Message ID | 20181023185429.GA6756@light.dominikbrodowski.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix compilation for !CONFIG_ACPI | expand |
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 20:54 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Fixes: 86d333a8cc7f ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add base_frequency > attribute") Thanks for the fix. > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > index 49c0abf2d48f..50c5699970c5 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > @@ -390,11 +390,6 @@ static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int > cpu) > static void intel_pstate_set_itmt_prio(int cpu) > { > } > - > -static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int cpu) > -{ > - return -ENOTSUPP; > -} What is ACPI is defined but SCHED_MC_PRIO is not defined? Based on "select ACPI_CPPC_LIB if X86_64 && ACPI && SCHED_MC_PRIO" So the above is still required. correct? > #endif > > static void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits(struct cpufreq_policy > *policy) > @@ -490,6 +485,11 @@ static inline bool > intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server(void) > { > return false; > } > + > +static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int cpu) > +{ > + return -ENOTSUPP; > +} > #endif > > static inline void update_turbo_state(void)
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:17:28PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 20:54 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > Fixes: 86d333a8cc7f ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add base_frequency > > attribute") > Thanks for the fix. > > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > index 49c0abf2d48f..50c5699970c5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > @@ -390,11 +390,6 @@ static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int > > cpu) > > static void intel_pstate_set_itmt_prio(int cpu) > > { > > } > > - > > -static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int cpu) > > -{ > > - return -ENOTSUPP; > > -} > What is ACPI is defined but SCHED_MC_PRIO is not defined? > Based on > "select ACPI_CPPC_LIB if X86_64 && ACPI && SCHED_MC_PRIO" > > So the above is still required. correct? Seems so, yes. Though that leads to either complicated #ifdefs or code duplications. In any case, I'd suggest marking at least nested #else and #endif lines with comments denoting which #ifdef they relate to, e.g. #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ Thanks, Dominik
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 21:34 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:17:28PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 20:54 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > > Fixes: 86d333a8cc7f ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add base_frequency > > > attribute") > > > > Thanks for the fix. > > > > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> > > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > > b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > > index 49c0abf2d48f..50c5699970c5 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > > @@ -390,11 +390,6 @@ static int > > > intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int > > > cpu) > > > static void intel_pstate_set_itmt_prio(int cpu) > > > { > > > } > > > - > > > -static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int cpu) > > > -{ > > > - return -ENOTSUPP; > > > -} > > > > What is ACPI is defined but SCHED_MC_PRIO is not defined? > > Based on > > "select ACPI_CPPC_LIB if X86_64 && ACPI && SCHED_MC_PRIO" > > > > So the above is still required. correct? > > Seems so, yes. Though that leads to either complicated #ifdefs or > code > duplications. > > In any case, I'd suggest marking at least nested #else and #endif > lines > with comments denoting which #ifdef they relate to, e.g. > > #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ > #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */ Will you submit a change? Thanks, Srinivas > > Thanks, > Dominik
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c index 49c0abf2d48f..50c5699970c5 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -390,11 +390,6 @@ static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int cpu) static void intel_pstate_set_itmt_prio(int cpu) { } - -static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int cpu) -{ - return -ENOTSUPP; -} #endif static void intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) @@ -490,6 +485,11 @@ static inline bool intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server(void) { return false; } + +static int intel_pstate_get_cppc_guranteed(int cpu) +{ + return -ENOTSUPP; +} #endif static inline void update_turbo_state(void)
Fixes: 86d333a8cc7f ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add base_frequency attribute") Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>