Message ID | 20180508070426.32211-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 08/05/18 08:04, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > The default-on property - or the def_value via legacy pdata) should be > handled as: > if it is 1, the backlight must be enabled (kept enabled) > if it is 0, the backlight must be disabled (kept disabled) > > This only works for the case when default-on is set. If it is not set then > the brightness of the backlight is set to 0. Now if the backlight is > enabled by external driver (graphics) the backlight will stay disabled since > the brightness is configured as 0. The backlight will not turn on. > > The correct action at probe time is to configure the props.power to > FB_BLANK_UNBLANK if we want the backlight on by default or to > FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN if the backlight should be off by default. > > The initial brightness should be set to 1. Hmnn... I guess this comes down to the definition of "on" for a binary Actually I'm a little worried that backlight already has too many different behaviors and that this patch introduces another way for them to be different! Is there any mileage in adopting the same approach as PWM backlight for blank/unblank management as a way to get a flicker free boot? For PWM the default property controls the initial brightness and the initial power state is unblanked *unless* there is a phandle link to the node, in which case we inherit whatever the power state the bootloader had configured before the driver probed. Put another way, what happens is we implement gpio_backlight_initial_power_state() to perform a similar task to pwm_backlight_initial_power_state(). Daniel. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> > --- > Hi, > > for some reason the original patch got lost: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9445539/ > > But it is still valid, so I'm resending it. > > Regards, > Peter > > drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c > index e470da95d806..904a4462cefe 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c > @@ -142,7 +142,9 @@ static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(bl); > } > > - bl->props.brightness = gbl->def_value; > + bl->props.power = gbl->def_value ? FB_BLANK_UNBLANK : FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN; > + bl->props.brightness = 1; > + > backlight_update_status(bl); > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bl); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Daniel, On 2018-06-13 18:11, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On 08/05/18 08:04, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> The default-on property - or the def_value via legacy pdata) should be >> handled as: >> if it is 1, the backlight must be enabled (kept enabled) >> if it is 0, the backlight must be disabled (kept disabled) >> >> This only works for the case when default-on is set. If it is not set >> then >> the brightness of the backlight is set to 0. Now if the backlight is >> enabled by external driver (graphics) the backlight will stay disabled >> since >> the brightness is configured as 0. The backlight will not turn on. >> >> The correct action at probe time is to configure the props.power to >> FB_BLANK_UNBLANK if we want the backlight on by default or to >> FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN if the backlight should be off by default. >> >> The initial brightness should be set to 1. > > Hmnn... I guess this comes down to the definition of "on" for a binary > > Actually I'm a little worried that backlight already has too many > different behaviors and that this patch introduces another way for them > to be different! > > Is there any mileage in adopting the same approach as PWM backlight for > blank/unblank management as a way to get a flicker free boot? This patch is merely fixing a bug in the driver. > For PWM the default property controls the initial brightness and the > initial power state is unblanked *unless* there is a phandle link to the > node, in which case we inherit whatever the power state the bootloader > had configured before the driver probed. > > Put another way, what happens is we implement > gpio_backlight_initial_power_state() to perform a similar task to > pwm_backlight_initial_power_state(). I agree, but what should we do with the default-on parameter? non DT boot or DT boot, no phandle link: default-on ? FB_BLANK_UNBLANK : FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN DT boot and phandle link: if the GPIO was enabled by the bootloader: FB_BLANK_UNBLANK if the GIOP was not enabled by the bootloader: FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN I think this will mimic closely what the pwm_backlight_initial_power_state() does. - Péter > > > Daniel. > > >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> >> --- >> Hi, >> >> for some reason the original patch got lost: >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9445539/ >> >> But it is still valid, so I'm resending it. >> >> Regards, >> Peter >> >> drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c >> b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c >> index e470da95d806..904a4462cefe 100644 >> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c >> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c >> @@ -142,7 +142,9 @@ static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct >> platform_device *pdev) >> return PTR_ERR(bl); >> } >> - bl->props.brightness = gbl->def_value; >> + bl->props.power = gbl->def_value ? FB_BLANK_UNBLANK : >> FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN; >> + bl->props.brightness = 1; >> + >> backlight_update_status(bl); >> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bl); >> > Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c index e470da95d806..904a4462cefe 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c @@ -142,7 +142,9 @@ static int gpio_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(bl); } - bl->props.brightness = gbl->def_value; + bl->props.power = gbl->def_value ? FB_BLANK_UNBLANK : FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN; + bl->props.brightness = 1; + backlight_update_status(bl); platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bl);
The default-on property - or the def_value via legacy pdata) should be handled as: if it is 1, the backlight must be enabled (kept enabled) if it is 0, the backlight must be disabled (kept disabled) This only works for the case when default-on is set. If it is not set then the brightness of the backlight is set to 0. Now if the backlight is enabled by external driver (graphics) the backlight will stay disabled since the brightness is configured as 0. The backlight will not turn on. The correct action at probe time is to configure the props.power to FB_BLANK_UNBLANK if we want the backlight on by default or to FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN if the backlight should be off by default. The initial brightness should be set to 1. Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> --- Hi, for some reason the original patch got lost: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9445539/ But it is still valid, so I'm resending it. Regards, Peter drivers/video/backlight/gpio_backlight.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)