diff mbox

pxa2xx_spi: fix memory corruption

Message ID 1310246098-21208-1-git-send-email-anarsoul@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Vasily Khoruzhick July 9, 2011, 9:14 p.m. UTC
pxa2xx_spi_probe allocates struct driver_data and null_dma_buf
at same time via spi_alloc_master(), but then calculates
null_dma_buf pointer incorrectly, and it causes memory corruption
later if DMA usage is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Comments

Marek Vasut July 9, 2011, 11:05 p.m. UTC | #1
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 11:14:58 PM Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> pxa2xx_spi_probe allocates struct driver_data and null_dma_buf
> at same time via spi_alloc_master(), but then calculates
> null_dma_buf pointer incorrectly, and it causes memory corruption
> later if DMA usage is enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> index dc25bee..ef38fbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static int __devinit pxa2xx_spi_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev) master->transfer = transfer;
> 
>  	drv_data->ssp_type = ssp->type;
> -	drv_data->null_dma_buf = (u32 *)ALIGN((u32)(drv_data +
> +	drv_data->null_dma_buf = (u32 *)ALIGN(((u32)drv_data +
>  						sizeof(struct driver_data)), 8);

This thing looks a bit disturbing in itself. Like, where the heck is that thing 
pointing in the end ? Since some data are written to address in "null_dma_buf" 
... isn't this just changing the corruption impact ?
> 
>  	drv_data->ioaddr = ssp->mmio_base;

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
Russell King - ARM Linux July 9, 2011, 11:11 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:05:48AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Saturday, July 09, 2011 11:14:58 PM Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> > pxa2xx_spi_probe allocates struct driver_data and null_dma_buf
> > at same time via spi_alloc_master(), but then calculates
> > null_dma_buf pointer incorrectly, and it causes memory corruption
> > later if DMA usage is enabled.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> > index dc25bee..ef38fbf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> > @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static int __devinit pxa2xx_spi_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev) master->transfer = transfer;
> > 
> >  	drv_data->ssp_type = ssp->type;
> > -	drv_data->null_dma_buf = (u32 *)ALIGN((u32)(drv_data +
> > +	drv_data->null_dma_buf = (u32 *)ALIGN(((u32)drv_data +
> >  						sizeof(struct driver_data)), 8);
> 
> This thing looks a bit disturbing in itself. Like, where the heck is that thing 
> pointing in the end ? Since some data are written to address in "null_dma_buf" 
> ... isn't this just changing the corruption impact ?

        /* Allocate master with space for drv_data and null dma buffer */
        master = spi_alloc_master(dev, sizeof(struct driver_data) + 16);

So there's 16 bytes at the end of driver_data.

However:

	(u32)(drv_data + sizeof(struct driver_data))

is pointer arithmetic.  drv_data points at an object of sizeof(struct
driver_data).  Adding one to this increments the pointer by
sizeof(struct driver_data) bytes.  So the above expression increments
the pointer by sizeof(struct driver_data)*sizeof(struct driver_data)
bytes, which is obviously complete rubbish.

	((u32)drv_data + sizeof(struct driver_data))

casts drv_data to a u32 first, then adds the sizeof(struct driver_data)
which moves us into the 16 bytes allocated off the end of the struct.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
Marek Vasut July 10, 2011, 7:14 a.m. UTC | #3
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 01:11:09 AM Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:05:48AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 09, 2011 11:14:58 PM Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> > > pxa2xx_spi_probe allocates struct driver_data and null_dma_buf
> > > at same time via spi_alloc_master(), but then calculates
> > > null_dma_buf pointer incorrectly, and it causes memory corruption
> > > later if DMA usage is enabled.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> > > index dc25bee..ef38fbf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> > > @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static int __devinit pxa2xx_spi_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev) master->transfer = transfer;
> > > 
> > >  	drv_data->ssp_type = ssp->type;
> > > 
> > > -	drv_data->null_dma_buf = (u32 *)ALIGN((u32)(drv_data +
> > > +	drv_data->null_dma_buf = (u32 *)ALIGN(((u32)drv_data +
> > > 
> > >  						sizeof(struct driver_data)), 8);
> > 
> > This thing looks a bit disturbing in itself. Like, where the heck is that
> > thing pointing in the end ? Since some data are written to address in
> > "null_dma_buf" ... isn't this just changing the corruption impact ?
> 
>         /* Allocate master with space for drv_data and null dma buffer */
>         master = spi_alloc_master(dev, sizeof(struct driver_data) + 16);
> 
> So there's 16 bytes at the end of driver_data.
> 
> However:
> 
> 	(u32)(drv_data + sizeof(struct driver_data))
> 
> is pointer arithmetic.  drv_data points at an object of sizeof(struct
> driver_data).  Adding one to this increments the pointer by
> sizeof(struct driver_data) bytes.  So the above expression increments
> the pointer by sizeof(struct driver_data)*sizeof(struct driver_data)
> bytes, which is obviously complete rubbish.
> 
> 	((u32)drv_data + sizeof(struct driver_data))
> 
> casts drv_data to a u32 first, then adds the sizeof(struct driver_data)
> which moves us into the 16 bytes allocated off the end of the struct.

The ptr arritmetic is clear, it was the 16 bytes after the structure I was 
missing ... if it's allocated there, it's fine. Thanks for clearing this.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
Marek Vasut July 10, 2011, 7:57 a.m. UTC | #4
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 09:14:45 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Sunday, July 10, 2011 01:11:09 AM Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 01:05:48AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > On Saturday, July 09, 2011 11:14:58 PM Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> > > > pxa2xx_spi_probe allocates struct driver_data and null_dma_buf
> > > > at same time via spi_alloc_master(), but then calculates
> > > > null_dma_buf pointer incorrectly, and it causes memory corruption
> > > > later if DMA usage is enabled.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c |    2 +-
> > > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> > > > index dc25bee..ef38fbf 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
> > > > @@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@ static int __devinit pxa2xx_spi_probe(struct
> > > > platform_device *pdev) master->transfer = transfer;
> > > > 
> > > >  	drv_data->ssp_type = ssp->type;
> > > > 
> > > > -	drv_data->null_dma_buf = (u32 *)ALIGN((u32)(drv_data +
> > > > +	drv_data->null_dma_buf = (u32 *)ALIGN(((u32)drv_data +
> > > > 
> > > >  						sizeof(struct driver_data)), 8);
> > > 
> > > This thing looks a bit disturbing in itself. Like, where the heck is
> > > that thing pointing in the end ? Since some data are written to
> > > address in "null_dma_buf" ... isn't this just changing the corruption
> > > impact ?
> > > 
> >         /* Allocate master with space for drv_data and null dma buffer */
> >         master = spi_alloc_master(dev, sizeof(struct driver_data) + 16);
> > 
> > So there's 16 bytes at the end of driver_data.
> > 
> > However:
> > 	(u32)(drv_data + sizeof(struct driver_data))
> > 
> > is pointer arithmetic.  drv_data points at an object of sizeof(struct
> > driver_data).  Adding one to this increments the pointer by
> > sizeof(struct driver_data) bytes.  So the above expression increments
> > the pointer by sizeof(struct driver_data)*sizeof(struct driver_data)
> > bytes, which is obviously complete rubbish.
> > 
> > 	((u32)drv_data + sizeof(struct driver_data))
> > 
> > casts drv_data to a u32 first, then adds the sizeof(struct driver_data)
> > which moves us into the 16 bytes allocated off the end of the struct.
> 
> The ptr arritmetic is clear, it was the 16 bytes after the structure I was
> missing ... if it's allocated there, it's fine. Thanks for clearing this.

Actually ... why don't we just add char null_buf[16] at the end of the structure 
instead of allocating +16 bytes and then doing this strange crap ? Or even 
better ... kzalloc() the buffer in probe(), then kfree() it in remove()?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
index dc25bee..ef38fbf 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/pxa2xx_spi.c
@@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@  static int __devinit pxa2xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	master->transfer = transfer;
 
 	drv_data->ssp_type = ssp->type;
-	drv_data->null_dma_buf = (u32 *)ALIGN((u32)(drv_data +
+	drv_data->null_dma_buf = (u32 *)ALIGN(((u32)drv_data +
 						sizeof(struct driver_data)), 8);
 
 	drv_data->ioaddr = ssp->mmio_base;