| Message ID | 1505300558-1242-1-git-send-email-gengdongjiu@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
HI Borislav, Tyler, Rafael,
sorry to disturb you. whether it is possible you can give a review
for this patch and below patch, seems it is pending long time. thank
you very much in advance for your time.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9952493/
2017-09-13 19:02 GMT+08:00 Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>:
> In current code logic, the two functions ghes_sea_add() and
> ghes_sea_remove() are only called when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> is defined. If not, it will return errors in the ghes_probe()
> and not continue. If the probe is failed, the ghes_sea_remove()
> also has no chance to be called.
>
> Hence, remove the unnecessary handling when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> is not defined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
>
> ---
> It is ever discussed here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/8/623
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 14 --------------
> 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index d661d452b238..c15a08db2c7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -813,7 +813,6 @@ static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_hed = {
> .notifier_call = ghes_notify_hed,
> };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea);
>
> /*
> @@ -848,19 +847,6 @@ static void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
> mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
> synchronize_rcu();
> }
> -#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
> -static inline void ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes)
> -{
> - pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to add SEA notification which is not supported\n",
> - ghes->generic->header.source_id);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
> -{
> - pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to remove SEA notification which is not supported\n",
> - ghes->generic->header.source_id);
> -}
> -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
> /*
> --
> 2.14.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c index d661d452b238..c15a08db2c7c 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c @@ -813,7 +813,6 @@ static struct notifier_block ghes_notifier_hed = { .notifier_call = ghes_notify_hed, }; -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea); /* @@ -848,19 +847,6 @@ static void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes) mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex); synchronize_rcu(); } -#else /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA */ -static inline void ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes) -{ - pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to add SEA notification which is not supported\n", - ghes->generic->header.source_id); -} - -static inline void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes) -{ - pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to remove SEA notification which is not supported\n", - ghes->generic->header.source_id); -} -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA */ #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI /*
In current code logic, the two functions ghes_sea_add() and ghes_sea_remove() are only called when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA is defined. If not, it will return errors in the ghes_probe() and not continue. If the probe is failed, the ghes_sea_remove() also has no chance to be called. Hence, remove the unnecessary handling when CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_SEA is not defined. Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com> --- It is ever discussed here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/8/623 --- drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)