| Message ID | 20180417173038.25510-7-brgl@bgdev.pl (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
On Tuesday 17 April 2018 11:00 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > > Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines > we used so far. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Looks good! Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> This depends on DaVinci gaining common clock / reset framework support though. I am guessing remoteproc maintainers will have to be reminded when its safe to apply. Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 19:30 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > > Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines > we used so far. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> [...] > @@ -268,6 +282,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(dsp_clk); > } > > + dsp_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(dsp_reset)) { > + if (PTR_ERR(dsp_reset) != -EPROBE_DEFER) > + dev_err(dev, "unable to get reset control: %ld\n", > + PTR_ERR(dsp_reset)); > + > + return PTR_ERR(dsp_reset); > + } > + > if (dev->of_node) { > ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev); > if (ret) { [...] > @@ -309,7 +333,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > * *not* in reset, but da8xx_rproc_start() needs the DSP to be > * held in reset at the time it is called. Given this requirement, devm_reset_control_get_exclusive above is the correct choice. > */ > - ret = davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk); > + ret = reset_control_assert(dsp_reset); Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
2018-04-18 7:44 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>: > On Tuesday 17 April 2018 11:00 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> >> >> Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines >> we used so far. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > > Looks good! > > Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> > > This depends on DaVinci gaining common clock / reset framework support > though. I am guessing remoteproc maintainers will have to be reminded > when its safe to apply. > > Thanks, > Sekhar Right, I assume you plan to apply the platform & DT patches from David for 4.18? We can then provide an immutable branch to remoteproc maintainers. Bart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c index b668e32996e2..76c06b70a1c6 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/bitops.h> #include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/reset.h> #include <linux/err.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/io.h> @@ -20,8 +21,6 @@ #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/remoteproc.h> -#include <mach/clock.h> /* for davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() */ - #include "remoteproc_internal.h" static char *da8xx_fw_name; @@ -72,6 +71,7 @@ struct da8xx_rproc { struct da8xx_rproc_mem *mem; int num_mems; struct clk *dsp_clk; + struct reset_control *dsp_reset; void (*ack_fxn)(struct irq_data *data); struct irq_data *irq_data; void __iomem *chipsig; @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = (struct da8xx_rproc *)rproc->priv; struct clk *dsp_clk = drproc->dsp_clk; + struct reset_control *dsp_reset = drproc->dsp_reset; int ret; /* hw requires the start (boot) address be on 1KB boundary */ @@ -155,7 +156,12 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) return ret; } - davinci_clk_reset_deassert(dsp_clk); + ret = reset_control_deassert(dsp_reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "reset_control_deassert() failed: %d\n", ret); + clk_disable_unprepare(dsp_clk); + return ret; + } return 0; } @@ -163,8 +169,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) static int da8xx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) { struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = rproc->priv; + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; + int ret; + + ret = reset_control_assert(drproc->dsp_reset); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "reset_control_assert() failed: %d\n", ret); + return ret; + } - davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk); clk_disable_unprepare(drproc->dsp_clk); return 0; @@ -232,6 +245,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct resource *bootreg_res; struct resource *chipsig_res; struct clk *dsp_clk; + struct reset_control *dsp_reset; void __iomem *chipsig; void __iomem *bootreg; int irq; @@ -268,6 +282,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(dsp_clk); } + dsp_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(dsp_reset)) { + if (PTR_ERR(dsp_reset) != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "unable to get reset control: %ld\n", + PTR_ERR(dsp_reset)); + + return PTR_ERR(dsp_reset); + } + if (dev->of_node) { ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(dev); if (ret) { @@ -287,6 +310,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) drproc = rproc->priv; drproc->rproc = rproc; drproc->dsp_clk = dsp_clk; + drproc->dsp_reset = dsp_reset; rproc->has_iommu = false; ret = da8xx_rproc_get_internal_memories(pdev, drproc); @@ -309,7 +333,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) * *not* in reset, but da8xx_rproc_start() needs the DSP to be * held in reset at the time it is called. */ - ret = davinci_clk_reset_assert(drproc->dsp_clk); + ret = reset_control_assert(dsp_reset); if (ret) goto free_rproc;