diff mbox

[2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: remove arm, mali-midgard compatible from rk3288

Message ID 20170710121227.14264-2-heiko@sntech.de (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Heiko Stübner July 10, 2017, 12:12 p.m. UTC
The binding specifies the actual implementations only (mali-t760
for example) but not the arm,mali-midgard used in some vendor kernels.
So drop that compatible property from the rk3288 where it had slipped in.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Rob Herring (Arm) July 11, 2017, 3 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:12:27PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> The binding specifies the actual implementations only (mali-t760
> for example) but not the arm,mali-midgard used in some vendor kernels.
> So drop that compatible property from the rk3288 where it had slipped in.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> index cb1d415d1201..e99d7ff4c939 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@
>  	};
>  
>  	gpu: mali@ffa30000 {

This should also be gpu@..., not mali.

> -		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-mali", "arm,mali-t760", "arm,mali-midgard";
> +		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-mali", "arm,mali-t760";
>  		reg = <0xffa30000 0x10000>;
>  		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  			     <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> -- 
> 2.11.0
>
Caesar Wang July 11, 2017, 8:04 a.m. UTC | #2
Heiko,

在 2017年07月10日 20:12, Heiko Stuebner 写道:
> The binding specifies the actual implementations only (mali-t760
> for example) but not the arm,mali-midgard used in some vendor kernels.
> So drop that compatible property from the rk3288 where it had slipped in.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> index cb1d415d1201..e99d7ff4c939 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@
>   	};
>   
>   	gpu: mali@ffa30000 {
> -		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-mali", "arm,mali-t760", "arm,mali-midgard";
> +		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-mali", "arm,mali-t760";

If we remove the "arm,mali-midgard", the mali driver maybe need update 
first.

 From the lastest MALI driver on ARM supply, the compatible only two 
property.
mali_kbase_core_linux.c
4163:    { .compatible = "arm,malit6xx" },
4164:    { .compatible = "arm,mali-midgard" },

That's odd with the two compatible, the driver should support the more.

-Caesar

>   		reg = <0xffa30000 0x10000>;
>   		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>   			     <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
Heiko Stübner July 11, 2017, 11:47 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Caesar,

Am Dienstag, 11. Juli 2017, 16:04:38 CEST schrieb Caesar Wang:
> Heiko,
> 
> 在 2017年07月10日 20:12, Heiko Stuebner 写道:
> > The binding specifies the actual implementations only (mali-t760
> > for example) but not the arm,mali-midgard used in some vendor kernels.
> > So drop that compatible property from the rk3288 where it had slipped in.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> > index cb1d415d1201..e99d7ff4c939 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
> > @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@
> >   	};
> >   
> >   	gpu: mali@ffa30000 {
> > -		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-mali", "arm,mali-t760", "arm,mali-midgard";
> > +		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-mali", "arm,mali-t760";
> 
> If we remove the "arm,mali-midgard", the mali driver maybe need update 
> first.
>
>  From the lastest MALI driver on ARM supply, the compatible only two 
> property.
> mali_kbase_core_linux.c
> 4163:    { .compatible = "arm,malit6xx" },
> 4164:    { .compatible = "arm,mali-midgard" },
> 
> That's odd with the two compatible, the driver should support the more.

Correct, the driver should be updated anyway. In general the official
dt-binding (the one in the linux kernel) should be followed, not the random
out-of-tree one distributed by vendor drivers :-) .

If you look for example at utgard (mali400 for example), the sane binding
used in the kernel, differs a lot from the binding used by the vendor-driver
as well (io-areas, irq-names etc).

In any case, as you use the mali vendor-driver with you vendor-tree,
it should be possible to do both in sync (dt-change from mainline; driver
change to use better compatibles).


Heiko
Heiko Stübner July 13, 2017, 5:13 p.m. UTC | #4
Am Montag, 10. Juli 2017, 14:12:27 CEST schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> The binding specifies the actual implementations only (mali-t760
> for example) but not the arm,mali-midgard used in some vendor kernels.
> So drop that compatible property from the rk3288 where it had slipped in.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

applied as fix for 4.13 after also fixing the node name to gpu@...
as spotted by Rob.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
index cb1d415d1201..e99d7ff4c939 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi
@@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ 
 	};
 
 	gpu: mali@ffa30000 {
-		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-mali", "arm,mali-t760", "arm,mali-midgard";
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-mali", "arm,mali-t760";
 		reg = <0xffa30000 0x10000>;
 		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
 			     <GIC_SPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,