Message ID | 3103570.fW0XyqvKVi@ada (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 29/03/2018 at 13:31:18 +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > Pretty sure. I rebuilt the whole BSP and added another line to the kernel > source to see if the tree I applied the patches to, was actually built: > > > diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c > index 7fde9cfbf203..f85affc74a86 100644 > --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c > +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c > @@ -222,7 +222,8 @@ static int __init tc_clkevt_register(struct device_node *node, > goto err_slow; > clk_disable(tce.clk); > > - clockevents_config_and_register(&tce.clkevt, 32768, 1, bits - 1); > + pr_info( "*** bits: 0x%x, BIT(bits): 0x%lx\n", bits, BIT(bits) ); > + clockevents_config_and_register(&tce.clkevt, 32768, 1, BIT(bits) - 1); > > ret = request_irq(tce.irq, tc_clkevt2_irq, IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_SHARED, > tce.clkevt.name, &tce); > > I've just tested on a g20, old driver: INT NAME RATE MAX 16 [vel at91_tick,] 175 Ints/s (max: 231) 19 [ vel tc_clkevt] 129 Ints/s (max: 129) new driver: INT NAME RATE MAX 17 [vel timer@fffa] 129 Ints/s (max: 129) 18 [ vel ttyS0] 175 Ints/s (max: 231)
On 29/03/2018 13:42, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 29/03/2018 at 13:31:18 +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: >> Pretty sure. I rebuilt the whole BSP and added another line to the kernel >> source to see if the tree I applied the patches to, was actually built: >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c >> index 7fde9cfbf203..f85affc74a86 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c >> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c >> @@ -222,7 +222,8 @@ static int __init tc_clkevt_register(struct device_node *node, >> goto err_slow; >> clk_disable(tce.clk); >> >> - clockevents_config_and_register(&tce.clkevt, 32768, 1, bits - 1); >> + pr_info( "*** bits: 0x%x, BIT(bits): 0x%lx\n", bits, BIT(bits) ); >> + clockevents_config_and_register(&tce.clkevt, 32768, 1, BIT(bits) - 1); >> >> ret = request_irq(tce.irq, tc_clkevt2_irq, IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_SHARED, >> tce.clkevt.name, &tce); >> >> > > I've just tested on a g20, old driver: > INT NAME RATE MAX > 16 [vel at91_tick,] 175 Ints/s (max: 231) > 19 [ vel tc_clkevt] 129 Ints/s (max: 129) > > > new driver: > INT NAME RATE MAX > 17 [vel timer@fffa] 129 Ints/s (max: 129) > 18 [ vel ttyS0] 175 Ints/s (max: 231) Can you give in both platforms how fast the clocksource wraps up ?
On 29/03/2018 at 14:07:34 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 29/03/2018 13:42, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 29/03/2018 at 13:31:18 +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > >> Pretty sure. I rebuilt the whole BSP and added another line to the kernel > >> source to see if the tree I applied the patches to, was actually built: > >> > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c > >> index 7fde9cfbf203..f85affc74a86 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c > >> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c > >> @@ -222,7 +222,8 @@ static int __init tc_clkevt_register(struct device_node *node, > >> goto err_slow; > >> clk_disable(tce.clk); > >> > >> - clockevents_config_and_register(&tce.clkevt, 32768, 1, bits - 1); > >> + pr_info( "*** bits: 0x%x, BIT(bits): 0x%lx\n", bits, BIT(bits) ); > >> + clockevents_config_and_register(&tce.clkevt, 32768, 1, BIT(bits) - 1); > >> > >> ret = request_irq(tce.irq, tc_clkevt2_irq, IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_SHARED, > >> tce.clkevt.name, &tce); > >> > >> > > > > I've just tested on a g20, old driver: > > INT NAME RATE MAX > > 16 [vel at91_tick,] 175 Ints/s (max: 231) > > 19 [ vel tc_clkevt] 129 Ints/s (max: 129) > > > > > > new driver: > > INT NAME RATE MAX > > 17 [vel timer@fffa] 129 Ints/s (max: 129) > > 18 [ vel ttyS0] 175 Ints/s (max: 231) > > Can you give in both platforms how fast the clocksource wraps up ? > sam9g20, old: clocksource: pit: mask: 0xfffffff max_cycles: 0xfffffff, max_idle_ns: 14370379250 ns sched_clock: 32 bits at 100 Hz, resolution 10000000ns, wraps every 21474836475000000ns clocksource: tcb_clksrc: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 114963034405 ns sam9g20, new: clocksource: timer@fffa0000:0,1: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 114963034405 ns sched_clock: 32 bits at 16MHz, resolution 60ns, wraps every 129171948513ns sama5d4, old: clocksource: pit: mask: 0x7ffffff max_cycles: 0x7ffffff, max_idle_ns: 10859434279 ns sched_clock: 32 bits at 100 Hz, resolution 10000000ns, wraps every 21474836475000000ns clocksource: tcb_clksrc: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 173750949719 ns sama5d4, new: clocksource: timer@fc024000:0: mask: 0xffffffff max_cycles: 0xffffffff, max_idle_ns: 173750949719 ns sched_clock: 32 bits at 11MHz, resolution 90ns, wraps every 195225786322ns
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c index 7fde9cfbf203..f85affc74a86 100644 --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-atmel-tcb.c @@ -222,7 +222,8 @@ static int __init tc_clkevt_register(struct device_node *node, goto err_slow; clk_disable(tce.clk); - clockevents_config_and_register(&tce.clkevt, 32768, 1, bits - 1); + pr_info( "*** bits: 0x%x, BIT(bits): 0x%lx\n", bits, BIT(bits) ); + clockevents_config_and_register(&tce.clkevt, 32768, 1, BIT(bits) - 1); ret = request_irq(tce.irq, tc_clkevt2_irq, IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_SHARED, tce.clkevt.name, &tce);