Message ID | CAOLK0pwczbQrno_vc2Uj6czyELyiEHeCAoi2SgDvvKcRNiijiw@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
* Tianyu Lan <lantianyu1986@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jim&Wanpeng: > Thanks for your help. > > 2017-12-08 5:25 GMT+08:00 Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>: > > Try disabling the module parameter, "unrestricted_guest." Make sure > > that the module parameter, "emulate_invalid_guest_state" is enabled. > > This combination allows userspace to feed invalid guest state into the > > in-kernel emulator. > > Yes, you are right. I need to disable unrestricted_guest to reproduce the issue. > > I find this is pop instruction emulation issue. According "SDM VOL2, > chapter INSTRUCTION > SET REFERENCE. POP—Pop a Value from the Stack" > > Protected Mode Exceptions > #GP(0) If attempt is made to load SS register with NULL segment selector. > > This test case hits it but current code doesn't check such case. > The following patch can fix the issue. > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > index abe74f7..e2ac5cc 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > @@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ static int emulate_pop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, > int rc; > struct segmented_address addr; > > + if ( !get_segment_selector(ctxt, VCPU_SREG_SS)) > + return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0); > + > addr.ea = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) & stack_mask(ctxt); > addr.seg = VCPU_SREG_SS; > rc = segmented_read(ctxt, addr, dest, len); s/if ( !get_segment_selector /if (!get_segment_selector I think it would also be nice to convert the syzkaller testcase to a new KVM unit test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git There's a test_pop() function in kvm-unit-tests/x86/emulator.c. Thanks, Ingo
2017-12-08 16:44 GMT+08:00 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>: > > * Tianyu Lan <lantianyu1986@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jim&Wanpeng: >> Thanks for your help. >> >> 2017-12-08 5:25 GMT+08:00 Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>: >> > Try disabling the module parameter, "unrestricted_guest." Make sure >> > that the module parameter, "emulate_invalid_guest_state" is enabled. >> > This combination allows userspace to feed invalid guest state into the >> > in-kernel emulator. >> >> Yes, you are right. I need to disable unrestricted_guest to reproduce the issue. >> >> I find this is pop instruction emulation issue. According "SDM VOL2, >> chapter INSTRUCTION >> SET REFERENCE. POP—Pop a Value from the Stack" >> >> Protected Mode Exceptions >> #GP(0) If attempt is made to load SS register with NULL segment selector. >> >> This test case hits it but current code doesn't check such case. >> The following patch can fix the issue. >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c >> index abe74f7..e2ac5cc 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c >> @@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ static int emulate_pop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, >> int rc; >> struct segmented_address addr; >> >> + if ( !get_segment_selector(ctxt, VCPU_SREG_SS)) >> + return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0); >> + >> addr.ea = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) & stack_mask(ctxt); >> addr.seg = VCPU_SREG_SS; >> rc = segmented_read(ctxt, addr, dest, len); > > s/if ( !get_segment_selector > /if (!get_segment_selector Sorry. I mixed xen and kernel code style... > > I think it would also be nice to convert the syzkaller testcase to a new KVM unit > test: Sure. I will add it. > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git > > There's a test_pop() function in kvm-unit-tests/x86/emulator.c. > > Thanks, > > Ingo
2017-12-08 16:28 GMT+08:00 Tianyu Lan <lantianyu1986@gmail.com>: > Hi Jim&Wanpeng: > Thanks for your help. > > 2017-12-08 5:25 GMT+08:00 Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>: >> Try disabling the module parameter, "unrestricted_guest." Make sure >> that the module parameter, "emulate_invalid_guest_state" is enabled. >> This combination allows userspace to feed invalid guest state into the >> in-kernel emulator. > > Yes, you are right. I need to disable unrestricted_guest to reproduce the issue. I can observe ctxt->exception.vector == 0xff which triggers Dmitry's report. Do you figure out the reason? Regards, Wanpeng Li > > I find this is pop instruction emulation issue. According "SDM VOL2, > chapter INSTRUCTION > SET REFERENCE. POP—Pop a Value from the Stack" > > Protected Mode Exceptions > #GP(0) If attempt is made to load SS register with NULL segment selector. > > This test case hits it but current code doesn't check such case. > The following patch can fix the issue. > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > index abe74f7..e2ac5cc 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > @@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ static int emulate_pop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, > int rc; > struct segmented_address addr; > > + if ( !get_segment_selector(ctxt, VCPU_SREG_SS)) > + return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0); > + > addr.ea = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) & stack_mask(ctxt); > addr.seg = VCPU_SREG_SS; > rc = segmented_read(ctxt, addr, dest, len);
On 12/8/2017 5:27 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote: > 2017-12-08 16:28 GMT+08:00 Tianyu Lan <lantianyu1986@gmail.com>: >> Hi Jim&Wanpeng: >> Thanks for your help. >> >> 2017-12-08 5:25 GMT+08:00 Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>: >>> Try disabling the module parameter, "unrestricted_guest." Make sure >>> that the module parameter, "emulate_invalid_guest_state" is enabled. >>> This combination allows userspace to feed invalid guest state into the >>> in-kernel emulator. >> >> Yes, you are right. I need to disable unrestricted_guest to reproduce the issue. > > I can observe ctxt->exception.vector == 0xff which triggers Dmitry's > report. Do you figure out the reason? > Yes, this is caused by that emulation callback returns error code while not emulate exception and not set exception vector. ctxt->exception.vector is default to be 0xff in emulate instruction code path.
On 08/12/2017 09:28, Tianyu Lan wrote: > I find this is pop instruction emulation issue. According "SDM VOL2, > chapter INSTRUCTION > SET REFERENCE. POP—Pop a Value from the Stack" > > Protected Mode Exceptions > #GP(0) If attempt is made to load SS register with NULL segment selector. This is not what the testcase is testing; this is already covered by __load_segment_descriptor: if (null_selector) { if (seg == VCPU_SREG_CS || seg == VCPU_SREG_TR) goto exception; if (seg == VCPU_SREG_SS) { if (ctxt->mode != X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64 || rpl != cpl) goto exception; ... } Is there a path that can return X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT without setting ctxt->exception.vector and/or without going through emulate_exception? I don't think it's possible to write a test in kvm-unit-tests, because the state has "impossible" segment descriptor cache contents. Paolo > This test case hits it but current code doesn't check such case. > The following patch can fix the issue. > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > index abe74f7..e2ac5cc 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > @@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ static int emulate_pop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, > int rc; > struct segmented_address addr; > > + if ( !get_segment_selector(ctxt, VCPU_SREG_SS)) > + return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0); > + > addr.ea = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) & stack_mask(ctxt); > addr.seg = VCPU_SREG_SS; > rc = segmented_read(ctxt, addr, dest, len);
On 2017年12月12日 06:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 08/12/2017 09:28, Tianyu Lan wrote: >> I find this is pop instruction emulation issue. According "SDM VOL2, >> chapter INSTRUCTION >> SET REFERENCE. POP—Pop a Value from the Stack" >> >> Protected Mode Exceptions >> #GP(0) If attempt is made to load SS register with NULL segment selector. > > This is not what the testcase is testing; this is already covered by > __load_segment_descriptor: > > if (null_selector) { > if (seg == VCPU_SREG_CS || seg == VCPU_SREG_TR) > goto exception; > > if (seg == VCPU_SREG_SS) { > if (ctxt->mode != X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64 || rpl != cpl) > goto exception; > ... > } Yes, __load_segment_descriptor() does such check. I find em_pop doesn't load SS segment. SS isn't loaded before calling em_pop in the test case. Should this be fixed? > > Is there a path that can return X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT without setting > ctxt->exception.vector and/or without going through emulate_exception? > > I don't think it's possible to write a test in kvm-unit-tests, because the > state has "impossible" segment descriptor cache contents. Sent out a fix patch for the issue. Please have a look. Thanks. https://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=151306208214733&w=2 > > Paolo > >> This test case hits it but current code doesn't check such case. >> The following patch can fix the issue. >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c >> index abe74f7..e2ac5cc 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c >> @@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ static int emulate_pop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, >> int rc; >> struct segmented_address addr; >> >> + if ( !get_segment_selector(ctxt, VCPU_SREG_SS)) >> + return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0); >> + >> addr.ea = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) & stack_mask(ctxt); >> addr.seg = VCPU_SREG_SS; >> rc = segmented_read(ctxt, addr, dest, len); >
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c index abe74f7..e2ac5cc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c @@ -1844,6 +1844,9 @@ static int emulate_pop(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int rc; struct segmented_address addr; + if ( !get_segment_selector(ctxt, VCPU_SREG_SS)) + return emulate_gp(ctxt, 0); + addr.ea = reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) & stack_mask(ctxt); addr.seg = VCPU_SREG_SS; rc = segmented_read(ctxt, addr, dest, len);