Message ID | 1535537370-10729-1-git-send-email-javier@cnexlabs.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | lightnvm: pblk: support variable OOB size | expand |
On 29.08.2018 12:09, Javier González wrote: > This patchset adds pblk support for variable metadata sizes on the out > of bound area. > > Igor, Marcin, you sent a patch some time ago implementing a similar > functionality, but it never got re-posted after review. Can you test > this and see if it works for your case? I did not implement support for > outlined metadata for the case where the reported OOB area is 0. It > should be pretty simple to do that on top of these patches though. > Sure, we will test that and let you know. I was busy last time and due to that I never repost it. I will do this on top of your patches, hopefully soon. > Thanks, > Javier > > Javier González (3): > lightnvm: use internal allocation for chunk log page > lightnvm: do no update csecs and sos on 1.2 > lightnvm: pblk: support variable OOB size > > drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c | 16 ++++++++++- > drivers/lightnvm/pblk-map.c | 19 +++++++++---- > drivers/lightnvm/pblk-read.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++------- > drivers/lightnvm/pblk.h | 18 +++++++++--- > drivers/nvme/host/lightnvm.c | 26 +++++++++++------ > 7 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-) >
> On 29 Aug 2018, at 16.51, Igor Konopko <igor.j.konopko@intel.com> wrote: > > > > On 29.08.2018 12:09, Javier González wrote: >> This patchset adds pblk support for variable metadata sizes on the out >> of bound area. >> Igor, Marcin, you sent a patch some time ago implementing a similar >> functionality, but it never got re-posted after review. Can you test >> this and see if it works for your case? I did not implement support for >> outlined metadata for the case where the reported OOB area is 0. It >> should be pretty simple to do that on top of these patches though. > > Sure, we will test that and let you know. I was busy last time and due > to that I never repost it. I will do this on top of your patches, > hopefully soon. > Thanks Igor, this would be great.