| Message ID | 20171201120651.29633-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi, 2017-12-01 13:06 GMT+01:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>: > Before this patch the enable signal was set before the PWM signal and > vice-versa on power off. This sequence is wrong, at least, it is on > the different panels datasheets that I checked, so I inverted the sequence > to follow the specs. > > For reference the following panels have the mentioned sequence: > - N133HSE-EA1 (Innolux) > - N116BGE (Innolux) > - N156BGE-L21 (Innolux) > - B101EAN0 (Auo) > - B101AW03 (Auo) > - LTN101NT05 (Samsung) > - CLAA101WA01A (Chunghwa) > > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com> > --- > Changes since v4: > - Rebase on top of mainline. > - Add the acks from Daniel Thompson and Jingoo Han. > Changes since v3: > - List the part numbers for the panel checked (Daniel Thompson) > Changes since v2: > - Add this as a separate patch (Thierry Reding) > Changes since v1: > - None > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 +++++---- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > index 1c2289d..698ec68 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > @@ -54,10 +54,11 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_on(struct pwm_bl_data *pb, int brightness) > if (err < 0) > dev_err(pb->dev, "failed to enable power supply\n"); > > + pwm_enable(pb->pwm); > + > if (pb->enable_gpio) > gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 1); > > - pwm_enable(pb->pwm); > pb->enabled = true; > } > > @@ -66,12 +67,12 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_off(struct pwm_bl_data *pb) > if (!pb->enabled) > return; > > - pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period); > - pwm_disable(pb->pwm); > - > if (pb->enable_gpio) > gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 0); > > + pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period); > + pwm_disable(pb->pwm); > + > regulator_disable(pb->power_supply); > pb->enabled = false; > } > -- > 2.9.3 > A gentle ping, It's been nearly two months since I sent this patchset, there is anything else that prevents these patches to land or incorporate in linux-next? Thanks, Enric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-12-01 13:06 GMT+01:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>: > > Before this patch the enable signal was set before the PWM signal and > > vice-versa on power off. This sequence is wrong, at least, it is on > > the different panels datasheets that I checked, so I inverted the sequence > > to follow the specs. > > > > For reference the following panels have the mentioned sequence: > > - N133HSE-EA1 (Innolux) > > - N116BGE (Innolux) > > - N156BGE-L21 (Innolux) > > - B101EAN0 (Auo) > > - B101AW03 (Auo) > > - LTN101NT05 (Samsung) > > - CLAA101WA01A (Chunghwa) > > > > Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> > > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> > > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com> > > --- > > Changes since v4: > > - Rebase on top of mainline. > > - Add the acks from Daniel Thompson and Jingoo Han. > > Changes since v3: > > - List the part numbers for the panel checked (Daniel Thompson) > > Changes since v2: > > - Add this as a separate patch (Thierry Reding) > > Changes since v1: > > - None > > > > drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 +++++---- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > A gentle ping, It's been nearly two months since I sent this patchset, > there is anything else that prevents these patches to land or > incorporate in linux-next? Looks like Daniel should Ack 2/5 since he had comments on it before and it still lacks a Backlight Ack. With regards to -next, the merge-window is open (should close in a little over a week), so the chances are, you'll get a long soak before the next merge-window opens.
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c index 1c2289d..698ec68 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c @@ -54,10 +54,11 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_on(struct pwm_bl_data *pb, int brightness) if (err < 0) dev_err(pb->dev, "failed to enable power supply\n"); + pwm_enable(pb->pwm); + if (pb->enable_gpio) gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 1); - pwm_enable(pb->pwm); pb->enabled = true; } @@ -66,12 +67,12 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_off(struct pwm_bl_data *pb) if (!pb->enabled) return; - pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period); - pwm_disable(pb->pwm); - if (pb->enable_gpio) gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 0); + pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period); + pwm_disable(pb->pwm); + regulator_disable(pb->power_supply); pb->enabled = false; }