diff mbox

usb: dwc3-exynos fix axius clock error path to do cleanup

Message ID 20170110230528.7612-1-shuahkh@osg.samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Shuah Khan Jan. 10, 2017, 11:05 p.m. UTC
Axius clock error path returns without disabling clock and suspend clock.
Fix it to disable them before returning error.

Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
---
 drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Javier Martinez Canillas Jan. 11, 2017, 12:27 a.m. UTC | #1
Hello Shuah,

Patch looks good to me, I've just one comment.

On 01/10/2017 08:05 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Axius clock error path returns without disabling clock and suspend clock.
> Fix it to disable them before returning error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
> index 3e8407a..f7421c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,8 @@ static int dwc3_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		exynos->axius_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "usbdrd30_axius_clk");
>  		if (IS_ERR(exynos->axius_clk)) {
>  			dev_err(dev, "no AXI UpScaler clk specified\n");
> -			return -ENODEV;
> +			ret = -ENODEV;
> +			goto axius_clk_err;
>  		}
>  		clk_prepare_enable(exynos->axius_clk);
>  	} else {
> @@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ static int dwc3_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	regulator_disable(exynos->vdd33);
>  err2:
>  	clk_disable_unprepare(exynos->axius_clk);
> +axius_clk_err:

This label isn't consistent with the others, I know the errN aren't great
so what about changing those to meaningful names in a preparatory patch?

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

Best regards,
Shuah Khan Jan. 11, 2017, 12:30 a.m. UTC | #2
On 01/10/2017 05:27 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Shuah,
> 
> Patch looks good to me, I've just one comment.
> 
> On 01/10/2017 08:05 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> Axius clock error path returns without disabling clock and suspend clock.
>> Fix it to disable them before returning error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
>> index 3e8407a..f7421c2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
>> @@ -136,7 +136,8 @@ static int dwc3_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  		exynos->axius_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "usbdrd30_axius_clk");
>>  		if (IS_ERR(exynos->axius_clk)) {
>>  			dev_err(dev, "no AXI UpScaler clk specified\n");
>> -			return -ENODEV;
>> +			ret = -ENODEV;
>> +			goto axius_clk_err;
>>  		}
>>  		clk_prepare_enable(exynos->axius_clk);
>>  	} else {
>> @@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ static int dwc3_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	regulator_disable(exynos->vdd33);
>>  err2:
>>  	clk_disable_unprepare(exynos->axius_clk);
>> +axius_clk_err:
> 
> This label isn't consistent with the others, I know the errN aren't great
> so what about changing those to meaningful names in a preparatory patch?
> 
> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> 
> Best regards,
> 

Javier,

Right they aren't consistent. Changing them all to a better naming scheme
will have be done in another cleanup patch in my opinion. I don't want to
include cleanup in this fix.

thanks,
-- Shuah
Javier Martinez Canillas Jan. 11, 2017, 12:32 a.m. UTC | #3
Hello Shuah,

On 01/10/2017 09:30 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:

[snip]

>>>  	clk_disable_unprepare(exynos->axius_clk);
>>> +axius_clk_err:
>>
>> This label isn't consistent with the others, I know the errN aren't great
>> so what about changing those to meaningful names in a preparatory patch?
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
> 
> Javier,
> 
> Right they aren't consistent. Changing them all to a better naming scheme
> will have be done in another cleanup patch in my opinion. I don't want to
> include cleanup in this fix.
>

I didn't mean to be done in the same patch, that's why I said in another
preparatory patch.
 
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
> 

Best regards,
Shuah Khan Jan. 11, 2017, 12:38 a.m. UTC | #4
On 01/10/2017 05:32 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Shuah,
> 
> On 01/10/2017 09:30 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
>>>>  	clk_disable_unprepare(exynos->axius_clk);
>>>> +axius_clk_err:
>>>
>>> This label isn't consistent with the others, I know the errN aren't great
>>> so what about changing those to meaningful names in a preparatory patch?
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>
>> Javier,
>>
>> Right they aren't consistent. Changing them all to a better naming scheme
>> will have be done in another cleanup patch in my opinion. I don't want to
>> include cleanup in this fix.
>>
> 
> I didn't mean to be done in the same patch, that's why I said in another
> preparatory patch.

Yes. I can send the cleanup patch.

-- Shuah
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
index 3e8407a..f7421c2 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-exynos.c
@@ -136,7 +136,8 @@  static int dwc3_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		exynos->axius_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "usbdrd30_axius_clk");
 		if (IS_ERR(exynos->axius_clk)) {
 			dev_err(dev, "no AXI UpScaler clk specified\n");
-			return -ENODEV;
+			ret = -ENODEV;
+			goto axius_clk_err;
 		}
 		clk_prepare_enable(exynos->axius_clk);
 	} else {
@@ -194,6 +195,7 @@  static int dwc3_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	regulator_disable(exynos->vdd33);
 err2:
 	clk_disable_unprepare(exynos->axius_clk);
+axius_clk_err:
 	clk_disable_unprepare(exynos->susp_clk);
 	clk_disable_unprepare(exynos->clk);
 	return ret;