Message ID | 20180709102847.15553-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:28:47AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > gem_render_copy requires a working GPU so check first. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > --- > tests/gem_render_copy.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/tests/gem_render_copy.c b/tests/gem_render_copy.c > index 8373cd738..238e70e97 100644 > --- a/tests/gem_render_copy.c > +++ b/tests/gem_render_copy.c > @@ -529,6 +529,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > igt_fixture { > data.drm_fd = drm_open_driver_render(DRIVER_INTEL); > data.devid = intel_get_drm_devid(data.drm_fd); > + igt_require_gem(data.drm_fd); Is there ever a case where we'd be happy with open_driver() failing? Just wondering about putting the require into the function itself. Anyways Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> > > data.bufmgr = drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(data.drm_fd, 4096); > igt_assert(data.bufmgr); > -- > 2.18.0 > > _______________________________________________ > igt-dev mailing list > igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2018-07-09 14:19:40) > On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:28:47AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > gem_render_copy requires a working GPU so check first. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > --- > > tests/gem_render_copy.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/tests/gem_render_copy.c b/tests/gem_render_copy.c > > index 8373cd738..238e70e97 100644 > > --- a/tests/gem_render_copy.c > > +++ b/tests/gem_render_copy.c > > @@ -529,6 +529,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > > igt_fixture { > > data.drm_fd = drm_open_driver_render(DRIVER_INTEL); > > data.devid = intel_get_drm_devid(data.drm_fd); > > + igt_require_gem(data.drm_fd); > > Is there ever a case where we'd be happy with open_driver() failing? > Just wondering about putting the require into the function itself. I suppose we could add require_gem to open_driver_render(), but it doesn't seem that generic. We definitely can do KMS operations even if execbuf() returns -EIO. At some point, we'll just have to bite the bullet and start rewriting GEM tests to apply to amdgpu as well -- there are quite a few that I think aren't i915 centric, e.g. gem_sync, that might help define what we can and what we can't generalise. -Chris
diff --git a/tests/gem_render_copy.c b/tests/gem_render_copy.c index 8373cd738..238e70e97 100644 --- a/tests/gem_render_copy.c +++ b/tests/gem_render_copy.c @@ -529,6 +529,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) igt_fixture { data.drm_fd = drm_open_driver_render(DRIVER_INTEL); data.devid = intel_get_drm_devid(data.drm_fd); + igt_require_gem(data.drm_fd); data.bufmgr = drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(data.drm_fd, 4096); igt_assert(data.bufmgr);
gem_render_copy requires a working GPU so check first. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> --- tests/gem_render_copy.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)