| Message ID | 51e33d41-37b1-9e88-4a13-503bb39e2e40@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
2018-03-29 0:30 GMT+02:00 Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>: > Hi Bart, > > On 03/27/2018 04:20 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> >> >> Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines >> we used so far. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> >> --- >> drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c >> index b668e32996e2..788f59809c02 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c >> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ >> >> #include <linux/bitops.h> >> #include <linux/clk.h> >> +#include <linux/reset.h> >> #include <linux/err.h> >> #include <linux/interrupt.h> >> #include <linux/io.h> >> @@ -20,8 +21,6 @@ >> #include <linux/platform_device.h> >> #include <linux/remoteproc.h> >> >> -#include <mach/clock.h> /* for davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() */ >> - >> #include "remoteproc_internal.h" >> >> static char *da8xx_fw_name; >> @@ -72,6 +71,7 @@ struct da8xx_rproc { >> struct da8xx_rproc_mem *mem; >> int num_mems; >> struct clk *dsp_clk; >> + struct reset_control *dsp_reset; >> void (*ack_fxn)(struct irq_data *data); >> struct irq_data *irq_data; >> void __iomem *chipsig; >> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) >> struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; >> struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = (struct da8xx_rproc *)rproc->priv; >> struct clk *dsp_clk = drproc->dsp_clk; >> + struct reset_control *dsp_reset = drproc->dsp_reset; >> int ret; >> >> /* hw requires the start (boot) address be on 1KB boundary */ >> @@ -155,7 +156,12 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) >> return ret; >> } >> >> - davinci_clk_reset_deassert(dsp_clk); >> + ret = reset_control_deassert(dsp_reset); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "reset_control_deassert() failed: %d\n", ret); >> + clk_disable_unprepare(dsp_clk); >> + return ret; >> + } >> >> return 0; >> } >> @@ -163,8 +169,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) >> static int da8xx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> { >> struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = rproc->priv; >> + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = reset_control_assert(drproc->dsp_reset); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "reset_control_assert() failed: %d\n", ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> >> - davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk); >> clk_disable_unprepare(drproc->dsp_clk); >> >> return 0; >> @@ -232,6 +245,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> struct resource *bootreg_res; >> struct resource *chipsig_res; >> struct clk *dsp_clk; >> + struct reset_control *dsp_reset; >> void __iomem *chipsig; >> void __iomem *bootreg; >> int irq; >> @@ -268,6 +282,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> return PTR_ERR(dsp_clk); >> } >> >> + dsp_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); >> + if (IS_ERR(dsp_reset)) { >> + if (PTR_ERR(dsp_reset) != -EPROBE_DEFER) >> + dev_err(dev, "unable to get reset control: %ld\n", >> + PTR_ERR(dsp_reset)); >> + >> + return PTR_ERR(dsp_reset); >> + } >> + >> if (dev->of_node) { >> ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev); >> if (ret) { >> @@ -309,7 +332,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> * *not* in reset, but da8xx_rproc_start() needs the DSP to be >> * held in reset at the time it is called. >> */ >> - ret = davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk); >> + ret = reset_control_assert(dsp_reset); >> if (ret) >> goto free_rproc; >> > > Tested your previous branch, need one more change in this patch to have > the remoteproc boot be actually executing some code. The acquired > dsp_reset is not stored in the drproc, so the start and stop were not > effective. The issue was masked because reset_control_assert() and > deassert() return 0 when a NULL pointer is passed in. > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c > @@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device > *pdev) > drproc = rproc->priv; > drproc->rproc = rproc; > drproc->dsp_clk = dsp_clk; > + drproc->dsp_reset = dsp_reset; > rproc->has_iommu = false; > > regards > Suman > Oh snap, thanks for spotting it. I'll just resend last two patches, since the previous six will be picked up at different places. Thanks, Bartosz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c @@ -311,6 +311,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) drproc = rproc->priv; drproc->rproc = rproc; drproc->dsp_clk = dsp_clk; + drproc->dsp_reset = dsp_reset; rproc->has_iommu = false;