diff mbox

[3/3] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add DMI fix_up_power_blacklist

Message ID 20170404085013.19837-4-hdegoede@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Hans de Goede April 4, 2017, 8:50 a.m. UTC
Add a DMI based blacklist for systems where calling
acpi_device_fix_up_power() is harmful.

Note as the comment added above the GPDwin entry explains unfortunately
the GPDwin dmi strings are somewhat generic, so I've added the bios-date
string for a more unique match, which means we need 3 entries for the
GPDwin for the 3 known BIOS versions out there.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Adrian Hunter April 5, 2017, 7:29 a.m. UTC | #1
On 04/04/17 11:50, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Add a DMI based blacklist for systems where calling
> acpi_device_fix_up_power() is harmful.
> 
> Note as the comment added above the GPDwin entry explains unfortunately
> the GPDwin dmi strings are somewhat generic, so I've added the bios-date
> string for a more unique match, which means we need 3 entries for the
> GPDwin for the 3 known BIOS versions out there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> index 8fe46ba..826e34f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  #include <linux/pm.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>  #include <linux/mmc/pm.h>
> @@ -83,7 +84,7 @@ struct sdhci_acpi_host {
>  	bool				use_runtime_pm;
>  };
>  
> -static int fix_up_power = 1;
> +static int fix_up_power = -1;
>  
>  static inline bool sdhci_acpi_flag(struct sdhci_acpi_host *c, unsigned int flag)
>  {
> @@ -363,6 +364,42 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id sdhci_acpi_ids[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, sdhci_acpi_ids);
>  
> +static const struct dmi_system_id fix_up_power_blacklist[] = {
> +	{
> +		/*
> +		 * Match for the GPDwin which unfortunately uses somewhat
> +		 * generic dmi strings, which is why the bios-date match is
> +		 * included and we need multiple entries :| These strings have
> +		 * been checked against 6 other byt/cht boards and board_vendor
> +		 * and board_name are unique to the GPDwin (in the test set)
> +		 * where as only one other board has the same board_version.
> +		 */
> +		.matches = {
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "AMI Corporation"),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VERSION, "Default string"),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_DATE, "10/25/2016"),
> +		},
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.matches = {
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "AMI Corporation"),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VERSION, "Default string"),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_DATE, "11/18/2016"),
> +		},
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.matches = {
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "AMI Corporation"),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VERSION, "Default string"),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_DATE, "02/21/2017"),

And if there are more versions?

I would prefer to add a module parameter to blacklist the offending HID:UID

> +		},
> +	},
> +	{ }
> +};
> +
>  static const struct sdhci_acpi_slot *sdhci_acpi_get_slot(const char *hid,
>  							 const char *uid)
>  {
> @@ -395,6 +432,13 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	if (fix_up_power == -1) {
> +		if (dmi_check_system(fix_up_power_blacklist))
> +			fix_up_power = 0;
> +		else
> +			fix_up_power = 1;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* Power on the SDHCI controller and its children */
>  	if (fix_up_power) {
>  		acpi_device_fix_up_power(device);
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hans de Goede April 5, 2017, 10:47 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

On 05-04-17 09:29, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 04/04/17 11:50, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Add a DMI based blacklist for systems where calling
>> acpi_device_fix_up_power() is harmful.
>>
>> Note as the comment added above the GPDwin entry explains unfortunately
>> the GPDwin dmi strings are somewhat generic, so I've added the bios-date
>> string for a more unique match, which means we need 3 entries for the
>> GPDwin for the 3 known BIOS versions out there.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>> index 8fe46ba..826e34f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/pm.h>
>>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
>>
>>  #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>>  #include <linux/mmc/pm.h>
>> @@ -83,7 +84,7 @@ struct sdhci_acpi_host {
>>  	bool				use_runtime_pm;
>>  };
>>
>> -static int fix_up_power = 1;
>> +static int fix_up_power = -1;
>>
>>  static inline bool sdhci_acpi_flag(struct sdhci_acpi_host *c, unsigned int flag)
>>  {
>> @@ -363,6 +364,42 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id sdhci_acpi_ids[] = {
>>  };
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, sdhci_acpi_ids);
>>
>> +static const struct dmi_system_id fix_up_power_blacklist[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Match for the GPDwin which unfortunately uses somewhat
>> +		 * generic dmi strings, which is why the bios-date match is
>> +		 * included and we need multiple entries :| These strings have
>> +		 * been checked against 6 other byt/cht boards and board_vendor
>> +		 * and board_name are unique to the GPDwin (in the test set)
>> +		 * where as only one other board has the same board_version.
>> +		 */
>> +		.matches = {
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "AMI Corporation"),
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"),
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VERSION, "Default string"),
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_DATE, "10/25/2016"),
>> +		},
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.matches = {
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "AMI Corporation"),
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"),
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VERSION, "Default string"),
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_DATE, "11/18/2016"),
>> +		},
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.matches = {
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "AMI Corporation"),
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"),
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VERSION, "Default string"),
>> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_DATE, "02/21/2017"),
>
> And if there are more versions?

True, I already sort of expected this, so I've asked the internets
to send me dmi strings for other Cherry Trail / Bay Trail devices,
I now have a sample set of 15 devices.

Among these the GPDwin is the only one to set DMI_BOARD_VENDOR to
"AMI Corporation", as well as the only one to set DMI_BOARD_NAME
to "Default string", one of only 2 to set DMI_BOARD_SERIAL to
"Default string" and as one of only 3 to set DMI_PRODUCT_NAME
to "Default string", so I think that if me on those 4 (the latter
2 to be on the save side) that we can then remove the BIOS date
check and use only one entry, I will do so in the next version.

I do believe that we really need a DMI quirk and not just a module
option as this is something which should just work (and wifi not working
actually is a recent regression, see below).

> I would prefer to add a module parameter to blacklist the offending HID:UID

I think that applying the module_param to only a single HID:UID is a good
idea, this will also make the DMI match more narrow, esp. since the
GPDwin uses the somewhat rare 80860F14:2 HID:UID which only got added to
the kernel recently (and promptly regressed wifi support on the GPDwin).

I will do so in the next version.

When you say "black_list" do you mean not apply the acpi_power_fix_up calls
to the selected HID:UID, or do you mean completely ignoring the device
(return -ENODEV from probe()) ?

I think only skipping the acpi_power_fix_up calls is better, because that
I've the feeling that might help on some boards which do have sdio-wifi too,
where as returning -ENODEV although it will work for the GPDwin case, is
less likely to help in other cases (although I must admit I guess it may also
help in some cases where only skipping the power-fixup might not).

Regards,

Hans



>
>> +		},
>> +	},
>> +	{ }
>> +};
>> +
>>  static const struct sdhci_acpi_slot *sdhci_acpi_get_slot(const char *hid,
>>  							 const char *uid)
>>  {
>> @@ -395,6 +432,13 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  	if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>
>> +	if (fix_up_power == -1) {
>> +		if (dmi_check_system(fix_up_power_blacklist))
>> +			fix_up_power = 0;
>> +		else
>> +			fix_up_power = 1;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	/* Power on the SDHCI controller and its children */
>>  	if (fix_up_power) {
>>  		acpi_device_fix_up_power(device);
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
index 8fe46ba..826e34f 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/pm.h>
 #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/dmi.h>
 
 #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
 #include <linux/mmc/pm.h>
@@ -83,7 +84,7 @@  struct sdhci_acpi_host {
 	bool				use_runtime_pm;
 };
 
-static int fix_up_power = 1;
+static int fix_up_power = -1;
 
 static inline bool sdhci_acpi_flag(struct sdhci_acpi_host *c, unsigned int flag)
 {
@@ -363,6 +364,42 @@  static const struct acpi_device_id sdhci_acpi_ids[] = {
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, sdhci_acpi_ids);
 
+static const struct dmi_system_id fix_up_power_blacklist[] = {
+	{
+		/*
+		 * Match for the GPDwin which unfortunately uses somewhat
+		 * generic dmi strings, which is why the bios-date match is
+		 * included and we need multiple entries :| These strings have
+		 * been checked against 6 other byt/cht boards and board_vendor
+		 * and board_name are unique to the GPDwin (in the test set)
+		 * where as only one other board has the same board_version.
+		 */
+		.matches = {
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "AMI Corporation"),
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"),
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VERSION, "Default string"),
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_DATE, "10/25/2016"),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.matches = {
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "AMI Corporation"),
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"),
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VERSION, "Default string"),
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_DATE, "11/18/2016"),
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		.matches = {
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "AMI Corporation"),
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"),
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VERSION, "Default string"),
+			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_DATE, "02/21/2017"),
+		},
+	},
+	{ }
+};
+
 static const struct sdhci_acpi_slot *sdhci_acpi_get_slot(const char *hid,
 							 const char *uid)
 {
@@ -395,6 +432,13 @@  static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	if (fix_up_power == -1) {
+		if (dmi_check_system(fix_up_power_blacklist))
+			fix_up_power = 0;
+		else
+			fix_up_power = 1;
+	}
+
 	/* Power on the SDHCI controller and its children */
 	if (fix_up_power) {
 		acpi_device_fix_up_power(device);