Message ID | 1525941077-31863-4-git-send-email-vidya.srinivas@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Op 10-05-18 om 10:31 schreef Vidya Srinivas: > From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > > We skip src trunction/adjustments for > NV12 case and handle the sizes directly. > Without this, pipe fifo underruns are seen on APL/KBL. > > v2: For NV12, making the src coordinates multiplier of 4 > > v3: Moving all the src coords handling code for NV12 > to skl_check_nv12_surface > > v4: Added RB from Mika > > v5: Rebased the series. Removed checks of mult of 4 in > skl_update_scaler, Added NV12 condition in intel_check_sprite_plane > where src x/w is being checked for mult of 2 for yuv planes. > > Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index dfca71e..cca46f9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -3102,6 +3102,42 @@ static int skl_check_main_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > return 0; > } > > +static int > +skl_check_nv12_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > + struct intel_plane_state *plane_state) > +{ > + int crtc_x2 = plane_state->base.crtc_x + plane_state->base.crtc_w; > + int crtc_y2 = plane_state->base.crtc_y + plane_state->base.crtc_h; > + > + if (((plane_state->base.src_x >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > + ((plane_state->base.src_y >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > + ((plane_state->base.src_w >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > + ((plane_state->base.src_h >> 16) % 4) != 0) { > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("src coords must be multiple of 4 for NV12\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + /* Clipping would cause a 1-3 pixel gap at the edge of the screen? */ > + if ((crtc_x2 > crtc_state->pipe_src_w && crtc_state->pipe_src_w % 4) || > + (crtc_y2 > crtc_state->pipe_src_h && crtc_state->pipe_src_h % 4)) { > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("It's not possible to clip %u,%u to %u,%u\n", > + crtc_x2, crtc_y2, > + crtc_state->pipe_src_w, crtc_state->pipe_src_h); > + return -EINVAL; > + } Oops, wrong checks here.. skl_check_nv12_surface is only needed for Display WA #1106, so check might need to be something like: static int skl_check_nv12_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, struct intel_plane_state *plane_state) { /* Display WA #1106 */ if (plane_state->base.rotation != (DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X | DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90) && plane_state->base.rotation != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270) return 0; /* src coordinates are rotated here. We check height but report it as width. */ if (((drm_rect_height(&plane_state->base.src) >> 16) % 4) != 0) { DRM_DEBUG_KMS("src width must be multiple of 4 for rotated NV12\n"); return -EINVAL; } return 0; } Would this hit FIFO underruns?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 2:56 PM > To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>; intel- > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/i915: Add skl_check_nv12_surface for NV12 > > Op 10-05-18 om 10:31 schreef Vidya Srinivas: > > From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > > > > We skip src trunction/adjustments for > > NV12 case and handle the sizes directly. > > Without this, pipe fifo underruns are seen on APL/KBL. > > > > v2: For NV12, making the src coordinates multiplier of 4 > > > > v3: Moving all the src coords handling code for NV12 to > > skl_check_nv12_surface > > > > v4: Added RB from Mika > > > > v5: Rebased the series. Removed checks of mult of 4 in > > skl_update_scaler, Added NV12 condition in intel_check_sprite_plane > > where src x/w is being checked for mult of 2 for yuv planes. > > > > Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 42 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > index dfca71e..cca46f9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > @@ -3102,6 +3102,42 @@ static int skl_check_main_surface(const struct > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static int > > +skl_check_nv12_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > + struct intel_plane_state *plane_state) { > > + int crtc_x2 = plane_state->base.crtc_x + plane_state->base.crtc_w; > > + int crtc_y2 = plane_state->base.crtc_y + plane_state->base.crtc_h; > > + > > + if (((plane_state->base.src_x >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > > + ((plane_state->base.src_y >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > > + ((plane_state->base.src_w >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > > + ((plane_state->base.src_h >> 16) % 4) != 0) { > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("src coords must be multiple of 4 for > NV12\n"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + /* Clipping would cause a 1-3 pixel gap at the edge of the screen? */ > > + if ((crtc_x2 > crtc_state->pipe_src_w && crtc_state->pipe_src_w % > 4) || > > + (crtc_y2 > crtc_state->pipe_src_h && crtc_state->pipe_src_h % 4)) > { > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("It's not possible to clip %u,%u to > %u,%u\n", > > + crtc_x2, crtc_y2, > > + crtc_state->pipe_src_w, crtc_state->pipe_src_h); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > Oops, wrong checks here.. > > skl_check_nv12_surface is only needed for Display WA #1106, so check > might need to be something like: > > static int > skl_check_nv12_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > struct intel_plane_state *plane_state) { > /* Display WA #1106 */ > if (plane_state->base.rotation != (DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X | > DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90) && > plane_state->base.rotation != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270) > return 0; > > /* src coordinates are rotated here. We check height but report it as > width. */ > if (((drm_rect_height(&plane_state->base.src) >> 16) % 4) != 0) { > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("src width must be multiple of 4 for > rotated NV12\n"); > return -EINVAL; > } > > return 0; > } > > Would this hit FIFO underruns? Thank you. I have made the change and floated the series. Please have a check. When I tested It on my end on GLK, I did not observe any fifo underruns. Will wait for IGT test results from BAT. Regards Vidya
> -----Original Message----- > From: Srinivas, Vidya > Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 8:36 AM > To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>; intel- > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/i915: Add skl_check_nv12_surface for NV12 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com] > > Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 2:56 PM > > To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>; intel- > > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/i915: Add skl_check_nv12_surface for > > NV12 > > > > Op 10-05-18 om 10:31 schreef Vidya Srinivas: > > > From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > We skip src trunction/adjustments for > > > NV12 case and handle the sizes directly. > > > Without this, pipe fifo underruns are seen on APL/KBL. > > > > > > v2: For NV12, making the src coordinates multiplier of 4 > > > > > > v3: Moving all the src coords handling code for NV12 to > > > skl_check_nv12_surface > > > > > > v4: Added RB from Mika > > > > > > v5: Rebased the series. Removed checks of mult of 4 in > > > skl_update_scaler, Added NV12 condition in intel_check_sprite_plane > > > where src x/w is being checked for mult of 2 for yuv planes. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 42 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 1 + > > > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > index dfca71e..cca46f9 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > @@ -3102,6 +3102,42 @@ static int skl_check_main_surface(const > > > struct > > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > > return 0; > > > } > > > > > > +static int > > > +skl_check_nv12_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > > + struct intel_plane_state *plane_state) { > > > + int crtc_x2 = plane_state->base.crtc_x + plane_state->base.crtc_w; > > > + int crtc_y2 = plane_state->base.crtc_y + plane_state->base.crtc_h; > > > + > > > + if (((plane_state->base.src_x >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > > > + ((plane_state->base.src_y >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > > > + ((plane_state->base.src_w >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > > > + ((plane_state->base.src_h >> 16) % 4) != 0) { > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("src coords must be multiple of 4 for > > NV12\n"); > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + } > > > + > > > + /* Clipping would cause a 1-3 pixel gap at the edge of the screen? */ > > > + if ((crtc_x2 > crtc_state->pipe_src_w && crtc_state->pipe_src_w % > > 4) || > > > + (crtc_y2 > crtc_state->pipe_src_h && crtc_state->pipe_src_h % > > > +4)) > > { > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("It's not possible to clip %u,%u to > > %u,%u\n", > > > + crtc_x2, crtc_y2, > > > + crtc_state->pipe_src_w, crtc_state->pipe_src_h); > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + } > > Oops, wrong checks here.. > > > > skl_check_nv12_surface is only needed for Display WA #1106, so check > > might need to be something like: > > > > static int > > skl_check_nv12_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > struct intel_plane_state *plane_state) { > > /* Display WA #1106 */ > > if (plane_state->base.rotation != (DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X | > > DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90) && > > plane_state->base.rotation != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270) > > return 0; > > > > /* src coordinates are rotated here. We check height but report it as > > width. */ > > if (((drm_rect_height(&plane_state->base.src) >> 16) % 4) != 0) { > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("src width must be multiple of 4 for > rotated NV12\n"); > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > return 0; > > } > > > > Would this hit FIFO underruns? > > Thank you. I have made the change and floated the series. Please have a > check. > When I tested It on my end on GLK, I did not observe any fifo underruns. Will > wait for IGT test results from BAT. > IGT BAT shows PASS on rev 6 of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41674/ This has the change for skl_check_nv12_surface. Can you please have a check? Thank you. Regards Vidya
> -----Original Message----- > From: Srinivas, Vidya > Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 5:08 PM > To: 'Maarten Lankhorst' <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>; 'intel- > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org' <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/i915: Add skl_check_nv12_surface for NV12 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Srinivas, Vidya > > Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 8:36 AM > > To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>; intel- > > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/i915: Add skl_check_nv12_surface for > > NV12 > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com] > > > Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 2:56 PM > > > To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>; intel- > > > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] drm/i915: Add skl_check_nv12_surface for > > > NV12 > > > > > > Op 10-05-18 om 10:31 schreef Vidya Srinivas: > > > > From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > > > We skip src trunction/adjustments for > > > > NV12 case and handle the sizes directly. > > > > Without this, pipe fifo underruns are seen on APL/KBL. > > > > > > > > v2: For NV12, making the src coordinates multiplier of 4 > > > > > > > > v3: Moving all the src coords handling code for NV12 to > > > > skl_check_nv12_surface > > > > > > > > v4: Added RB from Mika > > > > > > > > v5: Rebased the series. Removed checks of mult of 4 in > > > > skl_update_scaler, Added NV12 condition in > > > > intel_check_sprite_plane where src x/w is being checked for mult of 2 > for yuv planes. > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst > > > > <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 42 > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 1 + > > > > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > > index dfca71e..cca46f9 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > > @@ -3102,6 +3102,42 @@ static int skl_check_main_surface(const > > > > struct > > > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +static int > > > > +skl_check_nv12_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > > > + struct intel_plane_state *plane_state) { > > > > + int crtc_x2 = plane_state->base.crtc_x + plane_state->base.crtc_w; > > > > + int crtc_y2 = plane_state->base.crtc_y + > > > > +plane_state->base.crtc_h; > > > > + > > > > + if (((plane_state->base.src_x >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > > > > + ((plane_state->base.src_y >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > > > > + ((plane_state->base.src_w >> 16) % 4) != 0 || > > > > + ((plane_state->base.src_h >> 16) % 4) != 0) { > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("src coords must be multiple of 4 for > > > NV12\n"); > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > + } > > > > + > > > > + /* Clipping would cause a 1-3 pixel gap at the edge of the screen? */ > > > > + if ((crtc_x2 > crtc_state->pipe_src_w && crtc_state->pipe_src_w > > > > +% > > > 4) || > > > > + (crtc_y2 > crtc_state->pipe_src_h && crtc_state->pipe_src_h > > > > +% > > > > +4)) > > > { > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("It's not possible to clip %u,%u to > > > %u,%u\n", > > > > + crtc_x2, crtc_y2, > > > > + crtc_state->pipe_src_w, crtc_state->pipe_src_h); > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > + } > > > Oops, wrong checks here.. > > > > > > skl_check_nv12_surface is only needed for Display WA #1106, so check > > > might need to be something like: > > > > > > static int > > > skl_check_nv12_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, > > > struct intel_plane_state *plane_state) { > > > /* Display WA #1106 */ > > > if (plane_state->base.rotation != (DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X | > > > DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90) && > > > plane_state->base.rotation != DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270) > > > return 0; > > > > > > /* src coordinates are rotated here. We check height but report it > > > as width. */ > > > if (((drm_rect_height(&plane_state->base.src) >> 16) % 4) != 0) { > > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("src width must be multiple of 4 for > > rotated NV12\n"); > > > return -EINVAL; > > > } > > > > > > return 0; > > > } > > > > > > Would this hit FIFO underruns? > > > > Thank you. I have made the change and floated the series. Please have > > a check. > > When I tested It on my end on GLK, I did not observe any fifo > > underruns. Will wait for IGT test results from BAT. > > > > IGT BAT shows PASS on rev 6 of > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41674/ > This has the change for skl_check_nv12_surface. Can you please have a > check? > Thank you. Sorry to ask. Can these go in for merge? I mean after the drm-misc-next backmerge that you were mentioning. Regards Vidya > > Regards > Vidya
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index dfca71e..cca46f9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -3102,6 +3102,42 @@ static int skl_check_main_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, return 0; } +static int +skl_check_nv12_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, + struct intel_plane_state *plane_state) +{ + int crtc_x2 = plane_state->base.crtc_x + plane_state->base.crtc_w; + int crtc_y2 = plane_state->base.crtc_y + plane_state->base.crtc_h; + + if (((plane_state->base.src_x >> 16) % 4) != 0 || + ((plane_state->base.src_y >> 16) % 4) != 0 || + ((plane_state->base.src_w >> 16) % 4) != 0 || + ((plane_state->base.src_h >> 16) % 4) != 0) { + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("src coords must be multiple of 4 for NV12\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* Clipping would cause a 1-3 pixel gap at the edge of the screen? */ + if ((crtc_x2 > crtc_state->pipe_src_w && crtc_state->pipe_src_w % 4) || + (crtc_y2 > crtc_state->pipe_src_h && crtc_state->pipe_src_h % 4)) { + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("It's not possible to clip %u,%u to %u,%u\n", + crtc_x2, crtc_y2, + crtc_state->pipe_src_w, crtc_state->pipe_src_h); + return -EINVAL; + } + + plane_state->base.src.x1 = + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(plane_state->base.src.x1, 1 << 18) << 18; + plane_state->base.src.x2 = + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(plane_state->base.src.x2, 1 << 18) << 18; + plane_state->base.src.y1 = + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(plane_state->base.src.y1, 1 << 18) << 18; + plane_state->base.src.y2 = + DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(plane_state->base.src.y2, 1 << 18) << 18; + + return 0; +} + static int skl_check_nv12_aux_surface(struct intel_plane_state *plane_state) { const struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->base.fb; @@ -3185,6 +3221,9 @@ int skl_check_plane_surface(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, * the main surface setup depends on it. */ if (fb->format->format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12) { + ret = skl_check_nv12_surface(crtc_state, plane_state); + if (ret) + return ret; ret = skl_check_nv12_aux_surface(plane_state); if (ret) return ret; @@ -4806,8 +4845,7 @@ skl_update_scaler(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state, bool force_detach, } if (plane_scaler_check && pixel_format == DRM_FORMAT_NV12 && - (src_h < SKL_MIN_YUV_420_SRC_H || (src_w % 4) != 0 || - (src_h % 4) != 0)) { + (src_h < SKL_MIN_YUV_420_SRC_H || src_w < SKL_MIN_YUV_420_SRC_W)) { DRM_DEBUG_KMS("NV12: src dimensions not met\n"); return -EINVAL; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c index 0c394a2..c73553a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c @@ -1011,6 +1011,7 @@ intel_check_sprite_plane(struct intel_plane *plane, src->y2 = (src_y + src_h) << 16; if (intel_format_is_yuv(fb->format->format) && + fb->format->format != DRM_FORMAT_NV12 && (src_x % 2 || src_w % 2)) { DRM_DEBUG_KMS("src x/w (%u, %u) must be a multiple of 2 for YUV planes\n", src_x, src_w);