diff mbox

[v2,14/15] sd: Check for READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK size limit violation first

Message ID 20171214145255.31545-15-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Andrey Smirnov Dec. 14, 2017, 2:52 p.m. UTC
Check for READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK size limit violation first as opposed to
doing at the end of the command handler. Consider the following
scenario:

Emulated host driver is trying to read last byte of the last sector
via CMD18/ADMA, so what would happen is the following:

1. "ret" is filled with desired byte and "sd->data_offset" is
   incremented to 512 by

	    ret = sd->data[sd->data_offset ++];

2. sd->data_offset >= io_len becomes true, so

            sd->data_start += io_len;

   moves "sd->data_start" past valid data boundaries.

3. as a result "sd->data_start + io_len > sd->size" check becomes true
   and sd->card_status is marked with ADDRESS_ERROR, telling emulated
   host that the last CMD18 read failed, despite nothing bad/illegal
   happening.

To avoid having this false positive, move out-of-bounds check to
happen before BLK_READ_BLOCK(), so this way it will only trigger if
illegal read is truly about to happen.

Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Cc: yurovsky@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
---
 hw/sd/sd.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrey Smirnov Dec. 14, 2017, 4:45 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Andrey Smirnov
<andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check for READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK size limit violation first as opposed to
> doing at the end of the command handler. Consider the following
> scenario:
>
> Emulated host driver is trying to read last byte of the last sector
> via CMD18/ADMA, so what would happen is the following:
>
> 1. "ret" is filled with desired byte and "sd->data_offset" is
>    incremented to 512 by
>
>             ret = sd->data[sd->data_offset ++];
>
> 2. sd->data_offset >= io_len becomes true, so
>
>             sd->data_start += io_len;
>
>    moves "sd->data_start" past valid data boundaries.
>
> 3. as a result "sd->data_start + io_len > sd->size" check becomes true
>    and sd->card_status is marked with ADDRESS_ERROR, telling emulated
>    host that the last CMD18 read failed, despite nothing bad/illegal
>    happening.
>
> To avoid having this false positive, move out-of-bounds check to
> happen before BLK_READ_BLOCK(), so this way it will only trigger if
> illegal read is truly about to happen.
>

Disregard this patch, exactly this fix is already present in latest QEMU master.

Sorry for the noise.

Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov

> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org
> Cc: yurovsky@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
> ---
>  hw/sd/sd.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> index ba47bff4db..ce4ef17be3 100644
> --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> @@ -1797,8 +1797,17 @@ uint8_t sd_read_data(SDState *sd)
>          break;
>
>      case 18:   /* CMD18:  READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK */
> -        if (sd->data_offset == 0)
> +        if (sd->data_offset == 0) {
> +            if (sd->data_start + io_len > sd->size) {
> +                qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> +                              "%s: Trying to read past card's capacity\n",
> +                              __func__);
> +                sd->card_status |= ADDRESS_ERROR;
> +                return 0x00;
> +            }
> +
>              BLK_READ_BLOCK(sd->data_start, io_len);
> +        }
>          ret = sd->data[sd->data_offset ++];
>
>          if (sd->data_offset >= io_len) {
> @@ -1812,11 +1821,6 @@ uint8_t sd_read_data(SDState *sd)
>                      break;
>                  }
>              }
> -
> -            if (sd->data_start + io_len > sd->size) {
> -                sd->card_status |= ADDRESS_ERROR;
> -                break;
> -            }
>          }
>          break;
>
> --
> 2.14.3
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
index ba47bff4db..ce4ef17be3 100644
--- a/hw/sd/sd.c
+++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
@@ -1797,8 +1797,17 @@  uint8_t sd_read_data(SDState *sd)
         break;
 
     case 18:	/* CMD18:  READ_MULTIPLE_BLOCK */
-        if (sd->data_offset == 0)
+        if (sd->data_offset == 0) {
+            if (sd->data_start + io_len > sd->size) {
+                qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+                              "%s: Trying to read past card's capacity\n",
+                              __func__);
+                sd->card_status |= ADDRESS_ERROR;
+                return 0x00;
+            }
+
             BLK_READ_BLOCK(sd->data_start, io_len);
+        }
         ret = sd->data[sd->data_offset ++];
 
         if (sd->data_offset >= io_len) {
@@ -1812,11 +1821,6 @@  uint8_t sd_read_data(SDState *sd)
                     break;
                 }
             }
-
-            if (sd->data_start + io_len > sd->size) {
-                sd->card_status |= ADDRESS_ERROR;
-                break;
-            }
         }
         break;