diff mbox

[v1,1/3] KVM: s390: introduce defines for control registers

Message ID 7447003d-c228-8c18-76bc-d6536ba92bc7@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

David Hildenbrand April 30, 2018, 1:23 p.m. UTC 
On 27.04.2018 14:36, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> In KVM code we use masks to test/set control registers.
> 
> Let's define the ones we use in arch/s390/include/asm/ctl_reg.h and
> replace all occurrences in KVM code.
> 
> As we will be needing the define for Clock-comparator sign control soon,
> let's also add it.
> 
> Suggested-by: Collin L. Walling <walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

Just realized that I was sending out an older version of the patch,
(partially updated due to new SIGN bit) the following two hunks are
missing



Christian/Janosch, please tell me if you can fix this up by applying
or if I should resend.

Comments

Cornelia Huck April 30, 2018, 1:24 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:23:01 +0200
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 27.04.2018 14:36, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > In KVM code we use masks to test/set control registers.
> > 
> > Let's define the ones we use in arch/s390/include/asm/ctl_reg.h and
> > replace all occurrences in KVM code.
> > 
> > As we will be needing the define for Clock-comparator sign control soon,
> > let's also add it.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Collin L. Walling <walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>  
> 
> Just realized that I was sending out an older version of the patch,
> (partially updated due to new SIGN bit) the following two hunks are
> missing
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index 5a30fc275a4c..daa09f89ca2d 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int ckc_irq_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>         const u64 now = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm);
>         const u64 ckc = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc;
>  
> -       if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul) {
> +       if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR_SIGN) {
>                 if ((s64)ckc >= (s64)now)
>                         return 0;
>         } else if (ckc >= now) {
> @@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ static u64 __calculate_sltime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>         u64 cputm, sltime = 0;
>  
>         if (ckc_interrupts_enabled(vcpu)) {
> -               if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul) {
> +               if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR_SIGN) {
>                         if ((s64)now < (s64)ckc)
>                                 sltime = tod_to_ns((s64)ckc - (s64)now);
>                 } else if (now < ckc) {
> 
> 
> Christian/Janosch, please tell me if you can fix this up by applying
> or if I should resend.
> 

Looks even better with that change ;)

In any case, my R-b holds.
Janosch Frank April 30, 2018, 3:41 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 30.04.2018 15:23, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 27.04.2018 14:36, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> In KVM code we use masks to test/set control registers.
>>
>> Let's define the ones we use in arch/s390/include/asm/ctl_reg.h and
>> replace all occurrences in KVM code.
>>
>> As we will be needing the define for Clock-comparator sign control soon,
>> let's also add it.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Collin L. Walling <walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> 
> Just realized that I was sending out an older version of the patch,
> (partially updated due to new SIGN bit) the following two hunks are
> missing
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index 5a30fc275a4c..daa09f89ca2d 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int ckc_irq_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>         const u64 now = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm);
>         const u64 ckc = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc;
> 
> -       if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul) {
> +       if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR_SIGN) {
>                 if ((s64)ckc >= (s64)now)
>                         return 0;
>         } else if (ckc >= now) {
> @@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ static u64 __calculate_sltime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>         u64 cputm, sltime = 0;
> 
>         if (ckc_interrupts_enabled(vcpu)) {
> -               if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul) {
> +               if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR_SIGN) {
>                         if ((s64)now < (s64)ckc)
>                                 sltime = tod_to_ns((s64)ckc - (s64)now);
>                 } else if (now < ckc) {
> 
> 
> Christian/Janosch, please tell me if you can fix this up by applying
> or if I should resend.
> 

Please send a v2 of this patch as a reply, no need for a full resend.
Thanks for the work, have a nice first of May.

If possible try to get the linux.vnet.ibm.com addresses out of your
address books. We dropped the vnet bit recently.
David Hildenbrand April 30, 2018, 3:44 p.m. UTC | #3 
On 30.04.2018 17:41, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 30.04.2018 15:23, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 27.04.2018 14:36, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> In KVM code we use masks to test/set control registers.
>>>
>>> Let's define the ones we use in arch/s390/include/asm/ctl_reg.h and
>>> replace all occurrences in KVM code.
>>>
>>> As we will be needing the define for Clock-comparator sign control soon,
>>> let's also add it.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Collin L. Walling <walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>
>> Just realized that I was sending out an older version of the patch,
>> (partially updated due to new SIGN bit) the following two hunks are
>> missing
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> index 5a30fc275a4c..daa09f89ca2d 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int ckc_irq_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>         const u64 now = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm);
>>         const u64 ckc = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc;
>>
>> -       if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul) {
>> +       if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR_SIGN) {
>>                 if ((s64)ckc >= (s64)now)
>>                         return 0;
>>         } else if (ckc >= now) {
>> @@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ static u64 __calculate_sltime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>         u64 cputm, sltime = 0;
>>
>>         if (ckc_interrupts_enabled(vcpu)) {
>> -               if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul) {
>> +               if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR_SIGN) {
>>                         if ((s64)now < (s64)ckc)
>>                                 sltime = tod_to_ns((s64)ckc - (s64)now);
>>                 } else if (now < ckc) {
>>
>>
>> Christian/Janosch, please tell me if you can fix this up by applying
>> or if I should resend.
>>
> 
> Please send a v2 of this patch as a reply, no need for a full resend.
> Thanks for the work, have a nice first of May.

Yes, will send as reference to v1. Thanks - to you, too!

> 
> If possible try to get the linux.vnet.ibm.com addresses out of your
> address books. We dropped the vnet bit recently.
> 

Oh, haven't noticed that. Thanks for the heads up. maybe in another 10
years you'll be back to a pure "@ibm.com", one step at a time :P
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
index 5a30fc275a4c..daa09f89ca2d 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@  static int ckc_irq_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        const u64 now = kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_fast(vcpu->kvm);
        const u64 ckc = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ckc;
 
-       if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul) {
+       if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR_SIGN) {
                if ((s64)ckc >= (s64)now)
                        return 0;
        } else if (ckc >= now) {
@@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@  static u64 __calculate_sltime(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
        u64 cputm, sltime = 0;
 
        if (ckc_interrupts_enabled(vcpu)) {
-               if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & 0x0020000000000000ul) {
+               if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR_SIGN) {
                        if ((s64)now < (s64)ckc)
                                sltime = tod_to_ns((s64)ckc - (s64)now);
                } else if (now < ckc) {