Message ID | 1500954024-6860-6-git-send-email-preid@electromag.com.au (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
Hi Phil, Nice to get rid of the mask/unmask! One small nit though, the 'fail_del_adapters' label no longer describes what's going on. Please change it to 'fail_cleanup' or something like that. With that, Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> And also, for the future, please use subjects according to submitting-patches, i.e., in this case i2c: mux: pca954x: call request irq after adding mux segments (lower-case 'c' in call) Cheers, Peter On 2017-07-25 05:40, Phil Reid wrote: > The pca954x device do not have the ability to mask interrupts. For > i2c slave devices that also don't have masking ability (eg ltc1760 > smbalert output) delay registering the irq until after the mux > segments have been configured. During the mux add_adaptor call the > core i2c system can register an smbalert handler which would then > be called immediately when the irq is registered. This smbalert > handler will then clear the pending irq. > > This removes the need for the irq_mask / irq_unmask calls that were > original used to do this. > > Signed-off-by: Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> > --- > drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 85 +++++++++++-------------------------- > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c > index f1751c2..ac0f083 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c > @@ -246,36 +246,6 @@ static irqreturn_t pca954x_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) > return handled ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE; > } > > -static void pca954x_irq_mask(struct irq_data *idata) > -{ > - struct pca954x *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(idata); > - unsigned int pos = idata->hwirq; > - unsigned long flags; > - > - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags); > - > - data->irq_mask &= ~BIT(pos); > - if (!data->irq_mask) > - disable_irq(data->client->irq); > - > - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags); > -} > - > -static void pca954x_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *idata) > -{ > - struct pca954x *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(idata); > - unsigned int pos = idata->hwirq; > - unsigned long flags; > - > - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags); > - > - if (!data->irq_mask) > - enable_irq(data->client->irq); > - data->irq_mask |= BIT(pos); > - > - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags); > -} > - > static int pca954x_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *idata, unsigned int type) > { > if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW) > @@ -285,8 +255,6 @@ static int pca954x_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *idata, unsigned int type) > > static struct irq_chip pca954x_irq_chip = { > .name = "i2c-mux-pca954x", > - .irq_mask = pca954x_irq_mask, > - .irq_unmask = pca954x_irq_unmask, > .irq_set_type = pca954x_irq_set_type, > }; > > @@ -294,7 +262,7 @@ static int pca954x_irq_setup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc) > { > struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); > struct i2c_client *client = data->client; > - int c, err, irq; > + int c, irq; > > if (!data->chip->has_irq || client->irq <= 0) > return 0; > @@ -314,24 +282,22 @@ static int pca954x_irq_setup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc) > handle_simple_irq); > } > > - err = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, data->client->irq, NULL, > - pca954x_irq_handler, > - IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED, > - "pca954x", data); > - if (err) > - goto err_req_irq; > + return 0; > +} > > - disable_irq(data->client->irq); > +static void pca954x_cleanup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc) > +{ > + struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); > + int c, irq; > > - return 0; > -err_req_irq: > - for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) { > - irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c); > - irq_dispose_mapping(irq); > + if (data->irq) { > + for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) { > + irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c); > + irq_dispose_mapping(irq); > + } > + irq_domain_remove(data->irq); > } > - irq_domain_remove(data->irq); > - > - return err; > + i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); > } > > /* > @@ -417,6 +383,15 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > goto fail_del_adapters; > } > > + if (data->irq) { > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, data->client->irq, > + NULL, pca954x_irq_handler, > + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED, > + "pca954x", data); > + if (ret) > + goto fail_del_adapters; > + } > + > dev_info(&client->dev, > "registered %d multiplexed busses for I2C %s %s\n", > num, data->chip->muxtype == pca954x_ismux > @@ -425,25 +400,15 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > return 0; > > fail_del_adapters: > - i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); > + pca954x_cleanup(muxc); > return ret; > } > > static int pca954x_remove(struct i2c_client *client) > { > struct i2c_mux_core *muxc = i2c_get_clientdata(client); > - struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); > - int c, irq; > > - if (data->irq) { > - for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) { > - irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c); > - irq_dispose_mapping(irq); > - } > - irq_domain_remove(data->irq); > - } > - > - i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); > + pca954x_cleanup(muxc); > return 0; > } > >
G'day Peter, Thanks for the review. On 31/07/2017 16:09, Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Nice to get rid of the mask/unmask! One small nit though, the > 'fail_del_adapters' label no longer describes what's going on. > Please change it to 'fail_cleanup' or something like that. will do, I'll wait a little bit longer to see if there's any other comments on the series. > > With that, > Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> > > And also, for the future, please use subjects according to > submitting-patches, i.e., in this case > > i2c: mux: pca954x: call request irq after adding mux segments > > (lower-case 'c' in call) ok > > Cheers, > Peter > > On 2017-07-25 05:40, Phil Reid wrote: >> The pca954x device do not have the ability to mask interrupts. For >> i2c slave devices that also don't have masking ability (eg ltc1760 >> smbalert output) delay registering the irq until after the mux >> segments have been configured. During the mux add_adaptor call the >> core i2c system can register an smbalert handler which would then >> be called immediately when the irq is registered. This smbalert >> handler will then clear the pending irq. >> >> This removes the need for the irq_mask / irq_unmask calls that were >> original used to do this. >> >> Signed-off-by: Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> >> --- >> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 85 +++++++++++-------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c >> index f1751c2..ac0f083 100644 >> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c >> @@ -246,36 +246,6 @@ static irqreturn_t pca954x_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) >> return handled ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE; >> } >> >> -static void pca954x_irq_mask(struct irq_data *idata) >> -{ >> - struct pca954x *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(idata); >> - unsigned int pos = idata->hwirq; >> - unsigned long flags; >> - >> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags); >> - >> - data->irq_mask &= ~BIT(pos); >> - if (!data->irq_mask) >> - disable_irq(data->client->irq); >> - >> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags); >> -} >> - >> -static void pca954x_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *idata) >> -{ >> - struct pca954x *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(idata); >> - unsigned int pos = idata->hwirq; >> - unsigned long flags; >> - >> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags); >> - >> - if (!data->irq_mask) >> - enable_irq(data->client->irq); >> - data->irq_mask |= BIT(pos); >> - >> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags); >> -} >> - >> static int pca954x_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *idata, unsigned int type) >> { >> if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW) >> @@ -285,8 +255,6 @@ static int pca954x_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *idata, unsigned int type) >> >> static struct irq_chip pca954x_irq_chip = { >> .name = "i2c-mux-pca954x", >> - .irq_mask = pca954x_irq_mask, >> - .irq_unmask = pca954x_irq_unmask, >> .irq_set_type = pca954x_irq_set_type, >> }; >> >> @@ -294,7 +262,7 @@ static int pca954x_irq_setup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc) >> { >> struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); >> struct i2c_client *client = data->client; >> - int c, err, irq; >> + int c, irq; >> >> if (!data->chip->has_irq || client->irq <= 0) >> return 0; >> @@ -314,24 +282,22 @@ static int pca954x_irq_setup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc) >> handle_simple_irq); >> } >> >> - err = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, data->client->irq, NULL, >> - pca954x_irq_handler, >> - IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED, >> - "pca954x", data); >> - if (err) >> - goto err_req_irq; >> + return 0; >> +} >> >> - disable_irq(data->client->irq); >> +static void pca954x_cleanup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc) >> +{ >> + struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); >> + int c, irq; >> >> - return 0; >> -err_req_irq: >> - for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) { >> - irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c); >> - irq_dispose_mapping(irq); >> + if (data->irq) { >> + for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) { >> + irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c); >> + irq_dispose_mapping(irq); >> + } >> + irq_domain_remove(data->irq); >> } >> - irq_domain_remove(data->irq); >> - >> - return err; >> + i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); >> } >> >> /* >> @@ -417,6 +383,15 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, >> goto fail_del_adapters; >> } >> >> + if (data->irq) { >> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, data->client->irq, >> + NULL, pca954x_irq_handler, >> + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED, >> + "pca954x", data); >> + if (ret) >> + goto fail_del_adapters; >> + } >> + >> dev_info(&client->dev, >> "registered %d multiplexed busses for I2C %s %s\n", >> num, data->chip->muxtype == pca954x_ismux >> @@ -425,25 +400,15 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, >> return 0; >> >> fail_del_adapters: >> - i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); >> + pca954x_cleanup(muxc); >> return ret; >> } >> >> static int pca954x_remove(struct i2c_client *client) >> { >> struct i2c_mux_core *muxc = i2c_get_clientdata(client); >> - struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); >> - int c, irq; >> >> - if (data->irq) { >> - for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) { >> - irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c); >> - irq_dispose_mapping(irq); >> - } >> - irq_domain_remove(data->irq); >> - } >> - >> - i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); >> + pca954x_cleanup(muxc); >> return 0; >> } >> >> > > >
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c index f1751c2..ac0f083 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c @@ -246,36 +246,6 @@ static irqreturn_t pca954x_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) return handled ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE; } -static void pca954x_irq_mask(struct irq_data *idata) -{ - struct pca954x *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(idata); - unsigned int pos = idata->hwirq; - unsigned long flags; - - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags); - - data->irq_mask &= ~BIT(pos); - if (!data->irq_mask) - disable_irq(data->client->irq); - - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags); -} - -static void pca954x_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *idata) -{ - struct pca954x *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(idata); - unsigned int pos = idata->hwirq; - unsigned long flags; - - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags); - - if (!data->irq_mask) - enable_irq(data->client->irq); - data->irq_mask |= BIT(pos); - - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags); -} - static int pca954x_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *idata, unsigned int type) { if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW) @@ -285,8 +255,6 @@ static int pca954x_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *idata, unsigned int type) static struct irq_chip pca954x_irq_chip = { .name = "i2c-mux-pca954x", - .irq_mask = pca954x_irq_mask, - .irq_unmask = pca954x_irq_unmask, .irq_set_type = pca954x_irq_set_type, }; @@ -294,7 +262,7 @@ static int pca954x_irq_setup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc) { struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); struct i2c_client *client = data->client; - int c, err, irq; + int c, irq; if (!data->chip->has_irq || client->irq <= 0) return 0; @@ -314,24 +282,22 @@ static int pca954x_irq_setup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc) handle_simple_irq); } - err = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, data->client->irq, NULL, - pca954x_irq_handler, - IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED, - "pca954x", data); - if (err) - goto err_req_irq; + return 0; +} - disable_irq(data->client->irq); +static void pca954x_cleanup(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc) +{ + struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); + int c, irq; - return 0; -err_req_irq: - for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) { - irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c); - irq_dispose_mapping(irq); + if (data->irq) { + for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) { + irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c); + irq_dispose_mapping(irq); + } + irq_domain_remove(data->irq); } - irq_domain_remove(data->irq); - - return err; + i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); } /* @@ -417,6 +383,15 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, goto fail_del_adapters; } + if (data->irq) { + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, data->client->irq, + NULL, pca954x_irq_handler, + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED, + "pca954x", data); + if (ret) + goto fail_del_adapters; + } + dev_info(&client->dev, "registered %d multiplexed busses for I2C %s %s\n", num, data->chip->muxtype == pca954x_ismux @@ -425,25 +400,15 @@ static int pca954x_probe(struct i2c_client *client, return 0; fail_del_adapters: - i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); + pca954x_cleanup(muxc); return ret; } static int pca954x_remove(struct i2c_client *client) { struct i2c_mux_core *muxc = i2c_get_clientdata(client); - struct pca954x *data = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); - int c, irq; - if (data->irq) { - for (c = 0; c < data->chip->nchans; c++) { - irq = irq_find_mapping(data->irq, c); - irq_dispose_mapping(irq); - } - irq_domain_remove(data->irq); - } - - i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); + pca954x_cleanup(muxc); return 0; }
The pca954x device do not have the ability to mask interrupts. For i2c slave devices that also don't have masking ability (eg ltc1760 smbalert output) delay registering the irq until after the mux segments have been configured. During the mux add_adaptor call the core i2c system can register an smbalert handler which would then be called immediately when the irq is registered. This smbalert handler will then clear the pending irq. This removes the need for the irq_mask / irq_unmask calls that were original used to do this. Signed-off-by: Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au> --- drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c | 85 +++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)