Message ID | 20180821141512.368e3df2@xhacker.debian (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] PCI: dwc: fix scheduling while atomic issues | expand |
Hi Jisheng On 21/08/2018 07:15, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > When programming inbound/outbound atu, we call usleep_range() after > each checking PCIE_ATU_ENABLE bit. Unfortunately, the atu programming > can be called in atomic context: > > inbound atu programming could be called through > pci_epc_write_header() > =>dw_pcie_ep_write_header() > =>dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() > > outbound atu programming could be called through > pci_bus_read_config_dword() > =>dw_pcie_rd_conf() > =>dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu() > > Fix this issue by calling mdelay() instead. Makes sense. Thanks. Acked-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com> Regards, Gustavo > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com> > --- > > Since v1 > - use mdelay() instead of udelay() to avoid __bad_udelay() > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++---- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 3 +-- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > index 778c4f76a884..2153956a0b20 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > return; > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > } > dev_err(pci->dev, "Outbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > } > @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type, > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > return; > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > } > dev_err(pci->dev, "Outbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > } > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > return 0; > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > } > dev_err(pci->dev, "Inbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar, > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > return 0; > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > } > dev_err(pci->dev, "Inbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > index 96126fd8403c..9f1a5e399b70 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > @@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ > > /* Parameters for the waiting for iATU enabled routine */ > #define LINK_WAIT_MAX_IATU_RETRIES 5 > -#define LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN 9000 > -#define LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX 10000 > +#define LINK_WAIT_IATU 9 > > /* Synopsys-specific PCIe configuration registers */ > #define PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL 0x710 >
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 02:15:12PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > When programming inbound/outbound atu, we call usleep_range() after > each checking PCIE_ATU_ENABLE bit. Unfortunately, the atu programming > can be called in atomic context: > > inbound atu programming could be called through > pci_epc_write_header() > =>dw_pcie_ep_write_header() > =>dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() > > outbound atu programming could be called through > pci_bus_read_config_dword() > =>dw_pcie_rd_conf() > =>dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu() > > Fix this issue by calling mdelay() instead. > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com> Mind adding a Fixes: tag please ? Is: commit f8aed6ec624f ("PCI: dwc: designware: Add EP mode support") the commit you are fixing ? Thanks, Lorenzo > --- > > Since v1 > - use mdelay() instead of udelay() to avoid __bad_udelay() > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++---- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 3 +-- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > index 778c4f76a884..2153956a0b20 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > return; > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > } > dev_err(pci->dev, "Outbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > } > @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type, > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > return; > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > } > dev_err(pci->dev, "Outbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > } > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > return 0; > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > } > dev_err(pci->dev, "Inbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > > @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar, > if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) > return 0; > > - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); > + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); > } > dev_err(pci->dev, "Inbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > index 96126fd8403c..9f1a5e399b70 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h > @@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ > > /* Parameters for the waiting for iATU enabled routine */ > #define LINK_WAIT_MAX_IATU_RETRIES 5 > -#define LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN 9000 > -#define LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX 10000 > +#define LINK_WAIT_IATU 9 > > /* Synopsys-specific PCIe configuration registers */ > #define PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL 0x710 > -- > 2.18.0 >
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c index 778c4f76a884..2153956a0b20 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) return; - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); } dev_err(pci->dev, "Outbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); } @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type, if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) return; - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); } dev_err(pci->dev, "Outbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); } @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) return 0; - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); } dev_err(pci->dev, "Inbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar, if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE) return 0; - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX); + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU); } dev_err(pci->dev, "Inbound iATU is not being enabled\n"); diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h index 96126fd8403c..9f1a5e399b70 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h @@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ /* Parameters for the waiting for iATU enabled routine */ #define LINK_WAIT_MAX_IATU_RETRIES 5 -#define LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN 9000 -#define LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX 10000 +#define LINK_WAIT_IATU 9 /* Synopsys-specific PCIe configuration registers */ #define PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL 0x710
When programming inbound/outbound atu, we call usleep_range() after each checking PCIE_ATU_ENABLE bit. Unfortunately, the atu programming can be called in atomic context: inbound atu programming could be called through pci_epc_write_header() =>dw_pcie_ep_write_header() =>dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu() outbound atu programming could be called through pci_bus_read_config_dword() =>dw_pcie_rd_conf() =>dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu() Fix this issue by calling mdelay() instead. Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com> --- Since v1 - use mdelay() instead of udelay() to avoid __bad_udelay() drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)