Message ID | 1529763567-13131-4-git-send-email-tdas@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested, archived |
Headers | show |
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-06-23 07:19:27) > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..af437e0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c > @@ -0,0 +1,674 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 [...] > +static struct clk_alpha_pll disp_cc_pll0 = { > + .offset = 0x0, > + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_FABIA], > + .clkr = { > + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ > + .name = "disp_cc_pll0", > + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "bi_tcxo" }, > + .num_parents = 1, > + .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_fabia_ops, > + }, > + }, > +}; > + > +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src = { > + .cmd_rcgr = 0x20d0, > + .mnd_width = 0, > + .hid_width = 5, > + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, > + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ > + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src", > + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, > + .num_parents = 4, > + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, Why is there the no cache flag? Last time I asked I don't think I got any answer, and there isn't a comment here so please at least add a comment to the code so we don't forget. > + .ops = &clk_byte2_ops, > + }, > +}; > + > +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src = { > + .cmd_rcgr = 0x20ec, > + .mnd_width = 0, > + .hid_width = 5, > + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, > + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ > + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src", > + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, > + .num_parents = 4, > + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, > + .ops = &clk_byte2_ops, > + }, > +}; > + > +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src[] = { > + F(19200000, P_BI_TCXO, 1, 0, 0), > + { } > +}; > + > +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src = { > + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2108, > + .mnd_width = 0, > + .hid_width = 5, > + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, > + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src, > + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ > + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src", > + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, > + .num_parents = 4, > + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops, > + }, > +}; > + > +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_esc1_clk_src = { > + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2120, > + .mnd_width = 0, > + .hid_width = 5, > + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, > + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src, > + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ > + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_esc1_clk_src", > + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, > + .num_parents = 4, > + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops, > + }, > +}; > + [...] > + > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Stephen, Thanks for your review comments. On 7/9/2018 5:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-06-23 07:19:27) >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..af437e0 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,674 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > [...] >> +static struct clk_alpha_pll disp_cc_pll0 = { >> + .offset = 0x0, >> + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_FABIA], >> + .clkr = { >> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ >> + .name = "disp_cc_pll0", >> + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "bi_tcxo" }, >> + .num_parents = 1, >> + .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_fabia_ops, >> + }, >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src = { >> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x20d0, >> + .mnd_width = 0, >> + .hid_width = 5, >> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, >> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ >> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src", >> + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, >> + .num_parents = 4, >> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, > > Why is there the no cache flag? Last time I asked I don't think I got > any answer, and there isn't a comment here so please at least add a > comment to the code so we don't forget. > I think you missed my comment from the earlier email. I would add the comment and submit again. > Why is the nocache flag needed? Applies to all clks in this file. > This flag is required for all RCGs whose PLLs are controlled outside the clock controller. The display code would require the recalculated rate always. >> + .ops = &clk_byte2_ops, >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src = { >> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x20ec, >> + .mnd_width = 0, >> + .hid_width = 5, >> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, >> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ >> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src", >> + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, >> + .num_parents = 4, >> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, >> + .ops = &clk_byte2_ops, >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src[] = { >> + F(19200000, P_BI_TCXO, 1, 0, 0), >> + { } >> +}; >> + >> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src = { >> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2108, >> + .mnd_width = 0, >> + .hid_width = 5, >> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, >> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src, >> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ >> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src", >> + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, >> + .num_parents = 4, >> + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops, >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_esc1_clk_src = { >> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2120, >> + .mnd_width = 0, >> + .hid_width = 5, >> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, >> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src, >> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ >> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_esc1_clk_src", >> + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, >> + .num_parents = 4, >> + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops, >> + }, >> +}; >> + > [...] >> + >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > > MODULE_DESCRIPTION? >
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-08 20:38:03) > Hello Stephen, > > Thanks for your review comments. > > On 7/9/2018 5:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-06-23 07:19:27) > >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..af437e0 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c > >> @@ -0,0 +1,674 @@ > >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > [...] > >> +static struct clk_alpha_pll disp_cc_pll0 = { > >> + .offset = 0x0, > >> + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_FABIA], > >> + .clkr = { > >> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ > >> + .name = "disp_cc_pll0", > >> + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "bi_tcxo" }, > >> + .num_parents = 1, > >> + .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_fabia_ops, > >> + }, > >> + }, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src = { > >> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x20d0, > >> + .mnd_width = 0, > >> + .hid_width = 5, > >> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, > >> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ > >> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src", > >> + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, > >> + .num_parents = 4, > >> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, > > > > Why is there the no cache flag? Last time I asked I don't think I got > > any answer, and there isn't a comment here so please at least add a > > comment to the code so we don't forget. > > > > I think you missed my comment from the earlier email. I would add the > comment and submit again. Hmm.. ok. > > > Why is the nocache flag needed? Applies to all clks in this file. > > > > This flag is required for all RCGs whose PLLs are controlled outside the > clock controller. The display code would require the recalculated rate > always. Right. Why is the PLL controlled outside of the clock controller? The rate should propagate upward to the PLL from here, so who's going outside of that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 7/9/2018 11:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-08 20:38:03) >> Hello Stephen, >> >> Thanks for your review comments. >> >> On 7/9/2018 5:24 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-06-23 07:19:27) >>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 0000000..af437e0 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,674 @@ >>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >>> [...] >>>> +static struct clk_alpha_pll disp_cc_pll0 = { >>>> + .offset = 0x0, >>>> + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_FABIA], >>>> + .clkr = { >>>> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ >>>> + .name = "disp_cc_pll0", >>>> + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "bi_tcxo" }, >>>> + .num_parents = 1, >>>> + .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_fabia_ops, >>>> + }, >>>> + }, >>>> +}; >>>> + >>>> +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src = { >>>> + .cmd_rcgr = 0x20d0, >>>> + .mnd_width = 0, >>>> + .hid_width = 5, >>>> + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, >>>> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ >>>> + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src", >>>> + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, >>>> + .num_parents = 4, >>>> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, >>> >>> Why is there the no cache flag? Last time I asked I don't think I got >>> any answer, and there isn't a comment here so please at least add a >>> comment to the code so we don't forget. >>> >> >> I think you missed my comment from the earlier email. I would add the >> comment and submit again. > > Hmm.. ok. > >> >> > Why is the nocache flag needed? Applies to all clks in this file. >> > >> >> This flag is required for all RCGs whose PLLs are controlled outside the >> clock controller. The display code would require the recalculated rate >> always. > > Right. Why is the PLL controlled outside of the clock controller? The > rate should propagate upward to the PLL from here, so who's going > outside of that? > The DSI0/1 PLL are not part of the display clock controller, but in the display subsystem which are managed by the DRM drivers. When DRM drivers query for the rate clock driver should always return the non cached rates.
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 00:07:21) > > > On 7/9/2018 11:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> > >> > Why is the nocache flag needed? Applies to all clks in this file. > >> > > >> > >> This flag is required for all RCGs whose PLLs are controlled outside the > >> clock controller. The display code would require the recalculated rate > >> always. > > > > Right. Why is the PLL controlled outside of the clock controller? The > > rate should propagate upward to the PLL from here, so who's going > > outside of that? > > > The DSI0/1 PLL are not part of the display clock controller, but in the > display subsystem which are managed by the DRM drivers. When DRM drivers > query for the rate clock driver should always return the non cached rates. Why? Is the DSI PLL changing rate all the time, randomly, without going through the clk APIs to do so? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 7/9/2018 1:07 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 00:07:21) >> >> >> On 7/9/2018 11:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>>> >>>> > Why is the nocache flag needed? Applies to all clks in this file. >>>> > >>>> >>>> This flag is required for all RCGs whose PLLs are controlled outside the >>>> clock controller. The display code would require the recalculated rate >>>> always. >>> >>> Right. Why is the PLL controlled outside of the clock controller? The >>> rate should propagate upward to the PLL from here, so who's going >>> outside of that? >>> >> The DSI0/1 PLL are not part of the display clock controller, but in the >> display subsystem which are managed by the DRM drivers. When DRM drivers >> query for the rate clock driver should always return the non cached rates. > > Why? Is the DSI PLL changing rate all the time, randomly, without going > through the clk APIs to do so? > Hmm, I am afraid I do not have an answer for this, but this was the requirement to always return the non cached rates from the clock driver. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 02:34:07) > > > On 7/9/2018 1:07 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 00:07:21) > >> > >> > >> On 7/9/2018 11:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Why is the nocache flag needed? Applies to all clks in this file. > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> This flag is required for all RCGs whose PLLs are controlled outside the > >>>> clock controller. The display code would require the recalculated rate > >>>> always. > >>> > >>> Right. Why is the PLL controlled outside of the clock controller? The > >>> rate should propagate upward to the PLL from here, so who's going > >>> outside of that? > >>> > >> The DSI0/1 PLL are not part of the display clock controller, but in the > >> display subsystem which are managed by the DRM drivers. When DRM drivers > >> query for the rate clock driver should always return the non cached rates. > > > > Why? Is the DSI PLL changing rate all the time, randomly, without going > > through the clk APIs to do so? > > > > Hmm, I am afraid I do not have an answer for this, but this was the > requirement to always return the non cached rates from the clock driver. > Ok. Who knows about this requirement? Can we add someone from the display driver to understand more? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
++ Display driver team, On 7/9/2018 8:36 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 02:34:07) >> >> >> On 7/9/2018 1:07 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 00:07:21) >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/9/2018 11:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > Why is the nocache flag needed? Applies to all clks in this file. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> This flag is required for all RCGs whose PLLs are controlled outside the >>>>>> clock controller. The display code would require the recalculated rate >>>>>> always. >>>>> >>>>> Right. Why is the PLL controlled outside of the clock controller? The >>>>> rate should propagate upward to the PLL from here, so who's going >>>>> outside of that? >>>>> >>>> The DSI0/1 PLL are not part of the display clock controller, but in the >>>> display subsystem which are managed by the DRM drivers. When DRM drivers >>>> query for the rate clock driver should always return the non cached rates. >>> >>> Why? Is the DSI PLL changing rate all the time, randomly, without going >>> through the clk APIs to do so? >>> >> >> Hmm, I am afraid I do not have an answer for this, but this was the >> requirement to always return the non cached rates from the clock driver. >> > > Ok. Who knows about this requirement? Can we add someone from the > display driver to understand more? > As per my discussions offline with the display teams, There is a use-case where the clock framework is unaware of the PLL VCO frequency change and thus the drivers would query to get the actual HW frequency rather than the cached one. Do you think keeping these flags would have any impact other than always getting the non-cached rates?
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-12 10:21:33) > ++ Display driver team, > > On 7/9/2018 8:36 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 02:34:07) > >> > >> > >> On 7/9/2018 1:07 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 00:07:21) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 7/9/2018 11:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Why is the nocache flag needed? Applies to all clks in this file. > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This flag is required for all RCGs whose PLLs are controlled outside the > >>>>>> clock controller. The display code would require the recalculated rate > >>>>>> always. > >>>>> > >>>>> Right. Why is the PLL controlled outside of the clock controller? The > >>>>> rate should propagate upward to the PLL from here, so who's going > >>>>> outside of that? > >>>>> > >>>> The DSI0/1 PLL are not part of the display clock controller, but in the > >>>> display subsystem which are managed by the DRM drivers. When DRM drivers > >>>> query for the rate clock driver should always return the non cached rates. > >>> > >>> Why? Is the DSI PLL changing rate all the time, randomly, without going > >>> through the clk APIs to do so? > >>> > >> > >> Hmm, I am afraid I do not have an answer for this, but this was the > >> requirement to always return the non cached rates from the clock driver. > >> > > > > Ok. Who knows about this requirement? Can we add someone from the > > display driver to understand more? > > > As per my discussions offline with the display teams, > > There is a use-case where the clock framework is unaware of the PLL VCO > frequency change and thus the drivers would query to get the actual HW > frequency rather than the cached one. > > Do you think keeping these flags would have any impact other than always > getting the non-cached rates? > The flag will make it so clk_get_rate() works in spite of something changing the frequency behind the framework's back, but I want to understand what and why it's changing without framework involvement. We shouldn't need the flag here, because this flag is typically for clks that are controlled by some other entity that the kernel doesn't have control over. In this case, it seems like we have full control of the clk tree for the display PLL down to this clk, so it should be perfectly fine to not have this flag. The presence of the flag means that the display driver is doing something wrong. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2018-07-13 01:11, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-12 10:21:33) >> ++ Display driver team, >> >> On 7/9/2018 8:36 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 02:34:07) >> >> >> >> >> >> On 7/9/2018 1:07 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> >>> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 00:07:21) >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On 7/9/2018 11:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > Why is the nocache flag needed? Applies to all clks in this file. >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> This flag is required for all RCGs whose PLLs are controlled outside the >> >>>>>> clock controller. The display code would require the recalculated rate >> >>>>>> always. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Right. Why is the PLL controlled outside of the clock controller? The >> >>>>> rate should propagate upward to the PLL from here, so who's going >> >>>>> outside of that? >> >>>>> >> >>>> The DSI0/1 PLL are not part of the display clock controller, but in the >> >>>> display subsystem which are managed by the DRM drivers. When DRM drivers >> >>>> query for the rate clock driver should always return the non cached rates. >> >>> >> >>> Why? Is the DSI PLL changing rate all the time, randomly, without going >> >>> through the clk APIs to do so? >> >>> >> >> >> >> Hmm, I am afraid I do not have an answer for this, but this was the >> >> requirement to always return the non cached rates from the clock driver. >> >> >> > >> > Ok. Who knows about this requirement? Can we add someone from the >> > display driver to understand more? >> > >> As per my discussions offline with the display teams, >> >> There is a use-case where the clock framework is unaware of the PLL >> VCO >> frequency change and thus the drivers would query to get the actual HW >> frequency rather than the cached one. >> >> Do you think keeping these flags would have any impact other than >> always >> getting the non-cached rates? >> > > The flag will make it so clk_get_rate() works in spite of something > changing the frequency behind the framework's back, but I want to > understand what and why it's changing without framework involvement. We > shouldn't need the flag here, because this flag is typically for clks > that are controlled by some other entity that the kernel doesn't have > control over. In this case, it seems like we have full control of the > clk tree for the display PLL down to this clk, so it should be > perfectly > fine to not have this flag. The presence of the flag means that the > display driver is doing something wrong. These clocks are sourced from DSI PLL. In dsi command mode there is an idle use case when there is no activity on display, we switch of the source DSI PLL to save power by calling clk_disable_unprepare(). In this scenario if some client queries the clk_get_rate(), then if NO_CACHE flag is used the clk driver will return the cached rate which is some non-zero value set when we last called clk_set_rate(), before enabling the clock, whereas actually in HW this clk is disabled. So we used the NO_CACHE flag for the call to land in clk_recalc_rate and we return zero if the PLL is disabled. I remember some customer had scripts that runs through all the clocks during idle screen scenario and call clk_get_rate(), where they complained display clk_get_rate returns none zero value. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Stephen, On 7/13/2018 1:55 PM, spanda@codeaurora.org wrote: > On 2018-07-13 01:11, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-12 10:21:33) >>> ++ Display driver team, >>> >>> On 7/9/2018 8:36 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 02:34:07) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 7/9/2018 1:07 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> >>> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 00:07:21) >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On 7/9/2018 11:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> > Why is the nocache flag needed? Applies to all clks in >>> this file. >>> >>>>>> > >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> This flag is required for all RCGs whose PLLs are controlled >>> outside the >>> >>>>>> clock controller. The display code would require the >>> recalculated rate >>> >>>>>> always. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Right. Why is the PLL controlled outside of the clock >>> controller? The >>> >>>>> rate should propagate upward to the PLL from here, so who's going >>> >>>>> outside of that? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> The DSI0/1 PLL are not part of the display clock controller, but >>> in the >>> >>>> display subsystem which are managed by the DRM drivers. When DRM >>> drivers >>> >>>> query for the rate clock driver should always return the non >>> cached rates. >>> >>> >>> >>> Why? Is the DSI PLL changing rate all the time, randomly, without >>> going >>> >>> through the clk APIs to do so? >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> Hmm, I am afraid I do not have an answer for this, but this was the >>> >> requirement to always return the non cached rates from the clock >>> driver. >>> >> >>> > >>> > Ok. Who knows about this requirement? Can we add someone from the >>> > display driver to understand more? >>> > >>> As per my discussions offline with the display teams, >>> >>> There is a use-case where the clock framework is unaware of the PLL VCO >>> frequency change and thus the drivers would query to get the actual HW >>> frequency rather than the cached one. >>> >>> Do you think keeping these flags would have any impact other than always >>> getting the non-cached rates? >>> >> >> The flag will make it so clk_get_rate() works in spite of something >> changing the frequency behind the framework's back, but I want to >> understand what and why it's changing without framework involvement. We >> shouldn't need the flag here, because this flag is typically for clks >> that are controlled by some other entity that the kernel doesn't have >> control over. In this case, it seems like we have full control of the >> clk tree for the display PLL down to this clk, so it should be perfectly >> fine to not have this flag. The presence of the flag means that the >> display driver is doing something wrong. > > These clocks are sourced from DSI PLL. In dsi command mode there is an > idle use case when there > is no activity on display, we switch of the source DSI PLL to save power > by calling clk_disable_unprepare(). > In this scenario if some client queries the clk_get_rate(), then if > NO_CACHE flag is used the clk > driver will return the cached rate which is some non-zero value set when > we last called clk_set_rate(), > before enabling the clock, whereas actually in HW this clk is disabled. > So we used the NO_CACHE flag > for the call to land in clk_recalc_rate and we return zero if the PLL is > disabled. > I remember some customer had scripts that runs through all the clocks > during idle screen scenario > and call clk_get_rate(), where they complained display clk_get_rate > returns none zero value. > > Do you think the clock driver needs any update for flag for the next series? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoting spanda@codeaurora.org (2018-07-13 01:25:49) > On 2018-07-13 01:11, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-12 10:21:33) > >> ++ Display driver team, > >> > >> On 7/9/2018 8:36 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> > Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 02:34:07) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 7/9/2018 1:07 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> >>> Quoting Taniya Das (2018-07-09 00:07:21) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On 7/9/2018 11:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > Why is the nocache flag needed? Applies to all clks in this file. > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> This flag is required for all RCGs whose PLLs are controlled outside the > >> >>>>>> clock controller. The display code would require the recalculated rate > >> >>>>>> always. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Right. Why is the PLL controlled outside of the clock controller? The > >> >>>>> rate should propagate upward to the PLL from here, so who's going > >> >>>>> outside of that? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> The DSI0/1 PLL are not part of the display clock controller, but in the > >> >>>> display subsystem which are managed by the DRM drivers. When DRM drivers > >> >>>> query for the rate clock driver should always return the non cached rates. > >> >>> > >> >>> Why? Is the DSI PLL changing rate all the time, randomly, without going > >> >>> through the clk APIs to do so? > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> Hmm, I am afraid I do not have an answer for this, but this was the > >> >> requirement to always return the non cached rates from the clock driver. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Ok. Who knows about this requirement? Can we add someone from the > >> > display driver to understand more? > >> > > >> As per my discussions offline with the display teams, > >> > >> There is a use-case where the clock framework is unaware of the PLL > >> VCO > >> frequency change and thus the drivers would query to get the actual HW > >> frequency rather than the cached one. > >> > >> Do you think keeping these flags would have any impact other than > >> always > >> getting the non-cached rates? > >> > > > > The flag will make it so clk_get_rate() works in spite of something > > changing the frequency behind the framework's back, but I want to > > understand what and why it's changing without framework involvement. We > > shouldn't need the flag here, because this flag is typically for clks > > that are controlled by some other entity that the kernel doesn't have > > control over. In this case, it seems like we have full control of the > > clk tree for the display PLL down to this clk, so it should be > > perfectly > > fine to not have this flag. The presence of the flag means that the > > display driver is doing something wrong. > > These clocks are sourced from DSI PLL. In dsi command mode there is an > idle use case when there > is no activity on display, we switch of the source DSI PLL to save power > by calling clk_disable_unprepare(). > In this scenario if some client queries the clk_get_rate(), then if > NO_CACHE flag is used the clk > driver will return the cached rate which is some non-zero value set when > we last called clk_set_rate(), > before enabling the clock, whereas actually in HW this clk is disabled. If the clk is disabled in hardware it doesn't mean clk_get_rate() should return 0 Hz. The frequency of the clk is set to something, so we should return what that frequency is by reading the hardware. > So we used the NO_CACHE flag > for the call to land in clk_recalc_rate and we return zero if the PLL is > disabled. This is super wrong. If the PLL is disabled it still has some frequency configured. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig index 9c3480d..7300574 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig @@ -245,6 +245,16 @@ config SDM_VIDEOCC_845 Say Y if you want to support video devices and functionality such as video encode and decode. +config SDM_DISPCC_845 + tristate "SDM845 Display Clock Controller" + select SDM_GCC_845 + depends on COMMON_CLK_QCOM + help + Support for the display clock controller on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc + SDM845 devices. + Say Y if you want to support display devices and functionality such as + splash screen. + config SPMI_PMIC_CLKDIV tristate "SPMI PMIC clkdiv Support" depends on (COMMON_CLK_QCOM && SPMI) || COMPILE_TEST diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile index 762c011..2b041b2d 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_A53PLL) += a53-pll.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_CLK_APCS_MSM8916) += apcs-msm8916.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_CLK_RPM) += clk-rpm.o obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_CLK_SMD_RPM) += clk-smd-rpm.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SDM_DISPCC_845) += dispcc-sdm845.o obj-$(CONFIG_SDM_GCC_845) += gcc-sdm845.o obj-$(CONFIG_SDM_VIDEOCC_845) += videocc-sdm845.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI_PMIC_CLKDIV) += clk-spmi-pmic-div.o diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..af437e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c @@ -0,0 +1,674 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (c) 2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. + */ + +#include <linux/clk-provider.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/regmap.h> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h> + +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sdm845.h> + +#include "clk-alpha-pll.h" +#include "clk-branch.h" +#include "clk-rcg.h" +#include "clk-regmap-divider.h" +#include "common.h" +#include "gdsc.h" +#include "reset.h" + +enum { + P_BI_TCXO, + P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, + P_DISP_CC_PLL0_OUT_MAIN, + P_DSI0_PHY_PLL_OUT_BYTECLK, + P_DSI0_PHY_PLL_OUT_DSICLK, + P_DSI1_PHY_PLL_OUT_BYTECLK, + P_DSI1_PHY_PLL_OUT_DSICLK, + P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, + P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN_DIV, +}; + +static const struct parent_map disp_cc_parent_map_0[] = { + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 }, + { P_DSI0_PHY_PLL_OUT_BYTECLK, 1 }, + { P_DSI1_PHY_PLL_OUT_BYTECLK, 2 }, + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 }, +}; + +static const char * const disp_cc_parent_names_0[] = { + "bi_tcxo", + "dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk", + "dsi1_phy_pll_out_byteclk", + "core_bi_pll_test_se", +}; + +static const struct parent_map disp_cc_parent_map_2[] = { + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 }, + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 }, +}; + +static const char * const disp_cc_parent_names_2[] = { + "bi_tcxo", + "core_bi_pll_test_se", +}; + +static const struct parent_map disp_cc_parent_map_3[] = { + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 }, + { P_DISP_CC_PLL0_OUT_MAIN, 1 }, + { P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 4 }, + { P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN_DIV, 5 }, + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 }, +}; + +static const char * const disp_cc_parent_names_3[] = { + "bi_tcxo", + "disp_cc_pll0", + "gcc_disp_gpll0_clk_src", + "gcc_disp_gpll0_div_clk_src", + "core_bi_pll_test_se", +}; + +static const struct parent_map disp_cc_parent_map_4[] = { + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 }, + { P_DSI0_PHY_PLL_OUT_DSICLK, 1 }, + { P_DSI1_PHY_PLL_OUT_DSICLK, 2 }, + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 }, +}; + +static const char * const disp_cc_parent_names_4[] = { + "bi_tcxo", + "dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk", + "dsi1_phy_pll_out_dsiclk", + "core_bi_pll_test_se", +}; + +static struct clk_alpha_pll disp_cc_pll0 = { + .offset = 0x0, + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_FABIA], + .clkr = { + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_pll0", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "bi_tcxo" }, + .num_parents = 1, + .ops = &clk_alpha_pll_fabia_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src = { + .cmd_rcgr = 0x20d0, + .mnd_width = 0, + .hid_width = 5, + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src", + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, + .num_parents = 4, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_byte2_ops, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src = { + .cmd_rcgr = 0x20ec, + .mnd_width = 0, + .hid_width = 5, + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src", + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, + .num_parents = 4, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_byte2_ops, + }, +}; + +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src[] = { + F(19200000, P_BI_TCXO, 1, 0, 0), + { } +}; + +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src = { + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2108, + .mnd_width = 0, + .hid_width = 5, + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src, + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src", + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, + .num_parents = 4, + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_esc1_clk_src = { + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2120, + .mnd_width = 0, + .hid_width = 5, + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_0, + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src, + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_esc1_clk_src", + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_0, + .num_parents = 4, + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops, + }, +}; + +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk_src[] = { + F(19200000, P_BI_TCXO, 1, 0, 0), + F(85714286, P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 7, 0, 0), + F(100000000, P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 6, 0, 0), + F(150000000, P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 4, 0, 0), + F(171428571, P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 3.5, 0, 0), + F(200000000, P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 3, 0, 0), + F(300000000, P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 2, 0, 0), + F(344000000, P_DISP_CC_PLL0_OUT_MAIN, 2.5, 0, 0), + F(430000000, P_DISP_CC_PLL0_OUT_MAIN, 2, 0, 0), + { } +}; + +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk_src = { + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2088, + .mnd_width = 0, + .hid_width = 5, + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_3, + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk_src, + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk_src", + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_3, + .num_parents = 5, + .ops = &clk_rcg2_shared_ops, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_pclk0_clk_src = { + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2058, + .mnd_width = 8, + .hid_width = 5, + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_4, + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_pclk0_clk_src", + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_4, + .num_parents = 4, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_pixel_ops, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_pclk1_clk_src = { + .cmd_rcgr = 0x2070, + .mnd_width = 8, + .hid_width = 5, + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_4, + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_pclk1_clk_src", + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_4, + .num_parents = 4, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_pixel_ops, + }, +}; + +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_rot_clk_src[] = { + F(19200000, P_BI_TCXO, 1, 0, 0), + F(171428571, P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 3.5, 0, 0), + F(300000000, P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 2, 0, 0), + F(344000000, P_DISP_CC_PLL0_OUT_MAIN, 2.5, 0, 0), + F(430000000, P_DISP_CC_PLL0_OUT_MAIN, 2, 0, 0), + { } +}; + +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_rot_clk_src = { + .cmd_rcgr = 0x20a0, + .mnd_width = 0, + .hid_width = 5, + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_3, + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_rot_clk_src, + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_rot_clk_src", + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_3, + .num_parents = 5, + .ops = &clk_rcg2_shared_ops, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_rcg2 disp_cc_mdss_vsync_clk_src = { + .cmd_rcgr = 0x20b8, + .mnd_width = 0, + .hid_width = 5, + .parent_map = disp_cc_parent_map_2, + .freq_tbl = ftbl_disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src, + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_vsync_clk_src", + .parent_names = disp_cc_parent_names_2, + .num_parents = 2, + .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_ahb_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x4004, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x4004, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_ahb_clk", + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_axi_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x4008, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x4008, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_axi_clk", + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x2028, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x2028, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_regmap_div disp_cc_mdss_byte0_div_clk_src = { + .reg = 0x20e8, + .shift = 0, + .width = 2, + .clkr = { + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_div_clk_src", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_regmap_div_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_byte0_intf_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x202c, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x202c, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_intf_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_byte0_div_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x2030, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x2030, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_regmap_div disp_cc_mdss_byte1_div_clk_src = { + .reg = 0x2104, + .shift = 0, + .width = 2, + .clkr = { + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte1_div_clk_src", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_regmap_div_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_byte1_intf_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x2034, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x2034, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_byte1_intf_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_byte1_div_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x2038, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x2038, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_esc1_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x203c, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x203c, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_esc1_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_esc1_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x200c, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x200c, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_mdp_lut_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x201c, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x201c, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_mdp_lut_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_pclk0_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x2004, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x2004, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_pclk0_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_pclk0_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_pclk1_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x2008, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x2008, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_pclk1_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_pclk1_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_rot_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x2014, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x2014, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_rot_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_rot_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_rscc_ahb_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x5004, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x5004, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_rscc_ahb_clk", + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_rscc_vsync_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x5008, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x5008, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_rscc_vsync_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_vsync_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct clk_branch disp_cc_mdss_vsync_clk = { + .halt_reg = 0x2024, + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT, + .clkr = { + .enable_reg = 0x2024, + .enable_mask = BIT(0), + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){ + .name = "disp_cc_mdss_vsync_clk", + .parent_names = (const char *[]){ + "disp_cc_mdss_vsync_clk_src", + }, + .num_parents = 1, + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct gdsc mdss_gdsc = { + .gdscr = 0x3000, + .pd = { + .name = "mdss_gdsc", + }, + .pwrsts = PWRSTS_OFF_ON, + .flags = HW_CTRL | POLL_CFG_GDSCR, +}; + +static struct clk_regmap *disp_cc_sdm845_clocks[] = { + [DISP_CC_MDSS_AHB_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_ahb_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_AXI_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_axi_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE0_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE0_CLK_SRC] = &disp_cc_mdss_byte0_clk_src.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE0_INTF_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_byte0_intf_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE0_DIV_CLK_SRC] = + &disp_cc_mdss_byte0_div_clk_src.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE1_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE1_CLK_SRC] = &disp_cc_mdss_byte1_clk_src.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE1_INTF_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_byte1_intf_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_BYTE1_DIV_CLK_SRC] = + &disp_cc_mdss_byte1_div_clk_src.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_ESC0_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_ESC0_CLK_SRC] = &disp_cc_mdss_esc0_clk_src.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_ESC1_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_esc1_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_ESC1_CLK_SRC] = &disp_cc_mdss_esc1_clk_src.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_MDP_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_MDP_CLK_SRC] = &disp_cc_mdss_mdp_clk_src.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_MDP_LUT_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_mdp_lut_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_PCLK0_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_pclk0_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_PCLK0_CLK_SRC] = &disp_cc_mdss_pclk0_clk_src.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_PCLK1_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_pclk1_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_PCLK1_CLK_SRC] = &disp_cc_mdss_pclk1_clk_src.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_ROT_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_rot_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_ROT_CLK_SRC] = &disp_cc_mdss_rot_clk_src.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_RSCC_AHB_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_rscc_ahb_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_RSCC_VSYNC_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_rscc_vsync_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_VSYNC_CLK] = &disp_cc_mdss_vsync_clk.clkr, + [DISP_CC_MDSS_VSYNC_CLK_SRC] = &disp_cc_mdss_vsync_clk_src.clkr, + [DISP_CC_PLL0] = &disp_cc_pll0.clkr, +}; + +static const struct qcom_reset_map disp_cc_sdm845_resets[] = { + [DISP_CC_MDSS_RSCC_BCR] = { 0x5000 }, +}; + +static struct gdsc *disp_cc_sdm845_gdscs[] = { + [MDSS_GDSC] = &mdss_gdsc, +}; + +static const struct regmap_config disp_cc_sdm845_regmap_config = { + .reg_bits = 32, + .reg_stride = 4, + .val_bits = 32, + .max_register = 0x10000, + .fast_io = true, +}; + +static const struct qcom_cc_desc disp_cc_sdm845_desc = { + .config = &disp_cc_sdm845_regmap_config, + .clks = disp_cc_sdm845_clocks, + .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_sdm845_clocks), + .resets = disp_cc_sdm845_resets, + .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_sdm845_resets), + .gdscs = disp_cc_sdm845_gdscs, + .num_gdscs = ARRAY_SIZE(disp_cc_sdm845_gdscs), +}; + +static const struct of_device_id disp_cc_sdm845_match_table[] = { + { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dispcc" }, + { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, disp_cc_sdm845_match_table); + +static int disp_cc_sdm845_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct regmap *regmap; + struct alpha_pll_config disp_cc_pll0_config = { + .l = 0x2c, + .alpha = 0xcaaa, + }; + + regmap = qcom_cc_map(pdev, &disp_cc_sdm845_desc); + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) + return PTR_ERR(regmap); + + clk_fabia_pll_configure(&disp_cc_pll0, regmap, &disp_cc_pll0_config); + + /* Enable hardware clock gating for DSI and MDP clocks */ + regmap_update_bits(regmap, 0x8000, 0x7f0, 0x7f0); + + return qcom_cc_really_probe(pdev, &disp_cc_sdm845_desc, regmap); +} + +static struct platform_driver disp_cc_sdm845_driver = { + .probe = disp_cc_sdm845_probe, + .driver = { + .name = "disp_cc-sdm845", + .of_match_table = disp_cc_sdm845_match_table, + }, +}; + +static int __init disp_cc_sdm845_init(void) +{ + return platform_driver_register(&disp_cc_sdm845_driver); +} +subsys_initcall(disp_cc_sdm845_init); + +static void __exit disp_cc_sdm845_exit(void) +{ + platform_driver_unregister(&disp_cc_sdm845_driver); +} +module_exit(disp_cc_sdm845_exit); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
Add support for the display clock controller found on SDM845 based devices. This would allow display drivers to probe and control their clocks. Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org> --- drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig | 10 + drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile | 1 + drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c | 674 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 685 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sdm845.c