Message ID | 1509432908-17449-1-git-send-email-bhupinder.thakur@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Change the tag to for-4.10. Julien, this is needed to fix vuart emulation.
Hi Wei, Sorry I missed that e-mail. On 10/31/2017 10:07 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > Change the tag to for-4.10. > > Julien, this is needed to fix vuart emulation. To confirm, only patch #1 is candidate for Xen 4.10, right? The rest will be queued for Xen 4.11? For patch #1: Release-acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> Cheers, -- Julien Grall
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 03:56:23PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Wei, > > Sorry I missed that e-mail. > > On 10/31/2017 10:07 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > > Change the tag to for-4.10. > > > > Julien, this is needed to fix vuart emulation. > > To confirm, only patch #1 is candidate for Xen 4.10, right? The rest will be > queued for Xen 4.11? > I think so. Bhupinder, can you confirm that?
Hi, On 14 Nov 2017 3:35 pm, "Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 03:56:23PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > > Hi Wei, > > > > Sorry I missed that e-mail. > > > > On 10/31/2017 10:07 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > > > Change the tag to for-4.10. > > > > > > Julien, this is needed to fix vuart emulation. > > > > To confirm, only patch #1 is candidate for Xen 4.10, right? The rest > will be > > queued for Xen 4.11? > > > > I think so. > > Bhupinder, can you confirm that? > Yes. Only first patch is required for fixing the compilation issue. Regards, Bhupinder
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 05:12:26PM +0530, Bhupinder Thakur wrote: > Hi, > > On 14 Nov 2017 3:35 pm, "Wei Liu" <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 03:56:23PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > > > Hi Wei, > > > > > > Sorry I missed that e-mail. > > > > > > On 10/31/2017 10:07 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > > > > Change the tag to for-4.10. > > > > > > > > Julien, this is needed to fix vuart emulation. > > > > > > To confirm, only patch #1 is candidate for Xen 4.10, right? The rest > > will be > > > queued for Xen 4.11? > > > > > > > I think so. > > > > Bhupinder, can you confirm that? > > > > Yes. Only first patch is required for fixing the compilation issue. > Thanks. I will commit the first patch and put the rest in my for-next queue.
diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_console.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_console.c index c05dc28..6bfc0e5 100644 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_console.c +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_console.c @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ int libxl__device_vuart_add(libxl__gc *gc, uint32_t domid, flexarray_append(ro_front, "port"); flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%"PRIu32, state->vuart_port)); flexarray_append(ro_front, "ring-ref"); - flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%"PRI_xen_pfn, state->vuart_gfn)); + flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%"PRIu_xen_pfn, state->vuart_gfn)); flexarray_append(ro_front, "limit"); flexarray_append(ro_front, GCSPRINTF("%d", LIBXL_XENCONSOLE_LIMIT)); flexarray_append(ro_front, "type"); diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h index 5708cd2..05fd11c 100644 --- a/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-arm.h @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(vcpu_guest_core_regs_t); typedef uint64_t xen_pfn_t; #define PRI_xen_pfn PRIx64 +#define PRIu_xen_pfn PRIu64 /* Maximum number of virtual CPUs in legacy multi-processor guests. */ /* Only one. All other VCPUS must use VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info */ diff --git a/xen/include/public/arch-x86/xen.h b/xen/include/public/arch-x86/xen.h index ff91831..3b0b1d6 100644 --- a/xen/include/public/arch-x86/xen.h +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-x86/xen.h @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ __DeFiNe__ __DECL_REG_LO16(name) e ## name #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ typedef unsigned long xen_pfn_t; #define PRI_xen_pfn "lx" +#define PRIu_xen_pfn "lu" #endif #define XEN_HAVE_PV_GUEST_ENTRY 1