Message ID | 20180619094342.81831-6-tony@atomide.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > After enabling runtime PM, if we force hardware reset multiple times with: > > # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/wlcore/start_recovery > > We will after few tries get the following error: > > wlcore: ERROR timeout waiting for the hardware to complete initialization > > And then wlcore is unable to reconnect until after the wlcore related modules > are reloaded. > > Let's fix this by moving pm_runtime_put() earlier before we restart the hardware. > And let's use the sync version to make sure we're done before we restart. > > Note that we still will get -EBUSY warning from wl12xx_sdio_set_power() but let's > fix that separately once we know exactly why we get the warning. > > Reported-by: Eyal Reizer <eyalr@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> I'll do s/wclore/wlcore/ to the title.
* Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> [180627 15:44]: > > I'll do s/wclore/wlcore/ to the title. OK thanks and sorry about that one. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> writes: > * Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> [180627 15:44]: >> >> I'll do s/wclore/wlcore/ to the title. > > OK thanks and sorry about that one. No problem. I would not have even noticed the typo but I did 'list -s new wlcore' (which prints all patches in new state with wlcore on the subject) on my patchwork script and started to wonder where did the patch 5 go :)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c @@ -977,6 +977,7 @@ static void wl1271_recovery_work(struct work_struct *work) } wlcore_op_stop_locked(wl); + pm_runtime_put_sync(wl->dev); ieee80211_restart_hw(wl->hw); @@ -986,8 +987,6 @@ static void wl1271_recovery_work(struct work_struct *work) */ wlcore_wake_queues(wl, WLCORE_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_FW_RESTART); - pm_runtime_put(wl->dev); - out_unlock: wl->watchdog_recovery = false; clear_bit(WL1271_FLAG_RECOVERY_IN_PROGRESS, &wl->flags);
After enabling runtime PM, if we force hardware reset multiple times with: # echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy0/wlcore/start_recovery We will after few tries get the following error: wlcore: ERROR timeout waiting for the hardware to complete initialization And then wlcore is unable to reconnect until after the wlcore related modules are reloaded. Let's fix this by moving pm_runtime_put() earlier before we restart the hardware. And let's use the sync version to make sure we're done before we restart. Note that we still will get -EBUSY warning from wl12xx_sdio_set_power() but let's fix that separately once we know exactly why we get the warning. Reported-by: Eyal Reizer <eyalr@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)