Message ID | 20180911175807.26181-33-josef@toxicpanda.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | My current patch queue | expand |
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 01:58:03PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > We keep track of dirty bg's as a reservation in the delayed_refs_rsv, so > when we abort and we cleanup those dirty bgs we need to drop their > reservation so we don't have accounting issues and lots of scary > messages on umount. Shouldn't this just be part of patch 6? > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c > index caaca8154a1a..54fbdc944a3f 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c > @@ -4412,6 +4412,7 @@ void btrfs_cleanup_dirty_bgs(struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans, > > spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock); > btrfs_put_block_group(cache); > + btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release(fs_info, 1); > spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock); > } > spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock); > -- > 2.14.3 >
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index caaca8154a1a..54fbdc944a3f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -4412,6 +4412,7 @@ void btrfs_cleanup_dirty_bgs(struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans, spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock); btrfs_put_block_group(cache); + btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release(fs_info, 1); spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock); } spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
We keep track of dirty bg's as a reservation in the delayed_refs_rsv, so when we abort and we cleanup those dirty bgs we need to drop their reservation so we don't have accounting issues and lots of scary messages on umount. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)