| Message ID | 20171222161413.20816-3-miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 05:14:04PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> > > Use msleep for long (> 10ms) delays, instead of the busy waiting mdelay. > All delays are called from the probe routine, where scheduling is > allowed. > > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com> > Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> I am queueing this patch, however, ... > --- > drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c > index 706d74798cbe..6c4af2622d4f 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c > +++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void armada370_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, > reg &= ~PMU_TDC0_START_CAL_MASK; > writel(reg, priv->control); > > - mdelay(10); > + msleep(10); I want to double check with you that msleep(10) is documented to reach up to 20ms, see: WARNING: msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt #43: FILE: drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c:116: + msleep(10); WARNING: msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt #66: FILE: drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c:146: + msleep(10); Just want to check that you are aware of this and that it won't cause troubles in the code flows changed in this patch. Driver is still in one piece, correct? > } > > static void armada375_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, > @@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ static void armada375_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, > reg &= ~A375_HW_RESETn; > > writel(reg, priv->control + 4); > - mdelay(20); > + msleep(20); > > reg |= A375_HW_RESETn; > writel(reg, priv->control + 4); > - mdelay(50); > + msleep(50); > } > > static void armada380_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void armada380_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, > if (!(reg & A380_HW_RESET)) { > reg |= A380_HW_RESET; > writel(reg, priv->control); > - mdelay(10); > + msleep(10); > } > } > > -- > 2.11.0 >
Hello Eduardo, On Mon, 1 Jan 2018 12:55:39 -0800 Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 05:14:04PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> > > > > Use msleep for long (> 10ms) delays, instead of the busy waiting > > mdelay. All delays are called from the probe routine, where > > scheduling is allowed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com> > > Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> > > I am queueing this patch, however, ... > > > --- > > drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c | 8 ++++---- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c > > b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c index 706d74798cbe..6c4af2622d4f > > 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c > > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void armada370_init_sensor(struct > > platform_device *pdev, reg &= ~PMU_TDC0_START_CAL_MASK; > > writel(reg, priv->control); > > > > - mdelay(10); > > + msleep(10); > > I want to double check with you that msleep(10) is documented to reach > up to 20ms, see: > > > WARNING: msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms; see > Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt #43: FILE: > drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c:116: > + msleep(10); > > WARNING: msleep < 20ms can sleep for up to 20ms; see > Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt #66: FILE: > drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c:146: > + msleep(10); > > Just want to check that you are aware of this and that it won't cause > troubles in the code flows changed in this patch. Driver is still in > one piece, correct? Thanks for queueing the series. All of these delays are here to ensure that we do wait a minimum amount of time to let the hardware be ready, IMHO waiting up to 20ms is not an issue. Best regards, Miquèl > > > } > > > > static void armada375_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, > > @@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ static void armada375_init_sensor(struct > > platform_device *pdev, reg &= ~A375_HW_RESETn; > > > > writel(reg, priv->control + 4); > > - mdelay(20); > > + msleep(20); > > > > reg |= A375_HW_RESETn; > > writel(reg, priv->control + 4); > > - mdelay(50); > > + msleep(50); > > } > > > > static void armada380_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, > > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void armada380_init_sensor(struct > > platform_device *pdev, if (!(reg & A380_HW_RESET)) { > > reg |= A380_HW_RESET; > > writel(reg, priv->control); > > - mdelay(10); > > + msleep(10); > > } > > } > > > > -- > > 2.11.0 > >
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c index 706d74798cbe..6c4af2622d4f 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/armada_thermal.c @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void armada370_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, reg &= ~PMU_TDC0_START_CAL_MASK; writel(reg, priv->control); - mdelay(10); + msleep(10); } static void armada375_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, @@ -127,11 +127,11 @@ static void armada375_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, reg &= ~A375_HW_RESETn; writel(reg, priv->control + 4); - mdelay(20); + msleep(20); reg |= A375_HW_RESETn; writel(reg, priv->control + 4); - mdelay(50); + msleep(50); } static void armada380_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void armada380_init_sensor(struct platform_device *pdev, if (!(reg & A380_HW_RESET)) { reg |= A380_HW_RESET; writel(reg, priv->control); - mdelay(10); + msleep(10); } }