diff mbox

[v7,08/13] arm64: Add support for ACPI based firmware tables

Message ID 20180228220619.6992-9-jeremy.linton@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Jeremy Linton Feb. 28, 2018, 10:06 p.m. UTC
The /sys cache entries should support ACPI/PPTT generated cache
topology information. Lets detect ACPI systems and call
an arch specific cache_setup_acpi() routine to update the hardware
probed cache topology.

For arm64, if ACPI is enabled, determine the max number of cache
levels and populate them using the PPTT table if one is available.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

kernel test robot March 3, 2018, 9:58 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Jeremy,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on pm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.16-rc3 next-20180302]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jeremy-Linton/Support-PPTT-for-ARM64/20180304-005730
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
config: s390-default_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: s390x-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make.cross ARCH=s390 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/base/cacheinfo.o: In function `acpi_find_last_cache_level':
>> (.text+0x900): multiple definition of `acpi_find_last_cache_level'
   arch/s390/kernel/cache.o:(.text+0xc8): first defined here

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
Sudeep Holla March 6, 2018, 5:23 p.m. UTC | #2
On 28/02/18 22:06, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> The /sys cache entries should support ACPI/PPTT generated cache
> topology information. Lets detect ACPI systems and call
> an arch specific cache_setup_acpi() routine to update the hardware
> probed cache topology.
> 
> For arm64, if ACPI is enabled, determine the max number of cache
> levels and populate them using the PPTT table if one is available.
> 

I fail to understand the kbuild failure report association with this
patch(most likely the previous patch could be culprit, I am looking at
it in detail now), but for this patch

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
index 380f2e2fbed5..0bf0a835122f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ 
  * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
  */
 
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/cacheinfo.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 
@@ -46,7 +47,7 @@  static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
 
 static int __init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	unsigned int ctype, level, leaves, of_level;
+	unsigned int ctype, level, leaves, fw_level;
 	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
 
 	for (level = 1, leaves = 0; level <= MAX_CACHE_LEVEL; level++) {
@@ -59,15 +60,19 @@  static int __init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
 		leaves += (ctype == CACHE_TYPE_SEPARATE) ? 2 : 1;
 	}
 
-	of_level = of_find_last_cache_level(cpu);
-	if (level < of_level) {
+	if (acpi_disabled)
+		fw_level = of_find_last_cache_level(cpu);
+	else
+		fw_level = acpi_find_last_cache_level(cpu);
+
+	if (level < fw_level) {
 		/*
 		 * some external caches not specified in CLIDR_EL1
 		 * the information may be available in the device tree
 		 * only unified external caches are considered here
 		 */
-		leaves += (of_level - level);
-		level = of_level;
+		leaves += (fw_level - level);
+		level = fw_level;
 	}
 
 	this_cpu_ci->num_levels = level;