Message ID | 1527765086-19873-17-git-send-email-xieyisheng1@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 3470631510fa383feac5969b436499ca9bad03b8 |
Headers | show |
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 07:11:21PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote: > match_string() returns the index of an array for a matching string, > which can be used instead of open coded variant. I don't have either the cover letter or the rest of the series here so I've no context - what is the story here with regard to dependencies and things?
Hi Mark, On 2018/5/31 19:49, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 07:11:21PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote: >> match_string() returns the index of an array for a matching string, >> which can be used instead of open coded variant. > > I don't have either the cover letter or the rest of the series here so > I've no context - what is the story here with regard to dependencies and > things? Sorry about that I should have sent cover letter to you, but for too many maintainer to sent, I ignore this to avoid make too much noisy. Anyway, Here is the cover letter of v1 and I have add v2's cover letter to you: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/21/303 Each patch in this patchset is a separate one, for what this patchset want to do is use match_string() helper for echo subsystem. Thanks Yisheng >
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 08:25:39PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote: > Anyway, Here is the cover letter of v1 and I have add v2's cover letter to you: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/21/303 > Each patch in this patchset is a separate one, for what this patchset want to do > is use match_string() helper for echo subsystem. For something like this it's generally easier to not send everything as one big series - it avoids any confusion about dependencies and there's no actual relationship between the patches. Instead just sending each subsystem as a series or perhaps even just a bunch of separate patches should make things smoother.
Hi Mark, On 2018/6/1 0:02, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 08:25:39PM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote: > >> Anyway, Here is the cover letter of v1 and I have add v2's cover letter to you: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/21/303 > >> Each patch in this patchset is a separate one, for what this patchset want to do >> is use match_string() helper for echo subsystem. > > For something like this it's generally easier to not send everything as > one big series - it avoids any confusion about dependencies and there's > no actual relationship between the patches. Instead just sending each > subsystem as a series or perhaps even just a bunch of separate patches > should make things smoother. Thanks, will take this suggestion maybe next time. Thanks Yisheng >
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98088.c b/sound/soc/codecs/max98088.c index 865f64c..fb515aa 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/max98088.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/max98088.c @@ -1382,15 +1382,12 @@ static int max98088_set_bias_level(struct snd_soc_component *component, static int max98088_get_channel(struct snd_soc_component *component, const char *name) { - int i; + int ret; - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(eq_mode_name); i++) - if (strcmp(name, eq_mode_name[i]) == 0) - return i; - - /* Shouldn't happen */ - dev_err(component->dev, "Bad EQ channel name '%s'\n", name); - return -EINVAL; + ret = match_string(eq_mode_name, ARRAY_SIZE(eq_mode_name), name); + if (ret < 0) + dev_err(component->dev, "Bad EQ channel name '%s'\n", name); + return ret; } static void max98088_setup_eq1(struct snd_soc_component *component)
match_string() returns the index of an array for a matching string, which can be used instead of open coded variant. Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@huawei.com> --- v2: - split ret=xxx and move assignment to the line before 'if' - fix error return value - both per Andy sound/soc/codecs/max98088.c | 13 +++++-------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)