| Message ID | a99fc4e8-49e3-486a-b508-d764a952d9f8@rwthex-w2-a.rwth-ad.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi, On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:17:25PM +0100, Stefan Brüns wrote: > Include the OF-based modalias in the uevent sent when registering devices > on the sunxi RSB bus, so that user space has a chance to autoload the > kernel module for the device. > > Fixes a regression caused by commit 3f241bfa60bd ("arm64: allwinner: a64: > pine64: Use dcdc1 regulator for mmc0"). When the axp20x-rsb module for > the AXP803 PMIC is built as a module, it is not loaded and the system > ends up with an disfunctional MMC controller. > > Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> > --- > drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c > index 328ca93781cf..37cb57244cbe 100644 > --- a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c > @@ -173,11 +173,24 @@ static int sunxi_rsb_device_remove(struct device *dev) > return drv->remove(to_sunxi_rsb_device(dev)); > } > > +static int sunxi_rsb_device_uevent(struct device *dev, > + struct kobj_uevent_env *env) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ret = of_device_uevent_modalias(dev, env); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + return ret; A comment explaining why we need to ignore the ENODEV error code would be great here. > + return 0; > +} > + > static struct bus_type sunxi_rsb_bus = { > .name = RSB_CTRL_NAME, > .match = sunxi_rsb_device_match, > .probe = sunxi_rsb_device_probe, > .remove = sunxi_rsb_device_remove, > + .uevent = sunxi_rsb_device_uevent, Any reason to not use of_device_uevent_modalias directly here? Thanks! Maxime
On Monday, November 27, 2017 4:35:02 PM CET Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:17:25PM +0100, Stefan Brüns wrote: > > Include the OF-based modalias in the uevent sent when registering devices > > on the sunxi RSB bus, so that user space has a chance to autoload the > > kernel module for the device. > > > > Fixes a regression caused by commit 3f241bfa60bd ("arm64: allwinner: a64: > > pine64: Use dcdc1 regulator for mmc0"). When the axp20x-rsb module for > > the AXP803 PMIC is built as a module, it is not loaded and the system > > ends up with an disfunctional MMC controller. > > > > Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> > > --- > > > > drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c | 13 +++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c > > index 328ca93781cf..37cb57244cbe 100644 > > --- a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c > > +++ b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c > > @@ -173,11 +173,24 @@ static int sunxi_rsb_device_remove(struct device > > *dev)> > > return drv->remove(to_sunxi_rsb_device(dev)); > > > > } > > > > +static int sunxi_rsb_device_uevent(struct device *dev, > > + struct kobj_uevent_env *env) > > +{ > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = of_device_uevent_modalias(dev, env); > > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > > + return ret; > > A comment explaining why we need to ignore the ENODEV error code would > be great here. Lazy answer - everyone else is doing the same, and nobody cared to add an explanation. For *some* drivers, this is likely because the same device may be enumerated from e.g ACPI or OF, and for an ACPI device -ENODEV will be returned, as dev->of_node is NULL. For devices which are only usable in an OF context, this is bogus. Not sure about sunxi-rsb. > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > > > static struct bus_type sunxi_rsb_bus = { > > > > .name = RSB_CTRL_NAME, > > .match = sunxi_rsb_device_match, > > .probe = sunxi_rsb_device_probe, > > .remove = sunxi_rsb_device_remove, > > > > + .uevent = sunxi_rsb_device_uevent, > > Any reason to not use of_device_uevent_modalias directly here? *If* sunxi-rsb can be used without OF, then yes, otherwise no. Regards, Stefan
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:19 AM, Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > On Monday, November 27, 2017 4:35:02 PM CET Maxime Ripard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:17:25PM +0100, Stefan Brüns wrote: >> > Include the OF-based modalias in the uevent sent when registering devices >> > on the sunxi RSB bus, so that user space has a chance to autoload the >> > kernel module for the device. >> > >> > Fixes a regression caused by commit 3f241bfa60bd ("arm64: allwinner: a64: >> > pine64: Use dcdc1 regulator for mmc0"). When the axp20x-rsb module for >> > the AXP803 PMIC is built as a module, it is not loaded and the system >> > ends up with an disfunctional MMC controller. >> > >> > Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> >> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> >> > --- >> > >> > drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c | 13 +++++++++++++ >> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c >> > index 328ca93781cf..37cb57244cbe 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c >> > +++ b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c >> > @@ -173,11 +173,24 @@ static int sunxi_rsb_device_remove(struct device >> > *dev)> >> > return drv->remove(to_sunxi_rsb_device(dev)); >> > >> > } >> > >> > +static int sunxi_rsb_device_uevent(struct device *dev, >> > + struct kobj_uevent_env *env) >> > +{ >> > + int ret; >> > + >> > + ret = of_device_uevent_modalias(dev, env); >> > + if (ret != -ENODEV) >> > + return ret; >> >> A comment explaining why we need to ignore the ENODEV error code would >> be great here. > > Lazy answer - everyone else is doing the same, and nobody cared to add an > explanation. > > For *some* drivers, this is likely because the same device may be enumerated > from e.g ACPI or OF, and for an ACPI device -ENODEV will be returned, as > dev->of_node is NULL. > > For devices which are only usable in an OF context, this is bogus. Not sure > about sunxi-rsb. sunxi-rsb (and Allwinner support in mainline in general) is OF only. With the exception of mfd sub-devices, if someone is enumerating devices in some other fashion, it should rightly blow up in their face. >> > + return 0; >> > +} >> > + >> > >> > static struct bus_type sunxi_rsb_bus = { >> > >> > .name = RSB_CTRL_NAME, >> > .match = sunxi_rsb_device_match, >> > .probe = sunxi_rsb_device_probe, >> > .remove = sunxi_rsb_device_remove, >> > >> > + .uevent = sunxi_rsb_device_uevent, >> >> Any reason to not use of_device_uevent_modalias directly here? > > *If* sunxi-rsb can be used without OF, then yes, otherwise no. You can just use of_device_uevent_modalias, like the other OF platforms. ChenYu
diff --git a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c index 328ca93781cf..37cb57244cbe 100644 --- a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c +++ b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c @@ -173,11 +173,24 @@ static int sunxi_rsb_device_remove(struct device *dev) return drv->remove(to_sunxi_rsb_device(dev)); } +static int sunxi_rsb_device_uevent(struct device *dev, + struct kobj_uevent_env *env) +{ + int ret; + + ret = of_device_uevent_modalias(dev, env); + if (ret != -ENODEV) + return ret; + + return 0; +} + static struct bus_type sunxi_rsb_bus = { .name = RSB_CTRL_NAME, .match = sunxi_rsb_device_match, .probe = sunxi_rsb_device_probe, .remove = sunxi_rsb_device_remove, + .uevent = sunxi_rsb_device_uevent, }; static void sunxi_rsb_dev_release(struct device *dev)
Include the OF-based modalias in the uevent sent when registering devices on the sunxi RSB bus, so that user space has a chance to autoload the kernel module for the device. Fixes a regression caused by commit 3f241bfa60bd ("arm64: allwinner: a64: pine64: Use dcdc1 regulator for mmc0"). When the axp20x-rsb module for the AXP803 PMIC is built as a module, it is not loaded and the system ends up with an disfunctional MMC controller. Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> --- drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)