Message ID | 20171004175346.11956-1-kernel@esmil.dk (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
2017-10-04 19:53 GMT+02:00 Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>: > On the Samsung Chromebook Plus I get this error with 4.14-rc3: > > BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/3:1/50/0x00000002 > Modules linked in: > CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 4.14.0-0.rc3-kevin #2 > Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT) > Workqueue: events analogix_dp_psr_work > Call trace: > [<ffffff80080873b0>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x320 > [<ffffff80080876e4>] show_stack+0x14/0x20 > [<ffffff8008606d38>] dump_stack+0x9c/0xbc > [<ffffff80080c6b5c>] __schedule_bug+0x4c/0x70 > [<ffffff80086188c0>] __schedule+0x3f0/0x458 > [<ffffff8008618960>] schedule+0x38/0xa0 > [<ffffff800861c20c>] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x84/0xe8 > [<ffffff800861c2a0>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x10/0x18 > [<ffffff800861bcec>] usleep_range+0x64/0x78 > [<ffffff8008415a6c>] analogix_dp_transfer+0x16c/0x340 > [<ffffff8008412550>] analogix_dpaux_transfer+0x10/0x18 > [<ffffff80083ceb14>] drm_dp_dpcd_access+0x4c/0xf0 > [<ffffff80083cf614>] drm_dp_dpcd_write+0x1c/0x28 > [<ffffff8008413b98>] analogix_dp_disable_psr+0x60/0xa8 > [<ffffff800840da3c>] analogix_dp_psr_work+0x4c/0x90 > [<ffffff80080bb09c>] process_one_work+0x1d4/0x348 > [<ffffff80080bb258>] worker_thread+0x48/0x478 > [<ffffff80080c11fc>] kthread+0x12c/0x130 > [<ffffff8008084290>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 > > Changing rockchip_dp_device::psr_lock to a mutex rather > than spinlock seems to fix the issue. > > Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c | 14 ++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c > index 9606121fa185..d8f72d87ef08 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ struct rockchip_dp_device { > struct reset_control *rst; > > struct work_struct psr_work; > - spinlock_t psr_lock; > + struct mutex psr_lock; > unsigned int psr_state; > > const struct rockchip_dp_chip_data *data; > @@ -83,21 +83,20 @@ struct rockchip_dp_device { > static void analogix_dp_psr_set(struct drm_encoder *encoder, bool enabled) > { > struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = to_dp(encoder); > - unsigned long flags; > > if (!analogix_dp_psr_supported(dp->dev)) > return; > > dev_dbg(dp->dev, "%s PSR...\n", enabled ? "Entry" : "Exit"); > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags); > + mutex_lock(&dp->psr_lock); > if (enabled) > dp->psr_state = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE; > else > dp->psr_state = ~EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE; > > schedule_work(&dp->psr_work); > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp->psr_lock, flags); > + mutex_unlock(&dp->psr_lock); > } > > static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) > @@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) > struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = > container_of(work, typeof(*dp), psr_work); > int ret; > - unsigned long flags; > > ret = rockchip_drm_wait_vact_end(dp->encoder.crtc, > PSR_WAIT_LINE_FLAG_TIMEOUT_MS); > @@ -114,12 +112,12 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) > return; > } > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags); > + mutex_lock(&dp->psr_lock); > if (dp->psr_state == EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE) > analogix_dp_enable_psr(dp->dev); > else > analogix_dp_disable_psr(dp->dev); > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp->psr_lock, flags); > + mutex_unlock(&dp->psr_lock); > } > > static int rockchip_dp_pre_init(struct rockchip_dp_device *dp) > @@ -381,7 +379,7 @@ static int rockchip_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, > dp->plat_data.power_off = rockchip_dp_powerdown; > dp->plat_data.get_modes = rockchip_dp_get_modes; > > - spin_lock_init(&dp->psr_lock); > + mutex_init(&dp->psr_lock); > dp->psr_state = ~EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE; > INIT_WORK(&dp->psr_work, analogix_dp_psr_work); > > -- > 2.14.2 > Right this patch fixes the issue for me too. Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
On 2017年11月10日 20:07, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote: > 2017-10-04 19:53 GMT+02:00 Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>: >> On the Samsung Chromebook Plus I get this error with 4.14-rc3: >> >> BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/3:1/50/0x00000002 >> Modules linked in: >> CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 4.14.0-0.rc3-kevin #2 >> Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT) >> Workqueue: events analogix_dp_psr_work >> Call trace: >> [<ffffff80080873b0>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x320 >> [<ffffff80080876e4>] show_stack+0x14/0x20 >> [<ffffff8008606d38>] dump_stack+0x9c/0xbc >> [<ffffff80080c6b5c>] __schedule_bug+0x4c/0x70 >> [<ffffff80086188c0>] __schedule+0x3f0/0x458 >> [<ffffff8008618960>] schedule+0x38/0xa0 >> [<ffffff800861c20c>] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x84/0xe8 >> [<ffffff800861c2a0>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x10/0x18 >> [<ffffff800861bcec>] usleep_range+0x64/0x78 >> [<ffffff8008415a6c>] analogix_dp_transfer+0x16c/0x340 >> [<ffffff8008412550>] analogix_dpaux_transfer+0x10/0x18 >> [<ffffff80083ceb14>] drm_dp_dpcd_access+0x4c/0xf0 >> [<ffffff80083cf614>] drm_dp_dpcd_write+0x1c/0x28 >> [<ffffff8008413b98>] analogix_dp_disable_psr+0x60/0xa8 >> [<ffffff800840da3c>] analogix_dp_psr_work+0x4c/0x90 >> [<ffffff80080bb09c>] process_one_work+0x1d4/0x348 >> [<ffffff80080bb258>] worker_thread+0x48/0x478 >> [<ffffff80080c11fc>] kthread+0x12c/0x130 >> [<ffffff8008084290>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >> >> Changing rockchip_dp_device::psr_lock to a mutex rather >> than spinlock seems to fix the issue. >> >> Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c | 14 ++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c >> index 9606121fa185..d8f72d87ef08 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c >> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ struct rockchip_dp_device { >> struct reset_control *rst; >> >> struct work_struct psr_work; >> - spinlock_t psr_lock; >> + struct mutex psr_lock; >> unsigned int psr_state; >> >> const struct rockchip_dp_chip_data *data; >> @@ -83,21 +83,20 @@ struct rockchip_dp_device { >> static void analogix_dp_psr_set(struct drm_encoder *encoder, bool enabled) >> { >> struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = to_dp(encoder); >> - unsigned long flags; >> >> if (!analogix_dp_psr_supported(dp->dev)) >> return; >> >> dev_dbg(dp->dev, "%s PSR...\n", enabled ? "Entry" : "Exit"); >> >> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags); >> + mutex_lock(&dp->psr_lock); >> if (enabled) >> dp->psr_state = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE; >> else >> dp->psr_state = ~EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE; >> >> schedule_work(&dp->psr_work); >> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp->psr_lock, flags); >> + mutex_unlock(&dp->psr_lock); >> } >> >> static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) >> @@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) >> struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = >> container_of(work, typeof(*dp), psr_work); >> int ret; >> - unsigned long flags; >> >> ret = rockchip_drm_wait_vact_end(dp->encoder.crtc, >> PSR_WAIT_LINE_FLAG_TIMEOUT_MS); >> @@ -114,12 +112,12 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) >> return; >> } >> >> - spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags); >> + mutex_lock(&dp->psr_lock); >> if (dp->psr_state == EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE) >> analogix_dp_enable_psr(dp->dev); >> else >> analogix_dp_disable_psr(dp->dev); >> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp->psr_lock, flags); >> + mutex_unlock(&dp->psr_lock); >> } >> >> static int rockchip_dp_pre_init(struct rockchip_dp_device *dp) >> @@ -381,7 +379,7 @@ static int rockchip_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, >> dp->plat_data.power_off = rockchip_dp_powerdown; >> dp->plat_data.get_modes = rockchip_dp_get_modes; >> >> - spin_lock_init(&dp->psr_lock); >> + mutex_init(&dp->psr_lock); >> dp->psr_state = ~EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE; >> INIT_WORK(&dp->psr_work, analogix_dp_psr_work); >> >> -- >> 2.14.2 >> > Right this patch fixes the issue for me too. > > Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> > > > Right, it's a bug using spinlock with sleep, Pushed to drm-misc-fixes Thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c index 9606121fa185..d8f72d87ef08 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ struct rockchip_dp_device { struct reset_control *rst; struct work_struct psr_work; - spinlock_t psr_lock; + struct mutex psr_lock; unsigned int psr_state; const struct rockchip_dp_chip_data *data; @@ -83,21 +83,20 @@ struct rockchip_dp_device { static void analogix_dp_psr_set(struct drm_encoder *encoder, bool enabled) { struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = to_dp(encoder); - unsigned long flags; if (!analogix_dp_psr_supported(dp->dev)) return; dev_dbg(dp->dev, "%s PSR...\n", enabled ? "Entry" : "Exit"); - spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&dp->psr_lock); if (enabled) dp->psr_state = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE; else dp->psr_state = ~EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE; schedule_work(&dp->psr_work); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp->psr_lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&dp->psr_lock); } static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) @@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = container_of(work, typeof(*dp), psr_work); int ret; - unsigned long flags; ret = rockchip_drm_wait_vact_end(dp->encoder.crtc, PSR_WAIT_LINE_FLAG_TIMEOUT_MS); @@ -114,12 +112,12 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work) return; } - spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags); + mutex_lock(&dp->psr_lock); if (dp->psr_state == EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE) analogix_dp_enable_psr(dp->dev); else analogix_dp_disable_psr(dp->dev); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dp->psr_lock, flags); + mutex_unlock(&dp->psr_lock); } static int rockchip_dp_pre_init(struct rockchip_dp_device *dp) @@ -381,7 +379,7 @@ static int rockchip_dp_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, dp->plat_data.power_off = rockchip_dp_powerdown; dp->plat_data.get_modes = rockchip_dp_get_modes; - spin_lock_init(&dp->psr_lock); + mutex_init(&dp->psr_lock); dp->psr_state = ~EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE; INIT_WORK(&dp->psr_work, analogix_dp_psr_work);
On the Samsung Chromebook Plus I get this error with 4.14-rc3: BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/3:1/50/0x00000002 Modules linked in: CPU: 3 PID: 50 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 4.14.0-0.rc3-kevin #2 Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT) Workqueue: events analogix_dp_psr_work Call trace: [<ffffff80080873b0>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x320 [<ffffff80080876e4>] show_stack+0x14/0x20 [<ffffff8008606d38>] dump_stack+0x9c/0xbc [<ffffff80080c6b5c>] __schedule_bug+0x4c/0x70 [<ffffff80086188c0>] __schedule+0x3f0/0x458 [<ffffff8008618960>] schedule+0x38/0xa0 [<ffffff800861c20c>] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x84/0xe8 [<ffffff800861c2a0>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x10/0x18 [<ffffff800861bcec>] usleep_range+0x64/0x78 [<ffffff8008415a6c>] analogix_dp_transfer+0x16c/0x340 [<ffffff8008412550>] analogix_dpaux_transfer+0x10/0x18 [<ffffff80083ceb14>] drm_dp_dpcd_access+0x4c/0xf0 [<ffffff80083cf614>] drm_dp_dpcd_write+0x1c/0x28 [<ffffff8008413b98>] analogix_dp_disable_psr+0x60/0xa8 [<ffffff800840da3c>] analogix_dp_psr_work+0x4c/0x90 [<ffffff80080bb09c>] process_one_work+0x1d4/0x348 [<ffffff80080bb258>] worker_thread+0x48/0x478 [<ffffff80080c11fc>] kthread+0x12c/0x130 [<ffffff8008084290>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 Changing rockchip_dp_device::psr_lock to a mutex rather than spinlock seems to fix the issue. Signed-off-by: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> --- drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c | 14 ++++++-------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)