using inode->i_blkbits to compute the > number of blocks to be cleaned. Looks fine, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 01/08/2017 07:47 AM, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > The code currently uses sdio->blkbits to compute the number of blocks to > be cleaned. However sdio->blkbits is derived from the logical block size > of the underlying block device (Refer to the definition of > do_blockdev_direct_IO()). Due to this, generic/299 test would rarely > fail when executed on an ext4 filesystem with 64k as the block size and > when using a virtio based disk (having 512 byte as the logical block > size) inside a kvm guest. > > This commit fixes the bug by using inode->i_blkbits to compute the > number of blocks to be cleaned. Thanks, added for 4.10.
Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > The code currently uses sdio->blkbits to compute the number of blocks to > be cleaned. However sdio->blkbits is derived from the logical block size > of the underlying block device (Refer to the definition of > do_blockdev_direct_IO()). Due to this, generic/299 test would rarely > fail when executed on an ext4 filesystem with 64k as the block size and > when using a virtio based disk (having 512 byte as the logical block > size) inside a kvm guest. > > This commit fixes the bug by using inode->i_blkbits to compute the > number of blocks to be cleaned. > > Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > fs/direct-io.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c > index aeae8c0..b20adf9 100644 > --- a/fs/direct-io.c > +++ b/fs/direct-io.c > @@ -905,6 +905,7 @@ static inline void dio_zero_block(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio, > static int do_direct_IO(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio, > struct buffer_head *map_bh) > { > + const unsigned i_blkbits = dio->inode->i_blkbits; NAK. Please see commit ab73857e354 ("direct-io: don't read inode->i_blkbits multiple times"). I think you want: const unsigned i_blkbits = sdio->blkbits + sdio->blkfactor; as is used elsewhere in the code. Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sun 08-01-17 20:17:10, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > The code currently uses sdio->blkbits to compute the number of blocks to > be cleaned. However sdio->blkbits is derived from the logical block size > of the underlying block device (Refer to the definition of > do_blockdev_direct_IO()). Due to this, generic/299 test would rarely > fail when executed on an ext4 filesystem with 64k as the block size and > when using a virtio based disk (having 512 byte as the logical block > size) inside a kvm guest. > > This commit fixes the bug by using inode->i_blkbits to compute the > number of blocks to be cleaned. Ah, good catch. You can add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Honza > Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > fs/direct-io.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c > index aeae8c0..b20adf9 100644 > --- a/fs/direct-io.c > +++ b/fs/direct-io.c > @@ -905,6 +905,7 @@ static inline void dio_zero_block(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio, > static int do_direct_IO(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio, > struct buffer_head *map_bh) > { > + const unsigned i_blkbits = dio->inode->i_blkbits; > const unsigned blkbits = sdio->blkbits; > int ret = 0; > > @@ -949,7 +950,7 @@ static int do_direct_IO(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio, > clean_bdev_aliases( > map_bh->b_bdev, > map_bh->b_blocknr, > - map_bh->b_size >> blkbits); > + map_bh->b_size >> i_blkbits); > } > > if (!sdio->blkfactor) > -- > 2.5.5 >
diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c index aeae8c0..b20adf9 100644 --- a/fs/direct-io.c +++ b/fs/direct-io.c @@ -905,6 +905,7 @@ static inline void dio_zero_block(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio, static int do_direct_IO(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio, struct buffer_head *map_bh) { + const unsigned i_blkbits = dio->inode->i_blkbits; const unsigned blkbits = sdio->blkbits; int ret = 0; @@ -949,7 +950,7 @@ static int do_direct_IO(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio, clean_bdev_aliases( map_bh->b_bdev, map_bh->b_blocknr, - map_bh->b_size >> blkbits); + map_bh->b_size >> i_blkbits); } if (!sdio->blkfactor)
The code currently uses sdio->blkbits to compute the number of blocks to be cleaned. However sdio->blkbits is derived from the logical block size of the underlying block device (Refer to the definition of do_blockdev_direct_IO()). Due to this, generic/299 test would rarely fail when executed on an ext4 filesystem with 64k as the block size and when using a virtio based disk (having 512 byte as the logical block size) inside a kvm guest. This commit fixes the bug by using inode->i_blkbits to compute the number of blocks to be cleaned. Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- fs/direct-io.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)