diff mbox

drm/rockchip: Don't use spin_lock_irqsave in interrupt context

Message ID 20180210143501.30407-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Marc Zyngier Feb. 10, 2018, 2:35 p.m. UTC
The rockchip DRM driver is quite careful to disable interrupts
when taking a lock that is also taken in interrupt context,
which is a good thing.

What is a bit over the top is to use spin_lock_irqsave when
already in interrupt context, as you cannot take another
interrupt again, and disabling interrupt is just pure
overhead.

Switching to the non _irqsave version in interrupt context is
more logical, and less heavy handed.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Marc Zyngier Feb. 12, 2018, 9:28 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Heiko,

On 10/02/18 16:23, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> Am Samstag, 10. Februar 2018, 15:35:01 CET schrieb Marc Zyngier:
>> The rockchip DRM driver is quite careful to disable interrupts
>> when taking a lock that is also taken in interrupt context,
>> which is a good thing.
>>
>> What is a bit over the top is to use spin_lock_irqsave when
>> already in interrupt context, as you cannot take another
>> interrupt again, and disabling interrupt is just pure
>> overhead.
>>
>> Switching to the non _irqsave version in interrupt context is
>> more logical, and less heavy handed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> 
> please note, that we had a maintainer swap for the Rockchip drm-component,
> where Sandy replaced Mark [0] ... with me acting as sort-of (and not yet
> up to speed) backup.
> 
> So I guess Rockchip drm patches should also include
> 	Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com>

I guess that update didn't make it into 4.15, which is why I didn't spot
it. I'll repost the patches shortly including Sandy on Cc.

Thanks,

	M.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
index 72554f404b7e..e23877e72c43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
@@ -1159,15 +1159,14 @@  static void vop_handle_vblank(struct vop *vop)
 {
 	struct drm_device *drm = vop->drm_dev;
 	struct drm_crtc *crtc = &vop->crtc;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&drm->event_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock(&drm->event_lock);
 	if (vop->event) {
 		drm_crtc_send_vblank_event(crtc, vop->event);
 		drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
 		vop->event = NULL;
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drm->event_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&drm->event_lock);
 
 	if (test_and_clear_bit(VOP_PENDING_FB_UNREF, &vop->pending))
 		drm_flip_work_commit(&vop->fb_unref_work, system_unbound_wq);
@@ -1178,21 +1177,20 @@  static irqreturn_t vop_isr(int irq, void *data)
 	struct vop *vop = data;
 	struct drm_crtc *crtc = &vop->crtc;
 	uint32_t active_irqs;
-	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = IRQ_NONE;
 
 	/*
 	 * interrupt register has interrupt status, enable and clear bits, we
 	 * must hold irq_lock to avoid a race with enable/disable_vblank().
 	*/
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
+	spin_lock(&vop->irq_lock);
 
 	active_irqs = VOP_INTR_GET_TYPE(vop, status, INTR_MASK);
 	/* Clear all active interrupt sources */
 	if (active_irqs)
 		VOP_INTR_SET_TYPE(vop, clear, active_irqs, 1);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vop->irq_lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock(&vop->irq_lock);
 
 	/* This is expected for vop iommu irqs, since the irq is shared */
 	if (!active_irqs)