Message ID | b98f8f695178c9c9ac6e081680090d5ac97e8d7c.1537458163.git.robin.murphy@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Add non-strict mode support for iommu-dma | expand |
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 05:10:25PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> > > Now that io-pgtable knows how to dodge strict TLB maintenance, all > that's left to do is bridge the gap between the IOMMU core requesting > DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE for default domains, and showing the > appropriate IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT flag to alloc_io_pgtable_ops(). > > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> > [rm: convert to domain attribute, tweak commit message] > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > --- > > v8: > - Use nested switches for attrs > - Document barrier semantics > > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c > index f10c852479fc..db402e8b068b 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c > @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain { > struct mutex init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */ > > struct io_pgtable_ops *pgtbl_ops; > + bool non_strict; > > enum arm_smmu_domain_stage stage; > union { > @@ -1407,6 +1408,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(void *cookie) > cmd.tlbi.vmid = smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid; > } > > + /* > + * NOTE: when io-pgtable is in non-strict mode, we may get here with > + * PTEs previously cleared by unmaps on the current CPU not yet visible > + * to the SMMU. We are relying on the DSB implicit in queue_inc_prod() > + * to guarantee those are observed before the TLBI. Do be careful, 007. > + */ Good, so you can ignore my comment on the previous patch :) Will
On 28/09/18 13:19, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 05:10:25PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >> From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> >> >> Now that io-pgtable knows how to dodge strict TLB maintenance, all >> that's left to do is bridge the gap between the IOMMU core requesting >> DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE for default domains, and showing the >> appropriate IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT flag to alloc_io_pgtable_ops(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> >> [rm: convert to domain attribute, tweak commit message] >> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> >> --- >> >> v8: >> - Use nested switches for attrs >> - Document barrier semantics >> >> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c >> index f10c852479fc..db402e8b068b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c >> @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain { >> struct mutex init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */ >> >> struct io_pgtable_ops *pgtbl_ops; >> + bool non_strict; >> >> enum arm_smmu_domain_stage stage; >> union { >> @@ -1407,6 +1408,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(void *cookie) >> cmd.tlbi.vmid = smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid; >> } >> >> + /* >> + * NOTE: when io-pgtable is in non-strict mode, we may get here with >> + * PTEs previously cleared by unmaps on the current CPU not yet visible >> + * to the SMMU. We are relying on the DSB implicit in queue_inc_prod() >> + * to guarantee those are observed before the TLBI. Do be careful, 007. >> + */ > > Good, so you can ignore my comment on the previous patch :) Well, I suppose that comment in io-pgtable *could* have explicitly noted that same-CPU order is dealt with elsewhere - feel free to fix it up if you think it would be a helpful reminder for the future. Cheers, Robin.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 01:26:00PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 28/09/18 13:19, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 05:10:25PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > From: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> > > > > > > Now that io-pgtable knows how to dodge strict TLB maintenance, all > > > that's left to do is bridge the gap between the IOMMU core requesting > > > DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE for default domains, and showing the > > > appropriate IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT flag to alloc_io_pgtable_ops(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> > > > [rm: convert to domain attribute, tweak commit message] > > > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> > > > --- > > > > > > v8: > > > - Use nested switches for attrs > > > - Document barrier semantics > > > > > > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c > > > index f10c852479fc..db402e8b068b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c > > > @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain { > > > struct mutex init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */ > > > struct io_pgtable_ops *pgtbl_ops; > > > + bool non_strict; > > > enum arm_smmu_domain_stage stage; > > > union { > > > @@ -1407,6 +1408,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(void *cookie) > > > cmd.tlbi.vmid = smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid; > > > } > > > + /* > > > + * NOTE: when io-pgtable is in non-strict mode, we may get here with > > > + * PTEs previously cleared by unmaps on the current CPU not yet visible > > > + * to the SMMU. We are relying on the DSB implicit in queue_inc_prod() > > > + * to guarantee those are observed before the TLBI. Do be careful, 007. > > > + */ > > > > Good, so you can ignore my comment on the previous patch :) > > Well, I suppose that comment in io-pgtable *could* have explicitly noted > that same-CPU order is dealt with elsewhere - feel free to fix it up if you > think it would be a helpful reminder for the future. I think I'll move it into the documentation for the new attribute, so that any driver authors wanting to enable lazy invalidation know that they need to provide this guarantee in their full TLB invalidation callback. Will
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 01:26:00PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > On 28/09/18 13:19, Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 05:10:25PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c > > > > index f10c852479fc..db402e8b068b 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c > > > > @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain { > > > > struct mutex init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */ > > > > struct io_pgtable_ops *pgtbl_ops; > > > > + bool non_strict; > > > > enum arm_smmu_domain_stage stage; > > > > union { > > > > @@ -1407,6 +1408,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(void *cookie) > > > > cmd.tlbi.vmid = smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid; > > > > } > > > > + /* > > > > + * NOTE: when io-pgtable is in non-strict mode, we may get here with > > > > + * PTEs previously cleared by unmaps on the current CPU not yet visible > > > > + * to the SMMU. We are relying on the DSB implicit in queue_inc_prod() > > > > + * to guarantee those are observed before the TLBI. Do be careful, 007. > > > > + */ > > > > > > Good, so you can ignore my comment on the previous patch :) > > > > Well, I suppose that comment in io-pgtable *could* have explicitly noted > > that same-CPU order is dealt with elsewhere - feel free to fix it up if you > > think it would be a helpful reminder for the future. > > I think I'll move it into the documentation for the new attribute, so that > any driver authors wanting to enable lazy invalidation know that they need > to provide this guarantee in their full TLB invalidation callback. Hmm, so I started doing this but then realised we already required this behaviour for tlb_add_flush() afaict. That would mean that mainline currently has a bug for arm-smmu.c, because we use the _relaxed I/O accessors in there and there's no DSB after clearing the PTE on unmap(). Am I missing something? Will
On 28/09/18 14:55, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 01:26:00PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >>> On 28/09/18 13:19, Will Deacon wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 05:10:25PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c >>>>> index f10c852479fc..db402e8b068b 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c >>>>> @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain { >>>>> struct mutex init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */ >>>>> struct io_pgtable_ops *pgtbl_ops; >>>>> + bool non_strict; >>>>> enum arm_smmu_domain_stage stage; >>>>> union { >>>>> @@ -1407,6 +1408,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(void *cookie) >>>>> cmd.tlbi.vmid = smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid; >>>>> } >>>>> + /* >>>>> + * NOTE: when io-pgtable is in non-strict mode, we may get here with >>>>> + * PTEs previously cleared by unmaps on the current CPU not yet visible >>>>> + * to the SMMU. We are relying on the DSB implicit in queue_inc_prod() >>>>> + * to guarantee those are observed before the TLBI. Do be careful, 007. >>>>> + */ >>>> >>>> Good, so you can ignore my comment on the previous patch :) >>> >>> Well, I suppose that comment in io-pgtable *could* have explicitly noted >>> that same-CPU order is dealt with elsewhere - feel free to fix it up if you >>> think it would be a helpful reminder for the future. >> >> I think I'll move it into the documentation for the new attribute, so that >> any driver authors wanting to enable lazy invalidation know that they need >> to provide this guarantee in their full TLB invalidation callback. > > Hmm, so I started doing this but then realised we already required this > behaviour for tlb_add_flush() afaict. That would mean that mainline > currently has a bug for arm-smmu.c, because we use the _relaxed I/O > accessors in there and there's no DSB after clearing the PTE on unmap(). > > Am I missing something? Argh, no - I started having the same suspicion when changing those writel()s in patch #7, resolved to either mention it to you or investigate it myself as a separate fix, then promptly forgot entirely. Thanks for the reminder... Robin.
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c index f10c852479fc..db402e8b068b 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain { struct mutex init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */ struct io_pgtable_ops *pgtbl_ops; + bool non_strict; enum arm_smmu_domain_stage stage; union { @@ -1407,6 +1408,12 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(void *cookie) cmd.tlbi.vmid = smmu_domain->s2_cfg.vmid; } + /* + * NOTE: when io-pgtable is in non-strict mode, we may get here with + * PTEs previously cleared by unmaps on the current CPU not yet visible + * to the SMMU. We are relying on the DSB implicit in queue_inc_prod() + * to guarantee those are observed before the TLBI. Do be careful, 007. + */ arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(smmu, &cmd); __arm_smmu_tlb_sync(smmu); } @@ -1633,6 +1640,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_finalise(struct iommu_domain *domain) if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENCY) pgtbl_cfg.quirks = IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NO_DMA; + if (smmu_domain->non_strict) + pgtbl_cfg.quirks |= IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_NON_STRICT; + pgtbl_ops = alloc_io_pgtable_ops(fmt, &pgtbl_cfg, smmu_domain); if (!pgtbl_ops) return -ENOMEM; @@ -1934,15 +1944,27 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_get_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain, { struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain); - if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED) - return -EINVAL; - - switch (attr) { - case DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING: - *(int *)data = (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED); - return 0; + switch (domain->type) { + case IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED: + switch (attr) { + case DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING: + *(int *)data = (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED); + return 0; + default: + return -ENODEV; + } + break; + case IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA: + switch (attr) { + case DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE: + *(int *)data = smmu_domain->non_strict; + return 0; + default: + return -ENODEV; + } + break; default: - return -ENODEV; + return -EINVAL; } } @@ -1952,26 +1974,37 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_set_attr(struct iommu_domain *domain, int ret = 0; struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain); - if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED) - return -EINVAL; - mutex_lock(&smmu_domain->init_mutex); - switch (attr) { - case DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING: - if (smmu_domain->smmu) { - ret = -EPERM; - goto out_unlock; + switch (domain->type) { + case IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED: + switch (attr) { + case DOMAIN_ATTR_NESTING: + if (smmu_domain->smmu) { + ret = -EPERM; + goto out_unlock; + } + + if (*(int *)data) + smmu_domain->stage = ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED; + else + smmu_domain->stage = ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1; + break; + default: + ret = -ENODEV; + } + break; + case IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA: + switch(attr) { + case DOMAIN_ATTR_DMA_USE_FLUSH_QUEUE: + smmu_domain->non_strict = *(int *)data; + break; + default: + ret = -ENODEV; } - - if (*(int *)data) - smmu_domain->stage = ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED; - else - smmu_domain->stage = ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1; - break; default: - ret = -ENODEV; + ret = -EINVAL; } out_unlock: