diff mbox

[v5,06/36] drm/rockchip: Only wait for panel ACK on PSR entry

Message ID 20180309222327.18689-7-enric.balletbo@collabora.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Enric Balletbo i Serra March 9, 2018, 10:22 p.m. UTC
From: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com>

We currently wait for the panel to mirror our intended PSR state
before continuing on both PSR enter and PSR exit. This is really
only important to do when we're entering PSR, since we want to
be sure the last frame we pushed is being served from the panel's
internal fb before shutting down the soc blocks (vop/analogix).

This patch changes the behavior such that we only wait for the
panel to complete the PSR transition when we're entering PSR, and
to skip verification when we're exiting.

Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
---

 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c  | 5 ++++-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Heiko Stuebner March 12, 2018, 4:58 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

the subject is misleading I think, as this is touching only the generic
bridge code and not anything Rockchip-related, so should probably
be "drm/bridge"?

Am Freitag, 9. März 2018, 23:22:57 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra:
> From: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com>
> 
> We currently wait for the panel to mirror our intended PSR state
> before continuing on both PSR enter and PSR exit. This is really
> only important to do when we're entering PSR, since we want to
> be sure the last frame we pushed is being served from the panel's
> internal fb before shutting down the soc blocks (vop/analogix).
> 
> This patch changes the behavior such that we only wait for the
> panel to complete the PSR transition when we're entering PSR, and
> to skip verification when we're exiting.
> 
> Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org>
> Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

change itself looks good, so
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Enric Balletbo i Serra March 13, 2018, 12:26 a.m. UTC | #2
On 12/03/18 17:58, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the subject is misleading I think, as this is touching only the generic
> bridge code and not anything Rockchip-related, so should probably
> be "drm/bridge"?
> 

Right, I'll fix this when I need to send another version, I'll wait, for now, a
bit more for reviews on the other patches.

Thanks
  Enric

> Am Freitag, 9. März 2018, 23:22:57 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra:
>> From: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com>
>>
>> We currently wait for the panel to mirror our intended PSR state
>> before continuing on both PSR enter and PSR exit. This is really
>> only important to do when we're entering PSR, since we want to
>> be sure the last frame we pushed is being served from the panel's
>> internal fb before shutting down the soc blocks (vop/analogix).
>>
>> This patch changes the behavior such that we only wait for the
>> panel to complete the PSR transition when we're entering PSR, and
>> to skip verification when we're exiting.
>>
>> Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org>
>> Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
>> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> 
> change itself looks good, so
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>
Archit Taneja March 14, 2018, 5:54 a.m. UTC | #3
On Saturday 10 March 2018 03:52 AM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com>
> 
> We currently wait for the panel to mirror our intended PSR state
> before continuing on both PSR enter and PSR exit. This is really
> only important to do when we're entering PSR, since we want to
> be sure the last frame we pushed is being served from the panel's
> internal fb before shutting down the soc blocks (vop/analogix).
> 
> This patch changes the behavior such that we only wait for the
> panel to complete the PSR transition when we're entering PSR, and
> to skip verification when we're exiting.
> 

With the subject fix:

Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>

Thanks,
Archit

> Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org>
> Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> ---
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 4 ++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h | 2 +-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c  | 5 ++++-
>   3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> index 806c3878b3d6..5a2e35dc41e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ int analogix_dp_enable_psr(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
>   	psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
>   	psr_vsc.DB1 = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE | EDP_VSC_PSR_CRC_VALUES_VALID;
>   
> -	return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
> +	return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc, true);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_enable_psr);
>   
> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ int analogix_dp_disable_psr(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
>   	if (ret != 1)
>   		dev_err(dp->dev, "Failed to set DP Power0 %d\n", ret);
>   
> -	return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
> +	return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc, false);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_disable_psr);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
> index 920607d7eb3e..6a96ef7e6934 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ void analogix_dp_enable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>   void analogix_dp_disable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>   void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
>   int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> -			     struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);
> +			     struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc, bool blocking);
>   ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>   			     struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> index 005a3f7005d2..9df2f3ef000c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static ssize_t analogix_dp_get_psr_status(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
>   }
>   
>   int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> -			     struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
> +			     struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc, bool blocking)
>   {
>   	unsigned int val;
>   	int ret;
> @@ -1053,6 +1053,9 @@ int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
>   	val |= IF_EN;
>   	writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
>   
> +	if (!blocking)
> +		return 0;
> +
>   	ret = readx_poll_timeout(analogix_dp_get_psr_status, dp, psr_status,
>   		psr_status >= 0 &&
>   		((vsc->DB1 && psr_status == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB) ||
>
Heiko Stuebner March 14, 2018, 12:51 p.m. UTC | #4
Am Freitag, 9. März 2018, 23:22:57 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra:
> From: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com>
> 
> We currently wait for the panel to mirror our intended PSR state
> before continuing on both PSR enter and PSR exit. This is really
> only important to do when we're entering PSR, since we want to
> be sure the last frame we pushed is being served from the panel's
> internal fb before shutting down the soc blocks (vop/analogix).
> 
> This patch changes the behavior such that we only wait for the
> panel to complete the PSR transition when we're entering PSR, and
> to skip verification when we're exiting.
> 
> Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org>
> Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: zain wang <wzz@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

applied to drm-misc-next with the subject fixed.


Thanks
Heiko
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
index 806c3878b3d6..5a2e35dc41e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@  int analogix_dp_enable_psr(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
 	psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
 	psr_vsc.DB1 = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE | EDP_VSC_PSR_CRC_VALUES_VALID;
 
-	return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
+	return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc, true);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_enable_psr);
 
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@  int analogix_dp_disable_psr(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
 	if (ret != 1)
 		dev_err(dp->dev, "Failed to set DP Power0 %d\n", ret);
 
-	return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
+	return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc, false);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_disable_psr);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
index 920607d7eb3e..6a96ef7e6934 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@  void analogix_dp_enable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
 void analogix_dp_disable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
 void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
 int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
-			     struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);
+			     struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc, bool blocking);
 ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
 			     struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg);
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
index 005a3f7005d2..9df2f3ef000c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
@@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@  static ssize_t analogix_dp_get_psr_status(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
 }
 
 int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
-			     struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
+			     struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc, bool blocking)
 {
 	unsigned int val;
 	int ret;
@@ -1053,6 +1053,9 @@  int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
 	val |= IF_EN;
 	writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
 
+	if (!blocking)
+		return 0;
+
 	ret = readx_poll_timeout(analogix_dp_get_psr_status, dp, psr_status,
 		psr_status >= 0 &&
 		((vsc->DB1 && psr_status == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB) ||