diff mbox

[v3] media: s3c-camif: fix out-of-bounds array access

Message ID 20180116164740.2097257-1-arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Headers show

Commit Message

Arnd Bergmann Jan. 16, 2018, 4:47 p.m. UTC
While experimenting with older compiler versions, I ran
into a warning that no longer shows up on gcc-4.8 or newer:

drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c: In function '__camif_subdev_try_format':
drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c:1265:25: error: array subscript is below array bounds

This is an off-by-one bug, leading to an access before the start of the
array, while newer compilers silently assume this undefined behavior
cannot happen and leave the loop at index 0 if no other entry matches.

As Sylvester explains, we actually need to ensure that the
value is within the range, so this reworks the loop to be
easier to parse correctly, and an additional check to fall
back on the first format value for any unexpected input.

I found an existing gcc bug for it and added a reduced version
of the function there.

Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69249#c3
Fixes: babde1c243b2 ("[media] V4L: Add driver for S3C24XX/S3C64XX SoC series camera interface")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
v3: fix newly introduced off-by-one bug.
v2: rework logic rather than removing it.
---
 drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Sakari Ailus Jan. 16, 2018, 4:52 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:47:24PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> While experimenting with older compiler versions, I ran
> into a warning that no longer shows up on gcc-4.8 or newer:
> 
> drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c: In function '__camif_subdev_try_format':
> drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c:1265:25: error: array subscript is below array bounds
> 
> This is an off-by-one bug, leading to an access before the start of the
> array, while newer compilers silently assume this undefined behavior
> cannot happen and leave the loop at index 0 if no other entry matches.
> 
> As Sylvester explains, we actually need to ensure that the
> value is within the range, so this reworks the loop to be
> easier to parse correctly, and an additional check to fall
> back on the first format value for any unexpected input.
> 
> I found an existing gcc bug for it and added a reduced version
> of the function there.
> 
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69249#c3
> Fixes: babde1c243b2 ("[media] V4L: Add driver for S3C24XX/S3C64XX SoC series camera interface")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Thanks!

Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Laurent Pinchart Jan. 16, 2018, 8:17 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Arnd,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 18:47:24 EET Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> While experimenting with older compiler versions, I ran
> into a warning that no longer shows up on gcc-4.8 or newer:
> 
> drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c: In function
> '__camif_subdev_try_format':
> drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c:1265:25: error: array
> subscript is below array bounds
> 
> This is an off-by-one bug, leading to an access before the start of the
> array, while newer compilers silently assume this undefined behavior
> cannot happen and leave the loop at index 0 if no other entry matches.
> 
> As Sylvester explains, we actually need to ensure that the
> value is within the range, so this reworks the loop to be
> easier to parse correctly, and an additional check to fall
> back on the first format value for any unexpected input.
> 
> I found an existing gcc bug for it and added a reduced version
> of the function there.
> 
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69249#c3
> Fixes: babde1c243b2 ("[media] V4L: Add driver for S3C24XX/S3C64XX SoC series
> camera interface") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> v3: fix newly introduced off-by-one bug.
> v2: rework logic rather than removing it.
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c index
> 437395a61065..f51b92e94a32 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
> @@ -1256,16 +1256,19 @@ static void __camif_subdev_try_format(struct
> camif_dev *camif, {
>  	const struct s3c_camif_variant *variant = camif->variant;
>  	const struct vp_pix_limits *pix_lim;
> -	int i = ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats);
> +	int i;
> 
>  	/* FIXME: constraints against codec or preview path ? */
>  	pix_lim = &variant->vp_pix_limits[VP_CODEC];
> 
> -	while (i-- >= 0)
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats); i++)
>  		if (camif_mbus_formats[i] == mf->code)
>  			break;
> 
> -	mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[i];
> +	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats))
> +		mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[0];
> +	else
> +		mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[i];

I might be missing something very obvious, but isn't mf->code already == 
camif_mbus_formats[i] in the else branch ? How about simply

	unsigned int i;

	/* FIXME: constraints against codec or preview path ? */
	pix_lim = &variant->vp_pix_limits[VP_CODEC];

	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats); i++)
		if (camif_mbus_formats[i] == mf->code)
			break;

	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats))
		mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[0];

(I do love the for (...) { ... } else { ... } construct from Python, I miss it 
so much in C.)

>  	if (pad == CAMIF_SD_PAD_SINK) {
>  		v4l_bound_align_image(&mf->width, 8, CAMIF_MAX_PIX_WIDTH,
Arnd Bergmann Jan. 16, 2018, 9:46 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 18:47:24 EET Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> While experimenting with older compiler versions, I ran
>> into a warning that no longer shows up on gcc-4.8 or newer:
>>
>> drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c: In function
>> '__camif_subdev_try_format':
>> drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c:1265:25: error: array
>> subscript is below array bounds
>>
>> This is an off-by-one bug, leading to an access before the start of the
>> array, while newer compilers silently assume this undefined behavior
>> cannot happen and leave the loop at index 0 if no other entry matches.
>>
>> As Sylvester explains, we actually need to ensure that the
>> value is within the range, so this reworks the loop to be
>> easier to parse correctly, and an additional check to fall
>> back on the first format value for any unexpected input.
>>
>> I found an existing gcc bug for it and added a reduced version
>> of the function there.
>>
>> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69249#c3
>> Fixes: babde1c243b2 ("[media] V4L: Add driver for S3C24XX/S3C64XX SoC series
>> camera interface") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> ---
>> v3: fix newly introduced off-by-one bug.
>> v2: rework logic rather than removing it.
>> ---
>>  drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c | 9 ++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
>> b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c index
>> 437395a61065..f51b92e94a32 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
>> @@ -1256,16 +1256,19 @@ static void __camif_subdev_try_format(struct
>> camif_dev *camif, {
>>       const struct s3c_camif_variant *variant = camif->variant;
>>       const struct vp_pix_limits *pix_lim;
>> -     int i = ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats);
>> +     int i;
>>
>>       /* FIXME: constraints against codec or preview path ? */
>>       pix_lim = &variant->vp_pix_limits[VP_CODEC];
>>
>> -     while (i-- >= 0)
>> +     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats); i++)
>>               if (camif_mbus_formats[i] == mf->code)
>>                       break;
>>
>> -     mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[i];
>> +     if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats))
>> +             mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[0];
>> +     else
>> +             mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[i];
>
> I might be missing something very obvious, but isn't mf->code already ==
> camif_mbus_formats[i] in the else branch ?

Ah, that must be what I was thinking back when I first
discussed it with Sylvester in
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9950041/

Unfortunately, I hadn't given it as much thought today when
I tried to reconstruct the result to send a new version

> How about simply

>         unsigned int i;
>
>         /* FIXME: constraints against codec or preview path ? */
>         pix_lim = &variant->vp_pix_limits[VP_CODEC];
>
>         for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats); i++)
>                 if (camif_mbus_formats[i] == mf->code)
>                         break;
>
>         if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats))
>                 mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[0];

Yes, makes sense. I'll send a v4.

          Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
index 437395a61065..f51b92e94a32 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
@@ -1256,16 +1256,19 @@  static void __camif_subdev_try_format(struct camif_dev *camif,
 {
 	const struct s3c_camif_variant *variant = camif->variant;
 	const struct vp_pix_limits *pix_lim;
-	int i = ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats);
+	int i;
 
 	/* FIXME: constraints against codec or preview path ? */
 	pix_lim = &variant->vp_pix_limits[VP_CODEC];
 
-	while (i-- >= 0)
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats); i++)
 		if (camif_mbus_formats[i] == mf->code)
 			break;
 
-	mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[i];
+	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(camif_mbus_formats))
+		mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[0];
+	else
+		mf->code = camif_mbus_formats[i];
 
 	if (pad == CAMIF_SD_PAD_SINK) {
 		v4l_bound_align_image(&mf->width, 8, CAMIF_MAX_PIX_WIDTH,