diff mbox

[v4,3/9] arm64/acpi: Create arch specific cpu to acpi id helper

Message ID 20171109210311.25655-4-jeremy.linton@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Jeremy Linton Nov. 9, 2017, 9:03 p.m. UTC
Its helpful to be able to lookup the acpi_processor_id
associated with a logical cpu. Provide an arm64
helper to do this.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Sudeep Holla Nov. 20, 2017, 5:06 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:03:05PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Its helpful to be able to lookup the acpi_processor_id
> associated with a logical cpu. Provide an arm64
> helper to do this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index 59cca1d6ec54..408e7989d3a2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ static inline bool acpi_has_cpu_in_madt(void)
>  }
>  
>  struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(int cpu);
> +static inline u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	return	acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu)->uid;
> +}

If I followed the series correctly, this function is used in 2/9 already.
So this needs to be moved down in the series to avoid build failure during
bisection.

--
Regards,
Sudeep
Jeremy Linton Nov. 20, 2017, 5:09 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

On 11/20/2017 11:06 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:03:05PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>> Its helpful to be able to lookup the acpi_processor_id
>> associated with a logical cpu. Provide an arm64
>> helper to do this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> index 59cca1d6ec54..408e7989d3a2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
>> @@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ static inline bool acpi_has_cpu_in_madt(void)
>>   }
>>   
>>   struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(int cpu);
>> +static inline u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	return	acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu)->uid;
>> +}
> 
> If I followed the series correctly, this function is used in 2/9 already.
> So this needs to be moved down in the series to avoid build failure during
> bisection.

I don't believe there is a bisection failure here because the code using 
this routine is not yet being compiled until the 4/9.
Sudeep Holla Nov. 20, 2017, 5:14 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:09:47AM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/20/2017 11:06 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:03:05PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> >>Its helpful to be able to lookup the acpi_processor_id
> >>associated with a logical cpu. Provide an arm64
> >>helper to do this.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> >>---
> >>  arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 4 ++++
> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> >>index 59cca1d6ec54..408e7989d3a2 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> >>+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> >>@@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ static inline bool acpi_has_cpu_in_madt(void)
> >>  }
> >>  struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(int cpu);
> >>+static inline u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> >>+{
> >>+	return	acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu)->uid;
> >>+}
> >
> >If I followed the series correctly, this function is used in 2/9 already.
> >So this needs to be moved down in the series to avoid build failure during
> >bisection.
> 
> I don't believe there is a bisection failure here because the code using
> this routine is not yet being compiled until the 4/9.
> 

OK, I see. It's good to have definition ready before you use generally,
up to you.

--
Regards,
Sudeep
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
index 59cca1d6ec54..408e7989d3a2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -86,6 +86,10 @@  static inline bool acpi_has_cpu_in_madt(void)
 }
 
 struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(int cpu);
+static inline u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	return	acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu)->uid;
+}
 
 static inline void arch_fix_phys_package_id(int num, u32 slot) { }
 void __init acpi_init_cpus(void);