Message ID | 20180614203433.5602-5-jose.souza@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:34:33PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame and > compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by > source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD > and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS. > > Spec: 7723 > > v4: > patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time timeout' > to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG. > > v3: > disabling PSR instead of exiting on error > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index 140f6a27d696..ed34ccd81c7c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@ enum { > #define EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT (1<<12) > #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL (0<<11) > #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL (1<<11) > +#define EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE (1<<10) /* BDW+ */ > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us (0<<8) > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us (1<<8) > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us (2<<8) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > index 177cd57b1029..cf72b79caf3f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > > if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby) > dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE; > + if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) > + dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION; > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, dpcd_val); > > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, DP_SET_POWER_D0); > @@ -415,6 +417,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > else > val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL; > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) > + val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE; > + > val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK; > I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val); > } > @@ -1032,16 +1037,19 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > goto exit; > } > > - if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) { > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting PSR\n"); > + if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR | DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) { > + if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) I believe we can avoid the duplication of the conditions here... maybe with: if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) //msg else if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR) //msg else goto clear intel_psr_disable_locked() > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, disabling PSR\n"); > + if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR) > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error, disabling PSR\n"); > psr_disable(intel_dp); > } > - if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR | DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) > + if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR) > DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n", val); clear: > /* clear status register */ > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, val); > > - /* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */ > + /* TODO: handle PSR2 errors */ > exit: > mutex_unlock(&psr->lock); > } > -- > 2.17.1 >
On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 14:19 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:34:33PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza > wrote: > > > > Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame > > and > > compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by > > source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD > > and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS. > > > > Spec: 7723 > > > > v4: > > patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time > > timeout' > > to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG. > > > > v3: > > disabling PSR instead of exiting on error > > > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > index 140f6a27d696..ed34ccd81c7c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > @@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@ enum { > > #define EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT (1<<12) > > #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL (0<<11) > > #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL (1<<11) > > +#define EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE (1<<10) /* > > BDW+ */ > > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us (0<<8) > > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us (1<<8) > > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us (2<<8) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > index 177cd57b1029..cf72b79caf3f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp > > *intel_dp) > > > > if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby) > > dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE; > > + if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= > > 8) > > + dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION; > > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, > > dpcd_val); > > > > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, > > DP_SET_POWER_D0); > > @@ -415,6 +417,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp > > *intel_dp) > > else > > val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL; > > > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) > > + val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE; > > + > > val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & > > EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK; > > I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val); > > } > > @@ -1032,16 +1037,19 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp > > *intel_dp) > > goto exit; > > } > > > > - if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) { > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting > > PSR\n"); > > + if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR | > > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) { > > + if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) > I believe we can avoid the duplication of the conditions here... > maybe with: > if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) > //msg > else if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR) > //msg > else > goto clear > > intel_psr_disable_locked() > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, > > disabling PSR\n"); > > + if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR) > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error, > > disabling PSR\n"); > > psr_disable(intel_dp); > > } > > - if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR | > > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) > > + if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR) > > DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n", > > val); Shouldn't PSR be disabled for this case too? Or is this going to be done in another patch?
On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 14:19 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:34:33PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza > wrote: > > Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame > > and > > compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by > > source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD > > and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS. > > > > Spec: 7723 > > > > v4: > > patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time > > timeout' > > to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG. > > > > v3: > > disabling PSR instead of exiting on error > > > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > index 140f6a27d696..ed34ccd81c7c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > @@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@ enum { > > #define EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT (1<<12) > > #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL (0<<11) > > #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL (1<<11) > > +#define EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE (1<<10) /* > > BDW+ */ > > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us (0<<8) > > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us (1<<8) > > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us (2<<8) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > index 177cd57b1029..cf72b79caf3f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp > > *intel_dp) > > > > if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby) > > dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE; > > + if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= > > 8) > > + dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION; > > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, > > dpcd_val); > > > > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, > > DP_SET_POWER_D0); > > @@ -415,6 +417,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp > > *intel_dp) > > else > > val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL; > > > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) > > + val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE; > > + > > val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & > > EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK; > > I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val); > > } > > @@ -1032,16 +1037,19 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp > > *intel_dp) > > goto exit; > > } > > > > - if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) { > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting > > PSR\n"); > > + if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR | > > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) { > > + if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) > > I believe we can avoid the duplication of the conditions here... > maybe with: > if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) > //msg > else if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR) > //msg > else > goto clear Well val can have all 3 errors set, so it would only print the first debug message but I got your point, I will change to: if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) //msg if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR) //msg ... if (val) intel_psr_disable_locked() as right all errors are unrecovered. This sounds good? > > intel_psr_disable_locked() > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, > > disabling PSR\n"); > > + if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR) > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error, > > disabling PSR\n"); > > psr_disable(intel_dp); > > } > > - if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR | > > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) > > + if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR) > > DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n", > > val); > > clear: > > /* clear status register */ > > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, > > val); > > > > - /* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */ > > + /* TODO: handle PSR2 errors */ > > exit: > > mutex_unlock(&psr->lock); > > } > > -- > > 2.17.1 > >
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Souza, Jose wrote: > On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 14:19 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 01:34:33PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza > > wrote: > > > Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame > > > and > > > compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by > > > source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD > > > and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS. > > > > > > Spec: 7723 > > > > > > v4: > > > patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time > > > timeout' > > > to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG. > > > > > > v3: > > > disabling PSR instead of exiting on error > > > > > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> > > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > index 140f6a27d696..ed34ccd81c7c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > > > @@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@ enum { > > > #define EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT (1<<12) > > > #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL (0<<11) > > > #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL (1<<11) > > > +#define EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE (1<<10) /* > > > BDW+ */ > > > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us (0<<8) > > > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us (1<<8) > > > #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us (2<<8) > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > index 177cd57b1029..cf72b79caf3f 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c > > > @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp > > > *intel_dp) > > > > > > if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby) > > > dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE; > > > + if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= > > > 8) > > > + dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION; > > > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, > > > dpcd_val); > > > > > > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, > > > DP_SET_POWER_D0); > > > @@ -415,6 +417,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp > > > *intel_dp) > > > else > > > val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL; > > > > > > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) > > > + val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE; > > > + > > > val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & > > > EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK; > > > I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val); > > > } > > > @@ -1032,16 +1037,19 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp > > > *intel_dp) > > > goto exit; > > > } > > > > > > - if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) { > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting > > > PSR\n"); > > > + if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR | > > > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) { > > > + if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) > > > > I believe we can avoid the duplication of the conditions here... > > maybe with: > > if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) > > //msg > > else if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR) > > //msg > > else > > goto clear > > Well val can have all 3 errors set, so it would only print the first > debug message but I got your point, I will change to: > > if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) > //msg > if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR) > //msg > ... > > if (val) > intel_psr_disable_locked() > > as right all errors are unrecovered. This sounds good? cool, better than my goto idea ;) > > > > > > intel_psr_disable_locked() > > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, > > > disabling PSR\n"); > > > + if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR) > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error, > > > disabling PSR\n"); > > > psr_disable(intel_dp); > > > } > > > - if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR | > > > DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) > > > + if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR) > > > DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n", > > > val); > > > > clear: > > > /* clear status register */ > > > drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, > > > val); > > > > > > - /* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */ > > > + /* TODO: handle PSR2 errors */ > > > exit: > > > mutex_unlock(&psr->lock); > > > } > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > > >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 140f6a27d696..ed34ccd81c7c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -4038,6 +4038,7 @@ enum { #define EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT (1<<12) #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL (0<<11) #define EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL (1<<11) +#define EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE (1<<10) /* BDW+ */ #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us (0<<8) #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us (1<<8) #define EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us (2<<8) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index 177cd57b1029..cf72b79caf3f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -360,6 +360,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby) dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE; + if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_enabled && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) + dpcd_val |= DP_PSR_CRC_VERIFICATION; drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG, dpcd_val); drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SET_POWER, DP_SET_POWER_D0); @@ -415,6 +417,9 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) else val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL; + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) + val |= EDP_PSR_CRC_ENABLE; + val |= I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & EDP_PSR_RESTORE_PSR_ACTIVE_CTX_MASK; I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val); } @@ -1032,16 +1037,19 @@ void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) goto exit; } - if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) { - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, exiting PSR\n"); + if (val & (DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR | DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) { + if (val & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR) + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR RFB storage error, disabling PSR\n"); + if (val & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR) + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR Link CRC error, disabling PSR\n"); psr_disable(intel_dp); } - if (val & (DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR | DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)) + if (val & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR) DRM_ERROR("PSR_ERROR_STATUS not handled %x\n", val); /* clear status register */ drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, val); - /* TODO: handle other PSR/PSR2 errors */ + /* TODO: handle PSR2 errors */ exit: mutex_unlock(&psr->lock); }
Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame and compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS. Spec: 7723 v4: patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time timeout' to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG. v3: disabling PSR instead of exiting on error Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)