diff mbox

[1/6] qapi: fill in CpuInfoFast.arch in query-cpus-fast

Message ID 20180424214550.32549-2-lersek@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Laszlo Ersek April 24, 2018, 9:45 p.m. UTC
Commit ca230ff33f89 added added the @arch field to @CpuInfoFast, but it
failed to set the new field in qmp_query_cpus_fast(), when TARGET_S390X
was not defined. The updated @query-cpus-fast example in
"qapi-schema.json" showed "arch":"x86" only because qmp_query_cpus_fast()
calls g_malloc0() to allocate CpuInfoFast, and the CPU_INFO_ARCH_X86 enum
constant is generated with value 0.

All @arch values other than @s390 implied the @CpuInfoOther sub-struct for
@CpuInfoFast -- at the time of writing the patch --, thus no fields other
than @arch needed to be set when TARGET_S390X was not defined. Set @arch
now, by copying the corresponding assignments from qmp_query_cpus().

Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Fixes: ca230ff33f89bf7102cbfbc2328716da6750aaed
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
---

Notes:
    PATCHv1:
    
    - new patch

 cpus.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Eric Blake April 24, 2018, 10:30 p.m. UTC | #1
On 04/24/2018 04:45 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Commit ca230ff33f89 added added the @arch field to @CpuInfoFast, but it

s/added added/added/

> failed to set the new field in qmp_query_cpus_fast(), when TARGET_S390X
> was not defined. The updated @query-cpus-fast example in
> "qapi-schema.json" showed "arch":"x86" only because qmp_query_cpus_fast()
> calls g_malloc0() to allocate CpuInfoFast, and the CPU_INFO_ARCH_X86 enum
> constant is generated with value 0.
> 
> All @arch values other than @s390 implied the @CpuInfoOther sub-struct for
> @CpuInfoFast -- at the time of writing the patch --, thus no fields other
> than @arch needed to be set when TARGET_S390X was not defined. Set @arch
> now, by copying the corresponding assignments from qmp_query_cpus().

Perhaps worth mentioning that the riscv architecture shows up as 'other'
in this patch?  (But that gets cleaned up in the next one, so no big deal)

> 
> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Fixes: ca230ff33f89bf7102cbfbc2328716da6750aaed
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> ---
> 

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Markus Armbruster April 25, 2018, 6:39 a.m. UTC | #2
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> writes:

> Commit ca230ff33f89 added added the @arch field to @CpuInfoFast, but it
> failed to set the new field in qmp_query_cpus_fast(), when TARGET_S390X
> was not defined. The updated @query-cpus-fast example in
> "qapi-schema.json" showed "arch":"x86" only because qmp_query_cpus_fast()
> calls g_malloc0() to allocate CpuInfoFast, and the CPU_INFO_ARCH_X86 enum
> constant is generated with value 0.
>
> All @arch values other than @s390 implied the @CpuInfoOther sub-struct for
> @CpuInfoFast -- at the time of writing the patch --, thus no fields other
> than @arch needed to be set when TARGET_S390X was not defined. Set @arch
> now, by copying the corresponding assignments from qmp_query_cpus().

Now I'm confused.

In the schema, @arch "riscv" implies CpuInfoRISCV:

    { 'union': 'CpuInfoFast',
      'base': {'cpu-index': 'int', 'qom-path': 'str',
               'thread-id': 'int', '*props': 'CpuInstanceProperties',
               'arch': 'CpuInfoArch' },
      'discriminator': 'arch',
      'data': { 'x86': 'CpuInfoOther',
                'sparc': 'CpuInfoOther',
                'ppc': 'CpuInfoOther',
                'mips': 'CpuInfoOther',
                'tricore': 'CpuInfoOther',
                's390': 'CpuInfoS390',
                'riscv': 'CpuInfoRISCV',
                'other': 'CpuInfoOther' } }

In qmp_query_cpus_fast(), it can't imply anything, because can't occur.
That's a bug, and this patch fixes it.  Except it sets @arch to "other"
instead of "riscv" when defined(TARGET_RISCV).  Why?  Oh, I see, that
gets fixed in the next patch.  Please explain that in your commit
message, or squash the two patches.  The latter feels simpler, so that's
what I'd do.

>
> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Fixes: ca230ff33f89bf7102cbfbc2328716da6750aaed
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cornelia Huck April 25, 2018, 7:28 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 23:45:45 +0200
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:

> Commit ca230ff33f89 added added the @arch field to @CpuInfoFast, but it
> failed to set the new field in qmp_query_cpus_fast(), when TARGET_S390X
> was not defined. The updated @query-cpus-fast example in
> "qapi-schema.json" showed "arch":"x86" only because qmp_query_cpus_fast()
> calls g_malloc0() to allocate CpuInfoFast, and the CPU_INFO_ARCH_X86 enum
> constant is generated with value 0.
> 
> All @arch values other than @s390 implied the @CpuInfoOther sub-struct for
> @CpuInfoFast -- at the time of writing the patch --, thus no fields other
> than @arch needed to be set when TARGET_S390X was not defined. Set @arch
> now, by copying the corresponding assignments from qmp_query_cpus().

I agree with others that this looks a bit odd for riscv, and merging
patch 2 would be an option. But this is fine as well.

> 
> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaite.peter@gmail.com>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Fixes: ca230ff33f89bf7102cbfbc2328716da6750aaed
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Laszlo Ersek April 25, 2018, 12:30 p.m. UTC | #4
On 04/25/18 08:39, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> Commit ca230ff33f89 added added the @arch field to @CpuInfoFast, but it
>> failed to set the new field in qmp_query_cpus_fast(), when TARGET_S390X
>> was not defined. The updated @query-cpus-fast example in
>> "qapi-schema.json" showed "arch":"x86" only because qmp_query_cpus_fast()
>> calls g_malloc0() to allocate CpuInfoFast, and the CPU_INFO_ARCH_X86 enum
>> constant is generated with value 0.
>>
>> All @arch values other than @s390 implied the @CpuInfoOther sub-struct for
>> @CpuInfoFast -- at the time of writing the patch --, thus no fields other
>> than @arch needed to be set when TARGET_S390X was not defined. Set @arch
>> now, by copying the corresponding assignments from qmp_query_cpus().
> 
> Now I'm confused.
> 
> In the schema, @arch "riscv" implies CpuInfoRISCV:
> 
>     { 'union': 'CpuInfoFast',
>       'base': {'cpu-index': 'int', 'qom-path': 'str',
>                'thread-id': 'int', '*props': 'CpuInstanceProperties',
>                'arch': 'CpuInfoArch' },
>       'discriminator': 'arch',
>       'data': { 'x86': 'CpuInfoOther',
>                 'sparc': 'CpuInfoOther',
>                 'ppc': 'CpuInfoOther',
>                 'mips': 'CpuInfoOther',
>                 'tricore': 'CpuInfoOther',
>                 's390': 'CpuInfoS390',
>                 'riscv': 'CpuInfoRISCV',
>                 'other': 'CpuInfoOther' } }
> 
> In qmp_query_cpus_fast(), it can't imply anything, because can't occur.
> That's a bug, and this patch fixes it.  Except it sets @arch to "other"
> instead of "riscv" when defined(TARGET_RISCV).  Why?  Oh, I see, that
> gets fixed in the next patch.  Please explain that in your commit
> message, or squash the two patches.  The latter feels simpler, so that's
> what I'd do.

I figured I'd keep one "Fixes:" tag per patch, but I see this separation
confused at least three reviewers, so I'll squash #1 and #2, and will
list two "Fixes:" tags.

Thanks!
Laszlo
Laszlo Ersek April 25, 2018, 12:30 p.m. UTC | #5
On 04/25/18 00:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/24/2018 04:45 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Commit ca230ff33f89 added added the @arch field to @CpuInfoFast, but it
> 
> s/added added/added/

The more I edit commit messages, the more I mess them up :)

Thanks!
Laszlo
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
index 38eba8bff334..1a9a2edee1f2 100644
--- a/cpus.c
+++ b/cpus.c
@@ -2210,27 +2210,39 @@  CpuInfoFastList *qmp_query_cpus_fast(Error **errp)
         info->value->qom_path = object_get_canonical_path(OBJECT(cpu));
         info->value->thread_id = cpu->thread_id;
 
         info->value->has_props = !!mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props;
         if (info->value->has_props) {
             CpuInstanceProperties *props;
             props = g_malloc0(sizeof(*props));
             *props = mc->cpu_index_to_instance_props(ms, cpu->cpu_index);
             info->value->props = props;
         }
 
-#if defined(TARGET_S390X)
+#if defined(TARGET_I386)
+        info->value->arch = CPU_INFO_ARCH_X86;
+#elif defined(TARGET_PPC)
+        info->value->arch = CPU_INFO_ARCH_PPC;
+#elif defined(TARGET_SPARC)
+        info->value->arch = CPU_INFO_ARCH_SPARC;
+#elif defined(TARGET_MIPS)
+        info->value->arch = CPU_INFO_ARCH_MIPS;
+#elif defined(TARGET_TRICORE)
+        info->value->arch = CPU_INFO_ARCH_TRICORE;
+#elif defined(TARGET_S390X)
         s390_cpu = S390_CPU(cpu);
         env = &s390_cpu->env;
         info->value->arch = CPU_INFO_ARCH_S390;
         info->value->u.s390.cpu_state = env->cpu_state;
+#else
+        info->value->arch = CPU_INFO_ARCH_OTHER;
 #endif
         if (!cur_item) {
             head = cur_item = info;
         } else {
             cur_item->next = info;
             cur_item = info;
         }
     }
 
     return head;
 }