Message ID | 1532083566-43215-4-git-send-email-vviswana@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Delegated to: | Andy Gross |
Headers | show |
On 20/07/18 13:46, Vijay Viswanath wrote: > Some sdhci-msm controllers require that voltage switching be done after > the HW is ready for it. The HW informs its readiness through power irq. > The voltage switching should happen only then. > > Use the quirk for internal voltage switching and then control the > voltage switching using power irq. > > Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@codeaurora.org> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 209 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > index a0dc3e1..47732a2 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c > @@ -43,7 +43,9 @@ > #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW BIT(2) > #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_HIGH BIT(3) > #define CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS BIT(0) > +#define CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL BIT(1) > #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS BIT(2) > +#define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_FAIL BIT(3) > #define REQ_BUS_OFF BIT(0) > #define REQ_BUS_ON BIT(1) > #define REQ_IO_LOW BIT(2) > @@ -236,6 +238,14 @@ struct sdhci_msm_variant_info { > const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset; > }; > > +/* Holds voltage regulator information to be used by the driver*/ > +struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info { > + bool vmmc_load; > + u32 vmmc_level[2]; > + bool vqmmc_load; > + u32 vqmmc_level[2]; > +}; Kernel style is not to introduce structures that are only ever wholly contained within one other structure i.e. the members of struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info could just be in struct sdhci_msm_host instead. > + > struct sdhci_msm_host { > struct platform_device *pdev; > void __iomem *core_mem; /* MSM SDCC mapped address */ > @@ -258,6 +268,8 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host { > bool mci_removed; > const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops *var_ops; > const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset; > + struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info vreg_info; > + bool pltfm_init_done; > }; > > static const struct sdhci_msm_offset *sdhci_priv_msm_offset(struct sdhci_host *host) > @@ -1314,11 +1326,13 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) > { > struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); > struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); > + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc; > u32 irq_status, irq_ack = 0; > - int retry = 10; > + int retry = 10, ret = 0; > u32 pwr_state = 0, io_level = 0; > u32 config; > const struct sdhci_msm_offset *msm_offset = msm_host->offset; > + struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info vreg_info = msm_host->vreg_info; > > irq_status = msm_host_readl(msm_host, host, > msm_offset->core_pwrctl_status); > @@ -1351,14 +1365,91 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) > > /* Handle BUS ON/OFF*/ > if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_ON) { > - pwr_state = REQ_BUS_ON; > - io_level = REQ_IO_HIGH; > - irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; > + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) { > + if (vreg_info.vmmc_load) > + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, > + vreg_info.vmmc_level[1]); > + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, > + mmc->ios.vdd); Or-ing error numbers seems a bit weird. The code is a bit crammed also, so I suggest adding helper functions. For example consider something like: static int sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host, struct mmc_host *mmc, int level) { int load = msm_host->vmmc_level[level]; int ret; if (IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) return 0; if (msm_host->vmmc_load) { ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, load); if (ret) goto out; } ret = mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, mmc->ios.vdd); out: if (ret) pr_err("%s: vmmc failed: %d\n", mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); return ret; } > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: vmmc enable failed: %d\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); > + } > + > + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && !ret) { > + struct mmc_ios ios; > + > + if (vreg_info.vqmmc_load) > + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vqmmc, > + vreg_info.vqmmc_level[1]); > + /* > + * The IO voltage regulator maynot always support > + * a voltage close to vdd. Set IO voltage based on > + * capability of the regulator. > + */ > + if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_3_0V_SUPPORT) > + ios.signal_voltage = MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330; > + else if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_1_8V_SUPPORT) > + ios.signal_voltage = MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180; > + if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_VOLT_SUPPORT) { > + pr_err("%s: %s: setting signal voltage: %d\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), __func__, > + ios.signal_voltage); Why pr_err()? > + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(mmc, &ios); Again I suggest createing a helper function and not or-ing error numbers. > + } > + > + if (!ret) > + ret = regulator_enable(mmc->supply.vqmmc); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: vqmmc enable failed: %d\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); > + } > + if (!ret) { > + pwr_state = REQ_BUS_ON; > + io_level = REQ_IO_HIGH; > + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; > + } else { > + pr_err("%s: BUS_ON req failed(%d). irq_status: 0x%08x\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, irq_status); > + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL; > + } > } > if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_OFF) { > - pwr_state = REQ_BUS_OFF; > - io_level = REQ_IO_LOW; > - irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; > + /* > + * During platform initialization, we may get BUS_OFF request > + * and turn off the supply. EMMC devices expect Power off > + * notification before being turned off. So wait till platform > + * initialization is over to actually turn off power. > + */ > + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc) && msm_host->pltfm_init_done) { > + if (vreg_info.vmmc_load) > + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, > + vreg_info.vmmc_level[0]); > + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, > + mmc->ios.vdd); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: vmmc disabling failed: %d\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); > + } So with the function above, that would be: if (msm_host->pltfm_init_done) ret = sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(msm_host, mmc, 0) > + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && msm_host->pltfm_init_done && > + !ret) { > + if (vreg_info.vqmmc_load) > + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vqmmc, > + vreg_info.vqmmc_level[0]); > + ret |= regulator_disable(mmc->supply.vqmmc); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: vqmmc disabling failed: %d\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); > + } > + if (!ret) { > + pwr_state = REQ_BUS_OFF; > + io_level = REQ_IO_LOW; > + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; > + } else { > + pr_err("%s: BUS_ON req failed(%d). irq_status: 0x%08x\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, irq_status); > + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL; > + } > } > /* Handle IO LOW/HIGH */ > if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW) { > @@ -1370,6 +1461,15 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) > irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS; > } > > + if (io_level && !IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && !pwr_state) { > + ret = mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(mmc, &mmc->ios); > + if (ret) > + pr_err("%s: IO_level setting failed(%d). signal_voltage: %d, vdd: %d irq_status: 0x%08x\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, > + mmc->ios.signal_voltage, mmc->ios.vdd, > + irq_status); > + } > + > /* > * The driver has to acknowledge the interrupt, switch voltages and > * report back if it succeded or not to this register. The voltage > @@ -1415,10 +1515,9 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) > msm_host->curr_pwr_state = pwr_state; > if (io_level) > msm_host->curr_io_level = io_level; > - > pr_debug("%s: %s: Handled IRQ(%d), irq_status=0x%x, ack=0x%x\n", > - mmc_hostname(msm_host->mmc), __func__, irq, irq_status, > - irq_ack); > + mmc_hostname(msm_host->mmc), __func__, > + irq, irq_status, irq_ack); Seem to be some unrelated whitespace changes here. > } > > static irqreturn_t sdhci_msm_pwr_irq(int irq, void *data) > @@ -1563,6 +1662,13 @@ static void sdhci_msm_writeb(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 val, int reg) > sdhci_msm_check_power_status(host, req_type); > } > > +static void sdhci_msm_set_power(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned char mode, > + unsigned short vdd) > +{ > + sdhci_set_power_noreg(host, mode, vdd); Why not just have .set_power = sdhci_set_power_noreg() > + > +} > + > static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) > { > struct mmc_host *mmc = msm_host->mmc; > @@ -1605,6 +1711,91 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) > pr_debug("%s: supported caps: 0x%08x\n", mmc_hostname(mmc), caps); > } > > +static int sdhci_msm_register_vreg(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + > + ret = mmc_regulator_get_supply(msm_host->mmc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + if (device_property_read_u32_array(&msm_host->pdev->dev, > + "vmmc-current-level", > + msm_host->vreg_info.vmmc_level, 2) >= 0) > + msm_host->vreg_info.vmmc_load = true; > + if (device_property_read_u32_array(&msm_host->pdev->dev, > + "vqmmc-current-level", > + msm_host->vreg_info.vqmmc_level, 2) >= 0) > + msm_host->vreg_info.vqmmc_load = true; > + > + sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(msm_host); > + > + return 0; > + > +} > + > +static int sdhci_msm_start_signal_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc, > + struct mmc_ios *ios) > +{ > + struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); > + u16 ctrl; > + > + /* > + * Signal Voltage Switching is only applicable for Host Controllers > + * v3.00 and above. > + */ > + if (host->version < SDHCI_SPEC_300) > + return 0; > + > + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > + > + switch (ios->signal_voltage) { > + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330: > + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_330)) > + return -EINVAL; > + /* Set 1.8V Signal Enable in the Host Control2 register to 0 */ > + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180; > + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > + > + /* 3.3V regulator output should be stable within 5 ms */ > + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > + if (!(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180)) > + return 0; > + > + pr_warn("%s: 3.3V regulator output did not became stable\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc)); > + > + return -EAGAIN; > + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180: > + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_180)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* > + * Enable 1.8V Signal Enable in the Host Control2 > + * register > + */ > + ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180; > + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > + > + /* 1.8V regulator output should be stable within 5 ms */ > + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); > + if (ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180) > + return 0; > + > + pr_warn("%s: 1.8V regulator output did not became stable\n", > + mmc_hostname(mmc)); > + > + return -EAGAIN; > + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_120: > + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_120)) > + return -EINVAL; > + return 0; > + default: > + /* No signal voltage switch required */ > + return 0; > + } > + > +} > + > static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops mci_var_ops = { > .msm_readl_relaxed = sdhci_msm_mci_variant_readl_relaxed, > .msm_writel_relaxed = sdhci_msm_mci_variant_writel_relaxed, > @@ -1644,6 +1835,7 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) > .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_msm_set_uhs_signaling, > .write_w = sdhci_msm_writew, > .write_b = sdhci_msm_writeb, > + .set_power = sdhci_msm_set_power, > }; > > static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_msm_pdata = { > @@ -1672,6 +1864,8 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (IS_ERR(host)) > return PTR_ERR(host); > > + host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch = > + sdhci_msm_start_signal_voltage_switch; Perhaps put this where the other mmc_host_ops assignment is. > host->sdma_boundary = 0; > pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); > msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); > @@ -1819,6 +2013,10 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > msm_offset->core_vendor_spec_capabilities0); > } > > + ret = sdhci_msm_register_vreg(msm_host); > + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) Why not just: if (ret) > + goto clk_disable; > + > /* > * Power on reset state may trigger power irq if previous status of > * PWRCTL was either BUS_ON or IO_HIGH_V. So before enabling pwr irq > @@ -1867,7 +2065,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > ret = sdhci_add_host(host); > if (ret) > goto pm_runtime_disable; > - sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(msm_host); > + msm_host->pltfm_init_done = true; > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&pdev->dev); > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi Adrian, On 7/25/2018 7:34 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 20/07/18 13:46, Vijay Viswanath wrote: >> Some sdhci-msm controllers require that voltage switching be done after >> the HW is ready for it. The HW informs its readiness through power irq. >> The voltage switching should happen only then. >> >> Use the quirk for internal voltage switching and then control the >> voltage switching using power irq. >> >> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 209 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c >> index a0dc3e1..47732a2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c >> @@ -43,7 +43,9 @@ >> #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW BIT(2) >> #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_HIGH BIT(3) >> #define CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS BIT(0) >> +#define CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL BIT(1) >> #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS BIT(2) >> +#define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_FAIL BIT(3) >> #define REQ_BUS_OFF BIT(0) >> #define REQ_BUS_ON BIT(1) >> #define REQ_IO_LOW BIT(2) >> @@ -236,6 +238,14 @@ struct sdhci_msm_variant_info { >> const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset; >> }; >> >> +/* Holds voltage regulator information to be used by the driver*/ >> +struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info { >> + bool vmmc_load; >> + u32 vmmc_level[2]; >> + bool vqmmc_load; >> + u32 vqmmc_level[2]; >> +}; > Kernel style is not to introduce structures that are only ever wholly > contained within one other structure i.e. the members of struct > sdhci_msm_vreg_info could just be in struct sdhci_msm_host instead. Sure. Will move this to sdhci_msm_host >> + >> struct sdhci_msm_host { >> struct platform_device *pdev; >> void __iomem *core_mem; /* MSM SDCC mapped address */ >> @@ -258,6 +268,8 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host { >> bool mci_removed; >> const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops *var_ops; >> const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset; >> + struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info vreg_info; >> + bool pltfm_init_done; >> }; >> >> static const struct sdhci_msm_offset *sdhci_priv_msm_offset(struct sdhci_host *host) >> @@ -1314,11 +1326,13 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) >> { >> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); >> struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); >> + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc; >> u32 irq_status, irq_ack = 0; >> - int retry = 10; >> + int retry = 10, ret = 0; >> u32 pwr_state = 0, io_level = 0; >> u32 config; >> const struct sdhci_msm_offset *msm_offset = msm_host->offset; >> + struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info vreg_info = msm_host->vreg_info; >> >> irq_status = msm_host_readl(msm_host, host, >> msm_offset->core_pwrctl_status); >> @@ -1351,14 +1365,91 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) >> >> /* Handle BUS ON/OFF*/ >> if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_ON) { >> - pwr_state = REQ_BUS_ON; >> - io_level = REQ_IO_HIGH; >> - irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; >> + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) { >> + if (vreg_info.vmmc_load) >> + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, >> + vreg_info.vmmc_level[1]); >> + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, >> + mmc->ios.vdd); > Or-ing error numbers seems a bit weird. The code is a bit crammed also, > so I suggest adding helper functions. For example consider something like: > > static int sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host, > struct mmc_host *mmc, int level) > { > int load = msm_host->vmmc_level[level]; > int ret; > > if (IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) > return 0; > > if (msm_host->vmmc_load) { > ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, load); > if (ret) > goto out; > } > > ret = mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, mmc->ios.vdd); > out: > if (ret) > pr_err("%s: vmmc failed: %d\n", mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); > > return ret; > } Will update it as suggested. >> + if (ret) >> + pr_err("%s: vmmc enable failed: %d\n", >> + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); >> + } >> + >> + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && !ret) { >> + struct mmc_ios ios; >> + >> + if (vreg_info.vqmmc_load) >> + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vqmmc, >> + vreg_info.vqmmc_level[1]); >> + /* >> + * The IO voltage regulator maynot always support >> + * a voltage close to vdd. Set IO voltage based on >> + * capability of the regulator. >> + */ >> + if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_3_0V_SUPPORT) >> + ios.signal_voltage = MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330; >> + else if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_1_8V_SUPPORT) >> + ios.signal_voltage = MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180; >> + if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_VOLT_SUPPORT) { >> + pr_err("%s: %s: setting signal voltage: %d\n", >> + mmc_hostname(mmc), __func__, >> + ios.signal_voltage); > Why pr_err()? This need not be pr_err. Will change it to pr_debug(). >> + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(mmc, &ios); > Again I suggest createing a helper function and not or-ing error numbers. > >> + } >> + >> + if (!ret) >> + ret = regulator_enable(mmc->supply.vqmmc); >> + if (ret) >> + pr_err("%s: vqmmc enable failed: %d\n", >> + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); >> + } >> + if (!ret) { >> + pwr_state = REQ_BUS_ON; >> + io_level = REQ_IO_HIGH; >> + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; >> + } else { >> + pr_err("%s: BUS_ON req failed(%d). irq_status: 0x%08x\n", >> + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, irq_status); >> + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL; >> + } >> } >> if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_OFF) { >> - pwr_state = REQ_BUS_OFF; >> - io_level = REQ_IO_LOW; >> - irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; >> + /* >> + * During platform initialization, we may get BUS_OFF request >> + * and turn off the supply. EMMC devices expect Power off >> + * notification before being turned off. So wait till platform >> + * initialization is over to actually turn off power. >> + */ >> + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc) && msm_host->pltfm_init_done) { >> + if (vreg_info.vmmc_load) >> + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, >> + vreg_info.vmmc_level[0]); >> + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, >> + mmc->ios.vdd); >> + if (ret) >> + pr_err("%s: vmmc disabling failed: %d\n", >> + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); >> + } > So with the function above, that would be: > > if (msm_host->pltfm_init_done) > ret = sdhci_msm_set_vmmc(msm_host, mmc, 0) > >> + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && msm_host->pltfm_init_done && >> + !ret) { >> + if (vreg_info.vqmmc_load) >> + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vqmmc, >> + vreg_info.vqmmc_level[0]); >> + ret |= regulator_disable(mmc->supply.vqmmc); >> + if (ret) >> + pr_err("%s: vqmmc disabling failed: %d\n", >> + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); >> + } >> + if (!ret) { >> + pwr_state = REQ_BUS_OFF; >> + io_level = REQ_IO_LOW; >> + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; >> + } else { >> + pr_err("%s: BUS_ON req failed(%d). irq_status: 0x%08x\n", >> + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, irq_status); >> + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL; >> + } >> } >> /* Handle IO LOW/HIGH */ >> if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW) { >> @@ -1370,6 +1461,15 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) >> irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS; >> } >> >> + if (io_level && !IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && !pwr_state) { >> + ret = mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(mmc, &mmc->ios); >> + if (ret) >> + pr_err("%s: IO_level setting failed(%d). signal_voltage: %d, vdd: %d irq_status: 0x%08x\n", >> + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, >> + mmc->ios.signal_voltage, mmc->ios.vdd, >> + irq_status); >> + } >> + >> /* >> * The driver has to acknowledge the interrupt, switch voltages and >> * report back if it succeded or not to this register. The voltage >> @@ -1415,10 +1515,9 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) >> msm_host->curr_pwr_state = pwr_state; >> if (io_level) >> msm_host->curr_io_level = io_level; >> - >> pr_debug("%s: %s: Handled IRQ(%d), irq_status=0x%x, ack=0x%x\n", >> - mmc_hostname(msm_host->mmc), __func__, irq, irq_status, >> - irq_ack); >> + mmc_hostname(msm_host->mmc), __func__, >> + irq, irq_status, irq_ack); > Seem to be some unrelated whitespace changes here. > >> } >> >> static irqreturn_t sdhci_msm_pwr_irq(int irq, void *data) >> @@ -1563,6 +1662,13 @@ static void sdhci_msm_writeb(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 val, int reg) >> sdhci_msm_check_power_status(host, req_type); >> } >> >> +static void sdhci_msm_set_power(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned char mode, >> + unsigned short vdd) >> +{ >> + sdhci_set_power_noreg(host, mode, vdd); > Why not just have .set_power = sdhci_set_power_noreg() You are right. Will removeĀ sdhci_msm_set_power() > >> + >> +} >> + >> static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) >> { >> struct mmc_host *mmc = msm_host->mmc; >> @@ -1605,6 +1711,91 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) >> pr_debug("%s: supported caps: 0x%08x\n", mmc_hostname(mmc), caps); >> } >> >> +static int sdhci_msm_register_vreg(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) >> +{ >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + ret = mmc_regulator_get_supply(msm_host->mmc); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + if (device_property_read_u32_array(&msm_host->pdev->dev, >> + "vmmc-current-level", >> + msm_host->vreg_info.vmmc_level, 2) >= 0) >> + msm_host->vreg_info.vmmc_load = true; >> + if (device_property_read_u32_array(&msm_host->pdev->dev, >> + "vqmmc-current-level", >> + msm_host->vreg_info.vqmmc_level, 2) >= 0) >> + msm_host->vreg_info.vqmmc_load = true; >> + >> + sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(msm_host); >> + >> + return 0; >> + >> +} >> + >> +static int sdhci_msm_start_signal_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc, >> + struct mmc_ios *ios) >> +{ >> + struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); >> + u16 ctrl; >> + >> + /* >> + * Signal Voltage Switching is only applicable for Host Controllers >> + * v3.00 and above. >> + */ >> + if (host->version < SDHCI_SPEC_300) >> + return 0; >> + >> + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); >> + >> + switch (ios->signal_voltage) { >> + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330: >> + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_330)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + /* Set 1.8V Signal Enable in the Host Control2 register to 0 */ >> + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180; >> + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); >> + >> + /* 3.3V regulator output should be stable within 5 ms */ >> + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); >> + if (!(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180)) >> + return 0; >> + >> + pr_warn("%s: 3.3V regulator output did not became stable\n", >> + mmc_hostname(mmc)); >> + >> + return -EAGAIN; >> + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180: >> + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_180)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + /* >> + * Enable 1.8V Signal Enable in the Host Control2 >> + * register >> + */ >> + ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180; >> + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); >> + >> + /* 1.8V regulator output should be stable within 5 ms */ >> + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); >> + if (ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180) >> + return 0; >> + >> + pr_warn("%s: 1.8V regulator output did not became stable\n", >> + mmc_hostname(mmc)); >> + >> + return -EAGAIN; >> + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_120: >> + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_120)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + return 0; >> + default: >> + /* No signal voltage switch required */ >> + return 0; >> + } >> + >> +} >> + >> static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops mci_var_ops = { >> .msm_readl_relaxed = sdhci_msm_mci_variant_readl_relaxed, >> .msm_writel_relaxed = sdhci_msm_mci_variant_writel_relaxed, >> @@ -1644,6 +1835,7 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) >> .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_msm_set_uhs_signaling, >> .write_w = sdhci_msm_writew, >> .write_b = sdhci_msm_writeb, >> + .set_power = sdhci_msm_set_power, >> }; >> >> static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_msm_pdata = { >> @@ -1672,6 +1864,8 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> if (IS_ERR(host)) >> return PTR_ERR(host); >> >> + host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch = >> + sdhci_msm_start_signal_voltage_switch; > Perhaps put this where the other mmc_host_ops assignment is. sure. Will move it. >> host->sdma_boundary = 0; >> pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); >> msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); >> @@ -1819,6 +2013,10 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> msm_offset->core_vendor_spec_capabilities0); >> } >> >> + ret = sdhci_msm_register_vreg(msm_host); >> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) > Why not just: > > if (ret) > >> + goto clk_disable; >> + >> /* >> * Power on reset state may trigger power irq if previous status of >> * PWRCTL was either BUS_ON or IO_HIGH_V. So before enabling pwr irq >> @@ -1867,7 +2065,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> ret = sdhci_add_host(host); >> if (ret) >> goto pm_runtime_disable; >> - sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(msm_host); >> + msm_host->pltfm_init_done = true; >> >> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&pdev->dev); >> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev); >> Thanks for all the comments. Will incorporate all the commented changes. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c index a0dc3e1..47732a2 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c @@ -43,7 +43,9 @@ #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW BIT(2) #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_HIGH BIT(3) #define CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS BIT(0) +#define CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL BIT(1) #define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS BIT(2) +#define CORE_PWRCTL_IO_FAIL BIT(3) #define REQ_BUS_OFF BIT(0) #define REQ_BUS_ON BIT(1) #define REQ_IO_LOW BIT(2) @@ -236,6 +238,14 @@ struct sdhci_msm_variant_info { const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset; }; +/* Holds voltage regulator information to be used by the driver*/ +struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info { + bool vmmc_load; + u32 vmmc_level[2]; + bool vqmmc_load; + u32 vqmmc_level[2]; +}; + struct sdhci_msm_host { struct platform_device *pdev; void __iomem *core_mem; /* MSM SDCC mapped address */ @@ -258,6 +268,8 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host { bool mci_removed; const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops *var_ops; const struct sdhci_msm_offset *offset; + struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info vreg_info; + bool pltfm_init_done; }; static const struct sdhci_msm_offset *sdhci_priv_msm_offset(struct sdhci_host *host) @@ -1314,11 +1326,13 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) { struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); + struct mmc_host *mmc = host->mmc; u32 irq_status, irq_ack = 0; - int retry = 10; + int retry = 10, ret = 0; u32 pwr_state = 0, io_level = 0; u32 config; const struct sdhci_msm_offset *msm_offset = msm_host->offset; + struct sdhci_msm_vreg_info vreg_info = msm_host->vreg_info; irq_status = msm_host_readl(msm_host, host, msm_offset->core_pwrctl_status); @@ -1351,14 +1365,91 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) /* Handle BUS ON/OFF*/ if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_ON) { - pwr_state = REQ_BUS_ON; - io_level = REQ_IO_HIGH; - irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) { + if (vreg_info.vmmc_load) + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, + vreg_info.vmmc_level[1]); + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, + mmc->ios.vdd); + if (ret) + pr_err("%s: vmmc enable failed: %d\n", + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); + } + + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && !ret) { + struct mmc_ios ios; + + if (vreg_info.vqmmc_load) + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vqmmc, + vreg_info.vqmmc_level[1]); + /* + * The IO voltage regulator maynot always support + * a voltage close to vdd. Set IO voltage based on + * capability of the regulator. + */ + if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_3_0V_SUPPORT) + ios.signal_voltage = MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330; + else if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_1_8V_SUPPORT) + ios.signal_voltage = MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180; + if (msm_host->caps_0 & CORE_VOLT_SUPPORT) { + pr_err("%s: %s: setting signal voltage: %d\n", + mmc_hostname(mmc), __func__, + ios.signal_voltage); + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(mmc, &ios); + } + + if (!ret) + ret = regulator_enable(mmc->supply.vqmmc); + if (ret) + pr_err("%s: vqmmc enable failed: %d\n", + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); + } + if (!ret) { + pwr_state = REQ_BUS_ON; + io_level = REQ_IO_HIGH; + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; + } else { + pr_err("%s: BUS_ON req failed(%d). irq_status: 0x%08x\n", + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, irq_status); + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL; + } } if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_OFF) { - pwr_state = REQ_BUS_OFF; - io_level = REQ_IO_LOW; - irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; + /* + * During platform initialization, we may get BUS_OFF request + * and turn off the supply. EMMC devices expect Power off + * notification before being turned off. So wait till platform + * initialization is over to actually turn off power. + */ + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc) && msm_host->pltfm_init_done) { + if (vreg_info.vmmc_load) + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vmmc, + vreg_info.vmmc_level[0]); + ret |= mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, mmc->supply.vmmc, + mmc->ios.vdd); + if (ret) + pr_err("%s: vmmc disabling failed: %d\n", + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); + } + if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && msm_host->pltfm_init_done && + !ret) { + if (vreg_info.vqmmc_load) + ret = regulator_set_load(mmc->supply.vqmmc, + vreg_info.vqmmc_level[0]); + ret |= regulator_disable(mmc->supply.vqmmc); + if (ret) + pr_err("%s: vqmmc disabling failed: %d\n", + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret); + } + if (!ret) { + pwr_state = REQ_BUS_OFF; + io_level = REQ_IO_LOW; + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS; + } else { + pr_err("%s: BUS_ON req failed(%d). irq_status: 0x%08x\n", + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, irq_status); + irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_FAIL; + } } /* Handle IO LOW/HIGH */ if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW) { @@ -1370,6 +1461,15 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS; } + if (io_level && !IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vqmmc) && !pwr_state) { + ret = mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(mmc, &mmc->ios); + if (ret) + pr_err("%s: IO_level setting failed(%d). signal_voltage: %d, vdd: %d irq_status: 0x%08x\n", + mmc_hostname(mmc), ret, + mmc->ios.signal_voltage, mmc->ios.vdd, + irq_status); + } + /* * The driver has to acknowledge the interrupt, switch voltages and * report back if it succeded or not to this register. The voltage @@ -1415,10 +1515,9 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq) msm_host->curr_pwr_state = pwr_state; if (io_level) msm_host->curr_io_level = io_level; - pr_debug("%s: %s: Handled IRQ(%d), irq_status=0x%x, ack=0x%x\n", - mmc_hostname(msm_host->mmc), __func__, irq, irq_status, - irq_ack); + mmc_hostname(msm_host->mmc), __func__, + irq, irq_status, irq_ack); } static irqreturn_t sdhci_msm_pwr_irq(int irq, void *data) @@ -1563,6 +1662,13 @@ static void sdhci_msm_writeb(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 val, int reg) sdhci_msm_check_power_status(host, req_type); } +static void sdhci_msm_set_power(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned char mode, + unsigned short vdd) +{ + sdhci_set_power_noreg(host, mode, vdd); + +} + static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) { struct mmc_host *mmc = msm_host->mmc; @@ -1605,6 +1711,91 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) pr_debug("%s: supported caps: 0x%08x\n", mmc_hostname(mmc), caps); } +static int sdhci_msm_register_vreg(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) +{ + int ret = 0; + + ret = mmc_regulator_get_supply(msm_host->mmc); + if (ret) + return ret; + if (device_property_read_u32_array(&msm_host->pdev->dev, + "vmmc-current-level", + msm_host->vreg_info.vmmc_level, 2) >= 0) + msm_host->vreg_info.vmmc_load = true; + if (device_property_read_u32_array(&msm_host->pdev->dev, + "vqmmc-current-level", + msm_host->vreg_info.vqmmc_level, 2) >= 0) + msm_host->vreg_info.vqmmc_load = true; + + sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(msm_host); + + return 0; + +} + +static int sdhci_msm_start_signal_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc, + struct mmc_ios *ios) +{ + struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); + u16 ctrl; + + /* + * Signal Voltage Switching is only applicable for Host Controllers + * v3.00 and above. + */ + if (host->version < SDHCI_SPEC_300) + return 0; + + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); + + switch (ios->signal_voltage) { + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_330: + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_330)) + return -EINVAL; + /* Set 1.8V Signal Enable in the Host Control2 register to 0 */ + ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180; + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); + + /* 3.3V regulator output should be stable within 5 ms */ + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); + if (!(ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180)) + return 0; + + pr_warn("%s: 3.3V regulator output did not became stable\n", + mmc_hostname(mmc)); + + return -EAGAIN; + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_180: + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_180)) + return -EINVAL; + + /* + * Enable 1.8V Signal Enable in the Host Control2 + * register + */ + ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180; + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); + + /* 1.8V regulator output should be stable within 5 ms */ + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2); + if (ctrl & SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180) + return 0; + + pr_warn("%s: 1.8V regulator output did not became stable\n", + mmc_hostname(mmc)); + + return -EAGAIN; + case MMC_SIGNAL_VOLTAGE_120: + if (!(host->flags & SDHCI_SIGNALING_120)) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; + default: + /* No signal voltage switch required */ + return 0; + } + +} + static const struct sdhci_msm_variant_ops mci_var_ops = { .msm_readl_relaxed = sdhci_msm_mci_variant_readl_relaxed, .msm_writel_relaxed = sdhci_msm_mci_variant_writel_relaxed, @@ -1644,6 +1835,7 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host) .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_msm_set_uhs_signaling, .write_w = sdhci_msm_writew, .write_b = sdhci_msm_writeb, + .set_power = sdhci_msm_set_power, }; static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_msm_pdata = { @@ -1672,6 +1864,8 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (IS_ERR(host)) return PTR_ERR(host); + host->mmc_host_ops.start_signal_voltage_switch = + sdhci_msm_start_signal_voltage_switch; host->sdma_boundary = 0; pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); @@ -1819,6 +2013,10 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) msm_offset->core_vendor_spec_capabilities0); } + ret = sdhci_msm_register_vreg(msm_host); + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) + goto clk_disable; + /* * Power on reset state may trigger power irq if previous status of * PWRCTL was either BUS_ON or IO_HIGH_V. So before enabling pwr irq @@ -1867,7 +2065,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = sdhci_add_host(host); if (ret) goto pm_runtime_disable; - sdhci_msm_set_regulator_caps(msm_host); + msm_host->pltfm_init_done = true; pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&pdev->dev); pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);