| Message ID | 20180404153818.26179-21-eric.engestrom@imgtec.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
For exynos and omap, are they in active use anymore? I'm pretty sure that development of omap (the hardware) stopped, and others have told me exynos has stopped too. I also don't think there's any open source consumer, since there is no mesa driver for either of these. Dylan Quoting Eric Engestrom (2018-04-04 08:38:16) > Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com> > --- > meson.build | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build > index 24688535a329ac530c10..7b26977a9e84290fdd37 100644 > --- a/meson.build > +++ b/meson.build > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ foreach d : [ > ['nouveau', true, true], > ['vmwgfx', false, true], > ['omap', true, true], > - ['exynos', false, false], > + ['exynos', false, true], > ['freedreno', true, ['arm', 'aarch64'].contains(host_machine.cpu_family())], > ['tegra', true, false], > ['vc4', false, ['arm', 'aarch64'].contains(host_machine.cpu_family())], > -- > Cheers, > Eric >
On Wednesday, 2018-04-04 14:10:33 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote: > For exynos and omap, are they in active use anymore? I'm pretty sure that > development of omap (the hardware) stopped, and others have told me exynos has > stopped too. I also don't think there's any open source consumer, since there is > no mesa driver for either of these. Happy to drop these enablement patches; I just like to have everything possible built by default, but if these are dead I'm fine with leaving them disabled by default. > > Dylan > > Quoting Eric Engestrom (2018-04-04 08:38:16) > > Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com> > > --- > > meson.build | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build > > index 24688535a329ac530c10..7b26977a9e84290fdd37 100644 > > --- a/meson.build > > +++ b/meson.build > > @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ foreach d : [ > > ['nouveau', true, true], > > ['vmwgfx', false, true], > > ['omap', true, true], > > - ['exynos', false, false], > > + ['exynos', false, true], > > ['freedreno', true, ['arm', 'aarch64'].contains(host_machine.cpu_family())], > > ['tegra', true, false], > > ['vc4', false, ['arm', 'aarch64'].contains(host_machine.cpu_family())], > > -- > > Cheers, > > Eric > >
Quoting Eric Engestrom (2018-04-05 02:48:50) > On Wednesday, 2018-04-04 14:10:33 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote: > > For exynos and omap, are they in active use anymore? I'm pretty sure that > > development of omap (the hardware) stopped, and others have told me exynos has > > stopped too. I also don't think there's any open source consumer, since there is > > no mesa driver for either of these. > > Happy to drop these enablement patches; I just like to have everything > possible built by default, but if these are dead I'm fine with leaving > them disabled by default. > Yeah, I just don't know what the right thing is, it just seems like a bad idea to enable something by default that never really got anywhere. Dylan
diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build index 24688535a329ac530c10..7b26977a9e84290fdd37 100644 --- a/meson.build +++ b/meson.build @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ foreach d : [ ['nouveau', true, true], ['vmwgfx', false, true], ['omap', true, true], - ['exynos', false, false], + ['exynos', false, true], ['freedreno', true, ['arm', 'aarch64'].contains(host_machine.cpu_family())], ['tegra', true, false], ['vc4', false, ['arm', 'aarch64'].contains(host_machine.cpu_family())],
Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com> --- meson.build | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)