diff mbox

drm/crc: Only report a single overflow when a CRC fd is opened

Message ID 20180418125121.72081-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Maarten Lankhorst April 18, 2018, 12:51 p.m. UTC
This reduces the amount of spam when you debug a CRC reading
program.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c | 9 ++++++++-
 include/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.h     | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Ville Syrjälä April 18, 2018, 3:37 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 02:51:21PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> This reduces the amount of spam when you debug a CRC reading
> program.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  include/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.h     | 3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
> index 9f8312137cad..5a052c511e62 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ static int crtc_crc_data_count(struct drm_crtc_crc *crc)
>  static void crtc_crc_cleanup(struct drm_crtc_crc *crc)
>  {
>  	kfree(crc->entries);
> +	crc->overflow = false;
>  	crc->entries = NULL;
>  	crc->head = 0;
>  	crc->tail = 0;
> @@ -391,8 +392,14 @@ int drm_crtc_add_crc_entry(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool has_frame,
>  	tail = crc->tail;
>  
>  	if (CIRC_SPACE(head, tail, DRM_CRC_ENTRIES_NR) < 1) {
> +		bool overflow = crc->overflow;

'was_overflow' or something to indicate this is the old value?

> +
> +		crc->overflow = true;
>  		spin_unlock(&crc->lock);
> -		DRM_ERROR("Overflow of CRC buffer, userspace reads too slow.\n");
> +
> +		if (!overflow)
> +			DRM_ERROR("Overflow of CRC buffer, userspace reads too slow.\n");

would make this a bit less confusing perhaps. Now it reads as
"if (no overflow) DRM_ERROR("we have an overflow");" which makes no
sense on the first glance.

Apart from that
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

> +
>  		return -ENOBUFS;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.h b/include/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.h
> index 7d63b1d4adb9..b225eeb30d05 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct drm_crtc_crc_entry {
>   * @lock: protects the fields in this struct
>   * @source: name of the currently configured source of CRCs
>   * @opened: whether userspace has opened the data file for reading
> + * @overflow: whether an overflow occured.
>   * @entries: array of entries, with size of %DRM_CRC_ENTRIES_NR
>   * @head: head of circular queue
>   * @tail: tail of circular queue
> @@ -52,7 +53,7 @@ struct drm_crtc_crc_entry {
>  struct drm_crtc_crc {
>  	spinlock_t lock;
>  	const char *source;
> -	bool opened;
> +	bool opened, overflow;
>  	struct drm_crtc_crc_entry *entries;
>  	int head, tail;
>  	size_t values_cnt;
> -- 
> 2.17.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Maarten Lankhorst July 6, 2018, 1:08 p.m. UTC | #2
Op 18-04-18 om 17:37 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 02:51:21PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> This reduces the amount of spam when you debug a CRC reading
>> program.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>  include/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.h     | 3 ++-
>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
>> index 9f8312137cad..5a052c511e62 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
>> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ static int crtc_crc_data_count(struct drm_crtc_crc *crc)
>>  static void crtc_crc_cleanup(struct drm_crtc_crc *crc)
>>  {
>>  	kfree(crc->entries);
>> +	crc->overflow = false;
>>  	crc->entries = NULL;
>>  	crc->head = 0;
>>  	crc->tail = 0;
>> @@ -391,8 +392,14 @@ int drm_crtc_add_crc_entry(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool has_frame,
>>  	tail = crc->tail;
>>  
>>  	if (CIRC_SPACE(head, tail, DRM_CRC_ENTRIES_NR) < 1) {
>> +		bool overflow = crc->overflow;
> 'was_overflow' or something to indicate this is the old value?
>
>> +
>> +		crc->overflow = true;
>>  		spin_unlock(&crc->lock);
>> -		DRM_ERROR("Overflow of CRC buffer, userspace reads too slow.\n");
>> +
>> +		if (!overflow)
>> +			DRM_ERROR("Overflow of CRC buffer, userspace reads too slow.\n");
> would make this a bit less confusing perhaps. Now it reads as
> "if (no overflow) DRM_ERROR("we have an overflow");" which makes no
> sense on the first glance.
>
> Apart from that
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Thanks, fixed and pushed to drm-misc-next. :)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
index 9f8312137cad..5a052c511e62 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.c
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@  static int crtc_crc_data_count(struct drm_crtc_crc *crc)
 static void crtc_crc_cleanup(struct drm_crtc_crc *crc)
 {
 	kfree(crc->entries);
+	crc->overflow = false;
 	crc->entries = NULL;
 	crc->head = 0;
 	crc->tail = 0;
@@ -391,8 +392,14 @@  int drm_crtc_add_crc_entry(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool has_frame,
 	tail = crc->tail;
 
 	if (CIRC_SPACE(head, tail, DRM_CRC_ENTRIES_NR) < 1) {
+		bool overflow = crc->overflow;
+
+		crc->overflow = true;
 		spin_unlock(&crc->lock);
-		DRM_ERROR("Overflow of CRC buffer, userspace reads too slow.\n");
+
+		if (!overflow)
+			DRM_ERROR("Overflow of CRC buffer, userspace reads too slow.\n");
+
 		return -ENOBUFS;
 	}
 
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.h b/include/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.h
index 7d63b1d4adb9..b225eeb30d05 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_debugfs_crc.h
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@  struct drm_crtc_crc_entry {
  * @lock: protects the fields in this struct
  * @source: name of the currently configured source of CRCs
  * @opened: whether userspace has opened the data file for reading
+ * @overflow: whether an overflow occured.
  * @entries: array of entries, with size of %DRM_CRC_ENTRIES_NR
  * @head: head of circular queue
  * @tail: tail of circular queue
@@ -52,7 +53,7 @@  struct drm_crtc_crc_entry {
 struct drm_crtc_crc {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	const char *source;
-	bool opened;
+	bool opened, overflow;
 	struct drm_crtc_crc_entry *entries;
 	int head, tail;
 	size_t values_cnt;