diff mbox

Kernel unaligned access at ... btrfs_real_readdir+0x51c/0x718 [btrfs]

Message ID 20180416164805.GQ21272@twin.jikos.cz (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

David Sterba April 16, 2018, 4:48 p.m. UTC
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 04:52:16PM +0200, René Rebe wrote:
> I just installed the latest #t2sde test build on a sparc64 system with
> btrfs rootfs - you know, just for the fun of testing, and in contrast
> to my x86 and ppc systems I get tons of unaligned access warnings, in
> the form of:
> 
> [    0.000000] Btrfs loaded, crc32c=crc32c-generic
> [    0.000000] BTRFS: device fsid c84acf49-452a-4ed3-ae86-576975967db5 devid 1 transid 42 /dev/sda3
> [    0.000000] BTRFS info (device sda3): disk space caching is enabled
> [    0.000000] BTRFS info (device sda3): has skinny extents
> [    0.000000] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[102f3080] btrfs_real_readdir+0x51c/0x718 [btrfs]
> [    0.000000] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[102f30dc] btrfs_real_readdir+0x578/0x718 [btrfs]
> [    0.000000] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[102f313c] btrfs_real_readdir+0x5d8/0x718 [btrfs]
> [    0.000000] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[102f31a0] btrfs_real_readdir+0x63c/0x718 [btrfs]
> [    0.000000] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[102f3080] btrfs_real_readdir+0x51c/0x718 [btrfs]
> [    0.000000] log_unaligned: 38289 callbacks suppressed
> [    0.000000] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[102f3080] btrfs_real_readdir+0x51c/0x718 [btrfs]
> [    0.000000] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[102f30dc] btrfs_real_readdir+0x578/0x718 [btrfs]
> [    0.000000] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[102f313c] btrfs_real_readdir+0x5d8/0x718 [btrfs]
> [    0.000000] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[102f31a0] btrfs_real_readdir+0x63c/0x718 [btrfs]
> [    0.000000] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[102f3080] btrfs_real_readdir+0x51c/0x718 [btrfs]
> [    0.000000] log_unaligned: 112774 callbacks suppressed
> 
> in case some someone likes to address those, or has a quick patch to
> test, … just let me know ;-)

The warnings are valid, there's unaligned access introduced by patch

23b5ec74943f44378b68c0edd8e210a86318ea5e
btrfs: fix readdir deadlock with pagefault

The directory entries (struct dir_entry) are copied to a temporary
buffer as they fit, ie. no alignment, and the members accessed in
several places.

The following patch adds the proper unaligned access, only compile-tested.
Please test and let me know, thanks!

---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Rene Rebe April 16, 2018, 7:55 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 04/16/2018 06:48 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> The warnings are valid, there's unaligned access introduced by patch
> 
> 23b5ec74943f44378b68c0edd8e210a86318ea5e
> btrfs: fix readdir deadlock with pagefault
> 
> The directory entries (struct dir_entry) are copied to a temporary
> buffer as they fit, ie. no alignment, and the members accessed in
> several places.
> 
> The following patch adds the proper unaligned access, only compile-tested.
> Please test and let me know, thanks!
Would have loved to immediately give it a try, however, sorry,
I forgot to mention I'm on the latest stable release -4.16.2-
on a first glance this does not look like it does just apply.

I would re-base myself if I would not also have a glibc initialization 
bug to hunt and debug, too :-/

If you happen to also rebase it for current -stable, ... ;-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index e064c49c9a9a..f958eb686462 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/uio.h>
 #include <linux/magic.h>
 #include <linux/iversion.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
 #include "ctree.h"
 #include "disk-io.h"
 #include "transaction.h"
@@ -5905,11 +5906,13 @@  static int btrfs_filldir(void *addr, int entries, struct dir_context *ctx)
                struct dir_entry *entry = addr;
                char *name = (char *)(entry + 1);
 
-               ctx->pos = entry->offset;
-               if (!dir_emit(ctx, name, entry->name_len, entry->ino,
-                             entry->type))
+               ctx->pos = get_unaligned(&entry->offset);
+               if (!dir_emit(ctx, name, get_unaligned(&entry->name_len),
+                                       get_unaligned(&entry->ino),
+                                       get_unaligned(&entry->type)))
                        return 1;
-               addr += sizeof(struct dir_entry) + entry->name_len;
+               addr += sizeof(struct dir_entry) +
+                       get_unaligned(&entry->name_len);
                ctx->pos++;
        }
        return 0;
@@ -5999,14 +6002,15 @@  static int btrfs_real_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
                }
 
                entry = addr;
-               entry->name_len = name_len;
+               put_unaligned(name_len, &entry->name_len);
                name_ptr = (char *)(entry + 1);
                read_extent_buffer(leaf, name_ptr, (unsigned long)(di + 1),
                                   name_len);
-               entry->type = btrfs_filetype_table[btrfs_dir_type(leaf, di)];
+               put_unaligned(btrfs_filetype_table[btrfs_dir_type(leaf, di)],
+                               &entry->type);
                btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, di, &location);
-               entry->ino = location.objectid;
-               entry->offset = found_key.offset;
+               put_unaligned(location.objectid, &entry->ino);
+               put_unaligned(found_key.offset, &entry->offset);
                entries++;
                addr += sizeof(struct dir_entry) + name_len;
                total_len += sizeof(struct dir_entry) + name_len;