diff mbox

[v2,4/9] drm/i915/psr: Begin to handle PSR/PSR2 errors set by sink

Message ID 20180418224311.16577-4-jose.souza@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Souza, Jose April 18, 2018, 10:43 p.m. UTC
eDP spec states that sink device will do a short pulse in HPD
line when there is a PSR/PSR2 error that needs to be handled by
source, this is handling the first and most simples error:
DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR.

Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---

Changes from v1:
- printing a debug message when sink assert a error

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Dhinakaran Pandiyan April 26, 2018, 10:29 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 15:43 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> eDP spec states that sink device will do a short pulse in HPD
> line when there is a PSR/PSR2 error that needs to be handled by
> source, this is handling the first and most simples error:
> DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes from v1:
> - printing a debug message when sink assert a error
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  |  2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 62f82c4298ac..701963a192ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4462,6 +4462,8 @@ intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	if (intel_dp_needs_link_retrain(intel_dp))
>  		return false;
>  
> +	intel_psr_hpd_short_pulse_handle(intel_dp);
	 intel_psr_short_pulse() should be sufficient.

> +
>  	if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Compliance Test requested\n");
>  		/* Send a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 5bd2263407b2..b79e15ecd052 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1901,6 +1901,7 @@ void intel_psr_single_frame_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  				   unsigned frontbuffer_bits);
>  void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  			      struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +void intel_psr_hpd_short_pulse_handle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
>  
>  /* intel_runtime_pm.c */
>  int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 934498505356..4cb27faab707 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -996,6 +996,15 @@ void intel_psr_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>  }
>  
> +static void intel_psr_schedule_activate_work(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	if (dev_priv->psr.active || dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits
> +	    || work_busy(&dev_priv->psr.work.work))
> +		return;
> +
> +	schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work, msecs_to_jiffies(100));
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * intel_psr_flush - Flush PSR
>   * @dev_priv: i915 device
> @@ -1052,10 +1061,8 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
> -		if (!work_busy(&dev_priv->psr.work.work))
> -			schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,
> -					      msecs_to_jiffies(100));
> +	intel_psr_schedule_activate_work(dev_priv);
> +
>  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1122,3 +1129,36 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  		dev_priv->psr.exit = hsw_psr_exit;
>  	}
>  }
> +
> +void intel_psr_hpd_short_pulse_handle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> +	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> +	struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> +	struct i915_psr *psr = &dev_priv->psr;
> +	uint8_t val;
> +
> +	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv) || !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> +		return;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
> +
> +	if (psr->enabled != intel_dp)
> +		goto not_enabled;
> +
> +	if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &val) != 1) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR_STATUS read failed\n");

Since we can't handle the irq without reading the dpcd and the irq is
potentially an error condition, I think this should be DRM_ERROR.


> +		goto dpcd_error;
> +	}
> +
> +	if ((val & DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK) == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR sink internal error, exiting PSR\n");
> +		intel_psr_exit(dev_priv);

Shouldn't this be disabling PSR? Exit will allow for re-activation
immediately. An unknown error in the sink IMO should disable PSR for
good.

> +	}
> +
> +	/* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */
> +dpcd_error:
> +	intel_psr_schedule_activate_work(dev_priv);

Why? There is no intel_psr_exit() before the goto.


> +not_enabled:
> +	mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> +}
Souza, Jose April 30, 2018, 11:02 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 15:29 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> 

> 

> On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 15:43 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:

> > eDP spec states that sink device will do a short pulse in HPD

> > line when there is a PSR/PSR2 error that needs to be handled by

> > source, this is handling the first and most simples error:

> > DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR.

> > 

> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>

> > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>

> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> > ---

> > 

> > Changes from v1:

> > - printing a debug message when sink assert a error

> > 

> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  |  2 ++

> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  1 +

> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 48

> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---

> >  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

> > 

> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c

> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c

> > index 62f82c4298ac..701963a192ee 100644

> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c

> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c

> > @@ -4462,6 +4462,8 @@ intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp

> > *intel_dp)

> >  	if (intel_dp_needs_link_retrain(intel_dp))

> >  		return false;

> >  

> > +	intel_psr_hpd_short_pulse_handle(intel_dp);

> 

> 	 intel_psr_short_pulse() should be sufficient.


done

> 

> > +

> >  	if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type ==

> > DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {

> >  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Compliance Test

> > requested\n");

> >  		/* Send a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start

> > modeset */

> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h

> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h

> > index 5bd2263407b2..b79e15ecd052 100644

> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h

> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h

> > @@ -1901,6 +1901,7 @@ void intel_psr_single_frame_update(struct

> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,

> >  				   unsigned frontbuffer_bits);

> >  void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,

> >  			      struct intel_crtc_state

> > *crtc_state);

> > +void intel_psr_hpd_short_pulse_handle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);

> >  

> >  /* intel_runtime_pm.c */

> >  int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *);

> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > index 934498505356..4cb27faab707 100644

> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c

> > @@ -996,6 +996,15 @@ void intel_psr_invalidate(struct

> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,

> >  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);

> >  }

> >  

> > +static void intel_psr_schedule_activate_work(struct

> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)

> > +{

> > +	if (dev_priv->psr.active || dev_priv-

> > >psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits

> > +	    || work_busy(&dev_priv->psr.work.work))

> > +		return;

> > +

> > +	schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,

> > msecs_to_jiffies(100));

> > +}

> > +

> >  /**

> >   * intel_psr_flush - Flush PSR

> >   * @dev_priv: i915 device

> > @@ -1052,10 +1061,8 @@ void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private

> > *dev_priv,

> >  		}

> >  	}

> >  

> > -	if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv-

> > >psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)

> > -		if (!work_busy(&dev_priv->psr.work.work))

> > -			schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,

> > -					      msecs_to_jiffies(100

> > ));

> > +	intel_psr_schedule_activate_work(dev_priv);

> > +

> >  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);

> >  }

> >  

> > @@ -1122,3 +1129,36 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private

> > *dev_priv)

> >  		dev_priv->psr.exit = hsw_psr_exit;

> >  	}

> >  }

> > +

> > +void intel_psr_hpd_short_pulse_handle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)

> > +{

> > +	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port =

> > dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);

> > +	struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;

> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);

> > +	struct i915_psr *psr = &dev_priv->psr;

> > +	uint8_t val;

> > +

> > +	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv) || !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))

> > +		return;

> > +

> > +	mutex_lock(&psr->lock);

> > +

> > +	if (psr->enabled != intel_dp)

> > +		goto not_enabled;

> > +

> > +	if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &val)

> > != 1) {

> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR_STATUS read failed\n");

> 

> Since we can't handle the irq without reading the dpcd and the irq is

> potentially an error condition, I think this should be DRM_ERROR.


Done

> 

> 

> > +		goto dpcd_error;

> > +	}

> > +

> > +	if ((val & DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK) ==

> > DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR) {

> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR sink internal error, exiting

> > PSR\n");

> > +		intel_psr_exit(dev_priv);

> 

> Shouldn't this be disabling PSR? Exit will allow for re-activation

> immediately. An unknown error in the sink IMO should disable PSR for

> good.



I was not able to reproduce any of the PSR errors even once, I guess
only exit and enter PSR should be enough to sink fix the error but I
guess you are right, better be safe and avoid any rendering problems.

> 

> > +	}

> > +

> > +	/* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */

> > +dpcd_error:

> > +	intel_psr_schedule_activate_work(dev_priv);

> 

> Why? There is no intel_psr_exit() before the goto.


yep, it can be removed. It was a left over from the series with the
patches to exit psr on aux ch transfer.
Also now disabling PSR it will not be need.

> 

> 

> > +not_enabled:

> > +	mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);

> > +}

> 

>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 62f82c4298ac..701963a192ee 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -4462,6 +4462,8 @@  intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	if (intel_dp_needs_link_retrain(intel_dp))
 		return false;
 
+	intel_psr_hpd_short_pulse_handle(intel_dp);
+
 	if (intel_dp->compliance.test_type == DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING) {
 		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link Training Compliance Test requested\n");
 		/* Send a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 5bd2263407b2..b79e15ecd052 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -1901,6 +1901,7 @@  void intel_psr_single_frame_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 				   unsigned frontbuffer_bits);
 void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 			      struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
+void intel_psr_hpd_short_pulse_handle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
 
 /* intel_runtime_pm.c */
 int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 934498505356..4cb27faab707 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -996,6 +996,15 @@  void intel_psr_invalidate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
 }
 
+static void intel_psr_schedule_activate_work(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+	if (dev_priv->psr.active || dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits
+	    || work_busy(&dev_priv->psr.work.work))
+		return;
+
+	schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work, msecs_to_jiffies(100));
+}
+
 /**
  * intel_psr_flush - Flush PSR
  * @dev_priv: i915 device
@@ -1052,10 +1061,8 @@  void intel_psr_flush(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!dev_priv->psr.active && !dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits)
-		if (!work_busy(&dev_priv->psr.work.work))
-			schedule_delayed_work(&dev_priv->psr.work,
-					      msecs_to_jiffies(100));
+	intel_psr_schedule_activate_work(dev_priv);
+
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
 }
 
@@ -1122,3 +1129,36 @@  void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		dev_priv->psr.exit = hsw_psr_exit;
 	}
 }
+
+void intel_psr_hpd_short_pulse_handle(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
+{
+	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
+	struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
+	struct i915_psr *psr = &dev_priv->psr;
+	uint8_t val;
+
+	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv) || !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
+		return;
+
+	mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
+
+	if (psr->enabled != intel_dp)
+		goto not_enabled;
+
+	if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &val) != 1) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR_STATUS read failed\n");
+		goto dpcd_error;
+	}
+
+	if ((val & DP_PSR_SINK_STATE_MASK) == DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR sink internal error, exiting PSR\n");
+		intel_psr_exit(dev_priv);
+	}
+
+	/* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */
+dpcd_error:
+	intel_psr_schedule_activate_work(dev_priv);
+not_enabled:
+	mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
+}