Message ID | 1483513206-113046-1-git-send-email-wangzhou1@hisilicon.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
On 2017/1/4 15:00, Zhou Wang wrote: > The configuration data provided by an MCFG region (ie PCI segment and > bus range) may span multiple host bridges. > > Current code in pci_mcfg_lookup() carries out an exact match of host > bridge bus range start value against the MCFG region(s) bus range start > value which would cause configurations like the following: > > MCFG region: > bus range: 0x00~0xff. > segment: 0. > > PCI host bridges configuration (segment numbers and bus ranges): > host bridge 1: > bus range: 0x00~0x1f. > segment: 0. > host bridge 2: > bus range: 0x20~0x4f. > segment: 0. > > to fail, in that the bus range start value for host bridge 2 does > not match the bus range start value of the respective MCFG region. > > Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() to cater for > PCI configurations with multiple host bridges sharing the same > MCFG region. > > Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> > Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > --- > drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > index a6a4cea..2944353 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > @@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root, struct resource *cfgres, > goto skip_lookup; > > /* > - * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than > - * specified by caller. > + * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range. > */ > list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) { > - if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start && > + if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start && > e->bus_end >= bus_res->end) { > root->mcfg_addr = e->addr; > } > Hi Rafael, Could you please look into this patch if you have time? Thanks, Zhou -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> wrote: > On 2017/1/4 15:00, Zhou Wang wrote: >> The configuration data provided by an MCFG region (ie PCI segment and >> bus range) may span multiple host bridges. >> >> Current code in pci_mcfg_lookup() carries out an exact match of host >> bridge bus range start value against the MCFG region(s) bus range start >> value which would cause configurations like the following: >> >> MCFG region: >> bus range: 0x00~0xff. >> segment: 0. >> >> PCI host bridges configuration (segment numbers and bus ranges): >> host bridge 1: >> bus range: 0x00~0x1f. >> segment: 0. >> host bridge 2: >> bus range: 0x20~0x4f. >> segment: 0. >> >> to fail, in that the bus range start value for host bridge 2 does >> not match the bus range start value of the respective MCFG region. >> >> Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() to cater for >> PCI configurations with multiple host bridges sharing the same >> MCFG region. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> >> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> >> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> >> --- >> drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 5 ++--- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> index a6a4cea..2944353 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> @@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root, struct resource *cfgres, >> goto skip_lookup; >> >> /* >> - * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than >> - * specified by caller. >> + * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range. >> */ >> list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) { >> - if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start && >> + if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start && >> e->bus_end >= bus_res->end) { >> root->mcfg_addr = e->addr; >> } >> > > Hi Rafael, > > Could you please look into this patch if you have time? Well, it makes sense to me, but this is PCI, so Bjorn has to decide here. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2017/1/10 5:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> wrote: >> On 2017/1/4 15:00, Zhou Wang wrote: >>> The configuration data provided by an MCFG region (ie PCI segment and >>> bus range) may span multiple host bridges. >>> >>> Current code in pci_mcfg_lookup() carries out an exact match of host >>> bridge bus range start value against the MCFG region(s) bus range start >>> value which would cause configurations like the following: >>> >>> MCFG region: >>> bus range: 0x00~0xff. >>> segment: 0. >>> >>> PCI host bridges configuration (segment numbers and bus ranges): >>> host bridge 1: >>> bus range: 0x00~0x1f. >>> segment: 0. >>> host bridge 2: >>> bus range: 0x20~0x4f. >>> segment: 0. >>> >>> to fail, in that the bus range start value for host bridge 2 does >>> not match the bus range start value of the respective MCFG region. >>> >>> Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() to cater for >>> PCI configurations with multiple host bridges sharing the same >>> MCFG region. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> >>> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 5 ++--- >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >>> index a6a4cea..2944353 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >>> @@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root, struct resource *cfgres, >>> goto skip_lookup; >>> >>> /* >>> - * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than >>> - * specified by caller. >>> + * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range. >>> */ >>> list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) { >>> - if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start && >>> + if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start && >>> e->bus_end >= bus_res->end) { >>> root->mcfg_addr = e->addr; >>> } >>> >> >> Hi Rafael, >> >> Could you please look into this patch if you have time? > > Well, it makes sense to me, but this is PCI, so Bjorn has to decide here. > > Thanks, > Rafael Many thanks for looking into this patch! Hi Bjorn, Please look at this patch if you have time :) Thanks, Zhou > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 03:00:06PM +0800, Zhou Wang wrote: > The configuration data provided by an MCFG region (ie PCI segment and > bus range) may span multiple host bridges. > > Current code in pci_mcfg_lookup() carries out an exact match of host > bridge bus range start value against the MCFG region(s) bus range start > value which would cause configurations like the following: > > MCFG region: > bus range: 0x00~0xff. > segment: 0. > > PCI host bridges configuration (segment numbers and bus ranges): > host bridge 1: > bus range: 0x00~0x1f. > segment: 0. > host bridge 2: > bus range: 0x20~0x4f. > segment: 0. > > to fail, in that the bus range start value for host bridge 2 does > not match the bus range start value of the respective MCFG region. > > Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() to cater for > PCI configurations with multiple host bridges sharing the same > MCFG region. > > Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> > Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Applied to pci/enumeration for v4.11 with the following changelog: PCI/ACPI: Fix bus range comparison in pci_mcfg_lookup() The configuration data provided by an MCFG entry, i.e., PCI segment and bus range, may span multiple host bridges. pci_mcfg_lookup() previously required an exact match of the host bridge starting bus and the MCFG starting bus, which made the following configuration fail: MCFG region: segment: 0 bus range: 0x00-0xff host bridge segment: 0 bus range: 0x20-0x4f Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() so we can use any MCFG entry that contains the required bus range, as we do in pci_mmconfig_lookup(). [bhelgaas: changelog] Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > --- > drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > index a6a4cea..2944353 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c > @@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root, struct resource *cfgres, > goto skip_lookup; > > /* > - * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than > - * specified by caller. > + * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range. > */ > list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) { > - if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start && > + if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start && > e->bus_end >= bus_res->end) { > root->mcfg_addr = e->addr; > } > -- > 1.9.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2017/1/12 5:37, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 03:00:06PM +0800, Zhou Wang wrote: >> The configuration data provided by an MCFG region (ie PCI segment and >> bus range) may span multiple host bridges. >> >> Current code in pci_mcfg_lookup() carries out an exact match of host >> bridge bus range start value against the MCFG region(s) bus range start >> value which would cause configurations like the following: >> >> MCFG region: >> bus range: 0x00~0xff. >> segment: 0. >> >> PCI host bridges configuration (segment numbers and bus ranges): >> host bridge 1: >> bus range: 0x00~0x1f. >> segment: 0. >> host bridge 2: >> bus range: 0x20~0x4f. >> segment: 0. >> >> to fail, in that the bus range start value for host bridge 2 does >> not match the bus range start value of the respective MCFG region. >> >> Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() to cater for >> PCI configurations with multiple host bridges sharing the same >> MCFG region. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> >> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> >> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > > Applied to pci/enumeration for v4.11 with the following changelog: > > PCI/ACPI: Fix bus range comparison in pci_mcfg_lookup() > > The configuration data provided by an MCFG entry, i.e., PCI segment and bus > range, may span multiple host bridges. > > pci_mcfg_lookup() previously required an exact match of the host bridge > starting bus and the MCFG starting bus, which made the following > configuration fail: > > MCFG region: > segment: 0 > bus range: 0x00-0xff > > host bridge > segment: 0 > bus range: 0x20-0x4f > > Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() so we can use any MCFG entry > that contains the required bus range, as we do in pci_mmconfig_lookup(). > > [bhelgaas: changelog] > Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> > Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > Hi Bjorn, Many thanks for modifying the commit message and merging this patch! Best regards, Zhou >> --- >> drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 5 ++--- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> index a6a4cea..2944353 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c >> @@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root, struct resource *cfgres, >> goto skip_lookup; >> >> /* >> - * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than >> - * specified by caller. >> + * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range. >> */ >> list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) { >> - if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start && >> + if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start && >> e->bus_end >= bus_res->end) { >> root->mcfg_addr = e->addr; >> } >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c index a6a4cea..2944353 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c @@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ int pci_mcfg_lookup(struct acpi_pci_root *root, struct resource *cfgres, goto skip_lookup; /* - * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than - * specified by caller. + * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range. */ list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) { - if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start && + if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start && e->bus_end >= bus_res->end) { root->mcfg_addr = e->addr; }