diff mbox

[i-g-t,v2,2/2] tests/gem_exec_schedule: Add test for resetting preemptive batch

Message ID 20171204234541.23649-2-antonio.argenziano@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Antonio Argenziano Dec. 4, 2017, 11:45 p.m. UTC
This patch adds a test that will trigger a preemption of a low priority
batch by a 'bad' batch buffer which will hang. The test aims at making
sure that a hanging high priority batch will not disrupt the submission
flow of low priority contexts.

-v2:
	- Rename subtest (Chris)
	- Use igt_hang_ctx to hang ring (Chris)
	- Add comment on execution order checks (Chris)

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
---
 tests/gem_exec_schedule.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

Comments

Michał Winiarski Dec. 8, 2017, 9:58 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:45:41PM -0800, Antonio Argenziano wrote:
> This patch adds a test that will trigger a preemption of a low priority
> batch by a 'bad' batch buffer which will hang. The test aims at making
> sure that a hanging high priority batch will not disrupt the submission
> flow of low priority contexts.
> 
> -v2:
> 	- Rename subtest (Chris)
> 	- Use igt_hang_ctx to hang ring (Chris)
> 	- Add comment on execution order checks (Chris)
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>

> ---
>  tests/gem_exec_schedule.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
Chris Wilson Dec. 8, 2017, 10:06 p.m. UTC | #2
Quoting Antonio Argenziano (2017-12-04 23:45:41)
> This patch adds a test that will trigger a preemption of a low priority
> batch by a 'bad' batch buffer which will hang. The test aims at making
> sure that a hanging high priority batch will not disrupt the submission
> flow of low priority contexts.
> 
> -v2:
>         - Rename subtest (Chris)
>         - Use igt_hang_ctx to hang ring (Chris)
>         - Add comment on execution order checks (Chris)
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com>
> ---
> +static void preemptive_hang(int fd, unsigned ring)
> +{
> +       igt_spin_t *spin[16];

Someone is going to shout one day, what is it with the magic number 16?

#define MAX_ELSP_QLEN 16 ? And should be set to some safe number times
the forseeable future.

> +       igt_hang_t hang;
> +       uint32_t ctx[2];
> +
> +       ctx[HI] = gem_context_create(fd);
> +       gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[HI], MAX_PRIO);
> +
> +       for (int n = 0; n < 16; n++) {
> +               ctx[LO] = gem_context_create(fd);
> +               gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[LO], MIN_PRIO);
> +
> +               spin[n] = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, ctx[LO], ring, 0);
> +               igt_debug("spin[%d].handle=%d\n", n, spin[n]->handle);
> +
> +               gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[LO]);
> +       }
> +
> +       hang = igt_hang_ctx(fd, ctx[HI], ring, 0, NULL);
> +       gem_wait(fd, hang.handle, NULL);

That should be igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang);
-Chris
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c b/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
index d0f85b3e..0c2efaa2 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_schedule.c
@@ -515,6 +515,40 @@  static void preempt_self(int fd, unsigned ring)
 	gem_close(fd, result);
 }
 
+static void preemptive_hang(int fd, unsigned ring)
+{
+	igt_spin_t *spin[16];
+	igt_hang_t hang;
+	uint32_t ctx[2];
+
+	ctx[HI] = gem_context_create(fd);
+	gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[HI], MAX_PRIO);
+
+	for (int n = 0; n < 16; n++) {
+		ctx[LO] = gem_context_create(fd);
+		gem_context_set_priority(fd, ctx[LO], MIN_PRIO);
+
+		spin[n] = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, ctx[LO], ring, 0);
+		igt_debug("spin[%d].handle=%d\n", n, spin[n]->handle);
+
+		gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[LO]);
+	}
+
+	hang = igt_hang_ctx(fd, ctx[HI], ring, 0, NULL);
+	gem_wait(fd, hang.handle, NULL);
+
+	for (int n = 0; n < 16; n++) {
+		/* Current behavior is to execute requests in order of submission.
+		 * This is subject to change as the scheduler evolve. The test should
+		 * be updated to reflect such changes.
+		 */
+		igt_assert(gem_bo_busy(fd, spin[n]->handle));
+		igt_spin_batch_free(fd, spin[n]);
+	}
+
+	gem_context_destroy(fd, ctx[HI]);
+}
+
 static void deep(int fd, unsigned ring)
 {
 #define XS 8
@@ -1044,6 +1078,9 @@  igt_main
 							preempt(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags, NEW_CTX | HANG_LP);
 						}
 
+						igt_subtest_f("preemptive-hang-%s", e->name)
+							preemptive_hang(fd, e->exec_id | e->flags);
+
 						igt_fixture {
 							igt_disallow_hang(fd, hang);
 							igt_fork_hang_detector(fd);