diff mbox

[1/3] dt-bindings: phy: phy-rockchip-typec: add usb3 otg reset

Message ID 1515751704-13213-2-git-send-email-william.wu@rock-chips.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

William Wu Jan. 12, 2018, 10:08 a.m. UTC
This patch adds USB3 OTG reset property for rk3399 Type-C PHY
to hold the USB3 controller in reset state.

Signed-off-by: William Wu <william.wu@rock-chips.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Brian Norris Jan. 17, 2018, 10:07 p.m. UTC | #1
+ Enric

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:08:22PM +0800, William Wu wrote:
> This patch adds USB3 OTG reset property for rk3399 Type-C PHY
> to hold the USB3 controller in reset state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: William Wu <william.wu@rock-chips.com>
> ---

I was going back and forth on this, since at one point this binding was
merged but had no enabled users...but now I see Heiko has queued up some
of Enric's work for 4.16, and it uses the existing binding.

So, if this reset is added, it should be optional.

Brian

>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
> index 6ea867e..db2902e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Required properties:
>   - assigned-clock-rates : the phy core clk frequency, shall be: 50000000
>   - resets : a list of phandle + reset specifier pairs
>   - reset-names : string reset name, must be:
> -		 "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy"
> +		 "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy", "usb3-otg"
>   - extcon : extcon specifier for the Power Delivery
>  
>  Note, there are 2 type-c phys for RK3399, and they are almost identical, except
> @@ -56,8 +56,9 @@ Example:
>  		assigned-clock-rates = <50000000>;
>  		resets = <&cru SRST_UPHY0>,
>  			 <&cru SRST_UPHY0_PIPE_L00>,
> -			 <&cru SRST_P_UPHY0_TCPHY>;
> -		reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy";
> +			 <&cru SRST_P_UPHY0_TCPHY>,
> +			 <&cru SRST_A_USB3_OTG0>;
> +		reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy", "usb3-otg";
>  		rockchip,typec-conn-dir = <0xe580 0 16>;
>  		rockchip,usb3tousb2-en = <0xe580 3 19>;
>  		rockchip,external-psm = <0xe588 14 30>;
> @@ -84,8 +85,9 @@ Example:
>  		assigned-clock-rates = <50000000>;
>  		resets = <&cru SRST_UPHY1>,
>  			 <&cru SRST_UPHY1_PIPE_L00>,
> -			 <&cru SRST_P_UPHY1_TCPHY>;
> -		reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy";
> +			 <&cru SRST_P_UPHY1_TCPHY>,
> +			 <&cru SRST_A_USB3_OTG1>;
> +		reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy", "usb3-otg";
>  		rockchip,typec-conn-dir = <0xe58c 0 16>;
>  		rockchip,usb3tousb2-en = <0xe58c 3 19>;
>  		rockchip,external-psm = <0xe594 14 30>;
> -- 
> 2.0.0
> 
>
Enric Balletbo Serra Jan. 18, 2018, 5:20 p.m. UTC | #2
2018-01-17 23:07 GMT+01:00 Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>:
> + Enric
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:08:22PM +0800, William Wu wrote:
>> This patch adds USB3 OTG reset property for rk3399 Type-C PHY
>> to hold the USB3 controller in reset state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: William Wu <william.wu@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>
> I was going back and forth on this, since at one point this binding was
> merged but had no enabled users...but now I see Heiko has queued up some
> of Enric's work for 4.16, and it uses the existing binding.
>
> So, if this reset is added, it should be optional.
>

As Brian said commit 06c47e6286d5 'usb: dwc3: of-simple: Add support
to get resets for the device' introduced the support to get the resets
from dwc3-of-simple and the queued commit 'b7e63d95c14d arm64: dts:
rockchip: add reset property for dwc3 controllers on rk3399' started
using it. Without the latest I get errors like this doing bind/unbind
tests.

   dwc3: probe of fe900000.dwc3 failed with error -110

I just tested these series on top of mainline, I reverted my patch
because otherwise two drivers are requesting the same reset and fails,
and I did some of the bind/unbind test. They just worked fine, and
seems that this is right way, so this makes me think some questions.

Should 'b7e63d95c14d arm64: dts: rockchip: add reset property for dwc3
controllers on rk3399' removed for 4.16? That's a question for Heiko I
guess, if it's removed we will have usb broken meanwhile these patches
doesn't land. If we don't remove the patch we will need to introduce a
new patch in this series that reverts the first patch.

Is commit 06c47e6286d5 'usb: dwc3: of-simple: Add support to get
resets for the device'  really needed ? Seems that I was the only user
of it.

Anyway, these patches looks good to me and are

Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>

> Brian
>
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt | 12 +++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
>> index 6ea867e..db2902e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Required properties:
>>   - assigned-clock-rates : the phy core clk frequency, shall be: 50000000
>>   - resets : a list of phandle + reset specifier pairs
>>   - reset-names : string reset name, must be:
>> -              "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy"
>> +              "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy", "usb3-otg"
>>   - extcon : extcon specifier for the Power Delivery
>>
>>  Note, there are 2 type-c phys for RK3399, and they are almost identical, except
>> @@ -56,8 +56,9 @@ Example:
>>               assigned-clock-rates = <50000000>;
>>               resets = <&cru SRST_UPHY0>,
>>                        <&cru SRST_UPHY0_PIPE_L00>,
>> -                      <&cru SRST_P_UPHY0_TCPHY>;
>> -             reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy";
>> +                      <&cru SRST_P_UPHY0_TCPHY>,
>> +                      <&cru SRST_A_USB3_OTG0>;
>> +             reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy", "usb3-otg";
>>               rockchip,typec-conn-dir = <0xe580 0 16>;
>>               rockchip,usb3tousb2-en = <0xe580 3 19>;
>>               rockchip,external-psm = <0xe588 14 30>;
>> @@ -84,8 +85,9 @@ Example:
>>               assigned-clock-rates = <50000000>;
>>               resets = <&cru SRST_UPHY1>,
>>                        <&cru SRST_UPHY1_PIPE_L00>,
>> -                      <&cru SRST_P_UPHY1_TCPHY>;
>> -             reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy";
>> +                      <&cru SRST_P_UPHY1_TCPHY>,
>> +                      <&cru SRST_A_USB3_OTG1>;
>> +             reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy", "usb3-otg";
>>               rockchip,typec-conn-dir = <0xe58c 0 16>;
>>               rockchip,usb3tousb2-en = <0xe58c 3 19>;
>>               rockchip,external-psm = <0xe594 14 30>;
>> --
>> 2.0.0
>>
>>
Brian Norris Jan. 18, 2018, 5:47 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> As Brian said commit 06c47e6286d5 'usb: dwc3: of-simple: Add support
> to get resets for the device' introduced the support to get the resets
> from dwc3-of-simple and the queued commit 'b7e63d95c14d arm64: dts:
> rockchip: add reset property for dwc3 controllers on rk3399' started
> using it. Without the latest I get errors like this doing bind/unbind
> tests.
> 
>    dwc3: probe of fe900000.dwc3 failed with error -110
> 
> I just tested these series on top of mainline, I reverted my patch
> because otherwise two drivers are requesting the same reset and fails,
> and I did some of the bind/unbind test. They just worked fine, and
> seems that this is right way, so this makes me think some questions.

Actually, this was intended to coexist with DWC3 optionally controlling
the same reset. It was written before the reset framework was rewritten
to have shared and exclusive resets. Should this be rewritten to use
shared resets? We'd have to modify both dwc3 core and the PHY driver.

> Should 'b7e63d95c14d arm64: dts: rockchip: add reset property for dwc3
> controllers on rk3399' removed for 4.16? That's a question for Heiko I
> guess, if it's removed we will have usb broken meanwhile these patches
> doesn't land. If we don't remove the patch we will need to introduce a
> new patch in this series that reverts the first patch.

If we don't make this shared, I suppose Rockchip should rewrite this
series and rebase on Heiko's tree, where the DTSI change should just
remove the reset from DWC3 and add it to the PHY node at the same time.
That would be an atomic, non-breaking change.

> Is commit 06c47e6286d5 'usb: dwc3: of-simple: Add support to get
> resets for the device'  really needed ? Seems that I was the only user
> of it.

I don't personally know the history of this one. I just noticed that you
started using it to resolve a problem that was implemented differently
in our downstream tree.

> Anyway, these patches looks good to me and are
> 
> Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>

Awesome.

Brian
Rob Herring (Arm) Jan. 19, 2018, 9:49 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:47:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> > As Brian said commit 06c47e6286d5 'usb: dwc3: of-simple: Add support
> > to get resets for the device' introduced the support to get the resets
> > from dwc3-of-simple and the queued commit 'b7e63d95c14d arm64: dts:
> > rockchip: add reset property for dwc3 controllers on rk3399' started
> > using it. Without the latest I get errors like this doing bind/unbind
> > tests.
> > 
> >    dwc3: probe of fe900000.dwc3 failed with error -110
> > 
> > I just tested these series on top of mainline, I reverted my patch
> > because otherwise two drivers are requesting the same reset and fails,
> > and I did some of the bind/unbind test. They just worked fine, and
> > seems that this is right way, so this makes me think some questions.
> 
> Actually, this was intended to coexist with DWC3 optionally controlling
> the same reset. It was written before the reset framework was rewritten
> to have shared and exclusive resets. Should this be rewritten to use
> shared resets? We'd have to modify both dwc3 core and the PHY driver.

Seems like abuse of DT to me. If you need to control the controller's 
reset from the phy driver, then get the reset out of the controller 
node. The phy node should describe the connections to the phy.

Rob
Heiko Stuebner Feb. 10, 2018, 7:55 p.m. UTC | #5
Hi Wulf,

Am Montag, 22. Januar 2018, 12:33:05 CET schrieb wlf:
> 在 2018年01月20日 05:49, Rob Herring 写道:
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:47:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> >>> As Brian said commit 06c47e6286d5 'usb: dwc3: of-simple: Add support
> >>> to get resets for the device' introduced the support to get the resets
> >>> from dwc3-of-simple and the queued commit 'b7e63d95c14d arm64: dts:
> >>> rockchip: add reset property for dwc3 controllers on rk3399' started
> >>> using it. Without the latest I get errors like this doing bind/unbind
> >>> tests.
> >>>
> >>>     dwc3: probe of fe900000.dwc3 failed with error -110
> >>>
> >>> I just tested these series on top of mainline, I reverted my patch
> >>> because otherwise two drivers are requesting the same reset and fails,
> >>> and I did some of the bind/unbind test. They just worked fine, and
> >>> seems that this is right way, so this makes me think some questions.
> >> Actually, this was intended to coexist with DWC3 optionally controlling
> >> the same reset. It was written before the reset framework was rewritten
> >> to have shared and exclusive resets. Should this be rewritten to use
> >> shared resets? We'd have to modify both dwc3 core and the PHY driver.
> > Seems like abuse of DT to me. If you need to control the controller's
> > reset from the phy driver, then get the reset out of the controller
> > node. The phy node should describe the connections to the phy.
> I try to get the reset out of the controller, but I don't find a good
> way to get the reset ofthe controller associated with the given phy
> device node.  Is there an API like theof_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy() to
> get 'dr_mode' of the controller?

I guess the easiest way would be taking the of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy()
function move the part above the "finish" label into a separate function
like of_usb_get_node_by_phy (or possibly move that to an even more general
place as it is not usb-related at all) and use that function in
of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy() and also use it to get the reset you want via
something like:

node = of_usb_get_node_by_phy(...);
rst = of_reset_control_get(node, ...);

> And we're trying to find another method to fix the RK3399 tcphy power
> on fail issue.If we get another proper method, we may not need these
> phy patch series.

Did you find any different solution for that yet?

Heiko
wuliangfeng Feb. 12, 2018, 4:40 p.m. UTC | #6
Dear Heiko,

在 2018年02月11日 03:55, Heiko Stuebner 写道:
> Hi Wulf,
>
> Am Montag, 22. Januar 2018, 12:33:05 CET schrieb wlf:
>> 在 2018年01月20日 05:49, Rob Herring 写道:
>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:47:50AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
>>>>> As Brian said commit 06c47e6286d5 'usb: dwc3: of-simple: Add support
>>>>> to get resets for the device' introduced the support to get the resets
>>>>> from dwc3-of-simple and the queued commit 'b7e63d95c14d arm64: dts:
>>>>> rockchip: add reset property for dwc3 controllers on rk3399' started
>>>>> using it. Without the latest I get errors like this doing bind/unbind
>>>>> tests.
>>>>>
>>>>>      dwc3: probe of fe900000.dwc3 failed with error -110
>>>>>
>>>>> I just tested these series on top of mainline, I reverted my patch
>>>>> because otherwise two drivers are requesting the same reset and fails,
>>>>> and I did some of the bind/unbind test. They just worked fine, and
>>>>> seems that this is right way, so this makes me think some questions.
>>>> Actually, this was intended to coexist with DWC3 optionally controlling
>>>> the same reset. It was written before the reset framework was rewritten
>>>> to have shared and exclusive resets. Should this be rewritten to use
>>>> shared resets? We'd have to modify both dwc3 core and the PHY driver.
>>> Seems like abuse of DT to me. If you need to control the controller's
>>> reset from the phy driver, then get the reset out of the controller
>>> node. The phy node should describe the connections to the phy.
>> I try to get the reset out of the controller, but I don't find a good
>> way to get the reset ofthe controller associated with the given phy
>> device node.  Is there an API like theof_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy() to
>> get 'dr_mode' of the controller?
> I guess the easiest way would be taking the of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy()
> function move the part above the "finish" label into a separate function
> like of_usb_get_node_by_phy (or possibly move that to an even more general
> place as it is not usb-related at all) and use that function in
> of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy() and also use it to get the reset you want via
> something like:
>
> node = of_usb_get_node_by_phy(...);
> rst = of_reset_control_get(node, ...);
Thanks for your good suggestion. I think it's a good way to get the 
reset of the
controller by phy.
>> And we're trying to find another method to fix the RK3399 tcphy power
>> on fail issue.If we get another proper method, we may not need these
>> phy patch series.
> Did you find any different solution for that yet?
>
> Heiko
Yes, finally, we have found another way to fix the  RK3399 tcphy usb power
on fail issue. And Enric Balletbo i Serra <Enric Balletbo i Serra> has 
submitted
new patch series, refer to the following patches:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10207261/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10207267/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10207263/

So my patches can be abandoned.
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
index 6ea867e..db2902e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@  Required properties:
  - assigned-clock-rates : the phy core clk frequency, shall be: 50000000
  - resets : a list of phandle + reset specifier pairs
  - reset-names : string reset name, must be:
-		 "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy"
+		 "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy", "usb3-otg"
  - extcon : extcon specifier for the Power Delivery
 
 Note, there are 2 type-c phys for RK3399, and they are almost identical, except
@@ -56,8 +56,9 @@  Example:
 		assigned-clock-rates = <50000000>;
 		resets = <&cru SRST_UPHY0>,
 			 <&cru SRST_UPHY0_PIPE_L00>,
-			 <&cru SRST_P_UPHY0_TCPHY>;
-		reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy";
+			 <&cru SRST_P_UPHY0_TCPHY>,
+			 <&cru SRST_A_USB3_OTG0>;
+		reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy", "usb3-otg";
 		rockchip,typec-conn-dir = <0xe580 0 16>;
 		rockchip,usb3tousb2-en = <0xe580 3 19>;
 		rockchip,external-psm = <0xe588 14 30>;
@@ -84,8 +85,9 @@  Example:
 		assigned-clock-rates = <50000000>;
 		resets = <&cru SRST_UPHY1>,
 			 <&cru SRST_UPHY1_PIPE_L00>,
-			 <&cru SRST_P_UPHY1_TCPHY>;
-		reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy";
+			 <&cru SRST_P_UPHY1_TCPHY>,
+			 <&cru SRST_A_USB3_OTG1>;
+		reset-names = "uphy", "uphy-pipe", "uphy-tcphy", "usb3-otg";
 		rockchip,typec-conn-dir = <0xe58c 0 16>;
 		rockchip,usb3tousb2-en = <0xe58c 3 19>;
 		rockchip,external-psm = <0xe594 14 30>;