Message ID | 1489572237-6649-2-git-send-email-cl@rock-chips.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2017, 18:03:51 CET schrieb cl@rock-chips.com: > From: Chen Liang <cl@rock-chips.com> > > The rk3328 soc need more pin function index for pinctrl. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Liang <cl@rock-chips.com> > --- > include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h > b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h index aaec8ba..bc2b6af 100644 > --- a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h > @@ -63,5 +63,8 @@ > #define RK_FUNC_2 2 > #define RK_FUNC_3 3 > #define RK_FUNC_4 4 > +#define RK_FUNC_5 5 > +#define RK_FUNC_6 6 > +#define RK_FUNC_7 7 please don't amend that function list anymore. Only RK_FUNC_GPIO serves a real purpose but having constants FUNC_7 mapping simply to 7 does not help understand things better, so it's way easier to just have "7" as function in pinctrl entries in the devicetree. That list is mainly a remnant to keep compatibility with old devicetrees and I guess I should add a deprecated notice at some point :-) . Heiko
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h index aaec8ba..bc2b6af 100644 --- a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h @@ -63,5 +63,8 @@ #define RK_FUNC_2 2 #define RK_FUNC_3 3 #define RK_FUNC_4 4 +#define RK_FUNC_5 5 +#define RK_FUNC_6 6 +#define RK_FUNC_7 7 #endif