Message ID | 1532588943-19481-3-git-send-email-hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | add SPI controller driver for UniPhier SoCs | expand |
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> wrote: > Add SPI controller driver implemented in Socionext UniPhier SoCs. > > UniPhier SoCs have two types SPI controllers; SCSSI supports a > single channel, and MCSSI supports multiple channels. > This driver supports SCSSI only. > > This controller has 32bit TX/RX FIFO with depth of eight entry, > and supports the SPI master mode only. > > This commit is implemented in PIO transfer mode, not DMA transfer. Few style realted comments. > +#include <asm/unaligned.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/bitfield.h> > +#include <linux/bitops.h> > +#include <linux/clk.h> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/spi/spi.h> Slightly better to keep them in order and put asm/* at the last. > +#define SSI_TIMEOUT 2000 /* ms */ SSI_TIMEOUT_MS ? > +#define SSI_CTL 0x0 Slightly better to keep same width for the addresses, like 0x00 here. > +#define SSI_CKS 0x4 > +#define SSI_TXWDS 0x8 > +#define SSI_RXWDS 0xc Ditto. > +static int uniphier_spi_set_baudrate(struct spi_device *spi, unsigned int speed) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > + u32 val, ckrat; > + > + /* > + * the supported rates are even numbers from 4 to 254. (4,6,8...254) > + * round up as we look for equal or less speed > + */ > + ckrat = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(priv->clk), speed); > + ckrat = roundup(ckrat, 2); ckrat += ckrat & 1; ? > + /* check if requested speed is too small */ > + if (ckrat > SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER) > + return -EINVAL; So, does this critical? > + > + if (ckrat < SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER) > + ckrat = SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER; clamp_val() / max() ? > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_CKS); > + val &= ~SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; > + val |= ckrat & SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_CKS); > + > + return 0; > +} > + priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > + if (priv->irq < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get IRQ\n"); > + ret = -ENXIO; What's wrong with ret = priv->irq; ? > + goto out_disable_clk; > + } > +static const struct of_device_id uniphier_spi_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-scssi", }, > + { /* sentinel */ }, Slightly better without comma. > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, uniphier_spi_match);
Hi. 2018-07-26 16:09 GMT+09:00 Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com>: > Add SPI controller driver implemented in Socionext UniPhier SoCs. > > UniPhier SoCs have two types SPI controllers; SCSSI supports a > single channel, and MCSSI supports multiple channels. > This driver supports SCSSI only. > > This controller has 32bit TX/RX FIFO with depth of eight entry, > and supports the SPI master mode only. > > This commit is implemented in PIO transfer mode, not DMA transfer. > > Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> > Signed-off-by: Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> > --- > drivers/spi/Kconfig | 13 ++ > drivers/spi/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c | 539 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 553 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/Kconfig b/drivers/spi/Kconfig > index ad5d68e..671d078 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/spi/Kconfig > @@ -688,6 +688,19 @@ config SPI_TXX9 > help > SPI driver for Toshiba TXx9 MIPS SoCs > > +config SPI_UNIPHIER > + tristate "Socionext UniPhier SPI Controller" > + depends on (ARCH_UNIPHIER || COMPILE_TEST) && OF > + help > + This enables a driver for the Socionext UniPhier SoC SCSSI SPI controller. > + > + UniPhier SoCs have SCSSI and MCSSI SPI controllers. > + Every UniPhier SoC has SCSSI which supports single channel. > + Older UniPhier Pro4/Pro5 also has MCSSI which support multiple channels. > + This driver supports SCSSI only. > + > + If your SoC supports SCSSI, say Y here. > + > config SPI_XCOMM > tristate "Analog Devices AD-FMCOMMS1-EBZ SPI-I2C-bridge driver" > depends on I2C > diff --git a/drivers/spi/Makefile b/drivers/spi/Makefile > index cb1f437..a90d559 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/spi/Makefile > @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ spi-thunderx-objs := spi-cavium.o spi-cavium-thunderx.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_THUNDERX) += spi-thunderx.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_TOPCLIFF_PCH) += spi-topcliff-pch.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_TXX9) += spi-txx9.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_UNIPHIER) += spi-uniphier.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_XCOMM) += spi-xcomm.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_XILINX) += spi-xilinx.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_XLP) += spi-xlp.o > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c b/drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..2e80bb0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c > @@ -0,0 +1,539 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +// spi-uniphier.c - Socionext UniPhier SPI controller driver > +// Copyright 2012 Panasonic Corporation > +// Copyright 2016-2018 Socionext Inc. > + > +#include <asm/unaligned.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/bitfield.h> > +#include <linux/bitops.h> > +#include <linux/clk.h> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/spi/spi.h> > + > +#define SSI_TIMEOUT 2000 /* ms */ > +#define SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER 254 > +#define SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER 4 > + > +struct uniphier_spi_priv { > + void __iomem *base; > + int irq; irq is unnecessary because it is only used in probe(). Use a stack variable. > + struct clk *clk; > + struct spi_master *master; > + struct completion xfer_done; > + > + int error; > + unsigned int tx_bytes; > + unsigned int rx_bytes; > + const u8 *tx_buf; > + u8 *rx_buf; > + > + bool is_save_param; > + u8 bits_per_word; > + u16 mode; > + u32 speed_hz; > +}; > + > +#define SSI_CTL 0x0 > +#define SSI_CTL_EN BIT(0) > + > +#define SSI_CKS 0x4 > +#define SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK GENMASK(7, 0) > +#define SSI_CKS_CKPHS BIT(14) > +#define SSI_CKS_CKINIT BIT(13) > +#define SSI_CKS_CKDLY BIT(12) > + > +#define SSI_TXWDS 0x8 > +#define SSI_TXWDS_WDLEN_MASK GENMASK(13, 8) > +#define SSI_TXWDS_TDTF_MASK GENMASK(7, 6) > +#define SSI_TXWDS_DTLEN_MASK GENMASK(5, 0) > + > +#define SSI_RXWDS 0xc > +#define SSI_RXWDS_DTLEN_MASK GENMASK(5, 0) > + > +#define SSI_FPS 0x10 > +#define SSI_FPS_FSPOL BIT(15) > +#define SSI_FPS_FSTRT BIT(14) > + > +#define SSI_SR 0x14 > +#define SSI_SR_RNE BIT(0) > + > +#define SSI_IE 0x18 > +#define SSI_IE_RCIE BIT(3) > +#define SSI_IE_RORIE BIT(0) > + > +#define SSI_IS 0x1c > +#define SSI_IS_RXRS BIT(9) > +#define SSI_IS_RCID BIT(3) > +#define SSI_IS_RORID BIT(0) > + > +#define SSI_IC 0x1c > +#define SSI_IC_TCIC BIT(4) > +#define SSI_IC_RCIC BIT(3) > +#define SSI_IC_RORIC BIT(0) > + > +#define SSI_FC 0x20 > +#define SSI_FC_TXFFL BIT(12) > +#define SSI_FC_TXFTH_MASK GENMASK(11, 8) > +#define SSI_FC_RXFFL BIT(4) > +#define SSI_FC_RXFTH_MASK GENMASK(3, 0) > + > +#define SSI_TXDR 0x24 > +#define SSI_RXDR 0x24 > + > +#define SSI_FIFO_DEPTH 8U > + > +static inline unsigned int bytes_per_word(unsigned int bits) > +{ > + return bits <= 8 ? 1 : (bits <= 16 ? 2 : 4); > +} > + > +static inline void uniphier_spi_irq_enable(struct spi_device *spi, u32 mask) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > + u32 val; > + > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_IE); > + val |= mask; > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_IE); > +} > + > +static inline void uniphier_spi_irq_disable(struct spi_device *spi, u32 mask) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > + u32 val; > + > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_IE); > + val &= ~mask; > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_IE); > +} > + > +static void uniphier_spi_set_mode(struct spi_device *spi) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > + u32 val1, val2; > + > + /* > + * clock setting > + * CKPHS capture timing. 0:rising edge, 1:falling edge > + * CKINIT clock initial level. 0:low, 1:high > + * CKDLY clock delay. 0:no delay, 1:delay depending on FSTRT > + * (FSTRT=0: 1 clock, FSTRT=1: 0.5 clock) > + * > + * frame setting > + * FSPOL frame signal porarity. 0: low, 1: high > + * FSTRT start frame timing > + * 0: rising edge of clock, 1: falling edge of clock > + */ > + switch (spi->mode & (SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA)) { > + case SPI_MODE_0: > + /* CKPHS=1, CKINIT=0, CKDLY=1, FSTRT=0 */ > + val1 = SSI_CKS_CKPHS | SSI_CKS_CKDLY; > + val2 = 0; > + break; > + case SPI_MODE_1: > + /* CKPHS=0, CKINIT=0, CKDLY=0, FSTRT=1 */ > + val1 = 0; > + val2 = SSI_FPS_FSTRT; > + break; > + case SPI_MODE_2: > + /* CKPHS=0, CKINIT=1, CKDLY=1, FSTRT=1 */ > + val1 = SSI_CKS_CKINIT | SSI_CKS_CKDLY; > + val2 = SSI_FPS_FSTRT; > + break; > + case SPI_MODE_3: > + /* CKPHS=1, CKINIT=1, CKDLY=0, FSTRT=0 */ > + val1 = SSI_CKS_CKPHS | SSI_CKS_CKINIT; > + val2 = 0; > + break; > + } > + > + if (!(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)) > + val2 |= SSI_FPS_FSPOL; > + > + writel(val1, priv->base + SSI_CKS); > + writel(val2, priv->base + SSI_FPS); > + > + val1 = 0; > + if (spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST) > + val1 |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_TXWDS_TDTF_MASK, 1); > + writel(val1, priv->base + SSI_TXWDS); > + writel(val1, priv->base + SSI_RXWDS); > +} > + > +static void uniphier_spi_set_transfer_size(struct spi_device *spi, int size) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > + u32 val; > + > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_TXWDS); > + val &= ~(SSI_TXWDS_WDLEN_MASK | SSI_TXWDS_DTLEN_MASK); > + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_TXWDS_WDLEN_MASK, size); > + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_TXWDS_DTLEN_MASK, size); > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_TXWDS); > + > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_RXWDS); > + val &= ~SSI_RXWDS_DTLEN_MASK; > + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_RXWDS_DTLEN_MASK, size); > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_RXWDS); > +} > + > +static int uniphier_spi_set_baudrate(struct spi_device *spi, unsigned int speed) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > + u32 val, ckrat; > + > + /* > + * the supported rates are even numbers from 4 to 254. (4,6,8...254) > + * round up as we look for equal or less speed > + */ > + ckrat = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(priv->clk), speed); > + ckrat = roundup(ckrat, 2); > + > + /* check if requested speed is too small */ > + if (ckrat > SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (ckrat < SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER) > + ckrat = SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER; > + > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_CKS); > + val &= ~SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; > + val |= ckrat & SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_CKS); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int uniphier_spi_setup_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, > + struct spi_transfer *t) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > + u32 val; > + int ret; > + > + priv->error = 0; > + priv->tx_buf = t->tx_buf; > + priv->rx_buf = t->rx_buf; > + priv->tx_bytes = priv->rx_bytes = t->len; > + > + if (!priv->is_save_param || priv->mode != spi->mode) { > + uniphier_spi_set_mode(spi); > + priv->mode = spi->mode; > + } > + > + if (!priv->is_save_param || priv->bits_per_word != t->bits_per_word) { > + uniphier_spi_set_transfer_size(spi, t->bits_per_word); > + priv->bits_per_word = t->bits_per_word; > + } > + > + if (!priv->is_save_param || priv->speed_hz != t->speed_hz) { > + ret = uniphier_spi_set_baudrate(spi, t->speed_hz); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + priv->speed_hz = t->speed_hz; > + } > + > + if (!priv->is_save_param) > + priv->is_save_param = true; > + > + /* reset FIFOs */ > + val = SSI_FC_TXFFL | SSI_FC_RXFFL; > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_FC); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void uniphier_spi_send(struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv) > +{ > + int wsize; > + u32 val = 0; > + > + wsize = min(bytes_per_word(priv->bits_per_word), priv->tx_bytes); > + priv->tx_bytes -= wsize; > + > + if (priv->tx_buf) { > + switch (wsize) { > + case 1: > + val = *priv->tx_buf; > + break; > + case 2: > + val = get_unaligned_le16(priv->tx_buf); > + break; > + case 4: > + val = get_unaligned_le32(priv->tx_buf); > + break; > + } > + > + priv->tx_buf += wsize; > + } > + > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_TXDR); > +} > + > +static void uniphier_spi_recv(struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv) > +{ > + int rsize; > + u32 val; > + > + rsize = min(bytes_per_word(priv->bits_per_word), priv->rx_bytes); > + priv->rx_bytes -= rsize; > + > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_RXDR); > + > + if (priv->rx_buf) { > + switch (rsize) { > + case 1: > + *priv->rx_buf = (u8)val; Is this cast necessary? > + break; > + case 2: > + put_unaligned_le16(val, priv->rx_buf); > + break; > + case 4: > + put_unaligned_le32(val, priv->rx_buf); > + break; > + } > + > + priv->rx_buf += rsize; > + } > +} > + > +static void uniphier_spi_fill_tx_fifo(struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv) > +{ > + unsigned int tx_count; > + u32 val; > + > + tx_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(priv->tx_bytes, > + bytes_per_word(priv->bits_per_word)); > + tx_count = min(tx_count, SSI_FIFO_DEPTH); > + > + /* set fifo threthold */ Typo. threshold > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_FC); > + val &= ~(SSI_FC_TXFTH_MASK | SSI_FC_RXFTH_MASK); > + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_FC_TXFTH_MASK, tx_count); > + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_FC_RXFTH_MASK, tx_count); > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_FC); > + > + while (tx_count--) > + uniphier_spi_send(priv); > +} > + > +static void uniphier_spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > + u32 val; > + > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_FPS); > + > + if (enable) > + val |= SSI_FPS_FSPOL; > + else > + val &= ~SSI_FPS_FSPOL; > + > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_FPS); > +} > + > +static int uniphier_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, > + struct spi_device *spi, > + struct spi_transfer *t) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(master); > + int status; > + > + status = uniphier_spi_setup_transfer(spi, t); > + if (status < 0) > + return status; > + > + reinit_completion(&priv->xfer_done); > + > + uniphier_spi_fill_tx_fifo(priv); > + > + uniphier_spi_irq_enable(spi, SSI_IE_RCIE | SSI_IE_RORIE); > + > + status = wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->xfer_done, > + msecs_to_jiffies(SSI_TIMEOUT)); > + > + uniphier_spi_irq_disable(spi, SSI_IE_RCIE | SSI_IE_RORIE); > + > + if (status < 0) > + return status; > + > + return priv->error; > +} > + > +static int uniphier_spi_prepare_transfer_hardware(struct spi_master *master) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(master); > + > + writel(SSI_CTL_EN, priv->base + SSI_CTL); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int uniphier_spi_unprepare_transfer_hardware(struct spi_master *master) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(master); > + > + writel(0, priv->base + SSI_CTL); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static irqreturn_t uniphier_spi_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = dev_id; > + u32 val, stat; > + > + stat = readl(priv->base + SSI_IS); > + val = SSI_IC_TCIC | SSI_IC_RCIC | SSI_IC_RORIC; > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_IC); > + > + /* rx fifo overrun */ > + if (stat & SSI_IS_RORID) { > + priv->error = -EIO; > + goto done; > + } > + > + /* rx complete */ > + if ((stat & SSI_IS_RCID) && (stat & SSI_IS_RXRS)) { > + while ((readl(priv->base + SSI_SR) & SSI_SR_RNE) && > + (priv->rx_bytes - priv->tx_bytes) > 0) > + uniphier_spi_recv(priv); > + > + if ((readl(priv->base + SSI_SR) & SSI_SR_RNE) || > + (priv->rx_bytes != priv->tx_bytes)) { > + priv->error = -EIO; > + goto done; > + } else if (priv->rx_bytes == 0) > + goto done; > + > + /* next tx transfer */ > + uniphier_spi_fill_tx_fifo(priv); > + > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > + } > + > + return IRQ_NONE; > + > +done: > + complete(&priv->xfer_done); > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > +} > + > +static int uniphier_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv; > + struct spi_master *master; > + struct resource *res; > + unsigned long clksrc; > + int ret; > + > + master = spi_alloc_master(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv)); > + if (!master) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, master); > + > + priv = spi_master_get_devdata(master); > + priv->master = master; > + priv->is_save_param = false; > + > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + priv->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); > + if (IS_ERR(priv->base)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->base); > + goto out_master_put; > + } > + > + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get clock\n"); > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->clk); > + goto out_master_put; > + } > + > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk); > + if (ret) > + goto out_master_put; > + > + priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > + if (priv->irq < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get IRQ\n"); > + ret = -ENXIO; > + goto out_disable_clk; > + } > + > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, priv->irq, uniphier_spi_handler, > + 0, "uniphier-spi", priv); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n"); > + goto out_disable_clk; > + } > + > + init_completion(&priv->xfer_done); > + > + clksrc = clk_get_rate(priv->clk); How about 'clk_rate' ? > + master->max_speed_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(clksrc, SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER); > + master->min_speed_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(clksrc, SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER); > + master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH | SPI_LSB_FIRST; > + master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node; > + master->bus_num = pdev->id; > + master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(1, 32); > + > + master->set_cs = uniphier_spi_set_cs; > + master->transfer_one = uniphier_spi_transfer_one; > + master->prepare_transfer_hardware > + = uniphier_spi_prepare_transfer_hardware; > + master->unprepare_transfer_hardware > + = uniphier_spi_unprepare_transfer_hardware; > + master->num_chipselect = 1; > + > + ret = devm_spi_register_master(&pdev->dev, master); > + if (ret) > + goto out_disable_clk; > + > + return ret; I think return 0; will be clearer. > + > +out_disable_clk: > + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk); > + > +out_master_put: > + spi_master_put(master); > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int uniphier_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id uniphier_spi_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-scssi", }, > + { /* sentinel */ }, > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, uniphier_spi_match); > + > +static struct platform_driver uniphier_spi_driver = { > + .probe = uniphier_spi_probe, > + .remove = uniphier_spi_remove, > + .driver = { > + .name = "uniphier-spi", > + .of_match_table = uniphier_spi_match, > + }, > +}; > +module_platform_driver(uniphier_spi_driver); > + > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com>"); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Socionext UniPhier SPI controller driver"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > -- > 2.7.4 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Andy, Thank you for your check! > From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevchenko@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 5:46 PM > To: Hayashibara, Keiji/林原 啓二 <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: add SPI controller driver for UniPhier SoC > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> wrote: > > Add SPI controller driver implemented in Socionext UniPhier SoCs. > > > > UniPhier SoCs have two types SPI controllers; SCSSI supports a single > > channel, and MCSSI supports multiple channels. > > This driver supports SCSSI only. > > > > This controller has 32bit TX/RX FIFO with depth of eight entry, and > > supports the SPI master mode only. > > > > This commit is implemented in PIO transfer mode, not DMA transfer. > > Few style realted comments. > > > +#include <asm/unaligned.h> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > +#include <linux/bitfield.h> > > +#include <linux/bitops.h> > > +#include <linux/clk.h> > > +#include <linux/interrupt.h> > > +#include <linux/io.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > +#include <linux/of.h> > > +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > > +#include <linux/spi/spi.h> > > Slightly better to keep them in order and put asm/* at the last. I see. I will modify this. > > +#define SSI_TIMEOUT 2000 /* ms */ > > SSI_TIMEOUT_MS ? > > > +#define SSI_CTL 0x0 > > Slightly better to keep same width for the addresses, like 0x00 here. > > > +#define SSI_CKS 0x4 > > > +#define SSI_TXWDS 0x8 > > > +#define SSI_RXWDS 0xc > > Ditto. I will modify about above. > > > +static int uniphier_spi_set_baudrate(struct spi_device *spi, unsigned > > +int speed) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > > + u32 val, ckrat; > > + > > + /* > > + * the supported rates are even numbers from 4 to 254. (4,6,8...254) > > + * round up as we look for equal or less speed > > + */ > > + ckrat = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(priv->clk), speed); > > > + ckrat = roundup(ckrat, 2); > > ckrat += ckrat & 1; > > ? It's simple. I will modify. > > + /* check if requested speed is too small */ > > + if (ckrat > SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > So, does this critical? If set the value to SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER, the clock frequency will be set high. I don't change it to high frequency, and it is daringly an error. On the other hand, when changing to low frequency, I will change it automatically. > > + > > + if (ckrat < SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER) > > + ckrat = SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER; > > clamp_val() / max() ? I will modify it to use max(). > > > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_CKS); > > + val &= ~SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; > > + val |= ckrat & SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; > > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_CKS); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > > + priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > > + if (priv->irq < 0) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get IRQ\n"); > > > + ret = -ENXIO; > > What's wrong with > > ret = priv->irq; > > ? I will modify it. > > + goto out_disable_clk; > > + } > > > +static const struct of_device_id uniphier_spi_match[] = { > > + { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-scssi", }, > > > + { /* sentinel */ }, > > Slightly better without comma. OK. I will modify this. ----------------- Best Regards, Keiji Hayashibara > > +}; > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, uniphier_spi_match); > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Yamada-san, > From: Masahiro Yamada [mailto:yamada.masahiro@socionext.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 6:13 PM > To: Hayashibara, Keiji/林原 啓二 <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: add SPI controller driver for UniPhier SoC > > Hi. > > > 2018-07-26 16:09 GMT+09:00 Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com>: > > Add SPI controller driver implemented in Socionext UniPhier SoCs. > > > > UniPhier SoCs have two types SPI controllers; SCSSI supports a single > > channel, and MCSSI supports multiple channels. > > This driver supports SCSSI only. > > > > This controller has 32bit TX/RX FIFO with depth of eight entry, and > > supports the SPI master mode only. > > > > This commit is implemented in PIO transfer mode, not DMA transfer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> > > Signed-off-by: Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> > > --- > > drivers/spi/Kconfig | 13 ++ > > drivers/spi/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c | 539 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 553 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/Kconfig b/drivers/spi/Kconfig index > > ad5d68e..671d078 100644 > > --- a/drivers/spi/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/spi/Kconfig > > @@ -688,6 +688,19 @@ config SPI_TXX9 > > help > > SPI driver for Toshiba TXx9 MIPS SoCs > > > > +config SPI_UNIPHIER > > + tristate "Socionext UniPhier SPI Controller" > > + depends on (ARCH_UNIPHIER || COMPILE_TEST) && OF > > + help > > + This enables a driver for the Socionext UniPhier SoC SCSSI SPI controller. > > + > > + UniPhier SoCs have SCSSI and MCSSI SPI controllers. > > + Every UniPhier SoC has SCSSI which supports single channel. > > + Older UniPhier Pro4/Pro5 also has MCSSI which support multiple channels. > > + This driver supports SCSSI only. > > + > > + If your SoC supports SCSSI, say Y here. > > + > > config SPI_XCOMM > > tristate "Analog Devices AD-FMCOMMS1-EBZ SPI-I2C-bridge driver" > > depends on I2C > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/Makefile b/drivers/spi/Makefile index > > cb1f437..a90d559 100644 > > --- a/drivers/spi/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/spi/Makefile > > @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ spi-thunderx-objs := spi-cavium.o spi-cavium-thunderx.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_THUNDERX) += spi-thunderx.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_TOPCLIFF_PCH) += spi-topcliff-pch.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_TXX9) += spi-txx9.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_UNIPHIER) += spi-uniphier.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_XCOMM) += spi-xcomm.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_XILINX) += spi-xilinx.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_XLP) += spi-xlp.o > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c b/drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c > > new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2e80bb0 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,539 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +// spi-uniphier.c - Socionext UniPhier SPI controller driver > > +// Copyright 2012 Panasonic Corporation > > +// Copyright 2016-2018 Socionext Inc. > > + > > +#include <asm/unaligned.h> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > +#include <linux/bitfield.h> > > +#include <linux/bitops.h> > > +#include <linux/clk.h> > > +#include <linux/interrupt.h> > > +#include <linux/io.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > +#include <linux/of.h> > > +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > > +#include <linux/spi/spi.h> > > + > > +#define SSI_TIMEOUT 2000 /* ms */ > > +#define SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER 254 > > +#define SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER 4 > > + > > +struct uniphier_spi_priv { > > + void __iomem *base; > > + int irq; > > > irq is unnecessary because it is only used in probe(). > > Use a stack variable. I see. I will modify it. > > > > + struct clk *clk; > > + struct spi_master *master; > > + struct completion xfer_done; > > + > > + int error; > > + unsigned int tx_bytes; > > + unsigned int rx_bytes; > > + const u8 *tx_buf; > > + u8 *rx_buf; > > + > > + bool is_save_param; > > + u8 bits_per_word; > > + u16 mode; > > + u32 speed_hz; > > +}; > > + > > +#define SSI_CTL 0x0 > > +#define SSI_CTL_EN BIT(0) > > + > > +#define SSI_CKS 0x4 > > +#define SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK GENMASK(7, 0) > > +#define SSI_CKS_CKPHS BIT(14) > > +#define SSI_CKS_CKINIT BIT(13) > > +#define SSI_CKS_CKDLY BIT(12) > > + > > +#define SSI_TXWDS 0x8 > > +#define SSI_TXWDS_WDLEN_MASK GENMASK(13, 8) > > +#define SSI_TXWDS_TDTF_MASK GENMASK(7, 6) > > +#define SSI_TXWDS_DTLEN_MASK GENMASK(5, 0) > > + > > +#define SSI_RXWDS 0xc > > +#define SSI_RXWDS_DTLEN_MASK GENMASK(5, 0) > > + > > +#define SSI_FPS 0x10 > > +#define SSI_FPS_FSPOL BIT(15) > > +#define SSI_FPS_FSTRT BIT(14) > > + > > +#define SSI_SR 0x14 > > +#define SSI_SR_RNE BIT(0) > > + > > +#define SSI_IE 0x18 > > +#define SSI_IE_RCIE BIT(3) > > +#define SSI_IE_RORIE BIT(0) > > + > > +#define SSI_IS 0x1c > > +#define SSI_IS_RXRS BIT(9) > > +#define SSI_IS_RCID BIT(3) > > +#define SSI_IS_RORID BIT(0) > > + > > +#define SSI_IC 0x1c > > +#define SSI_IC_TCIC BIT(4) > > +#define SSI_IC_RCIC BIT(3) > > +#define SSI_IC_RORIC BIT(0) > > + > > +#define SSI_FC 0x20 > > +#define SSI_FC_TXFFL BIT(12) > > +#define SSI_FC_TXFTH_MASK GENMASK(11, 8) > > +#define SSI_FC_RXFFL BIT(4) > > +#define SSI_FC_RXFTH_MASK GENMASK(3, 0) > > + > > +#define SSI_TXDR 0x24 > > +#define SSI_RXDR 0x24 > > + > > +#define SSI_FIFO_DEPTH 8U > > + > > +static inline unsigned int bytes_per_word(unsigned int bits) { > > + return bits <= 8 ? 1 : (bits <= 16 ? 2 : 4); } > > + > > +static inline void uniphier_spi_irq_enable(struct spi_device *spi, > > +u32 mask) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > > + u32 val; > > + > > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_IE); > > + val |= mask; > > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_IE); } > > + > > +static inline void uniphier_spi_irq_disable(struct spi_device *spi, > > +u32 mask) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > > + u32 val; > > + > > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_IE); > > + val &= ~mask; > > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_IE); } > > + > > +static void uniphier_spi_set_mode(struct spi_device *spi) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > > + u32 val1, val2; > > + > > + /* > > + * clock setting > > + * CKPHS capture timing. 0:rising edge, 1:falling edge > > + * CKINIT clock initial level. 0:low, 1:high > > + * CKDLY clock delay. 0:no delay, 1:delay depending on FSTRT > > + * (FSTRT=0: 1 clock, FSTRT=1: 0.5 clock) > > + * > > + * frame setting > > + * FSPOL frame signal porarity. 0: low, 1: high > > + * FSTRT start frame timing > > + * 0: rising edge of clock, 1: falling edge of clock > > + */ > > + switch (spi->mode & (SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA)) { > > + case SPI_MODE_0: > > + /* CKPHS=1, CKINIT=0, CKDLY=1, FSTRT=0 */ > > + val1 = SSI_CKS_CKPHS | SSI_CKS_CKDLY; > > + val2 = 0; > > + break; > > + case SPI_MODE_1: > > + /* CKPHS=0, CKINIT=0, CKDLY=0, FSTRT=1 */ > > + val1 = 0; > > + val2 = SSI_FPS_FSTRT; > > + break; > > + case SPI_MODE_2: > > + /* CKPHS=0, CKINIT=1, CKDLY=1, FSTRT=1 */ > > + val1 = SSI_CKS_CKINIT | SSI_CKS_CKDLY; > > + val2 = SSI_FPS_FSTRT; > > + break; > > + case SPI_MODE_3: > > + /* CKPHS=1, CKINIT=1, CKDLY=0, FSTRT=0 */ > > + val1 = SSI_CKS_CKPHS | SSI_CKS_CKINIT; > > + val2 = 0; > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + if (!(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)) > > + val2 |= SSI_FPS_FSPOL; > > + > > + writel(val1, priv->base + SSI_CKS); > > + writel(val2, priv->base + SSI_FPS); > > + > > + val1 = 0; > > + if (spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST) > > + val1 |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_TXWDS_TDTF_MASK, 1); > > + writel(val1, priv->base + SSI_TXWDS); > > + writel(val1, priv->base + SSI_RXWDS); } > > + > > +static void uniphier_spi_set_transfer_size(struct spi_device *spi, > > +int size) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > > + u32 val; > > + > > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_TXWDS); > > + val &= ~(SSI_TXWDS_WDLEN_MASK | SSI_TXWDS_DTLEN_MASK); > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_TXWDS_WDLEN_MASK, size); > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_TXWDS_DTLEN_MASK, size); > > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_TXWDS); > > + > > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_RXWDS); > > + val &= ~SSI_RXWDS_DTLEN_MASK; > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_RXWDS_DTLEN_MASK, size); > > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_RXWDS); } > > + > > +static int uniphier_spi_set_baudrate(struct spi_device *spi, unsigned > > +int speed) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > > + u32 val, ckrat; > > + > > + /* > > + * the supported rates are even numbers from 4 to 254. (4,6,8...254) > > + * round up as we look for equal or less speed > > + */ > > + ckrat = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(priv->clk), speed); > > + ckrat = roundup(ckrat, 2); > > + > > + /* check if requested speed is too small */ > > + if (ckrat > SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (ckrat < SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER) > > + ckrat = SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER; > > + > > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_CKS); > > + val &= ~SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; > > + val |= ckrat & SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; > > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_CKS); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int uniphier_spi_setup_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, > > + struct spi_transfer *t) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > > + u32 val; > > + int ret; > > + > > + priv->error = 0; > > + priv->tx_buf = t->tx_buf; > > + priv->rx_buf = t->rx_buf; > > + priv->tx_bytes = priv->rx_bytes = t->len; > > + > > + if (!priv->is_save_param || priv->mode != spi->mode) { > > + uniphier_spi_set_mode(spi); > > + priv->mode = spi->mode; > > + } > > + > > + if (!priv->is_save_param || priv->bits_per_word != t->bits_per_word) { > > + uniphier_spi_set_transfer_size(spi, t->bits_per_word); > > + priv->bits_per_word = t->bits_per_word; > > + } > > + > > + if (!priv->is_save_param || priv->speed_hz != t->speed_hz) { > > + ret = uniphier_spi_set_baudrate(spi, t->speed_hz); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + priv->speed_hz = t->speed_hz; > > + } > > + > > + if (!priv->is_save_param) > > + priv->is_save_param = true; > > + > > + /* reset FIFOs */ > > + val = SSI_FC_TXFFL | SSI_FC_RXFFL; > > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_FC); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static void uniphier_spi_send(struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv) { > > + int wsize; > > + u32 val = 0; > > + > > + wsize = min(bytes_per_word(priv->bits_per_word), priv->tx_bytes); > > + priv->tx_bytes -= wsize; > > + > > + if (priv->tx_buf) { > > + switch (wsize) { > > + case 1: > > + val = *priv->tx_buf; > > + break; > > + case 2: > > + val = get_unaligned_le16(priv->tx_buf); > > + break; > > + case 4: > > + val = get_unaligned_le32(priv->tx_buf); > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + priv->tx_buf += wsize; > > + } > > + > > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_TXDR); } > > + > > +static void uniphier_spi_recv(struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv) { > > + int rsize; > > + u32 val; > > + > > + rsize = min(bytes_per_word(priv->bits_per_word), priv->rx_bytes); > > + priv->rx_bytes -= rsize; > > + > > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_RXDR); > > + > > + if (priv->rx_buf) { > > + switch (rsize) { > > + case 1: > > + *priv->rx_buf = (u8)val; > > Is this cast necessary? I added it explicitly, but I will modify it. > > > + break; > > + case 2: > > + put_unaligned_le16(val, priv->rx_buf); > > + break; > > + case 4: > > + put_unaligned_le32(val, priv->rx_buf); > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + priv->rx_buf += rsize; > > + } > > +} > > + > > +static void uniphier_spi_fill_tx_fifo(struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv) > > +{ > > + unsigned int tx_count; > > + u32 val; > > + > > + tx_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(priv->tx_bytes, > > + bytes_per_word(priv->bits_per_word)); > > + tx_count = min(tx_count, SSI_FIFO_DEPTH); > > + > > + /* set fifo threthold */ > > > Typo. threshold I will modify it. > > > > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_FC); > > + val &= ~(SSI_FC_TXFTH_MASK | SSI_FC_RXFTH_MASK); > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_FC_TXFTH_MASK, tx_count); > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_FC_RXFTH_MASK, tx_count); > > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_FC); > > + > > + while (tx_count--) > > + uniphier_spi_send(priv); } > > + > > +static void uniphier_spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable) > > +{ > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > > + u32 val; > > + > > + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_FPS); > > + > > + if (enable) > > + val |= SSI_FPS_FSPOL; > > + else > > + val &= ~SSI_FPS_FSPOL; > > + > > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_FPS); } > > + > > +static int uniphier_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, > > + struct spi_device *spi, > > + struct spi_transfer *t) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(master); > > + int status; > > + > > + status = uniphier_spi_setup_transfer(spi, t); > > + if (status < 0) > > + return status; > > + > > + reinit_completion(&priv->xfer_done); > > + > > + uniphier_spi_fill_tx_fifo(priv); > > + > > + uniphier_spi_irq_enable(spi, SSI_IE_RCIE | SSI_IE_RORIE); > > + > > + status = wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->xfer_done, > > + > > + msecs_to_jiffies(SSI_TIMEOUT)); > > + > > + uniphier_spi_irq_disable(spi, SSI_IE_RCIE | SSI_IE_RORIE); > > + > > + if (status < 0) > > + return status; > > + > > + return priv->error; > > +} > > + > > +static int uniphier_spi_prepare_transfer_hardware(struct spi_master > > +*master) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = > > +spi_master_get_devdata(master); > > + > > + writel(SSI_CTL_EN, priv->base + SSI_CTL); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int uniphier_spi_unprepare_transfer_hardware(struct spi_master > > +*master) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = > > +spi_master_get_devdata(master); > > + > > + writel(0, priv->base + SSI_CTL); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static irqreturn_t uniphier_spi_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = dev_id; > > + u32 val, stat; > > + > > + stat = readl(priv->base + SSI_IS); > > + val = SSI_IC_TCIC | SSI_IC_RCIC | SSI_IC_RORIC; > > + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_IC); > > + > > + /* rx fifo overrun */ > > + if (stat & SSI_IS_RORID) { > > + priv->error = -EIO; > > + goto done; > > + } > > + > > + /* rx complete */ > > + if ((stat & SSI_IS_RCID) && (stat & SSI_IS_RXRS)) { > > + while ((readl(priv->base + SSI_SR) & SSI_SR_RNE) && > > + (priv->rx_bytes - priv->tx_bytes) > 0) > > + uniphier_spi_recv(priv); > > + > > + if ((readl(priv->base + SSI_SR) & SSI_SR_RNE) || > > + (priv->rx_bytes != priv->tx_bytes)) { > > + priv->error = -EIO; > > + goto done; > > + } else if (priv->rx_bytes == 0) > > + goto done; > > + > > + /* next tx transfer */ > > + uniphier_spi_fill_tx_fifo(priv); > > + > > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > > + } > > + > > + return IRQ_NONE; > > + > > +done: > > + complete(&priv->xfer_done); > > + return IRQ_HANDLED; > > +} > > + > > +static int uniphier_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { > > + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv; > > + struct spi_master *master; > > + struct resource *res; > > + unsigned long clksrc; > > + int ret; > > + > > + master = spi_alloc_master(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv)); > > + if (!master) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, master); > > + > > + priv = spi_master_get_devdata(master); > > + priv->master = master; > > + priv->is_save_param = false; > > + > > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > > + priv->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); > > + if (IS_ERR(priv->base)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->base); > > + goto out_master_put; > > + } > > + > > + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); > > + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get clock\n"); > > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->clk); > > + goto out_master_put; > > + } > > + > > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk); > > + if (ret) > > + goto out_master_put; > > + > > + priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > > + if (priv->irq < 0) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get IRQ\n"); > > + ret = -ENXIO; > > + goto out_disable_clk; > > + } > > + > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, priv->irq, uniphier_spi_handler, > > + 0, "uniphier-spi", priv); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n"); > > + goto out_disable_clk; > > + } > > + > > + init_completion(&priv->xfer_done); > > + > > + clksrc = clk_get_rate(priv->clk); > > > How about 'clk_rate' ? OK. I will replace clksrc to clk_rate. > > > > + master->max_speed_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(clksrc, SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER); > > + master->min_speed_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(clksrc, SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER); > > + master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH | SPI_LSB_FIRST; > > + master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node; > > + master->bus_num = pdev->id; > > + master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(1, 32); > > + > > + master->set_cs = uniphier_spi_set_cs; > > + master->transfer_one = uniphier_spi_transfer_one; > > + master->prepare_transfer_hardware > > + = uniphier_spi_prepare_transfer_hardware; > > + master->unprepare_transfer_hardware > > + = uniphier_spi_unprepare_transfer_hardware; > > + master->num_chipselect = 1; > > + > > + ret = devm_spi_register_master(&pdev->dev, master); > > + if (ret) > > + goto out_disable_clk; > > + > > + return ret; > > > I think > > return 0; > > will be clearer. I think so. I will modify it. Thank you. ----------------- Best Regards, Keiji Hayashibara -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 07/26/2018 12:38 PM, Keiji Hayashibara wrote: > Hello Andy, > > Thank you for your check! > > >> From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevchenko@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 5:46 PM >> To: Hayashibara, Keiji/林原 啓二 <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: add SPI controller driver for UniPhier SoC >> >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> wrote: >>> Add SPI controller driver implemented in Socionext UniPhier SoCs. >>> >>> UniPhier SoCs have two types SPI controllers; SCSSI supports a single >>> channel, and MCSSI supports multiple channels. >>> This driver supports SCSSI only. >>> >>> This controller has 32bit TX/RX FIFO with depth of eight entry, and >>> supports the SPI master mode only. >>> >>> This commit is implemented in PIO transfer mode, not DMA transfer. >> >> Few style realted comments. >> >>> +#include <asm/unaligned.h> >>> +#include <linux/kernel.h> >>> +#include <linux/bitfield.h> >>> +#include <linux/bitops.h> >>> +#include <linux/clk.h> >>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> >>> +#include <linux/io.h> >>> +#include <linux/module.h> >>> +#include <linux/of.h> >>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h> >>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> >>> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h> >> >> Slightly better to keep them in order and put asm/* at the last. > > I see. I will modify this. > > >>> +#define SSI_TIMEOUT 2000 /* ms */ >> >> SSI_TIMEOUT_MS ? >> >>> +#define SSI_CTL 0x0 >> >> Slightly better to keep same width for the addresses, like 0x00 here. >> >>> +#define SSI_CKS 0x4 >> >>> +#define SSI_TXWDS 0x8 >> >>> +#define SSI_RXWDS 0xc >> >> Ditto. > > I will modify about above. > >> >>> +static int uniphier_spi_set_baudrate(struct spi_device *spi, unsigned >>> +int speed) { >>> + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); >>> + u32 val, ckrat; >>> + >>> + /* >>> + * the supported rates are even numbers from 4 to 254. (4,6,8...254) >>> + * round up as we look for equal or less speed >>> + */ >>> + ckrat = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(priv->clk), speed); >> >>> + ckrat = roundup(ckrat, 2); >> >> ckrat += ckrat & 1; >> >> ? > > It's simple. I will modify. > > >>> + /* check if requested speed is too small */ >>> + if (ckrat > SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER) >> >>> + return -EINVAL; >> >> So, does this critical? > > If set the value to SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER, the clock frequency will be set high. > I don't change it to high frequency, and it is daringly an error. > On the other hand, when changing to low frequency, I will change it automatically. > >>> + >>> + if (ckrat < SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER) >>> + ckrat = SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER; In fact you don't need this checks. You already set in probe function this. master->max_speed_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(clksrc, SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER); master->min_speed_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(clksrc, SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER); The SPI core will check if transfer speed is higher than controller speed and if is, will set the transfer speed to master->max_speed_hz. In case of master->min_speed_hz, if transfer speed is lower than master->min_speed_hz __spi_validate(drivers/spi/spi.c) will return -EINVAL. >> >> clamp_val() / max() ? > > I will modify it to use max(). > >> >>> + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_CKS); >>> + val &= ~SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; >>> + val |= ckrat & SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; >>> + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_CKS); >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >> >>> + priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); >>> + if (priv->irq < 0) { >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get IRQ\n"); >> >>> + ret = -ENXIO; >> >> What's wrong with >> >> ret = priv->irq; >> >> ? > > I will modify it. > >>> + goto out_disable_clk; >>> + } >> >>> +static const struct of_device_id uniphier_spi_match[] = { >>> + { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-scssi", }, >> >>> + { /* sentinel */ }, >> >> Slightly better without comma. > > OK. I will modify this. > > ----------------- > Best Regards, > Keiji Hayashibara > > > >>> +}; >>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, uniphier_spi_match); >> >> -- >> With Best Regards, >> Andy Shevchenko > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> wrote: >> > + /* check if requested speed is too small */ >> > + if (ckrat > SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER) >> >> > + return -EINVAL; >> >> So, does this critical? > > If set the value to SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER, the clock frequency will be set high. > I don't change it to high frequency, and it is daringly an error. > On the other hand, when changing to low frequency, I will change it automatically. No. My point is, if somehow user asks for that condition to be happened you bail out, while when using clamp_val() you may continue to work at maximum limit, though issue warning to user, for example. >> > + >> > + if (ckrat < SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER) >> > + ckrat = SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER; >> >> clamp_val() / max() ? > > I will modify it to use max(). See above.
On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 11:46 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > + > > + /* > > + * the supported rates are even numbers from 4 to 254. (4,6,8...254) > > + * round up as we look for equal or less speed > > + */ > > + ckrat = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(priv->clk), speed); > > + ckrat = roundup(ckrat, 2); > > ckrat += ckrat & 1; Either way, the compiler produces the same code: add r0, r0, #1 bic r0, r0, #1 I.e., ckrat = (ckrat + 1) & ~1, one "add" and one "and". Might as well use the macro so it's clear. There is also round_up(x,y), which I believe is intended to be used only with power of 2 values of y.
Hello Radu, > From: Radu Pirea [mailto:radu.pirea@microchip.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 7:58 PM > To: Hayashibara, Keiji/林原 啓二 <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com>; 'Andy Shevchenko' > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: add SPI controller driver for UniPhier SoC > > > > On 07/26/2018 12:38 PM, Keiji Hayashibara wrote: > > Hello Andy, > > > > Thank you for your check! > > > > > >> From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevchenko@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 5:46 PM > >> To: Hayashibara, Keiji/林原 啓二 <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: add SPI controller driver for > >> UniPhier SoC > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> wrote: > >>> Add SPI controller driver implemented in Socionext UniPhier SoCs. > >>> > >>> UniPhier SoCs have two types SPI controllers; SCSSI supports a > >>> single channel, and MCSSI supports multiple channels. > >>> This driver supports SCSSI only. > >>> > >>> This controller has 32bit TX/RX FIFO with depth of eight entry, and > >>> supports the SPI master mode only. > >>> > >>> This commit is implemented in PIO transfer mode, not DMA transfer. > >> > >> Few style realted comments. > >> > >>> +#include <asm/unaligned.h> > >>> +#include <linux/kernel.h> > >>> +#include <linux/bitfield.h> > >>> +#include <linux/bitops.h> > >>> +#include <linux/clk.h> > >>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> > >>> +#include <linux/io.h> > >>> +#include <linux/module.h> > >>> +#include <linux/of.h> > >>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h> > >>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > >>> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h> > >> > >> Slightly better to keep them in order and put asm/* at the last. > > > > I see. I will modify this. > > > > > >>> +#define SSI_TIMEOUT 2000 /* ms */ > >> > >> SSI_TIMEOUT_MS ? > >> > >>> +#define SSI_CTL 0x0 > >> > >> Slightly better to keep same width for the addresses, like 0x00 here. > >> > >>> +#define SSI_CKS 0x4 > >> > >>> +#define SSI_TXWDS 0x8 > >> > >>> +#define SSI_RXWDS 0xc > >> > >> Ditto. > > > > I will modify about above. > > > >> > >>> +static int uniphier_spi_set_baudrate(struct spi_device *spi, > >>> +unsigned int speed) { > >>> + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > >>> + u32 val, ckrat; > >>> + > >>> + /* > >>> + * the supported rates are even numbers from 4 to 254. (4,6,8...254) > >>> + * round up as we look for equal or less speed > >>> + */ > >>> + ckrat = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(priv->clk), speed); > >> > >>> + ckrat = roundup(ckrat, 2); > >> > >> ckrat += ckrat & 1; > >> > >> ? > > > > It's simple. I will modify. > > > > > >>> + /* check if requested speed is too small */ > >>> + if (ckrat > SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER) > >> > >>> + return -EINVAL; > >> > >> So, does this critical? > > > > If set the value to SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER, the clock frequency will be set high. > > I don't change it to high frequency, and it is daringly an error. > > On the other hand, when changing to low frequency, I will change it automatically. > > > >>> + > >>> + if (ckrat < SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER) > >>> + ckrat = SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER; > > In fact you don't need this checks. You already set in probe function this. > master->max_speed_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(clksrc, SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER); > master->min_speed_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(clksrc, SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER); > > The SPI core will check if transfer speed is higher than controller speed and if is, will set the transfer speed > to master->max_speed_hz. In case of master->min_speed_hz, if transfer speed is lower than > master->min_speed_hz __spi_validate(drivers/spi/spi.c) will return -EINVAL. I see. I confirmed __spi_validate() and understood that this check code is unnecessary. I will remove this check code. Thank you. > >> > >> clamp_val() / max() ? > > > > I will modify it to use max(). > > > >> > >>> + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_CKS); > >>> + val &= ~SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; > >>> + val |= ckrat & SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; > >>> + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_CKS); > >>> + > >>> + return 0; > >>> +} > >> > >>> + priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > >>> + if (priv->irq < 0) { > >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get IRQ\n"); > >> > >>> + ret = -ENXIO; > >> > >> What's wrong with > >> > >> ret = priv->irq; > >> > >> ? > > > > I will modify it. > > > >>> + goto out_disable_clk; > >>> + } > >> > >>> +static const struct of_device_id uniphier_spi_match[] = { > >>> + { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-scssi", }, > >> > >>> + { /* sentinel */ }, > >> > >> Slightly better without comma. > > > > OK. I will modify this. > > > > ----------------- > > Best Regards, > > Keiji Hayashibara > > > > > > > >>> +}; > >>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, uniphier_spi_match); > >> > >> -- > >> With Best Regards, > >> Andy Shevchenko > > ----------------- Best Regards, Keiji Hayashibara -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Andy, > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Andy > Shevchenko > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 10:44 PM > To: Hayashibara, Keiji/林原 啓二 <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>; > Yamada, Masahiro/山田 真弘 <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>; linux-spi <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>; linux-arm > Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>; Masami Hiramatsu > <masami.hiramatsu@linaro.org>; Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Hayashi, Kunihiko/林 邦彦 <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: add SPI controller driver for UniPhier SoC > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> wrote: > > >> > + /* check if requested speed is too small */ > >> > + if (ckrat > SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER) > >> > >> > + return -EINVAL; > >> > >> So, does this critical? > > > > If set the value to SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER, the clock frequency will be set high. > > I don't change it to high frequency, and it is daringly an error. > > On the other hand, when changing to low frequency, I will change it automatically. > > No. My point is, if somehow user asks for that condition to be happened you bail out, while when using clamp_val() > you may continue to work at maximum limit, though issue warning to user, for example. Thank you. I understood what you pointed out. However, I found this code unnecessary as pointed out by Radu, so I will delete it. > >> > + > >> > + if (ckrat < SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER) > >> > + ckrat = SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER; > >> > >> clamp_val() / max() ? > > > > I will modify it to use max(). > > See above. This is also the same as above. > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko ----------------- Best Regards, Keiji Hayashibara -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hello Trent and Andy, > From: Trent Piepho [mailto:tpiepho@impinj.com] > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 2:02 AM > To: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com; Hayashibara, Keiji/林原 啓二 <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: add SPI controller driver for UniPhier SoC > > On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 11:46 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * the supported rates are even numbers from 4 to 254. (4,6,8...254) > > > + * round up as we look for equal or less speed > > > + */ > > > + ckrat = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(priv->clk), speed); > > > + ckrat = roundup(ckrat, 2); > > > > ckrat += ckrat & 1; > > Either way, the compiler produces the same code: > > add r0, r0, #1 > bic r0, r0, #1 > > I.e., ckrat = (ckrat + 1) & ~1, one "add" and one "and". > > Might as well use the macro so it's clear. There is also round_up(x,y), which I believe is intended to be used > only with power of 2 values of y. I confirmed round_up() macro. This macro is optimized to power of 2 argument, and it matches to this case and clear. I will replace to round_up() macro. Thank you. ----------------- Best Regards, Keiji Hayashibara -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com> wrote: > Hello Trent and Andy, >> > > + ckrat = roundup(ckrat, 2); >> > >> > ckrat += ckrat & 1; >> >> Either way, the compiler produces the same code: >> >> add r0, r0, #1 >> bic r0, r0, #1 >> >> I.e., ckrat = (ckrat + 1) & ~1, one "add" and one "and". >> >> Might as well use the macro so it's clear. There is also round_up(x,y), which I believe is intended to be used >> only with power of 2 values of y. > > I confirmed round_up() macro. > This macro is optimized to power of 2 argument, > and it matches to this case and clear. > > I will replace to round_up() macro. Good!
diff --git a/drivers/spi/Kconfig b/drivers/spi/Kconfig index ad5d68e..671d078 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/spi/Kconfig @@ -688,6 +688,19 @@ config SPI_TXX9 help SPI driver for Toshiba TXx9 MIPS SoCs +config SPI_UNIPHIER + tristate "Socionext UniPhier SPI Controller" + depends on (ARCH_UNIPHIER || COMPILE_TEST) && OF + help + This enables a driver for the Socionext UniPhier SoC SCSSI SPI controller. + + UniPhier SoCs have SCSSI and MCSSI SPI controllers. + Every UniPhier SoC has SCSSI which supports single channel. + Older UniPhier Pro4/Pro5 also has MCSSI which support multiple channels. + This driver supports SCSSI only. + + If your SoC supports SCSSI, say Y here. + config SPI_XCOMM tristate "Analog Devices AD-FMCOMMS1-EBZ SPI-I2C-bridge driver" depends on I2C diff --git a/drivers/spi/Makefile b/drivers/spi/Makefile index cb1f437..a90d559 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/Makefile +++ b/drivers/spi/Makefile @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ spi-thunderx-objs := spi-cavium.o spi-cavium-thunderx.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_THUNDERX) += spi-thunderx.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_TOPCLIFF_PCH) += spi-topcliff-pch.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_TXX9) += spi-txx9.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_UNIPHIER) += spi-uniphier.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_XCOMM) += spi-xcomm.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_XILINX) += spi-xilinx.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_XLP) += spi-xlp.o diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c b/drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2e80bb0 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-uniphier.c @@ -0,0 +1,539 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// spi-uniphier.c - Socionext UniPhier SPI controller driver +// Copyright 2012 Panasonic Corporation +// Copyright 2016-2018 Socionext Inc. + +#include <asm/unaligned.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/bitfield.h> +#include <linux/bitops.h> +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_platform.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h> + +#define SSI_TIMEOUT 2000 /* ms */ +#define SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER 254 +#define SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER 4 + +struct uniphier_spi_priv { + void __iomem *base; + int irq; + struct clk *clk; + struct spi_master *master; + struct completion xfer_done; + + int error; + unsigned int tx_bytes; + unsigned int rx_bytes; + const u8 *tx_buf; + u8 *rx_buf; + + bool is_save_param; + u8 bits_per_word; + u16 mode; + u32 speed_hz; +}; + +#define SSI_CTL 0x0 +#define SSI_CTL_EN BIT(0) + +#define SSI_CKS 0x4 +#define SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK GENMASK(7, 0) +#define SSI_CKS_CKPHS BIT(14) +#define SSI_CKS_CKINIT BIT(13) +#define SSI_CKS_CKDLY BIT(12) + +#define SSI_TXWDS 0x8 +#define SSI_TXWDS_WDLEN_MASK GENMASK(13, 8) +#define SSI_TXWDS_TDTF_MASK GENMASK(7, 6) +#define SSI_TXWDS_DTLEN_MASK GENMASK(5, 0) + +#define SSI_RXWDS 0xc +#define SSI_RXWDS_DTLEN_MASK GENMASK(5, 0) + +#define SSI_FPS 0x10 +#define SSI_FPS_FSPOL BIT(15) +#define SSI_FPS_FSTRT BIT(14) + +#define SSI_SR 0x14 +#define SSI_SR_RNE BIT(0) + +#define SSI_IE 0x18 +#define SSI_IE_RCIE BIT(3) +#define SSI_IE_RORIE BIT(0) + +#define SSI_IS 0x1c +#define SSI_IS_RXRS BIT(9) +#define SSI_IS_RCID BIT(3) +#define SSI_IS_RORID BIT(0) + +#define SSI_IC 0x1c +#define SSI_IC_TCIC BIT(4) +#define SSI_IC_RCIC BIT(3) +#define SSI_IC_RORIC BIT(0) + +#define SSI_FC 0x20 +#define SSI_FC_TXFFL BIT(12) +#define SSI_FC_TXFTH_MASK GENMASK(11, 8) +#define SSI_FC_RXFFL BIT(4) +#define SSI_FC_RXFTH_MASK GENMASK(3, 0) + +#define SSI_TXDR 0x24 +#define SSI_RXDR 0x24 + +#define SSI_FIFO_DEPTH 8U + +static inline unsigned int bytes_per_word(unsigned int bits) +{ + return bits <= 8 ? 1 : (bits <= 16 ? 2 : 4); +} + +static inline void uniphier_spi_irq_enable(struct spi_device *spi, u32 mask) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); + u32 val; + + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_IE); + val |= mask; + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_IE); +} + +static inline void uniphier_spi_irq_disable(struct spi_device *spi, u32 mask) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); + u32 val; + + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_IE); + val &= ~mask; + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_IE); +} + +static void uniphier_spi_set_mode(struct spi_device *spi) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); + u32 val1, val2; + + /* + * clock setting + * CKPHS capture timing. 0:rising edge, 1:falling edge + * CKINIT clock initial level. 0:low, 1:high + * CKDLY clock delay. 0:no delay, 1:delay depending on FSTRT + * (FSTRT=0: 1 clock, FSTRT=1: 0.5 clock) + * + * frame setting + * FSPOL frame signal porarity. 0: low, 1: high + * FSTRT start frame timing + * 0: rising edge of clock, 1: falling edge of clock + */ + switch (spi->mode & (SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA)) { + case SPI_MODE_0: + /* CKPHS=1, CKINIT=0, CKDLY=1, FSTRT=0 */ + val1 = SSI_CKS_CKPHS | SSI_CKS_CKDLY; + val2 = 0; + break; + case SPI_MODE_1: + /* CKPHS=0, CKINIT=0, CKDLY=0, FSTRT=1 */ + val1 = 0; + val2 = SSI_FPS_FSTRT; + break; + case SPI_MODE_2: + /* CKPHS=0, CKINIT=1, CKDLY=1, FSTRT=1 */ + val1 = SSI_CKS_CKINIT | SSI_CKS_CKDLY; + val2 = SSI_FPS_FSTRT; + break; + case SPI_MODE_3: + /* CKPHS=1, CKINIT=1, CKDLY=0, FSTRT=0 */ + val1 = SSI_CKS_CKPHS | SSI_CKS_CKINIT; + val2 = 0; + break; + } + + if (!(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)) + val2 |= SSI_FPS_FSPOL; + + writel(val1, priv->base + SSI_CKS); + writel(val2, priv->base + SSI_FPS); + + val1 = 0; + if (spi->mode & SPI_LSB_FIRST) + val1 |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_TXWDS_TDTF_MASK, 1); + writel(val1, priv->base + SSI_TXWDS); + writel(val1, priv->base + SSI_RXWDS); +} + +static void uniphier_spi_set_transfer_size(struct spi_device *spi, int size) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); + u32 val; + + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_TXWDS); + val &= ~(SSI_TXWDS_WDLEN_MASK | SSI_TXWDS_DTLEN_MASK); + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_TXWDS_WDLEN_MASK, size); + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_TXWDS_DTLEN_MASK, size); + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_TXWDS); + + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_RXWDS); + val &= ~SSI_RXWDS_DTLEN_MASK; + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_RXWDS_DTLEN_MASK, size); + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_RXWDS); +} + +static int uniphier_spi_set_baudrate(struct spi_device *spi, unsigned int speed) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); + u32 val, ckrat; + + /* + * the supported rates are even numbers from 4 to 254. (4,6,8...254) + * round up as we look for equal or less speed + */ + ckrat = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(priv->clk), speed); + ckrat = roundup(ckrat, 2); + + /* check if requested speed is too small */ + if (ckrat > SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER) + return -EINVAL; + + if (ckrat < SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER) + ckrat = SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER; + + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_CKS); + val &= ~SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; + val |= ckrat & SSI_CKS_CKRAT_MASK; + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_CKS); + + return 0; +} + +static int uniphier_spi_setup_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, + struct spi_transfer *t) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); + u32 val; + int ret; + + priv->error = 0; + priv->tx_buf = t->tx_buf; + priv->rx_buf = t->rx_buf; + priv->tx_bytes = priv->rx_bytes = t->len; + + if (!priv->is_save_param || priv->mode != spi->mode) { + uniphier_spi_set_mode(spi); + priv->mode = spi->mode; + } + + if (!priv->is_save_param || priv->bits_per_word != t->bits_per_word) { + uniphier_spi_set_transfer_size(spi, t->bits_per_word); + priv->bits_per_word = t->bits_per_word; + } + + if (!priv->is_save_param || priv->speed_hz != t->speed_hz) { + ret = uniphier_spi_set_baudrate(spi, t->speed_hz); + if (ret) + return ret; + priv->speed_hz = t->speed_hz; + } + + if (!priv->is_save_param) + priv->is_save_param = true; + + /* reset FIFOs */ + val = SSI_FC_TXFFL | SSI_FC_RXFFL; + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_FC); + + return 0; +} + +static void uniphier_spi_send(struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv) +{ + int wsize; + u32 val = 0; + + wsize = min(bytes_per_word(priv->bits_per_word), priv->tx_bytes); + priv->tx_bytes -= wsize; + + if (priv->tx_buf) { + switch (wsize) { + case 1: + val = *priv->tx_buf; + break; + case 2: + val = get_unaligned_le16(priv->tx_buf); + break; + case 4: + val = get_unaligned_le32(priv->tx_buf); + break; + } + + priv->tx_buf += wsize; + } + + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_TXDR); +} + +static void uniphier_spi_recv(struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv) +{ + int rsize; + u32 val; + + rsize = min(bytes_per_word(priv->bits_per_word), priv->rx_bytes); + priv->rx_bytes -= rsize; + + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_RXDR); + + if (priv->rx_buf) { + switch (rsize) { + case 1: + *priv->rx_buf = (u8)val; + break; + case 2: + put_unaligned_le16(val, priv->rx_buf); + break; + case 4: + put_unaligned_le32(val, priv->rx_buf); + break; + } + + priv->rx_buf += rsize; + } +} + +static void uniphier_spi_fill_tx_fifo(struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv) +{ + unsigned int tx_count; + u32 val; + + tx_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(priv->tx_bytes, + bytes_per_word(priv->bits_per_word)); + tx_count = min(tx_count, SSI_FIFO_DEPTH); + + /* set fifo threthold */ + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_FC); + val &= ~(SSI_FC_TXFTH_MASK | SSI_FC_RXFTH_MASK); + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_FC_TXFTH_MASK, tx_count); + val |= FIELD_PREP(SSI_FC_RXFTH_MASK, tx_count); + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_FC); + + while (tx_count--) + uniphier_spi_send(priv); +} + +static void uniphier_spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); + u32 val; + + val = readl(priv->base + SSI_FPS); + + if (enable) + val |= SSI_FPS_FSPOL; + else + val &= ~SSI_FPS_FSPOL; + + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_FPS); +} + +static int uniphier_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, + struct spi_device *spi, + struct spi_transfer *t) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(master); + int status; + + status = uniphier_spi_setup_transfer(spi, t); + if (status < 0) + return status; + + reinit_completion(&priv->xfer_done); + + uniphier_spi_fill_tx_fifo(priv); + + uniphier_spi_irq_enable(spi, SSI_IE_RCIE | SSI_IE_RORIE); + + status = wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->xfer_done, + msecs_to_jiffies(SSI_TIMEOUT)); + + uniphier_spi_irq_disable(spi, SSI_IE_RCIE | SSI_IE_RORIE); + + if (status < 0) + return status; + + return priv->error; +} + +static int uniphier_spi_prepare_transfer_hardware(struct spi_master *master) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(master); + + writel(SSI_CTL_EN, priv->base + SSI_CTL); + + return 0; +} + +static int uniphier_spi_unprepare_transfer_hardware(struct spi_master *master) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = spi_master_get_devdata(master); + + writel(0, priv->base + SSI_CTL); + + return 0; +} + +static irqreturn_t uniphier_spi_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = dev_id; + u32 val, stat; + + stat = readl(priv->base + SSI_IS); + val = SSI_IC_TCIC | SSI_IC_RCIC | SSI_IC_RORIC; + writel(val, priv->base + SSI_IC); + + /* rx fifo overrun */ + if (stat & SSI_IS_RORID) { + priv->error = -EIO; + goto done; + } + + /* rx complete */ + if ((stat & SSI_IS_RCID) && (stat & SSI_IS_RXRS)) { + while ((readl(priv->base + SSI_SR) & SSI_SR_RNE) && + (priv->rx_bytes - priv->tx_bytes) > 0) + uniphier_spi_recv(priv); + + if ((readl(priv->base + SSI_SR) & SSI_SR_RNE) || + (priv->rx_bytes != priv->tx_bytes)) { + priv->error = -EIO; + goto done; + } else if (priv->rx_bytes == 0) + goto done; + + /* next tx transfer */ + uniphier_spi_fill_tx_fifo(priv); + + return IRQ_HANDLED; + } + + return IRQ_NONE; + +done: + complete(&priv->xfer_done); + return IRQ_HANDLED; +} + +static int uniphier_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv; + struct spi_master *master; + struct resource *res; + unsigned long clksrc; + int ret; + + master = spi_alloc_master(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv)); + if (!master) + return -ENOMEM; + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, master); + + priv = spi_master_get_devdata(master); + priv->master = master; + priv->is_save_param = false; + + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); + priv->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); + if (IS_ERR(priv->base)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->base); + goto out_master_put; + } + + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get clock\n"); + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->clk); + goto out_master_put; + } + + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk); + if (ret) + goto out_master_put; + + priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); + if (priv->irq < 0) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get IRQ\n"); + ret = -ENXIO; + goto out_disable_clk; + } + + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, priv->irq, uniphier_spi_handler, + 0, "uniphier-spi", priv); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n"); + goto out_disable_clk; + } + + init_completion(&priv->xfer_done); + + clksrc = clk_get_rate(priv->clk); + + master->max_speed_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(clksrc, SSI_MIN_CLK_DIVIDER); + master->min_speed_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(clksrc, SSI_MAX_CLK_DIVIDER); + master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_CS_HIGH | SPI_LSB_FIRST; + master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node; + master->bus_num = pdev->id; + master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(1, 32); + + master->set_cs = uniphier_spi_set_cs; + master->transfer_one = uniphier_spi_transfer_one; + master->prepare_transfer_hardware + = uniphier_spi_prepare_transfer_hardware; + master->unprepare_transfer_hardware + = uniphier_spi_unprepare_transfer_hardware; + master->num_chipselect = 1; + + ret = devm_spi_register_master(&pdev->dev, master); + if (ret) + goto out_disable_clk; + + return ret; + +out_disable_clk: + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk); + +out_master_put: + spi_master_put(master); + return ret; +} + +static int uniphier_spi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct uniphier_spi_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct of_device_id uniphier_spi_match[] = { + { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-scssi", }, + { /* sentinel */ }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, uniphier_spi_match); + +static struct platform_driver uniphier_spi_driver = { + .probe = uniphier_spi_probe, + .remove = uniphier_spi_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "uniphier-spi", + .of_match_table = uniphier_spi_match, + }, +}; +module_platform_driver(uniphier_spi_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Keiji Hayashibara <hayashibara.keiji@socionext.com>"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Socionext UniPhier SPI controller driver"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");