diff mbox

[4/8] struct page: add field for vm_struct

Message ID 20180313214554.28521-5-igor.stoppa@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Igor Stoppa March 13, 2018, 9:45 p.m. UTC
When a page is used for virtual memory, it is often necessary to obtain
a handler to the corresponding vm_struct, which refers to the virtually
continuous area generated when invoking vmalloc.

The struct page has a "mapping" field, which can be re-used, to store a
pointer to the parent area.

This will avoid more expensive searches, later on.

Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
---
 include/linux/mm_types.h | 1 +
 mm/vmalloc.c             | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

Comments

Matthew Wilcox March 13, 2018, 10 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:45:50PM +0200, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> When a page is used for virtual memory, it is often necessary to obtain
> a handler to the corresponding vm_struct, which refers to the virtually
> continuous area generated when invoking vmalloc.
> 
> The struct page has a "mapping" field, which can be re-used, to store a
> pointer to the parent area.
> 
> This will avoid more expensive searches, later on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>

Regardless of the fate of the rest of this patchset, this makes sense
and we should have this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jay Freyensee March 14, 2018, 5:43 p.m. UTC | #2
On 3/13/18 3:00 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:45:50PM +0200, Igor Stoppa wrote:
>> When a page is used for virtual memory, it is often necessary to obtain
>> a handler to the corresponding vm_struct, which refers to the virtually
>> continuous area generated when invoking vmalloc.
>>
>> The struct page has a "mapping" field, which can be re-used, to store a
>> pointer to the parent area.
>>
>> This will avoid more expensive searches, later on.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>

Igor, do you mind sticking these tags on the files that have spent some 
time reviewing a revision of your patchset (like the Reviewed-by: tags I 
provided last revision?)

Thanks,
Jay


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Igor Stoppa March 15, 2018, 9:38 a.m. UTC | #3
On 14/03/18 19:43, J Freyensee wrote:
> On 3/13/18 3:00 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

[...]

>>> Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
> 
> Igor, do you mind sticking these tags on the files that have spent some 
> time reviewing a revision of your patchset (like the Reviewed-by: tags I 
> provided last revision?)

Apologies, that was not intentional, I forgot it.
I will do it, although most of the files will now change so much that I
am not sure what will survive, beside this patch, in the form that you
reviewed.

I suppose the Review-by tag drops, if the patch changes.

--
igor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jay Freyensee March 15, 2018, 6:51 p.m. UTC | #4
On 3/15/18 2:38 AM, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> On 14/03/18 19:43, J Freyensee wrote:
>> On 3/13/18 3:00 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> [...]
>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
>> Igor, do you mind sticking these tags on the files that have spent some
>> time reviewing a revision of your patchset (like the Reviewed-by: tags I
>> provided last revision?)
> Apologies, that was not intentional, I forgot it.
> I will do it, although most of the files will now change so much that I
> am not sure what will survive, beside this patch, in the form that you
> reviewed.
>
> I suppose the Review-by tag drops, if the patch changes.

That's true, if so much of the patch changes it basically looks like 
something different, the Reviewed-by: would drop.

Jay

>
> --
> igor

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index fd1af6b9591d..c3a4825e10c0 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@  struct page {
 		void *s_mem;			/* slab first object */
 		atomic_t compound_mapcount;	/* first tail page */
 		/* page_deferred_list().next	 -- second tail page */
+		struct vm_struct *area;
 	};
 
 	/* Second double word */
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index ebff729cc956..61a1ca22b0f6 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -1536,6 +1536,7 @@  static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int deallocate_pages)
 			struct page *page = area->pages[i];
 
 			BUG_ON(!page);
+			page->area = NULL;
 			__free_pages(page, 0);
 		}
 
@@ -1705,6 +1706,7 @@  static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 			area->nr_pages = i;
 			goto fail;
 		}
+		page->area = area;
 		area->pages[i] = page;
 		if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask|highmem_mask))
 			cond_resched();